Hello,
I noticed some problems with mock, when building tools such as valgrind,
syslinux etc. on x86_64.
The default mock config says to exclude i386 and similar packages.
However, these programs depend on stubs-32.h from the i386 glibc-devel
package.
The x86_64 glibc-devel only brings stubs-6
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 11:25:43AM +0200, Andreas Thienemann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I noticed some problems with mock, when building tools such as valgrind,
> syslinux etc. on x86_64.
>
> The default mock config says to exclude i386 and similar packages.
>
> However, these programs depend on stubs
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 11:33 +0200, Florian La Roche wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 11:25:43AM +0200, Andreas Thienemann wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I noticed some problems with mock, when building tools such as valgrind,
> > syslinux etc. on x86_64.
> >
> > The default mock config says to exclud
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> seth vidal
> On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 11:33 +0200, Florian La Roche wrote:
> > On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 11:25:43AM +0200, Andreas Thienemann wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I noticed some problems with
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 11:08 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> > seth vidal
> > On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 11:33 +0200, Florian La Roche wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 11:25:43AM +0200, Andreas T
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> seth vidal
> Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 1:27 PM
> To: Discussion of Fedora build system
> Subject: RE: Multiarch support for mock
>
> On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 11:08 -05
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 10:48:39AM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 11:33 +0200, Florian La Roche wrote:
> > On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 11:25:43AM +0200, Andreas Thienemann wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I noticed some problems with mock, when building tools such as valgrind,
> > >
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 00:03 +0200, Florian La Roche wrote:
> > So you're saying that in order to build 64bit packages we REQUIRE
> > glibc*.i686?
> >
> > Are you serious? So there's no way to build x86_64 w/o i386 first being
> > built?
>
> Hello Seth,
>
> No, just that glibc is an exception to
