Re: dist-git proof of concept phase 1 complete

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 03:21, Jesse Keating wrote: > [...] > Currently I only have anonymous git:// access setup, as we play with > some options for authenticated writing.[...] Gitosis which is already in fedora does a pretty good job of this including key based auth as well as multiple authoriz

Re: x86-64 on i386 (was Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?)

On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 00:20, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 16:19:54 -0600, >  Chris Adams wrote: >> >> That would be AMD that fixed it, not Intel.  Intel tried to push >> everybody to a new architecture (Itanium), while AMD revised and >> extended i386 to 64 bits.  After Itan

Re: tcl / tk without threads??!!

2009/8/7 Paulo Cavalcanti : > > Can someone explain why tcl/tk is > compiled using: > > %configure --disable-threads A search through the spec file links back to this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443246 -- There are 10 kinds of people in the world: Those who understand binar

Re: More Fedora mock breakage

2009/7/31 Tom Lane : > I'm getting a pile of these: > > ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve: > rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) is needed by exim-4.69-12.fc12.x86_64 > rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) is needed by crontabs-1.10-31.fc12.noarch > rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) is needed by logrotate-3.7.8-3.fc12.x86_64 > rpmlib(Paylo

Re: new to list, first post

2009/7/30 > Is Fedora really gaining that much ground with every bi-yearly release to > justify that pace? Regular release are pretty much a requirement for providing large numbers or large scale updates. Providing some of these large scale updates just arent practical without breaking an existin

Re: Red Hat Bugzilla Front Page query "In Progress" broken

2009/7/21 Edwin ten Brink : > On 07/21/2009 09:34 PM, Ricky Zhou wrote: >> >> On 2009-07-21 09:25:57 PM, Edwin ten Brink wrote: >> >>> >>> I'm not sure where to file this bug against Red Hat Bugzilla. >>> >>> On my Red Hat Bugzilla Front Page, under "Open Issues: In Progress >>> Reported by You", n

Re: Against what do I file this bug?

2009/7/16 Stefan Hartsuiker : > On Thu, July 16, 2009 16:33, John5342 wrote: >> 2009/7/16 Stefan Hartsuiker : >>> On Wed, July 15, 2009 17:31, Matthew Woehlke wrote: >>>> S.A. Hartsuiker wrote: >>>>> On 07/15/2009 01:24 AM, Matthew Woehlke wrote: &g

Re: Against what do I file this bug?

2009/7/16 Stefan Hartsuiker : > On Wed, July 15, 2009 17:31, Matthew Woehlke wrote: >> S.A. Hartsuiker wrote: >>> On 07/15/2009 01:24 AM, Matthew Woehlke wrote: This sounds like an initrd problem to me, but I am no expert. >>> >>>  Uhm, no. I am in the ''Fedora Interactive'' bit, the >>> /etc/

Re: F11 updates?

2009/7/10 Peter Robinson : > Hi All, > > Is there an issue with F11 updates, I don't remember seeing anything > on the list about it but AFAICT it seems there's not been an updates > push for around 2 weeks. Last updates i saw where 3rd and 4th July which is a while ago but hardly 2 weeks. Other t

Re: Feature proposal: Extended Life Cycle Support

2009/7/8 Ding Yi Chen : > > - "Kevin Kofler" wrote: > >> Ding-Yi Chen wrote: >> > Therefore, I would like to propose an alternative approach, >> > namely, project Denture. See my blog post for further information: >> > http://dingyichen.livejournal.com/14055.html >> > >> > Any comments? >> >>

Re: Feature proposal: Extended Life Cycle Support

2009/7/8 Ding Yi Chen : > > - "John5342" wrote: > >> 2009/7/7 Ding-Yi Chen : >> > >> > 於 二，2009-07-07 於 14:44 +0100，John5342 提到： >> >> 2009/7/7 Ding-Yi Chen : >> >> > >> >> > Any comments? >> >

Re: an update to automake-1.11?

2009/7/7 Ville Skyttä : > On Tuesday 07 July 2009, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> Ville Skyttä wrote: >> > The FSF seems to disagree with that. >> > >> > http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/manual/html_node/Distributing.html#D >> >istributing >> >> That applies to the automatically copied shell code, but

Re: Feature proposal: Extended Life Cycle Support

2009/7/7 Ding-Yi Chen : > > 於 二，2009-07-07 於 14:44 +0100，John5342 提到： >> 2009/7/7 Ding-Yi Chen : >> > >> > Any comments? >> >> In theory your proposal sounds great but i see just one major flaw >> that probably doesn't have a solution. Your

Re: Feature proposal: Extended Life Cycle Support

2009/7/7 Ding-Yi Chen : > > 於 日，2009-07-05 於 12:32 +0200，Jeroen van Meeuwen 提到： >> On 07/05/2009 12:12 PM, Jos Vos wrote: >> > On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 12:03:05PM +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: >> > >> >> The CentOS project, or it's upstream, has a release cycle of approximately >> >> three years

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] dracut-0.3

2009/7/2 Harald Hoyer : > On 07/02/2009 01:25 PM, Daniel Drake wrote: >> >> On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 13:14 +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote: >>> >>> The idea is to pregenerate a generic initrd and package it in an rpm and >>> deliver >>> it together with the kernel. There should be no need to generate the >>

Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26

2009/6/26 Seth Vidal : > I suggest everyone cut the drama. We're talking about whether or not the > live cd is labeled as 'gnome desktop' or leaving it as it currently is which > says: 'fedora 11 desktop edition: featuring the gnome desktop'. I see a very big difference. I look at http://fedorapro

Re: Heads up: NoArch Sub Packages Feature continues

2009/6/15 Seth Vidal > > > On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Rex Dieter wrote: > > Seth Vidal wrote: >> >> >>> So if you're on x86_64 >>> >>> and you have foo-1.1.i386 and foo-1.0.x86_64 >>> >>> and you run: >>> >>> yum install foo >>> >>> you would expect foo-1.1.i386 to be installed instead of foo-1.0.x86_

Re: BlueJ Advice Needed

2009/6/9 Frank Murphy (Frankly3d) : > Hoping to package BlueJ. > http://www.bluej.org/about/what.html > > > Q1: > http://www.bluej.org/download/download.html > Downloadable jar file, (and use contents of) > or > http://www.bluej.org/download/source-download.html > Contains mix of Win\Mac\*nix stuff