RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Why FFL isn't more interesting, in one graphic

2013-12-02 Thread authfriend
Share tries her hardest to create confusion: > Emily, thanks for making it simple for me. Since I'm with my family I don't > have as much time as usual to > read and respond on FFL. Yes, I think Judy used qualifiers in the example > she gave. No, I gave no "example," Share. Rather, I

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Why FFL isn't more interesting, in one graphic

2013-12-02 Thread awoelflebater
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Emily, thanks for making it simple for me. Since I'm with my family I don't have as much time as usual to read and respond on FFL. Yes, I think Judy used qualifiers in the example she gave. What I mainly remember is how she initially respo

RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Why FFL isn't more interesting, in one graphic

2013-12-02 Thread sharelong60
Emily, thanks for making it simple for me. Since I'm with my family I don't have as much time as usual to read and respond on FFL. Yes, I think Judy used qualifiers in the example she gave. What I mainly remember is how she initially responded and how she continues to write to and about me

RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Why FFL isn't more interesting, in one graphic

2013-12-02 Thread doctordumbass
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GrWMBB7DdXo http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GrWMBB7DdXo ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Ah ha ha ha ha ha. My kid thinks I am crazy as a loon, given all this laughing at my computer screen. Yes, Doctor, you have me figured out. I was pulling a

RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Why FFL isn't more interesting, in one graphic

2013-12-02 Thread doctordumbass
It grows on trees, too! Thanks! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Emily, I empathize with Share -- For example, let's take that first sentence: What, exactly, do you mean, by, "Share, is it raining in Fairfield?"?? I'm not

RE: RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Why FFL isn't more interesting, in one graphic

2013-12-02 Thread emilymaenot
Well, I couldn't figure out my question either. Let me rephrase: "Share, do you agree that Judy *did* include qualifiers, including the one you specifically mention (sounds like) in the section of said post below that I have copied to this one?" Share, this is a yes/no question. I won't t

RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Why FFL isn't more interesting, in one graphic

2013-12-01 Thread authfriend
Emily, if you'll forgive me, I can't figure out what this question means; I wouldn't blame Share if she couldn't either: Emily wrote: > Here is a second question for you: "How to you remember the posts that Judy > wrote differently than she > wrote them?" No, this is not a setup. I am

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Why FFL isn't more interesting, in one graphic

2013-12-01 Thread feste37
You misunderstand. I meant that Ann is not involved in the situation, not you. By kind of nuts, I mean your relentless obsession with small, unimportant details, your inability to let go of anything in the way that a normal person would. Quite frankly, you often sound like a patient in a me

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Why FFL isn't more interesting, in one graphic

2013-12-01 Thread emilymaenot
Correction: "To ask her to do that is a waste of my time currently. Maybe later." ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: As demonstrated on this forum, at least, Share's makeup prevents her from taking personal accountability for her words or actions. This isn't a criticism, it is