Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

2009/10/21 Jesse Keating : > On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 13:28 -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 06:22:04PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >> > IIUC, you're mis-interpreting the YUM output there. NetworkManager-gnome >> > doesn't have a dependancy on KDE, rather it happens to be

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Bill Nottingham wrote: Darryl L. Pierce (dpie...@redhat.com) said: You're correct in that removing the KDE group attempts to remove the NetworkManager-gnome rpm. I remembered uninstalling KDE also removed NetworkManager-gnome which borked my laptop until I re-installed th

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

On 10/21/2009 10:58 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 06:22:04PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >> IIUC, you're mis-interpreting the YUM output there. NetworkManager-gnome >> doesn't have a dependancy on KDE, rather it happens to be part of the >> "KDE (K Desktop Environment)

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

- "Jesse Keating" wrote: > On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 13:28 -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 06:22:04PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > IIUC, you're mis-interpreting the YUM output there. > NetworkManager-gnome > > > doesn't have a dependancy on KDE, rather it hap

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 13:28 -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 06:22:04PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > IIUC, you're mis-interpreting the YUM output there. NetworkManager-gnome > > doesn't have a dependancy on KDE, rather it happens to be part of the > > "KDE (K Deskto

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

Darryl L. Pierce (dpie...@redhat.com) said: > You're correct in that removing the KDE group attempts to remove the > NetworkManager-gnome rpm. I remembered uninstalling KDE also removed > NetworkManager-gnome which borked my laptop until I re-installed the > RPM. That's something that should be fi

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 06:22:04PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > IIUC, you're mis-interpreting the YUM output there. NetworkManager-gnome > doesn't have a dependancy on KDE, rather it happens to be part of the > "KDE (K Desktop Environment)" group. ie in doing a 'groupremove' > you explicitl

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 01:08:43PM -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:00:13AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 12:58 -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: > > > > > > And you can't uninstall KDE without killing gnome since > > > NetworkManager-gnome has a dep

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:00:13AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 12:58 -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: > > > > And you can't uninstall KDE without killing gnome since > > NetworkManager-gnome has a dependency on KDE... > > Um, what? Care to elaborate? http://www.pastebin.

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 12:58 -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: > > And you can't uninstall KDE without killing gnome since > NetworkManager-gnome has a dependency on KDE... Um, what? Care to elaborate? -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating signa

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 12:52:49PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > I suspect the problem with that is attempting to determine a universal > concept of 'offensive'. Heck, we might have no-offensive-packages-kde > that conflicts with 'gnome-*', and no-offensive-packages-gnome... And you can't uninst

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

Eric Springer (erik...@gmail.com) said: > > It's probably abusing the system and breaks a million guidelines, but what > about making a "no-offensive-packages" package that explicitly conflicts > with a list of offensive packages? I suspect the problem with that is attempting to determine a unive

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Steven James Drinnan wrote: > > Well any ideas, for me Package Kit would be the way to go. Then users > could add the packages or groups to the exclude list. Maybe an extra > password (optional) for parents / supervisors. > > Or like was mentioned a way to create

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

Wow this has really hit sore point, It just goes to show that there pro and cons on both sides. Like or not people want the ability to filter content that that deem unfit. Thats why I asked about it in the first place the concern was simple, I have young children and I installed a screamingly i

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 12:30 +0200, Josephine Tannhäuser wrote: > > > 2009/10/16 Steven James Drinnan > I recently installed gestikk. And to my horror one of the > dialogs said. > > (Check Box) F*** off > > No lie, > > So how

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, Muayyad AlSadi wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Offensive_Packages hahaha! what a bad joke! This thread needs to stop, too. If you wish to continue discussing it - please do so off-list. Thank You, -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Offensive_Packages hahaha! what a bad joke! not only you advertise pornography packages you give conclusions and according to which things you called "offensive packages" made a pornography packages equivalent to glorifying God (minbar package) how cheap this l

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

Dne 19.10.2009 13:27, Thomas Janssen napsal(a): > Well, this thread was disputable. But you crossed a line here. Some > idiots on this planet grab the same statement all the time when they > run out of arguments. This is not even acceptable as a "tongue in the > cheek". http://en.wikipedia.org/wik

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 01:59:50PM +0200, Josephine Tannh?user wrote: > 2009/10/19 Guido Grazioli > > > Come on guys, let this thread die. > > In other words, shut the > > export YUM_I_LIKE_BAD_WORDS=1 && yum -y install fuck > > up ;-) > > > f.u.c.k.u.p. the computer of Hagbard Celine? > My fa

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

2009/10/19 Thomas Janssen > Well, this thread was disputable. But you crossed a line here. Some > idiots on this planet grab the same statement all the time when they > run out of arguments. This is not even acceptable as a "tongue in the > cheek".

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

2009/10/19 Ismael Olea : > > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Josephine Tannhäuser > wrote: >> >> btw. I'm still missing Godwin's Law. It's a must for stupid >> nonsense-discussions, but I'm not missing it! > > > So, you are acting clearly as a Nazi! > Well, this thread was disputable. But yo

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

OMG Even 4chan is funnier than you -- Josephine "Fine" Tannhäuser 2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Josephine Tannhäuser < josephine.tannhau...@googlemail.com> wrote: > btw. I'm still missing Godwin's Law. It's a must for stupid > nonsense-discussions, but I'm not missing it! So, you are acting clearly as a Nazi! -- Ismael Olea http://olea.org/diario/ --

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

2009/10/19 Yaakov Nemoy > This is really a stupid thread. > Of course! But who is the stupid? The one who started this thread or those who answered it or those who wasting so much time to discuss about nonsense? -- Josephine "Fine" Tannhäuser 2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 -- fedora-devel-list maili

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

2009/10/19 Josephine Tannhäuser : > > > 2009/10/16 Steven James Drinnan >> >> I recently installed gestikk. And to my horror one of the dialogs said. >> >> (Check Box) F*** off >> >> No lie, >> >> So how does one recommend that this be removed. >> >> Steven >> >> -- >> fedora-devel-list mailing li

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

Dne 19.10.2009 02:39, Ismael Olea napsal(a): > bibletime.i586 : BibleTime is an easy to use Bible study tool for KDE > gnomesword.i586 : GNOME-based Bible research tool > kio_sword.i586 : A lightweight frontend for the Sword Bible project for KDE > sword.i586 : Free Bible Software Project > sword-d

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Ismael Olea wrote: > My 0.02€ More like your troll-cents. Despite the absurdity (of this whole thing, in fact) I've added a category and included it. And people can make up their own minds. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

> Maybe this could be added as a feature in future releases - there may > not be many packages that need to be added but it would give a big group > of users some peace of mind. IMHO if this kind of feature is accepted would be needed to do in other cases, for example about religion. In a fast se

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 09:35 +1000, Eric Springer wrote: > On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Steven James Drinnan wrote: > > I recently installed gestikk. And to my horror one of the dialogs said. > > Not sure if it's the best road to take, how ever I've created a page > in the wiki (that can be ed

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Steven James Drinnan wrote: > I recently installed gestikk. And to my horror one of the dialogs said. Not sure if it's the best road to take, how ever I've created a page in the wiki (that can be edited mercilessly or deleted if you think it'll just attract attent

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 03:28 +0200, Guido Grazioli wrote: > I didnt say i find profanity not offensive; also, i strongly agree > with your > point (*when* wouldnt profanity be considered gratuitous?). > > My question was, would you call that patch a "bugfix", or > "enhancement"? > Or it is just li

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

On 10/17/2009 06:58 AM, Guido Grazioli wrote: > My question was, would you call that patch a "bugfix", or "enhancement"? > Or it is just like the beep over a bad word on tv, and by all means you can > do that thanks to gpl? In this case, since the wording has already been fixed upstream, it woul

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

2009/10/17 Adam Williamson > On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 01:09 +0200, Guido Grazioli wrote: > > Is GPL really a way to freely censor a developer work, as in this > > case? > > If it were closed source, you wouldn't had the right to do that. > > > > That string is more stupid than offensive; and the esc

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 01:09 +0200, Guido Grazioli wrote: > Is GPL really a way to freely censor a developer work, as in this > case? > If it were closed source, you wouldn't had the right to do that. > > That string is more stupid than offensive; and the escalation found There are people who fin

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

Is GPL really a way to freely censor a developer work, as in this case? If it were closed source, you wouldn't had the right to do that. That string is more stupid than offensive; and the escalation found here, starting from the word fuck to things like sexism, racism and tolerance probably was mo

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

Just to make it clear, I just don't care about gnaughty presence or not in repositories. I'm not a Debian freak, you know :) I'm just worried that we might burden package maintainers with additional, boring and mostly useless censorship tasks. First, optional, then mandatory. Erm, if we were to t

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > * I volunteered to make the patch if the maintainer didn't want to do it. > (And then perhaps I can talk the reporter into submitting hte patch > upstream for me ;-) So this takes part of the time burden away. You might not even have to. I think, from only a little po

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 10:29:46PM +0200, Haïkel Guémar wrote: > Le 16/10/2009 19:19, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit : > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:58:39PM +0800, Steven James Drinnan wrote: > >> I recently installed gestikk. And to my horror one of the dialogs said. > >> > >> (Check Box) F*** off > >>

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

2009/10/16 Haïkel Guémar : > Le 16/10/2009 19:19, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit : >> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:58:39PM +0800, Steven James Drinnan wrote: >>> I recently installed gestikk. And to my horror one of the dialogs said. >>> >>> (Check Box) F*** off > > I recently came accross Gnaughty (aka Fas

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Haïkel Guémar wrote: > > > It's not really that offensive (sexist, racist, homophobic etc...), it's > not installed by default so it won't hurt our image. Anyone offended > should go complain to upstream, Fedora maintainers have no time to waste > on such petty is

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

Le 16/10/2009 19:19, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit : > On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:58:39PM +0800, Steven James Drinnan wrote: >> I recently installed gestikk. And to my horror one of the dialogs said. >> >> (Check Box) F*** off >> >> No lie, >> >> So how does one recommend that this be removed. >> > Wha

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

On Fri, 16 Oct 2009, Kevin Kofler wrote: Steven James Drinnan wrote: But my point was the image of Fedora.Does Fedora want be associated with software vendors that use this type of language? Why the fuck would we not? Is there something fucking wrong with the word "fuck"? Let's just fucking

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

Steven James Drinnan wrote: > But my point was the image of Fedora.Does Fedora want be associated with > software vendors that use this type of language? Why the fuck would we not? Is there something fucking wrong with the word "fuck"? Let's just fucking stop this fucking "politically correct" no

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:58:39PM +0800, Steven James Drinnan wrote: > I recently installed gestikk. And to my horror one of the dialogs said. > > (Check Box) F*** off > > No lie, > > So how does one recommend that this be removed. > What we'll probably do is patch the code to have a less ob

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

Steven James Drinnan (ste...@scc.hk) said: > I will file a ticket. > > But my point was the image of Fedora.Does Fedora want be associated with > software vendors that use this type of language? There are worse things in the package collection, alas, depending on your point of view. In any cas

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 01:10:09PM +0400, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > 2009/10/16 Rahul Sundaram : > > On 10/16/2009 02:29 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > > > >> You see, I personally prefer to live in the society with some level of > >> aggressively thinking and speaking minorities, rather than in dark > >

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

On 10/16/2009 02:40 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > Civil and decent behavior is to be tolerant to others, right? So, > please, be tolerant to sexists/racists/-ists. Quite the opposite. You are really confused about what being civil and decent actually means. If someone is being sexist or racist towa

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

2009/10/16 Rahul Sundaram : > On 10/16/2009 02:29 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > >> You see, I personally prefer to live in the society with some level of >> aggressively thinking and speaking minorities, rather than in dark >> ages of censorship, brainwashing and hypocrisy. > You seem to be equating

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

On 10/16/2009 02:29 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > You see, I personally prefer to live in the society with some level of > aggressively thinking and speaking minorities, rather than in dark > ages of censorship, brainwashing and hypocrisy. You seem to be equating "aggressive thinking" with sexism a

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

2009/10/16 Till Maas : > You may also want to think about whether you really find it great that > there's sexism on the internet, because you might have confused it with > sexual content. No, I meant sexism. I thought, that sexism is modern trend nowadays, since almost every OSS-related rss-feed

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 10:48:24AM +0400, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > Please, disconnect yourself from the Internet asap, because it's full > of obscene videos, jokes, sexism and so on. And that's great! Even if something is on the internet, this does not meant that it has a place within the Fedora C

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

2009/10/16 Steven James Drinnan : > I will file  a ticket. > > But my point was the image of Fedora.Does Fedora want be associated with > software vendors that use this type of language? Please, disconnect yourself from the Internet asap, because it's full of obscene videos, jokes, sexism and so o

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

On Thursday 15 October 2009 11:39:26 pm Steven James Drinnan wrote: > I will file a ticket. > > But my point was the image of Fedora.Does Fedora want be associated with > software vendors that use this type of language? > > Steven Absolutely! As long as the software is good, I don't care what k

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

On 10/16/2009 12:09 PM, Steven James Drinnan wrote: > I will file a ticket. > > But my point was the image of Fedora.Does Fedora want be associated with > software vendors that use this type of language? They aren't usually vendors. They are usually just hobbyists. It would be good to highlight

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

I will file a ticket. But my point was the image of Fedora.Does Fedora want be associated with software vendors that use this type of language? Steven On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 07:31 +0200, Haïkel Guémar wrote: > Le 16/10/2009 06:58, Steven James Drinnan a écrit : > > I recently installed gestikk.

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

I will file a ticket. But my point was the image of Fedora.Does Fedora want be associated with software vendors that use this type of language? Steven On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 07:31 +0200, Haïkel Guémar wrote: > Le 16/10/2009 06:58, Steven James Drinnan a écrit : > > I recently installed gestikk.

Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

Le 16/10/2009 06:58, Steven James Drinnan a écrit : > I recently installed gestikk. And to my horror one of the dialogs said. > > (Check Box) F*** off > > No lie, > > So how does one recommend that this be removed. > > Steven > File a ticket upstream. The string itself is in the .glade file

Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.

I recently installed gestikk. And to my horror one of the dialogs said. (Check Box) F*** off No lie, So how does one recommend that this be removed. Steven signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com http