Re: Firefox SELinux bug from Alpha Blockers meeting.

2009-08-10 Thread Bill Nottingham
Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) (boche...@fedoraproject.org) said: > I just wanted to know if I should open a new bug report for Epiphany > as SEAlert got confused or if it is indeed the same bug, in which case > I'll be patient. See bug 516057. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-li

Re: Firefox SELinux bug from Alpha Blockers meeting.

2009-08-08 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 11:06, Matěj Cepl wrote: > Adam Miller writes: > >> Today in our F12Alpha Blocker meeting we discussed the status of the >> Firefox SELinux bug. >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512845 >> >> And we were hoping to get in contact with caillon, stransky, jhorak

Re: Firefox SELinux bug from Alpha Blockers meeting.

2009-08-08 Thread Matěj Cepl
Adam Miller writes: > Today in our F12Alpha Blocker meeting we discussed the status of the > Firefox SELinux bug. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512845 > > And we were hoping to get in contact with caillon, stransky, jhorak > for more information on the bug as well as send this t

Re: Firefox SELinux bug from Alpha Blockers meeting.

2009-08-07 Thread Bill McGonigle
On 08/07/2009 03:40 PM, Adam Miller wrote: > to get any outside feedback that others might have on > the topic of this being a F12Alpha Blocker. it's a restricted-access bug. -Bill -- Bill McGonigle, Owner BFC Computing, LLC http://bfccomputing.com/ Email, IM, VOIP: b...@bfccomputing.com Teleph

Firefox SELinux bug from Alpha Blockers meeting.

2009-08-07 Thread Adam Miller
Today in our F12Alpha Blocker meeting we discussed the status of the Firefox SELinux bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512845 And we were hoping to get in contact with caillon, stransky, jhorak for more information on the bug as well as send this to the developer list in order to g