Re: [JANITOR] Duplicate directory ownership cleanups

2009-06-27 Thread Panu Matilainen
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Chris Weyl wrote: On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu wrote: On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Jussi Lehtola jussileht...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 18:07 +0200, Iain Arnell wrote: okay, not actually broken,

Re: [JANITOR] Duplicate directory ownership cleanups

2009-06-27 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sat, 27 Jun 2009 12:00:24 +0300 (EEST), Panu wrote: multiprovided dir /usr/share/man/man1 - filesystem-2.4.21-1.fc11.x86_64 - gnome-power-manager-2.26.1-3.fc11.x86_64 - policycoreutils-2.0.62-12.6.fc11.x86_64 multiprovided dir /usr/share/man/man8 -

Re: yum 3.2.23 more than 10x slower than 3.2.21?! (BZ #508445)

2009-06-27 Thread Roberto Ragusa
Roberto Ragusa wrote: Never programmed in python, but this could be O(N^2). for pkg in pkgs[1:]: if pkg.repo.cost lowcost: msg = _('excluding for cost: %s from %s') % (pkg, pkg.repo.id) self.verbose_logger.log(logginglevels.DEBUG_3, msg)

Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26

2009-06-27 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 19:00 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: This all sounds pretty great. Is there more information on AutoQA other than the project here? If you read the last several weeks of FWN, look at the QA section and specifically the bit about the weekly QA meeting, Will Woods gives a

rawhide report: 20090627 changes

2009-06-27 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Sat Jun 27 06:15:07 UTC 2009 New package SevenZip Java SDK for LZMA New package mediawiki-HTTP302Found Forces an external HTTP 302 redirect instead of internal redirects New package rubygem-gettext_rails Localization support for Ruby on Rails by

TeX Live 2008 available for testing

2009-06-27 Thread Jindrich Novy
Good news everyone! I've invented a device that installs TeX Live 2008 on your Fedora! /futurama TeX Live 2008 is now packaged and available for testing. It is not in Fedora yet because it requires reviews of couple of packages. But you can test it before it happens. If you want to give it a

Building firefox

2009-06-27 Thread Paul
Hi, For some reason, firefox has become really unstable on the likes of eBay and facebook (it crashes out after clicking on the login button). It looks like it could be either a gcj issue or xulrunner. I've tried to rebuild from the srpm, it built, but then when I try to install I get Error

Rawhide pulseaudio manager problem

2009-06-27 Thread Paul
Hi, Despite the packagekit updates, I've still not got any sound on my rawhide box. When I've run from the command line pulseaudio --start or pulseaudio -D it returns E: main.c: Daemon startup failed When I run PulseAudio Manager, I'm seeing something which may explain things a bit (though

Re: Rawhide debuginfo packages with no sources

2009-06-27 Thread Mat Booth
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Ville Skyttäville.sky...@iki.fi wrote: Hello, Quite a few packages that produce *-debuginfo without sources have crept again in rawhide.  See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Debuginfo for possible reasons, the most usual of which in my (past, haven't

Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26

2009-06-27 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 06/27/2009 03:50 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote: They sometimes post a mail in a thread like this one and avoid further actions, as they have little hope to have their voice heard by RedHat (this is not a typo for Fedora). Yes, it is a typo for Red Hat :-) Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing

Re: TeX Live 2008 available for testing

2009-06-27 Thread José Matos
On Saturday 27 June 2009 13:41:42 Jindrich Novy wrote: Good news everyone! I've invented a device that installs TeX Live 2008 on your Fedora! /futurama TeX Live 2008 is now packaged and available for testing. It is not in Fedora yet because it requires reviews of couple of packages. But you

Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26

2009-06-27 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 06/27/2009 09:13 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: As for integration, we offer a perfectly integrated KDE spin, thank you very much... We're working really hard on distro integration. For example, why do you think I wrote that KDM ConsoleKit patch back in F7 times (a modified version of which got

Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26

2009-06-27 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 06/27/2009 09:13 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: As for integration, we offer a perfectly integrated KDE spin, thank you very much... We're working really hard on distro integration. For example, why do you think I wrote that KDM ConsoleKit

Re: TeX Live 2008 available for testing

2009-06-27 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le samedi 27 juin 2009 à 14:41 +0200, Jindrich Novy a écrit : TeX Live 2008 is now packaged and available for testing. It is not in Fedora yet because it requires reviews of couple of packages. But you can test it before it happens. None of your font packages follow Fedora fonts packaging

Re: Building firefox

2009-06-27 Thread Ricky Zhou
On 2009-06-27 01:54:03 PM, Paul wrote: Error unpacking rpm package firefox-3.5-0.22.beta4.fc12.i586 error : unpacking of archive failed on file /usr/lib/firefox-3.5b4/firefox;4a4615d6 : cpio : Digest mismatch firefox-3.5-0.22.beta4.fc12.i586 was supposed to be removed but is not! This probably

Re: Building firefox

2009-06-27 Thread Paul
Hi, Error unpacking rpm package firefox-3.5-0.22.beta4.fc12.i586 error : unpacking of archive failed on file /usr/lib/firefox-3.5b4/firefox;4a4615d6 : cpio : Digest mismatch firefox-3.5-0.22.beta4.fc12.i586 was supposed to be removed but is not! This probably means that the source RPM

Re: Building firefox

2009-06-27 Thread Edwin ten Brink
Paul wrote: I've tried to rebuild from the srpm, it built, but then when I try to install I get Error unpacking rpm package firefox-3.5-0.22.beta4.fc12.i586 error : unpacking of archive failed on file /usr/lib/firefox-3.5b4/firefox;4a4615d6 : cpio : Digest mismatch

Re: TeX Live 2008 available for testing

2009-06-27 Thread Matej Cepl
Jindrich Novy, Sat, 27 Jun 2009 14:41:42 +0200: then you can do: # yum install texlive Transaction Check Error: file /usr/share/texmf from install of texlive-2008-0.1.fc11.x86_64 conflicts with file from package gnuplot-common-4.2.4-6.fc11.x86_64 Matěj -- fedora-devel-list mailing list

Re: TeX Live 2008 available for testing

2009-06-27 Thread Matej Cepl
Matej Cepl, Sat, 27 Jun 2009 21:21:43 +: Jindrich Novy, Sat, 27 Jun 2009 14:41:42 +0200: then you can do: # yum install texlive Installing : texlive-2008-0.1.fc11.x86_642/92 Error unpacking rpm package texlive-2008-0.1.fc11.x86_64 error: unpacking of

Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26

2009-06-27 Thread Niels Haase
2009/6/27 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com: I never know where to reply to these sort of threads... but I guess I will pick here. ;) On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:44:48 -0500 inode0 ino...@gmail.com wrote: ...snip... When I look at a directory listing and see Fedora-11-x86_64-Live.iso

Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26

2009-06-27 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 6:28 PM, drago01 wrote: On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 6:04 PM, drago01 wrote: Why treat XFCE as second class citizen ... Easy answer: because the size of its userbase is not in the same order of magnitude with Gnome.

Re: TeX Live 2008 available for testing

2009-06-27 Thread Jindrich Novy
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 03:26:53PM +0100, José Matos wrote: On Saturday 27 June 2009 13:41:42 Jindrich Novy wrote: Note that it is in testing state so (many) bugs could occur. There are possible clashes with applications packaged separately (such as dvipdfmx, etc.) so we may want to discuss

Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26

2009-06-27 Thread Kevin Kofler
drago01 wrote: Yeah but only because it is treated as a second class citizen (I hate using this kind of arguments but I think you should get the point). There are plenty of distributions shipping XFCE or LXDE by default. Even the fairly-famous Knoppix is now defaulting to LXDE. So the choice is

Re: TeX Live 2008 available for testing

2009-06-27 Thread Jindrich Novy
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 09:24:47PM +, Matej Cepl wrote: Matej Cepl, Sat, 27 Jun 2009 21:21:43 +: Jindrich Novy, Sat, 27 Jun 2009 14:41:42 +0200: then you can do: # yum install texlive Installing : texlive-2008-0.1.fc11.x86_642/92 Error

Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26

2009-06-27 Thread Kevin Kofler
Rahul Sundaram wrote: * Proper integration of NetworkManager. KDE currently is using NetworkManager-gnome which doesn't integrate well with KDE The plan is to default to kde-plasma-networkmanagement in F12. As we had agreed in the KDE SIG meetings, I'll be flipping the switch in Rawhide soon

Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26

2009-06-27 Thread Kevin Kofler
Rahul Sundaram wrote: Err, no. I didn't say that. You are missing the point. My list of differences wasn't a comprehensive comparison of DE's but Fedora driven important features that are lacking integration with KDE. I think KDE in Fedora falls short of the perfect integration that is

Re: rawhide report: 20090627 changes

2009-06-27 Thread Kevin Kofler
Rawhide Report wrote: New package SevenZip Java SDK for LZMA Why was this approved and imported with that name when we clearly agreed on this list that the name needs to be changed? Kevin Kofler -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com

Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26

2009-06-27 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Sun, 2009-06-28 at 02:04 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: That's not distro integration. It's Fedora developers who happen to be upstream developers calling their upstream GNOME features Fedora features. That doesn't make them any less GNOME-only features. This is at most a failure of our

Re: rawhide report: 20090627 changes

2009-06-27 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 8:07 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Rawhide Report wrote: New package SevenZip         Java SDK for LZMA Why was this approved and imported with that name when we clearly agreed on this list that the name needs to be changed? As far as I know, a general agreement hasn't

Re: TeX Live 2008 available for testing

2009-06-27 Thread Kevin Kofler
Jindrich Novy wrote: This is caused by the fact that the /usr/share/texmf exists on your system. The new texlive needs to replace it with symlink and RPM doesn't allow to do that if the directory already exists. Please remove the directory manually and try again. There are some (really

Re: rawhide report: 20090627 changes

2009-06-27 Thread Kevin Kofler
Orcan Ogetbil wrote: From my perspective, I am not convinced about the impact of the disaster this package name will create. So far we didn't have SevenZip in Fedora. We did have the real 7-Zip, the portable version is called p7zip. 7-Zip is the name of a Window$ application, both GUI and

Re: update mechanism for new releases

2009-06-27 Thread Christopher Stone
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Matthew Woehlkemw_tr...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 11:05 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: The problem with preupgrade is that it needs user interaction and a lot of space. It downloads the distro update locally,

Re: [JANITOR] Duplicate directory ownership cleanups

2009-06-27 Thread Christopher Stone
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Tom spot Callawaytcall...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, I'm Scruffy, the Fedora Janitor. Hi Scruffy, I maintain a lot of php packages which show up on Seth's list. As far as I know all my php packages are correct in their directory ownership. Please contact me before

Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26

2009-06-27 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 06/28/2009 05:25 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: So, most of the stuff you mention will be fixed really soon, probably already in F12! But there are also plenty of KDE features GNOME doesn't have (e.g. where's a GNOME desktop globe matching Marble?). It's perfectly normal that some features are

Re: rawhide report: 20090627 changes

2009-06-27 Thread Eric Springer
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Orcan Ogetbiloget.fed...@gmail.com wrote: PS: Is this really so important? I think so. The name SevenZip will mislead the majority of people who want to just extract a .7z I know the requirements might be on your side, but java-lzma(-sdk) is clearly the most

rpms/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ErrorPage/devel perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ErrorPage.spec, 1.1, 1.2

2009-06-27 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
Author: eseyman Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ErrorPage/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5808 Modified Files: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ErrorPage.spec Log Message: Update to 1.21 Index: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ErrorPage.spec

[Bug 508496] New: Perl: symbol lookup error: .../Wx.so: undefined symbol: Perl_Guse_safe_putenv_ptr

2009-06-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Perl: symbol lookup error: .../Wx.so: undefined symbol: Perl_Guse_safe_putenv_ptr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508496 Summary: Perl: symbol

rpms/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ErrorPage/devel .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ErrorPage.spec, 1.2, 1.3 sources, 1.2, 1.3

2009-06-27 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
Author: eseyman Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ErrorPage/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13996 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ErrorPage.spec sources Log Message: Rebuild Index: .cvsignore

[Bug 491536] cssh is broken

2009-06-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491536 --- Comment #18 from Mohammed Arafa bugzi...@in-egypt.net 2009-06-28 01:49:32 EDT --- that fixed it! thanks --