Theodore Papadopoulo wrote:
> According to http://www.itk.org/Wiki/CMake_RPATH_handling this is now
> corrected since almost two years (december 2007).
We tried it in a 2.6.x, which is more recent than that, and it didn't work.
(We ended up with things like /usr/lib or /usr/lib64 being set as an
Mike Cloaked wrote:
> Exactly which config interface are you referring to that enables this for
> xorg for kdm? Many systems do not have xorg.conf once installed, so
> presumably there is something else?
Well, KDM runs as root, so usually root's KDE settings are relevant, but
stock KDE doesn't ha
Today I upgrade my Fedora to Fedora 12 Beta, It looks very well. But I found
ATi display driver does not run well.
My display card is Sapphire HD3650 with 256MB GDDR3 VRAM (RV635). I choose
OSS driver for my card. Glxgears runs so smoothly with xorg-x11-drv-ati
because of KMS by default, neverthele
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 03:16:21PM +0800, Liang Suilong wrote:
> Another question, Will Fedora 12 provide Opensource 3D acceleration driver
> for R600/R700?
From F12 beta announcment:
* Graphics support improvements - Fedora 12 introduces experimental 3D
Hi,
Jim Parsons left Red Hat a little while back and the only contact
details I have is his Red Hat email address, which is of course no
longer valid. I've opened a bugzilla #530027 as per the unresponsive
maintainer procedure, but I was hoping to be able to skip the section
regarding sending of m
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 02:27:46AM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 20.10.2009, 17:01 -0700 schrieb Jesse Keating:
> > On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 01:11 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> > >
> > > What really scares me is that there is a number of security updates in
> > > bodhi that d
Hi,
I just installed F12 Beta. Here are some thoughts
1 - during the first boot smolt panicked - there was an error related
to time zones in python-sitepackages or something like that.
2 - I tried to reboot the system - ctrl + alt + del, but it stopped on
process termination
3 - after reboot syst
Hi,
I have created a simple tool called rpmguard for checking differences
between RPM packages. It is very similar to rpmdiff, but it prints only
important changes, not all. Therefore it can be used every time a new
package is built to easily see if something hasn’t went completely wrong.
Read
Compose started at Wed Oct 21 06:15:23 UTC 2009
Broken deps for ppc64
--
python-mwlib-0.11.2-3.20090522hg2956.fc12.ppc64 requires LabPlot
New package adf-tribun-fonts
A newsprint-like serif typeface
New package gfs
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 06:56 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> I have created a simple tool called rpmguard for checking differences
> between RPM packages. It is very similar to rpmdiff, but it prints only
> important changes, not all. Therefore it can be used every time a new
> package is built to eas
>> As the Dell Latitude D630 is one of the more common devices that smolt
>> reports being used by Fedora I thought I'd mention my upgrade
>> experience and issues for F-12.
>>
>> Probably the two usual things that people query are grahics and wifi.
>> The model I have has the Intel IWL-4965AGN dev
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>> As the Dell Latitude D630 is one of the more common devices that smolt
>>> reports being used by Fedora I thought I'd mention my upgrade
>>> experience and issues for F-12.
>>>
>>> Probably the two usual things that people query are grahic
Hi,
On 10/21/2009 11:11 AM, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
Hi,
Jim Parsons left Red Hat a little while back and the only contact
details I have is his Red Hat email address, which is of course no
longer valid. I've opened a bugzilla #530027 as per the unresponsive
maintainer procedure, but I was hopi
Hi,
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 14:40 +0200, Milos Jakubicek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/21/2009 11:11 AM, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Jim Parsons left Red Hat a little while back and the only contact
> > details I have is his Red Hat email address, which is of course no
> > longer valid. I've
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 01:57:14PM +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 14:40 +0200, Milos Jakubicek wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 10/21/2009 11:11 AM, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Jim Parsons left Red Hat a little while back and the only contact
> > > det
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:15:55PM -0400, Warren Togami wrote:
> sssd-0.6.1-2.fc12 skrooge-0.5.2-2.fc12 translate-toolkit-1.4.1-2.fc12
> vhostmd-0.4-0.2.gitea2f772d.fc12 qtcurve-gtk2-0.69.0-1.fc12
> qtcurve-kde4-0.69.0-1.fc12 gfs-ignacio-fonts-20090923-1.fc12
> adf-tribun-fonts-1.13-1.fc12 g
Hi,
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 14:13 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 01:57:14PM +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 14:40 +0200, Milos Jakubicek wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 10/21/2009 11:11 AM, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > >
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Rex Dieter wrote:
>> I'm convinced to revert, I'll run the change by my fellow cmake
>> maintainers (I think we have buy-in from everyone though).
>
> Please test that we really don't end up with standard paths like /usr/lib
> or /usr/lib64 in the rpath of installed executab
Dne 21.10.2009 12:31, Michał Piotrowski napsal:
I just installed F12 Beta. Here are some thoughts
Hello,
Thank you for testing the Beta.
1 - during the first boot smolt panicked - there was an error related
to time zones in python-sitepackages or something like that.
2 - I tried to reboot the
On 10/21/2009 03:21 PM, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
I'm willing to accept that argument, and indeed just the same discussion
is currently going on, on one of our internal lists too. The issue is
who will do the work to get s-c-c back working again? Conga is actively
maintained, and s-c-c is not at
2009/10/21 Kamil Paral :
> Hi,
>
> I have created a simple tool called rpmguard for checking differences
> between RPM packages. It is very similar to rpmdiff, but it prints only
> important changes, not all. Therefore it can be used every time a new
> package is built to easily see if something ha
On 10/21/2009 12:54 AM, hidenori.is...@avasys.jp wrote:
> A colleague of mine submitted a bug report regarding an infinite loop
> triggered when calling `lsb_start_daemon` with the `-p` option[1]. This
> bug has been around since at least Fedora 9 and is still present in the
> beta for Fedora 12.
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 12:52:49PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> I suspect the problem with that is attempting to determine a universal
> concept of 'offensive'. Heck, we might have no-offensive-packages-kde
> that conflicts with 'gnome-*', and no-offensive-packages-gnome...
And you can't uninst
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 12:58 -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
>
> And you can't uninstall KDE without killing gnome since
> NetworkManager-gnome has a dependency on KDE...
Um, what? Care to elaborate?
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
signa
Eric Springer (erik...@gmail.com) said:
> > It's probably abusing the system and breaks a million guidelines, but what
> about making a "no-offensive-packages" package that explicitly conflicts
> with a list of offensive packages?
I suspect the problem with that is attempting to determine a unive
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:00:13AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 12:58 -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> >
> > And you can't uninstall KDE without killing gnome since
> > NetworkManager-gnome has a dependency on KDE...
>
> Um, what? Care to elaborate?
http://www.pastebin.
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 01:08:43PM -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:00:13AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 12:58 -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> > >
> > > And you can't uninstall KDE without killing gnome since
> > > NetworkManager-gnome has a dep
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 06:22:04PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> IIUC, you're mis-interpreting the YUM output there. NetworkManager-gnome
> doesn't have a dependancy on KDE, rather it happens to be part of the
> "KDE (K Desktop Environment)" group. ie in doing a 'groupremove'
> you explicitl
Darryl L. Pierce (dpie...@redhat.com) said:
> You're correct in that removing the KDE group attempts to remove the
> NetworkManager-gnome rpm. I remembered uninstalling KDE also removed
> NetworkManager-gnome which borked my laptop until I re-installed the
> RPM. That's something that should be fi
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 13:28 -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 06:22:04PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > IIUC, you're mis-interpreting the YUM output there. NetworkManager-gnome
> > doesn't have a dependancy on KDE, rather it happens to be part of the
> > "KDE (K Deskto
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 13:31 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >>> As the Dell Latitude D630 is one of the more common devices that smolt
> >>> reports being used by Fedora I thought I'd mention my upgrade
> >>> experience and issues for F-12.
>
- "Jesse Keating" wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 13:28 -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 06:22:04PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > IIUC, you're mis-interpreting the YUM output there.
> NetworkManager-gnome
> > > doesn't have a dependancy on KDE, rather it hap
On 10/21/2009 10:58 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 06:22:04PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> IIUC, you're mis-interpreting the YUM output there. NetworkManager-gnome
>> doesn't have a dependancy on KDE, rather it happens to be part of the
>> "KDE (K Desktop Environment)
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Darryl L. Pierce (dpie...@redhat.com) said:
You're correct in that removing the KDE group attempts to remove the
NetworkManager-gnome rpm. I remembered uninstalling KDE also removed
NetworkManager-gnome which borked my laptop until I re-installed th
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:11:37AM +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Jim Parsons left Red Hat a little while back and the only contact
> details I have is his Red Hat email address, which is of course no
> longer valid. I've opened a bugzilla #530027 as per the unresponsive
> maintainer pr
2009/10/21 Jesse Keating :
> On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 13:28 -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 06:22:04PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> > IIUC, you're mis-interpreting the YUM output there. NetworkManager-gnome
>> > doesn't have a dependancy on KDE, rather it happens to be
On 10/21/2009 02:10 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
I've talked to FESCo people on IRC and after some discussion I've gone
ahead
and reassigned ownership. Since people seem to like this, if you don't want
to maintain and fix this package, please go through the orphan process
rather than just retirin
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 13:31 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> >>> As the Dell Latitude D630 is one of the more common devices that smolt
>> >>> reports being used by Fedora I thought I'd
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 11:17 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> As the Dell Latitude D630 is one of the more common devices that smolt
>> reports being used by Fedora I thought I'd mention my upgrade
>> experience and issues for F
Fedora Release Engineering decided to deal with the 250+ backlog of
Bodhi update requests by tagging them all into f12-final. Bodhi is now
disabled for Fedora 12 updates.
Questions
=
1) Why tag all Update requests into f12-final?
At this point of the schedule we realized that there we
I don't really want to revive the thread about automake 1.11, but I do
want to point out that it did break actual buildability:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1761549&name=build.log
Please, people. Don't update things in stable releases just for fun.
Particularly if your packa
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Adam Jackson wrote:
I don't really want to revive the thread about automake 1.11, but I do
want to point out that it did break actual buildability:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1761549&name=build.log
Please, people. Don't update things in stable rel
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 16:30 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > I don't really want to revive the thread about automake 1.11, but I do
> > want to point out that it did break actual buildability:
> >
> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1761549&n
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Adam Jackson wrote:
> I don't really want to revive the thread about automake 1.11, but I do
> want to point out that it did break actual buildability:
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1761549&name=build.log
>
> Please, people. Don't update things in stab
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 16:30 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Adam Jackson wrote:
I don't really want to revive the thread about automake 1.11, but I do
want to point out that it did break actual buildability:
http://koji.fedoraproject.or
Am 2009-10-21 08:47, schrieb Ralf Ertzinger:
Hi.
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:40:46 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
In most cases, you can get that information from the original RPM
compared to the system... if you have the RPM :).
rpm -Vp
Which is pretty much what I want, just pulling the dat
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 15:16 +0800, Liang Suilong wrote:
> Today I upgrade my Fedora to Fedora 12 Beta, It looks very well. But I
> found ATi display driver does not run well.
>
>
> My display card is Sapphire HD3650 with 256MB GDDR3 VRAM (RV635). I
> choose OSS driver for my card. Glxgears runs
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 12:31 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just installed F12 Beta. Here are some thoughts
>
> 1 - during the first boot smolt panicked - there was an error related
> to time zones in python-sitepackages or something like that.
Could you try to reproduce and provide
On Mon October 19 2009, mcloaked wrote:
> Given the recent long thread concerning upstream decisions about defaults
> in Thunderbird 3.0beta4 it seems to me that just because upstream makes a
> specific decision does not always mean that is the best decision. What
That discussion was not about
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 13:28 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > Try adding the parameter 'nomodeset' instead of removing any parameters.
> > What happens then?
>
> It has certainly improved it. I wasn't in front of the machine as it
> booted this morning so I'll need to check out plymouth this eveni
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 15:12 +, Mat Booth wrote:
> 2009/10/21 Kamil Paral :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have created a simple tool called rpmguard for checking differences
> > between RPM packages. It is very similar to rpmdiff, but it prints only
> > important changes, not all. Therefore it can be used e
Hi folks,
I tried installing F12 fresh today without burning media. I had F11 on a
lvm, and was installing F12 on another. Here's what happened:
- Put the iso on a ntfs partition
- Put the vmlinuz+initrd.img in F11's grub .. and boot into the installer,
pointing it to install from HDD
- The install
When: Friday, 2009-10-23 @ 15:00 UTC (11 AM EDT)
Where: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
We will be doing a follow-up to the meeting that was held today. Below
is the list bugs still blocking the release of Fedora 12.
527048 - nss - NEW - nss-sysinit: system-wide nss sql empty key
dat
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 15:00 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> When: Friday, 2009-10-23 @ 15:00 UTC (11 AM EDT)
> Where: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
>
> We will be doing a follow-up to the meeting that was held today. Below
> is the list bugs still blocking the release of Fedora 12.
Bring
Lyos Gemini Norezel writes:
> Why not just require a secondary email address?
"Require" a secondary email address? Not everyone has one, or wants
to hand it over if they do. That sounds more like a recipe for driving
maintainers away than making sure you can contact them.
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 12:31 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just installed F12 Beta. Here are some thoughts
> >
> > 1 - during the first boot smolt panicked - there was an error related
> > to time zones in python-sitepackages or some
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 17:08 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 12:31 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I just installed F12 Beta. Here are some thoughts
> > >
> > > 1 - during the first boot smolt panicked - ther
2009/10/22 Adam Williamson :
> On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 17:08 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 12:31 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > I just installed F12 Beta. Here are some thoughts
>> > >
>> > > 1 - durin
2009/10/21 Adam Williamson :
> On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 12:31 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> I guess this is a plymouth bug. I disabled it in grub conf and system
>> works correctly. Is there any chance to completely remove plymouth
>> from the system? (even from initrd)
>
> >From a quick look, we
Hi,
This is a problem that touches some of Fedora services.
I've got a network
192.168.101.0
192.168.101.1 - this is my router
192.168.101.200 - ozzy - my F11 server
192.168.101.100 - dio - my Windows 6 workstation
I use two DNS servers
nameserver 192.168.1.1
nameserver 194.204.159.1
The pro
2009/10/21 Michał Piotrowski :
> Hi,
>
> This is a problem that touches some of Fedora services.
>
> I've got a network
>
> 192.168.101.0
>
> 192.168.101.1 - this is my router
> 192.168.101.200 - ozzy - my F11 server
> 192.168.101.100 - dio - my Windows 6 workstation
>
> I use two DNS servers
>
> n
Hi,
I'm trying to download F12 beta DVD x86_64 iso using jigdo (I've used
jigdo to download previous versions too). It successfully downloaded all
files, but it doesn't accept downloaded install.img file and tries to
download it again and again. I've tried downloading install.img several
times
To Tomasz,
Thank you! I have enabled compiz with ati oss drivers.
To Adam Williamson
Oh..So I need to remove radeonhd driver in my box. RadeonHD seems to be one
part of xorg-x11-drv-ati. They provides the same things to ati users. But
radeonhd only stand for R500/R600 later.
Yes, When rolling up
Milos Jakubicek wrote:
> Most probably those are the packages which failed during the mass
> rebuild...there are still plenty of them:
>
> http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/need-rebuild.html
That list is out of date. I fixed clutter-gtkmm to build a while ago because
it had broken dependencies,
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 08:36 +0800, Liang Suilong wrote:
> Oh..So I need to remove radeonhd driver in my box. RadeonHD seems to
> be one part of xorg-x11-drv-ati. They provides the same things to ati
> users. But radeonhd only stand for R500/R600 later.
radeonhd is not part of ati, they are effec
Adam Jackson wrote:
> I don't really want to revive the thread about automake 1.11, but I do
> want to point out that it did break actual buildability:
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1761549&name=build.log
So xorg-x11-server needs a one-line patch to build again? I fail to
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> I don't really want to revive the thread about automake 1.11, but I do
> want to point out that it did break actual buildability:
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1761549&name=build.log
>
> Please, people. Don't update thi
Hi.
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 22:50:42 +0200, nodata wrote:
> Running on the compromised system, or running somewhere else?
> Where are you running rpm from?
Running from an external boot medium (CD/DVD/USB stick/whatever), not
from within the (possibly compromised) system itself. The known good
signa
68 matches
Mail list logo
