Hi,
I'm having a problem *not* being
able to build 'i686' packages (i.e. optional_arches=i686) anymore *after*
having upgraded our plague server/builder (Opteron x86_64) a couple of
weeks ago from plague-0.4.3 to *plague-0.5.0*. The problem happens only
with i686 (optional_arches=i686) -- not wit
On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 09:58 -0400, Joe Todaro wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I'm having a problem *not* being able to build 'i686' packages (i.e.
> optional_arches=i686) anymore *after* having upgraded our plague
> server/builder (Opteron x86_64) a couple of weeks ago from
> plague-0.4.3 to *plague-0.5.0*. Th
Thank You, Dan. My answers are below...
> Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on
07/06/2006 09:59:33 AM:
> On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 09:58 -0400, Joe Todaro wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > I'm having a problem *not* being able to build 'i686' packages
(i.e.
> > optional_arches=i686) anymore *after*
On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 09:58 -0400, Joe Todaro wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I'm having a problem *not* being able to build 'i686' packages (i.e.
> optional_arches=i686) anymore *after* having upgraded our plague
> server/builder (Opteron x86_64) a couple of weeks ago from
> plague-0.4.3 to *plague-0.5.0*. Th
Thanks Dan.
So I ran a quick regression test, just to make sure
that *i386* is still working, but, it *failed* ... (also note that i686
gave basically the same errors..)
SEE BELOW for *regression* test results, both BEFORE
and AFTER applying patch 'plague-opt-arches-fix.patch' to server/Config.p
On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 09:48 -0400, Joe Todaro wrote:
>
> Thanks Dan.
>
> So I ran a quick regression test, just to make sure that *i386* is
> still working, but, it *failed* ... (also note that i686 gave
> basically the same errors..)
>
> SEE BELOW for *regression* test results, both BEFORE an
Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/16/2006
10:41:55 AM:
> On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 09:48 -0400, Joe Todaro wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Dan.
> >
> > So I ran a quick regression test, just to make sure that *i386*
is
> > still working, but, it *failed* ... (also note that i686 gave
> > basicall
On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 12:18 -0400, Joe Todaro wrote:
>
> Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/16/2006 10:41:55 AM:
>
> > On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 09:48 -0400, Joe Todaro wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks Dan.
> > >
> > > So I ran a quick regression test, just to make sure that *i386* is
> > > sti
DW> Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
on 07/17/2006 06:11:34 AM:
JT> > On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 12:18 -0400, Joe
Todaro wrote:
JT> > Regardless, though, I still don't see
any variable
JT> > in /usr/bin/plague-server that has *anything* to
JT> > with "optional arches" or "base
arches", which
J
On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 18:49 -0400, Joe Todaro wrote:
> DW> and on the server, which has _no_ architecture at all, you'd have
> DW> in /etc/plague/server/targets:
> DW>
> DW> fedora-devel-core.cfg
> DW> fedora-5-core.cfg
> DW> fedora-4-core.cfg
> DW> fedora-devel-extras.cfg
> DW> fedora-5-extras.cf
Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/19/2006
10:07:54 AM:
> On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 18:49 -0400, Joe Todaro wrote:
> > DW> and on the server, which has _no_ architecture at all,
you'd have
> > DW> in /etc/plague/server/targets:
> > DW>
> > DW> fedora-devel-core.cfg
> > DW> fedora-5-core.cf
On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 13:09 -0400, Joe Todaro wrote:
>
> Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/19/2006 10:07:54 AM:
>
> > On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 18:49 -0400, Joe Todaro wrote:
> > > DW> and on the server, which has _no_ architecture at all, you'd
> have
> > > DW> in /etc/plague/server/targe
Hey Dan,
Great news. We *fixed* the plague-0.5
"depsolve" problem with a minor
change to the PackageJob.py module.
See below...
>> On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 09:58 -0400, Joe Todaro
wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> I'm having a problem *not* being able to build 'i686' packages
(i.e.
>> optional_arches=i686)
On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 16:48 -0400, Joe Todaro wrote:
>
> Hey Dan,
>
> Great news. We *fixed* the plague-0.5 "depsolve" problem with a minor
> change to the PackageJob.py module. See below...
>
> >> On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 09:58 -0400, Joe Todaro wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >> I'm having a probl
14 matches
Mail list logo