Re: bodhi and security updates/updates-testing

2007-06-22 Thread Till Maas
On Fr Juni 22 2007, Axel Thimm wrote: > Looks like the login timeouts are insanely short and trac has no > recovery mechanism for that. I experienced some problems login in to hosted.fedoraprojects and bodhi or koji around the same time, maybe this was the cause. Iirc, the login on hosted.fedor

Re: mock rfe - buildgroup

2007-07-06 Thread Till Maas
On Fr Juli 6 2007, Michael E Brown wrote: > +++ b/etc/defaults.cfg > +config_opts['chroot_setup_cmd'] = 'groupinstall buildsys-build' > > This could be problematic for F7, F6, EPEL4/5 and others. When you call the group "build" instead of "buildsys-build" , F7 may use the group definition that i

[PATCH] Makefile.common: correct URL to Koji setup page in the wiki

2007-07-11 Thread Till Maas
Aloas, the attached patch changes the URL in Makefile.common for Koji client setup from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BuildSystemClientSetup to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/BuildSystemClientSetup The first URL is a redirection to the second one. If this is not the correct pl

[PATCH] Makefile.common: add scratch build targets

2007-07-11 Thread Till Maas
Aloas, the attached patch adds support for scratch builds to Makefile.common: scratch-build Request scratch build of "fcgi-2_4_0-2_fc8" for dist-f8 scratch-build- Request scratch build of "fcgi-2_4_0-2_fc8" for dist-f8 and archs examples: make scratch-build-i386,ppc64

Re: [PATCH] Makefile.common: add scratch build targets

2007-07-11 Thread Till Maas
On Mi Juli 11 2007, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > Rather than have a check for koji's existence in each target, i would > perfer a target to check for koji and have the makefile call that. Then if > the location to get information changes or we switch out koji and go to > something else we only need to

Re: [PATCH] Makefile.common: add scratch build targets

2007-07-11 Thread Till Maas
On Mi Juli 11 2007, Till Maas wrote: > @$(BUILD_CLIENT) build $(BUILD_FLAGS) $(TARGET) '$(CVS_URL)' > @$(BUILD_CLIENT) build --scratch $(BUILD_FLAGS) $(TARGET) '$(CVS_URL)' > @$(BUILD_CLIENT) build --scratch --arch-override=$* $(BUILD_FLAGS) > $(TARGET) &#x

[PATCH] Makefile.common: remove CVS_EXTRAS_RC

2007-07-11 Thread Till Maas
Hiyas, Makefile.common uses CVS_EXTRAS_RC to define the variable of the user config file and uses a complex structure to only include it, when it is a file. According to "info make", there is a much easier way: | If you want `make' to simply ignore a makefile which does not exist | and cannot b

[PATCH] Makefile.common: properly define the default goal

2007-07-12 Thread Till Maas
Aloa, the attached patch makes sure, that "all" ist the default goal, even when there are other targets in .cvspkgsrc. This allows to define other targets in this configuration file without changing the default goal. When one wants to change the default goal, this is still possible with setting

mock: enable gpgcheck for f8 config file

2007-11-18 Thread Till Maas
Hiyas, now that the groups repo is not used anymore in mock, imho the gpgcheck option can be enabled by default and only be disabled for the local repo. It will only need the required gpg-keys be included in the mock rpm and some more lines in the config files. I will write a patch for this if

[Patch] Typo in Makefile.common scratch-build-% target

2007-12-04 Thread Till Maas
Hiyas, I noticed that there is a typo in the scratch-build-% target in Makefile.common, which breaks the target. The attached patch fixes this. Regards, Till cvs diff: Diffing . Index: Makefile.common === RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/common/

Re: mock: enable gpgcheck for f8 config file

2007-12-15 Thread Till Maas
On Monday 19 November 2007 09:01:59 Michael E Brown wrote: > On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 11:01:40PM +0100, Till Maas wrote: > > now that the groups repo is not used anymore in mock, imho the gpgcheck > > option can be enabled by default and only be disabled for the local repo. > &

Re: mock: enable gpgcheck for f8 config file

2007-12-15 Thread Till Maas
On Saturday 15 December 2007 16:34:44 Jesse Keating wrote: > Couldn't the repo configs just point to the online version of it, and > have yum download the key when needed? (or if it's already on the file > system use it?) It is possible afaik, but it is less secure, because yum can not check, w

Re: mock: enable gpgcheck for f8 config file

2008-01-03 Thread Till Maas
On Do Januar 3 2008, Michael E Brown wrote: > It looks to me like the goal of adding gpg key support is to add some > stricter security guarantees around mock builds. It would be nice if you > could codify exactly what you think the security guarantee should look > like, and what are the possible

Re: mock: enable gpgcheck for f8 config file

2008-01-03 Thread Till Maas
On Do Januar 3 2008, seth vidal wrote: > it uses urlgrabber which uses urllib[2] underneath. ssl connections > specific ca to focus on. > > but what does this have to do with gpg certs? gpg certs aren't ssl > certs. When yum (rpm?) verifies ssl certificates for https urls to acquire gpgkeys, it

[Patch] add BUILD_FLAGS support to make scratch-build

2008-01-06 Thread Till Maas
Hiyas, The scratch build target does not respect the BUILD_FLAGS variable, that is repected for make build. This patch changes this and makes it possible to use, e.g.: make scratch-build BUILD_FLAGS=--nowait Regards, Till The scratch build target does not respect the BUILD_FLAGS variable, that is

Re: [Patch] add BUILD_FLAGS support to make scratch-build

2008-01-06 Thread Till Maas
On Sun January 6 2008, Jesse Keating wrote: > KOJI_FLAGS="--nowait" make scratch-build This does not work and also needs my patch to work: $ KOJI_FLAGS="--nowait" make scratch-build Created task: 328830 Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=328830 Watching tasks (this may b

Re: [Patch] add BUILD_FLAGS support to make scratch-build

2008-01-15 Thread Till Maas
Aloas, On Sun January 6 2008, Till Maas wrote: > The scratch build target does not respect the BUILD_FLAGS variable, > that is repected for make build. This patch changes this and makes it > possible to use, e.g.: > make scratch-build BUILD_FLAGS=--nowait do you manage the patches i

Re: [PATCH] koji make sending email on success to owner configurable

2008-01-17 Thread Till Maas
On Tue January 15 2008, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > the attached patch makes it configurable to send email to the owner of a > package and person submitting the job. This is needed for secondary arches > so that you dont get 6 emails per build. My 2 cents: The name of the variable is could be better.

Re: New upstream release of Koji (and a refresh of Fedora builders?)

2008-01-25 Thread Till Maas
On Fri January 25 2008, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > here is the updated patch. if its too late thats ok There was a missing "i" in line 40, here is this fixed. Regards, Till From 61b4c4f156378d8feee9ff7af86c8d123f17725b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dennis Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 14

Re: OpenSuSE Buildsystem

2008-12-16 Thread Till Maas
On Tue December 16 2008, Mike McGrath wrote: > The problem is time and coordination. So on a whim I thought I'd send > this email out. Do we have any contributors out there who are both > members of Fedora and SuSE who would be willing to lead this charge, find > similarities and places for coor