On Tuesday 24 November 2009 22:49:53 Matěj Cepl wrote:
Dne 24.11.2009 22:37, Adam Williamson napsal(a):
We came up with several possible courses of action. First, we
acknowledge that abrt team is working on improving duplicate detection,
but Matej noted that this is intrinsically hard work
On Wednesday 21 October 2009 23:27:31 Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 15:16 +0800, Liang Suilong wrote:
Today I upgrade my Fedora to Fedora 12 Beta, It looks very well. But I
found ATi display driver does not run well.
My display card is Sapphire HD3650 with 256MB GDDR3
this, please share.
Thanks,
Michal Hlavinka
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Friday 09 October 2009 15:31:45 Michal Hlavinka wrote:
The most important question is: Is there anything that requires these files
can be read and written by mail group?
Well, I already know one, cyrus-imapd most probably requires mail rw. Is there
anything else?
--
fedora-devel-list
This reminds me your note:
https://tango.0pointer.de/pipermail/pulseaudio-discuss/2009-July/004519.htm
l
PA does not make use of hardware mixing. And I don't plan to change
that. It's obsolete technology. CPUs these days come with extensions
such as MMX or SSE precisely for
On Wednesday 29 July 2009 15:16:20 Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 29.07.09 12:33, Michal Hlavinka (mhlav...@redhat.com) wrote:
This reminds me your note:
https://tango.0pointer.de/pipermail/pulseaudio-discuss/2009-July/004519
.htm l
PA does not make use of hardware
Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 02:08:55PM +0200, Ondřej Vašík wrote:
Stefan Assmann wrote:
Hi all,
I was wondering why there's no $HOME/bin directory and $HOME/bin not
mentioned in the $PATH variable. Any particular reason not to have that
by default?
$HOME/bin
On Wednesday 08 July 2009 16:30:56 Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Christoph Höger on 07/08/2009 09:21 AM wrote:
how do I do that?
I guess you can use Delete/Unpush/Revoke request or something like that in
bodhi web interface.
Since you have not submitted it for stable I do not see any problem.
On Monday 29 June 2009 12:48:11 David wrote:
Re the discussion at
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-June/msg01991.html
The below suggestion tries to satisfy all parties:
- it presents a neutral default
- it presents a simple choice for newbie who doesnt know what a
Hello,
I don't want to start a long thread, but just to ask a couple questions for
my own clarification. Does a maintainer's responsibilities end with
packaging bugs? IOW, if there is a problem in the package that is _broken
code_ do they need to do something about it or is it acceptable for
1. How did you find out about Fedora Test Days?
fedora-devel-list
2. Was sufficient documentation available to help you participate in a
Fedora Test Day? If not, what did you find missing or in need of
improvement?
mostly, see examples:
good:
Test Day:2009-03-26 Nouveau
/sbin/lspci -d
What if upstream answers: ok, thanks for bug report, please try this
patch... or I've fixed it in repo, please try svn snapshot, if it's
fixed for you?
In that case we can roll a fixed package (e.g. as a scratch build). (If
upstream says try a current snapshot, it should be fixed, I'll
There is much more information that can be pulled via a turbogrears
app we are running. But I am looking to see what is useful in terms
of a weekly report. I have the date tuesday to tuesday as it matches
up with the Bugzappers meeting time.
Hi,
thanks for the stats. I'd like to see there
13 matches
Mail list logo
