Howdy,
Anybody else seeing this with the latest kernel?
# xm list
Error: Error connecting to xend: Connection refused. Is xend running?
# ps -ef|grep xen
root1211 0 17:02 ?00:00:00 [xenwatch]
root1311 0 17:02 ?00:00:00 [xenbus]
root 1953 1 0
Updated Packages:
gcc-4.1.0-2
---
* Sat Mar 04 2006 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com 4.1.0-2
- update from -gcc-4_1-branch (-r111570:111697)
- PRs c++/26291, libgfortran/26136, libgfortran/26423, libgfortran/26464,
libstdc++/26526, rtl-optimization/26345, target/19061,
Gilboa Davara gilb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 2006-03-05 at 16:12 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
The worst annoyance right now is the gnome panel not being closed on
logout, as a result gnome-session refuses to create a panel on login.
I don't know if a
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 12:01 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
Hello,
It seems to me that there is no command line acpi client in fedora core.
If I'm not wrong, maybe acpitool (that I packaged in extras) could be moved
to core? It has more functionalities than the other client I found, acpi
(that
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 17:05 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
Things like hal / gnome-power-manager right now works well for the core
distribution (some day we'll even get rid of acpid) so I'm not sure why
acpitool (which admittedly may be useful for admins / expert users with
special needs)
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 17:05 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
It can stay in Extras, it is just a proposition. But it may be interesting
to have a command line acpi client, even for non-experts, but for those
who have a basic use of the command line. Using an abstraction layer with
hal seems
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 17:13 +0900, Naoki wrote:
Anybody else seeing this with the latest kernel?
[snip]
RuntimeError: (111, 'Connection refused')
For now, the temporary workaround is to mknod /dev/kmem. Hopefully that
should go away after today
No doubt unrelated but with this kernel on boot
Dnia 06-03-2006, pon o godzinie 22:20 +, David Woodhouse napisał(a):
On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 14:14 -0500, Chris Tyler wrote:
Should we consider bind-chroot obsolete, since SElinux should be able
to provide similar protection (preventing named from touching files it
should not, even if
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 23:28 +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
BTW bind.
Anyone work on fix Fedora bind for make this package FHS compliant ?
Current base directory for bind files is /var/named and acording to FHS
specification it will be better use /var/lib/named.
That'd would be nice.
I write
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=150222hide_resolved=1
We are now attempting to fix some last minute problems. Your help would
be greatly appreciated in finding solutions for the problems listed in
the above FC5 Blocker list.
Your testing of rawhide nightly
John Thacker wrote:
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 05:01:26PM -0800, Z wrote:
Where did the compose key selection went? Or is it fixed to right-alt?
System - Preferences - Keyboard - Layout Options - Compose key position
John
Before you do this, could you please do this first.
gconftool-2 -R
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: bad URL in perl-Net-Telnet package description
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180591
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What
12 matches
Mail list logo
