Re: Ubuntu shows updates / security updates on shell logins

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > It's actually a security risk to display this to non-admin users. It's like > putting a sticker on your door saying "This door is not locked because my > keyhole is not working." > By that logic, Packagekit displaying that to endusers is the

Re: fedora-pkgdb: make it discoverable on browser home page?

On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Matthias Clasen > wrote: > > My initial idea was to make this a 'top 10 apps', ie be selective, > > instead of trying to be all-inclusive and make the user scroll through > > dozens of pages with niche apps..

Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 11 - 2009-08-20

On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:20:54 -0500, Juan wrote: > > > I maintain beagle, and although I did add the Excludes directive to it, > the > > reason I haven't pushed the update is because it doesn't actually fix > > anything other than prevent

Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 11 - 2009-08-20

I maintain beagle, and although I did add the Excludes directive to it, the reason I haven't pushed the update is because it doesn't actually fix anything other than prevent that annoying email from being sent out. Besides, beagle worked fine for PPC64 users on Fedora 11 at some point. -- Ing. J

Re: Fedora 11 / EPEL 5 MD5 Issue

On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Rick L. Vinyard, Jr. wrote: > I've built the following package on Fedora 10 and 11 in mock without any > problems. > http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/libMini-9.0.3-2.fc11.src.rpm > > However, when I try and build for EPEL 5 using mock on a F11 machine I get >

Re: glipper (was Re: Purging the F12 orphans)

On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Conrad Meyer wrote: > On Tuesday 14 July 2009 12:01:26 pm Christoph Wickert wrote: > > Am Dienstag, den 14.07.2009, 13:23 -0500 schrieb Juan Rodriguez: > > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Jesse Keating > > > wrote: > > &

Re: Purging the F12 orphans

On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: > Unblocked orphan glipper > If noone's taking care of glipper, I'll have to sign up, as I actually *depend* on glipper to function properly. Co-maintainers welcome. -- Ing. Juan M. Rodriguez Moreno Desarrollador de Sistemas Abiertos Sitio

Re: beagle

On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:43 AM, drago01 wrote: > Juan just took ownership of beagle, so the issue (not having a > maintainer) is solved now. > However, if anyone wants to co-maintain the package, feel free to do so. :) -- Ing. Juan M. Rodriguez Moreno Desarrollador de Sistemas Abiertos Siti

Re: beagle

On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:07 AM, drago01 wrote: > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Toshio Kuratomi > wrote: > > On 07/14/2009 04:16 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > >> On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:48:33 +0200, Michael wrote: > >> > >>> * Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: > >>> > >>>

Re: Feature proposal: Extended Life Cycle Support

On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 5:39 AM, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Sun, 2009-07-05 at 12:03 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: > > The CentOS project, or it's upstream, has a release cycle of > approximately > > three years -not a steady release cycle of three years but that's what it > > turns out to be.