On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 11:38:20AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
- BADURL:base-file-name:$PACKAGENAME
This means that the URI provided in the Source(s) line didn't result in
a download of the source. This could be any of: URL changed, version
changed and URL wasn't updated, Site is down,
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 09:59:06PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 01/06/2010 09:24 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 11:38:20AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
- BADURL:base-file-name:$PACKAGENAME
This means that the URI provided in the Source(s) line didn't result
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 08:22:09PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 19:21 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
git clone git://publictest5.fedoraproject.org/git/pkgs/kernel
This was the wrong path:
git clone git://publictest5.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/kernel
I'm on vacation,
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:54:44PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 15:49 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
I'm on vacation, but I couldn't resist taking a look-see.
Something looks odd. It appears to have collapsed every CVS branch
onto the master git branch instead
There's some obvious bugs below in a bunch of packages.
The 2nd and 3rd arguments to memset calls are the wrong way around.
I found these after grepping through a make prep'd devel/ tree.
15 hits out of 100G of source code isn't that bad, but we can do better!
Dave
Checking
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 01:58:38PM -0500, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 01:43:13PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
There's some obvious bugs below in a bunch of packages.
The 2nd and 3rd arguments to memset calls are the wrong way around.
I found these after grepping through
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 04:13:39PM -0500, Casey Dahlin wrote:
Most recent 32-bit Intels can address 32GB of system memory.
It might be possible, but it's really not a good idea.
Even 16GB is pushing it. At that point, your lower 1GB of memory is so full
of page structs, that quickly invoking
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 08:48:03AM -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
Hi,
/sbin/installkernel doesn't pass --dracut to /sbin/new-kernel-pkg, so a
make install from a kernel.org kernel tree tries to
invoke /sbin/mkinitrd rather than dracut. Is that intentional?
Also, any ideas on why a
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 10:53:19AM -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
The problem I have is that some folks want to include additional drivers
into their initrd.
examples please.
Dave
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 08:30:14AM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
Quick summary: use this tool:
http://clang-analyzer.llvm.org/
If you're not using its scan-build tool, then start. Right now.
Really. It's that good.
Recently I've run it on a variety of packages, from coreutils
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 01:15:40PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
I added a path to the clang bin/ dir, and copied scan-build to my ~/bin
and then ran with 'make defconfig ; scan-build -o clang make bzImage'
Am I missing something obvious ?
It may be that the kernel defines $(CC) to
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 08:44:00AM -0400, James Laska wrote:
top post
Heads up for anyone installing from rawhide today. A fix didn't land in
time for anaconda-12.19 (see bug#520791), I've built an updates.img
(http://jlaska.fedorapeople.org/520791-updates.img) for anyone
interested
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 01:36:26PM -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 08/27/2009 01:21 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
What is the policy regarding deletion of individual entries in the
middle of %changelog?
A developer added a %changelog entry to each of my cloud daemons'
packages, on
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:13:10AM -0500, Joe Nall wrote:
On Aug 18, 2009, at 5:16 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Hi
Is there a reason that since longer time 2.6.29-Kernels for Fedora
10 landing in
Updates-testing followed with 2.6.27-Builds in the meantime?
On machines
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 04:53:54PM +0200, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
Hello.
Starting with F11 kmemleak is part of the kernel
huh? It's never been on in F11. In fact, the code isn't even present as
an option there. (It's a post 2.6.30 feature)
In rawhide, it was switched on for about a week a
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 04:41:46AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 07/24/2009 04:37 AM, Michał Bentkowski wrote:
Hi, due to lack of time and losing some enthusiasm, I want to orphan
following packages:
aria2 -- High speed download utility with resuming and segmented
downloading
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 11:21:58AM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
kernel-2.6.31-0.42.rc2.fc12
---
* Sat Jul 04 2009 Chuck Ebbert cebb...@redhat.com
- 2.6.31-rc1-git11
* Sat Jul 04 2009 Dave Jones da...@redhat.com 2.6.31-0.42.rc2
- 2.6.31-rc2
* Fri Jul 03
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 04:53:27PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 08:08:40PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
In tomorrows rawhide kernel, I've enabled a debugging option
called kmemleak. As the name suggests, this tracks memory allocations,
and prints backtraces
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 11:24:35PM +0930, Glen Turner wrote:
F12 x86 will not work on i586 (or i686 without CMOV)
Intel Pentium
Intel Pentium Pro
VIA Cyrix III
VIA C3 and C3-M (Samuel 2)
VIA C3 and C3-M (Ezra)
VIA C3 and C3-M
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 04:56:07PM -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
I *wish* it made a difference. I did an upgrade am an left with a host
of fc10 packages because the fc11 ones weren't considered newer.
For example people with updates-testing enabled on fc10 got a
non-upgraded yum
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 08:37:40PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
I've orphaned the fxload, unison213, unison227 packages. unison* have
reverted ownership to gemi. fxload now has no maintainer.
Unfortunately, with a young child, busy job, and the fact I switched my
PC to Ubuntu, I'm not
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 01:53:13PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Way back when in February [1], FESCo decided that for Fedora 11, i586 would
be the default architecture, and for Fedora 12, it would be some variant of
i686. It's time to follow through on that action item.
I've submitted
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 09:57:56PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 15.06.09 09:15, James Morris (jmor...@namei.org) wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 10:04:46PM -0600, Callum Lerwick wrote:
Especially with yum backed network installs becoming available. If you
don't want to download and burn an entire DVD iso, just download a
10-50mb network install iso. This is what I do with debian on the rare
occasion I
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 11:35:47PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Dave Jones (da...@redhat.com) said:
I'm not claiming to be representative of the majority of Fedora users,
but given there are a lot of Fedora users less fortunate than myself,
I believe that discontinuing CD iso's would
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 09:28:16AM +, Brian wrote:
I've been struggling trying to get my USB bluetooth dongle to work on
my i586 based MiniITX since I started trying FC5 (Test 3).
The same BT dongle worked fine under the old FC4 installation.
From what I can see,
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 11:45:23PM +, Brian wrote:
Hi,
I've been struggling trying to get my USB bluetooth dongle to work on
my i586 based MiniITX since I started trying FC5 (Test 3).
The same BT dongle worked fine under the old FC4 installation.
From what I can see, in the
27 matches
Mail list logo
