/programmer_reference/changelog_4.8.26.html#id1655375
Thanks,
Jindrich
--
Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 05:03:21PM +0100, Christoph Höger wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 22.12.2009, 15:09 +0100 schrieb Jindrich Novy:
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:45:52AM +0100, Christoph Höger wrote:
Hi all,
after texlive 2009 crashed my latex compiling process one day before I
wanted
No package texlive-scheme-full available.
Nothing to do
Shouldn't that work?
Confirmed. I rewrote the the upstream - Fedora repo script from
scratch where an error occured. It is fixed so please try again now.
Jindrich
--
Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com http://people.redhat.com/jnovy
cases are presented on the PXZ homepage.
Thanks,
Jindrich
--
Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
rebuild as these are not present in the compat-db
package.
Thanks,
Jindrich
--
Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Hi Jonathan,
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 10:30:44PM +, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
2009/10/30 Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com:
I'm presenting a complete list of packages shipped in TeX Live to
discuss another possible obsoletions:
dvipdfm
dvipdfmx
I think the latest TeXLive doesn't
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 09:27:08PM -0500, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
Latest F11 texlive-2009 update complains about dependencies of the new
packages (which have .fc12 version suffixes!) on
libpoppler.so.5()(64bit).
It is now fixed.
Jindrich
--
Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com http
.
Jindrich
--
Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
-Math = 2009 is needed by package
texlive-collection-fontsextra-2009-2.13989.fc12.noarch (installed)
Fixed.
--
Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel
evince against the new libkpathsea. For now, I suggest to remove
evince-dvi, install TeX Live and rebuild evince locally from fedora CVS.
Then you can install evince-dvi from your local build which will be
linked against the TeX Live 2009's kpathsea.
Jindrich
--
Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com http
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 08:09:38AM -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
Jindrich Novy wrote:
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 07:37:54PM -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
-- Processing Dependency: texlive-Asana-Math = 2009 for package:
texlive- collection-fontsextra-2009-2.13989.fc12.noarch
--- Package texlive
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 05:37:32PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 06:53:25AM -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
Lots of errors like these:
Error: Missing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.11)(64bit) is needed by
package
texlive
scriptlets from an old installation of
TeX Live. Just reinstalling all TL packages in this case so that TL has
correct scriptlets will help.
Jindrich
--
Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https
of texlive-kpathsea-
doc-2009-2.15842.fc12.noarch conflicts with file from package
kpathsea-2007-46.fc11.x86_64
Both conflicts are now fixed.
--
Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https
--
Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
and info pages are installed to texmf/doc/{info,man}
by TeX Live and aren't actually visible to info/man. I'll fix it in
the next update.
Jindrich
--
Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https
the texlive directory after removal of the main
package in order to not to leave empty directories in
/usr/share/texlive RPM didn't remove itself for some reason.
It is now fixed with the current packages in the repository.
Jindrich
--
Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com http://people.redhat.com
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 05:26:25PM +, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
2009/10/29 Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com:
Currently I'm trying to not to replace any package that has a separate
upstream and is already packaged separatelly in Fedora.
IMO I think we'd be better off adopting
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:59:30AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
Jindrich Novy wrote:
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 03:05:34PM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
I wonder if texlive should include a /etc/profile.d package to set
TEXMFCNF,
so that other packages, such as xdvipdfmx will work? Or, should
it in the texmf.cnf kpathsea configuration file
directly in the new TL2009 update.
Jindrich
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
--
Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/
--
fedora-devel
kpathsea) together with TL2009. Up to now you
needed to remove all applications dependent on kpathsea because of its
dependency on TL2007 which is removed now.
Jiri
Jindrich
--
Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel
repository, please consider removing it and installing again.
Thanks,
Jindrich
--
Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 08:30:37AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
Jindrich Novy wrote:
Hi,
I would like to announce couple of major changes in the TeX Live 2009
repository.
Where?
In the Fedora TeX Live 2009 testing repository, for more info:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features
/YGqeWg9536I8L9ugVFDnEwq958DRznB0FKCVpycnph1zMofGviLkrVv
vjL/wtA8bfitn/xgR24o
=8Hkv
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
--
Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/
--
fedora
which was dropped by upstream you
shouldn't experience lots of incompatibilities.
For testing you can use packages from this scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1730146
Jindrich
--
Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/
--
fedora-devel-list
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 09:32:08AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 01:49:49PM +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
Hi!
Oracle released a new DB 4.8.24 recently and it is now ready to hit
rawhide. Before that happens I want to let you test your package(s)
You mean devel/dist-f13
/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
--
Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 05:10:58PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 Jindrich Novy wrote:
Hi,
first off, thanks many people who sent me RFE and bugfix
proposals. I've tried to fix most of them in the current package set
in the testing repository:
OK, I have finally
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 05:16:41PM -0400, Horst H. von Brand wrote:
José Matos jama...@fc.up.pt wrote:
On Friday 04 September 2009 Jindrich Novy wrote:
It should be fixed now altogether with new packages in the repository.
Jindrich
One (really) minor hiccup, when installing all
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 06:47:58PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
On Thursday 27 August 2009 Jindrich Novy wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 03:02:18PM +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
Hi,
first off, thanks many people who sent me RFE and bugfix
proposals. I've tried to fix most of them
University Math Sciences
mjs AT clemson DOT edu
http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
--
Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/
--
fedora-devel
. should work fine now.
Jindrich
Cheers
Stefan.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
--
Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel
,
Jindrich
Martin
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
--
Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:40:25PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 Jindrich Novy wrote:
Hi,
first off, thanks many people who sent me RFE and bugfix
proposals. I've tried to fix most of them in the current package set
in the testing repository:
rpm -i
http
libkpathsea soname.
Jindrich
Jindrich Novy wrote:
Hi,
first off, thanks many people who sent me RFE and bugfix
proposals. I've tried to fix most of them in the current package set
in the testing repository:
rpm -i
http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-
release-2009
will announce next repo updates here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:Features/TeXLive
Thanks,
Jindrich
--
Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 03:07:19PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jindrich Novy wrote:
Nope, it is intentional. It is needed to somehow distinguish the
noarch and arch-dependent part. So package texlive-csplain contains
the noarch bits and texlive-csplain.ARCH ships the binaries.
Wouldn't
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 04:21:35PM +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 17:10 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 04:48:49PM +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
It seems your spec making program has some bugs, as some packages have
names such as texlive-csplain.ARCH
Jindrich
--
Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 04:48:49PM +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 14:44 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
Hi,
TeX Live 2009 pretest is now available via external repository for
testing in Fedora:
rpm -Uhv
http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-release-2009-0.1
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 03:38:57PM +0100, Mary Ellen Foster wrote:
2009/8/20 Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com:
Thanks for noticing. I've tested only upgrade from texlive-2007
installation with no dvipdfmx installed. I'll fix it in the next
repo update.
Another related upgrade issue
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 04:03:54PM +0200, Pavel Lisy wrote:
Jindrich Novy píše v Čt 20. 08. 2009 v 14:44 +0200:
Hi,
TeX Live 2009 pretest is now available via external repository for
testing in Fedora:
rpm -Uhv
http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-release-2009-0.1.fc11
of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
--
Jindrich Novy jn
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 05:11:31PM +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
2009/8/20 Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com:
2009/8/20 Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com:
Maybe a good idea is to start directly with TeX Live 2009 in Fedora
because TL 2008 has different package set and TL 2009 contains
Hi Norbert,
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 06:33:26PM +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
Hi Jindrich,
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009, Jindrich Novy wrote:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/TeXLive
How do you handle installation of
texlive-scheme-*
since the schemes are overlapping? AFAIR rpm does
- J
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
--
Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 08:10:07AM +, Matej Cepl wrote:
Jindrich Novy, Sun, 28 Jun 2009 01:21:34 +0200:
This is caused by the fact that the /usr/share/texmf exists on your
system. The new texlive needs to replace it with symlink and RPM doesn't
allow to do that if the directory already
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 02:36:37AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jindrich Novy wrote:
This is caused by the fact that the /usr/share/texmf exists on your
system. The new texlive needs to replace it with symlink and RPM
doesn't allow to do that if the directory already exists. Please remove
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:17:47AM +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
2009/6/29 Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 08:10:07AM +, Matej Cepl wrote:
I think dvipdfm is maintained by you as well, isn't it?
Nope, dvipdfm is maintained by Jonathan G. Underwood (jgu
fedora package maintainers to fix them. In case you are a
maintainer of such package please send me an email to jn...@redhat.com
so that we can sort it out on the TeX Live side (packages maintained
separately are preferred).
Thanks,
Jindrich
--
Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com http
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 03:26:53PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
On Saturday 27 June 2009 13:41:42 Jindrich Novy wrote:
Note that it is in testing state so (many) bugs could occur. There are
possible clashes with applications packaged separately (such as
dvipdfmx, etc.) so we may want to discuss
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 09:24:47PM +, Matej Cepl wrote:
Matej Cepl, Sat, 27 Jun 2009 21:21:43 +:
Jindrich Novy, Sat, 27 Jun 2009 14:41:42 +0200:
then you can do:
# yum install texlive
Installing :
texlive-2008-0.1.fc11.x86_642/92
Error
52 matches
Mail list logo
