On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 10:52 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 19:21 +0100, Martin Sourada wrote:
> > So,
> >
> > since I've already received 3 separate bug reports caused by BadIDChoice
> > X Error in subtitleeditor [1][2][3] (haven't had en
So,
since I've already received 3 separate bug reports caused by BadIDChoice
X Error in subtitleeditor [1][2][3] (haven't had enough time to debug
and try to fix it yet though) by abrt, I wonder if there is any room for
duplicity detection improvement in these cases, or if we are doomed to
zillio
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 21:45 -0200, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
> Can you post this info in the bug report ?
I was just about to at your request (I think one of the two places is
enough ;-) but noticed that Nathan was faster in applying relevant
changes. Note that I haven't done a throughout check, o
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 16:10 -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> Hello,
>I just posted my first review request a few days ago. I think someone
> has been trying to help me through that process. Up to now I've felt
> like I've been following instructions. Could someone please review the
> info
Package texlive-dvips is obsoleted by texlive, trying to install
texlive-2009-0.3.20090827.fc11.i586 instead
This is obviously wrong obsolete, as dvips is actually provided by
texlive-dvips, but for some reason unless I tell yum to specifically
install the noarch package (by running yum install
te
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 16:29 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 03:53:06PM +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
> Please be sure you remove all the old formats generated with the old
> TeX Live. In most cases clearing the /var/lib/texmf/ and ~/.texlive* contents
> should
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 15:40 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
> progressed smoothly, haven't tried runtime yet (though, seeing that your
So, just noticed I needed to install texlive-csplain in order to have
it, but it does not work:
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-1.40.10 (Web2C 2009)
re
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 14:44 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> TeX Live 2009 pretest is now available via external repository for
> testing in Fedora:
>
> rpm -Uhv
> http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-release-2009-0.1.fc11.noarch.rpm
>
> Maybe a good idea is to start directly with
On Sun, 2009-08-16 at 11:21 +0200, Christoph Höger wrote:
> Well on fedora 10 it cannot connect to irc. Which makes it pretty
> unusable.
Well, it can connect to irc for me on F11...
Martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fed
Hi,
I've just built this and seems like some of the runtime deps were
raised, so far I've noticed gstreamer-python-0.10.16, you should bump
the dep in spec as well.
Martin
On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 18:30 +, Jeffrey C. Ollie wrote:
> Author: jcollie
>
> Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pitivi/F-11
> In
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 10:33 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> Sorry for the late warning, but today is the alpha freeze for Fedora 12.
> Shortly I will be creating f12-alpha and cloning dist-f12 into it. I'll
> keep it updated so that any build that happens up until tonight's
> rawhide compose (0600 U
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 16:40 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> I've now generated the first of the mass rebuild status pages.
>
> http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/needed-f12-rebuilds.html
mso (1):
invinxble-backgrounds
This is a false positive. I've marked this package as DEAD in cvs
(licensin
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 10:58 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 09:40 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> >
> > It's that time of the release cycle again, to purge the orphans before
> > we get to feature freeze. Any unblocked orphans will be purged by the
> > 28th of this month. Here
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 20:12 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> We are talking about a live cd installation, yes? You can close the
> installer then.
>
Yes, and reboot in order to be able to use the installed system. The
suggested feature is, as I understand it, trying to make this reboot
optional, i.e
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 02:04 -0600, Douglas McClendon wrote:
> Fedorans,
>
> Can you spare 50 or 100K? If you can spare 100K/700M in the forthcoming
> Fedora-12 LiveCD, I can provide you with a rebootless installation
> experience.
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/RebootlessInstaller
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 14:07 +0200, Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) wrote:
> Look at your /etc/profile (or ~/.bash_profile, I don't remember).
>
> There should be something like:
> [ -d ~/bin ] && PATH=~/bin:$PATH
>
> Which means that the folder will be added to your PATH if it exists.
Well, I have ther
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 13:31 +0200, Stefan Assmann wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering why there's no $HOME/bin directory and $HOME/bin not
> mentioned in the $PATH variable. Any particular reason not to have that
> by default?
>
>Stefan
Hi,
because most people don't need it? Well, I would n
On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 13:10 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
> Then the description need changing:
>
> Description wpa_supplicant is a WPA Supplicant for Linux, BSD and
> Windows with support for WPA and WPA2 (IEEE 802.11i / RSN). Supplicant
> is the IEEE 802.1X/WPA component that is used in the clien
On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 12:14 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
> Why does yum erase wireless-tools want to:
> Removing for dependencies:
> anaconda
> firstboot
> rhpl
> system-config-(boot,date,date-docs,firewall,
> firewall-tui,keyboard,kickstart,language,lvm,
> network,network-tui,rootpassword,users,user
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 23:53 +0200, David Nielsen wrote:
>
>
> 2009/6/19 Peter Robinson
>
> mono-tools-2.4.2-1.fc12
> ---
> * Tue Jun 09 2009 Paul F. Johnson
> - 2.4.2-1
> - Bump to 2.4.2
On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 22:19 -0400, Charles Butterfield wrote:
> * Root gdm login - gets harder every release - SHAME ON YOU root
> nazis!
You can always init 3, login as root and startx if you *really need*
graphical root login (or use su in gnome-terminal or whatever gui
terminal is
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 12:53:07PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> Or consider "Recommends: B >= 1.2" - what exactly does this mean? The
> package does something "better" if B is installed too, but what if we
> only have B 1.0 installed/available. Does the package even work with B
> 1.0? If it
22 matches
Mail list logo
