I do a large number of local mock builds as a part of the package
reviews that I do, and one problem I consistently run into is
executables and .so files coming out with mode 775, but a scratch
build in Fedora's koji instance showing the expected 755 permissions.
I thought it might be some local e
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
I do a large number of local mock builds as a part of the package
reviews that I do, and one problem I consistently run into is
executables and .so files coming out with mode 775, but a scratch
build in Fedora's koji instance showing the expected 755 permissions.
I th
> "MM" == Mike McLean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MM> I believe the umask needs to be 002 in order for users in the mock
MM> group to be able to use mock effectively.
Which umask? My person one? If mock requires a specific umask value,
it should simply set one itself.
MM> Regardless, if th
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 03:08 -0500, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> (file permissions, user ownership, group ownership, directory
> permissions)
That's what I get for answering something after midnight without looking
it up in the manual. Thanks!
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 23:48 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 22:26 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "(-.root,root,-)" is quite
>
> I do believe that sets it to "whatever owner permissions the file has on
> the filesystem, root owner, root group, whatever group permissions
> "JK" == Jesse Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JK> I do believe that sets it to "whatever owner permissions the file
JK> has on the filesystem, root owner, root group, whatever group
JK> permissions it has on the filesystem" or something close to that
JK> effect.
Well, yes, but obviously
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 08:14 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> Well, yes, but obviously (755,root,root,755) doesn't work all that
> well, because then all files are executable. (-,root,root,755) would
> be OK, I guess, but of course that wouldn't have any bearing on the
> problem I'm seeing.
II
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
"MM" == Mike McLean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MM> I believe the umask needs to be 002 in order for users in the mock
MM> group to be able to use mock effectively.
Which umask? My person one? If mock requires a specific umask value,
it should simply set one itsel
On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 22:26 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> "(-.root,root,-)" is quite
I do believe that sets it to "whatever owner permissions the file has on
the filesystem, root owner, root group, whatever group permissions it
has on the filesystem" or something close to that effect. In
> "MM" == Mike McLean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MM> It does. mock calls os.umask(002) at startup (and has for a
MM> while). The mock on the Fedora build hosts has this line. I'm not
MM> sure why you're seeing a difference. Can you point to a specific
MM> Fedora build whose results differ fro
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 12:32 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> Here's a package from a recent review:
> http://www.math.uh.edu/~tibbs/rpms/cave9-0.3-2.bog9.src.rpm
>
> When build locally, the included file /usr/bin/cave9 has mode 0775.
> When built in koji
> (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji
11 matches
Mail list logo
