Broken dependencies: tetex-font-kerkis

2009-01-13 Thread buildsys
tetex-font-kerkis has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On x86_64: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On i386: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.f

Broken dependencies: tetex-font-cm-lgc

2009-01-13 Thread buildsys
tetex-font-cm-lgc has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts On x86_64: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts On i386: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts O

[Bug 474734] Blurriness of Latin letter R (U+0052) in Liberation Regular

2009-01-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474734 --- Comment #7 from san 2009-01-14 02:02:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Hi, could I ask which part of the glyph you

[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11

2009-01-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477373, which changed state. Bug 477373 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines http

[Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 Caius CHANCE changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 428427] [kn_IN][fonts-indic] - 0CB5+0CCA is wrongly rendering

2009-01-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428427 --- Comment #8 from Shankar Prasad 2009-01-14 01:12:26 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328952) --> (https://bugzilla.re

[Bug 471538] FontForge Abort Opening some .otf files

2009-01-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471538 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 471538] FontForge Abort Opening some .otf files

2009-01-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471538 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-14 00:21:41 EDT --- I'm going to go ahead and close this now, as the indicated buil

[Bug 462038] Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted.

2009-01-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462038 --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-13 23:51:53 EDT --- > Kevin, would you consider pushing the devel version to F10?

rpms/cjkunifonts/devel cjkunifonts.spec,1.29,1.30

2009-01-13 Thread Caius Chance
Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6413 Modified Files: cjkunifonts.spec Log Message: * Wed Jan 14 2009 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-13.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#477373 - Included _font_pkg macro to conform new fo

[Bug 462041] Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted.

2009-01-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462041 Bug 462041 depends on bug 462038, which changed state. Bug 462038 Summary: Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't

[Bug 462038] Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted.

2009-01-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462038 Roozbeh Pournader changed: What|Removed |Added

rpms/doulos-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.6, 1.7 doulos-fonts.spec, 1.6, 1.7 sources, 1.6, 1.7

2009-01-13 Thread Roozbeh Pournader
Author: roozbeh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/doulos-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21116 Modified Files: .cvsignore doulos-fonts.spec sources Log Message: * Tue Jan 13 2009 Roozbeh Pournader - 4.104-1 - Update main font to 4.104 (with Unicode 5.1 support) -

[Bug 162370] Print the table!

2009-01-13 Thread gucharmap (bugzilla.gnome.org)
If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162370 gucharmap | general | Ver

[Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-13 18:27:25 EDT --- After a mail exchange with Tom the new naming rules will

[Bug 447298] Qt 4 uses Nimbus Sans L (Helvetica) instead of DejaVu Sans (Sans Serif)

2009-01-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447298 --- Comment #24 from Alexei Podtelezhnikov 2009-01-13 17:40:33 EDT --- Re: Comment #22 I am sorry I pointed out that this

[Bug 479596] Review Request: serafettin-cartoon-fonts - Sans-serif Cartoon Fonts

2009-01-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479596 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-13 16:55:11 EDT --- serafettin-cartoon-fonts-0.5-1.fc10 has been submitte

rpms/serafettin-cartoon-fonts/F-10 import.log, NONE, 1.1 serafettin-cartoon-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2

2009-01-13 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
Author: oget Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/serafettin-cartoon-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15968/F-10 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log serafettin-cartoon-fonts.spec Log Message: * Tue Jan 13 2009 - 0.5-1 - New version with

rpms/serafettin-cartoon-fonts/F-9 import.log, NONE, 1.1 serafettin-cartoon-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2

2009-01-13 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
Author: oget Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/serafettin-cartoon-fonts/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15650/F-9 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log serafettin-cartoon-fonts.spec Log Message: * Tue Jan 13 2009 - 0.5-1 - New version with v

rpms/serafettin-cartoon-fonts/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 serafettin-cartoon-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2

2009-01-13 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
Author: oget Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/serafettin-cartoon-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15264/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log serafettin-cartoon-fonts.spec Log Message: * Tue Jan 13 2009 - 0.5-1 - New version wi

[Bug 479596] Review Request: serafettin-cartoon-fonts - Sans-serif Cartoon Fonts

2009-01-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479596 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 479596] Review Request: serafettin-cartoon-fonts - Sans-serif Cartoon Fonts

2009-01-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479596 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 447298] Qt 4 uses Nimbus Sans L (Helvetica) instead of DejaVu Sans (Sans Serif)

2009-01-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447298 --- Comment #23 from Rex Dieter 2009-01-13 10:01:16 EDT --- qt-copy patch tests out good here, local hack/patch removed in

[Bug 447298] Qt 4 uses Nimbus Sans L (Helvetica) instead of DejaVu Sans (Sans Serif)

2009-01-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447298 --- Comment #22 from Kevin Kofler 2009-01-13 09:24:31 EDT --- That's a completely separate issue, please comment in bug 35

[Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 428427] [kn_IN][fonts-indic] - 0CB5+0CCA is wrongly rendering

2009-01-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428427 --- Comment #7 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-01-13 07:42:10 EDT --- The brhknd font mentioned is not a unicode/opentype font. P

[Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 --- Comment #9 from Sarantis Paskalis 2009-01-13 07:35:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > rpm > cm-lgc-fonts-common (d

[Bug 479100] [kn_IN] Conjunct combination of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering wrongly

2009-01-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479100 Rahul Bhalerao changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-13 06:56:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > I see. > > The current package

[Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 --- Comment #7 from Sarantis Paskalis 2009-01-13 06:13:01 EDT --- I see. The current package is named tetex-font-cm-lgc.

[Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 --- Comment #5 from Sarantis Paskalis 2009-01-13 04:41:59 EDT --- Thanks for the feedback. (In reply to comment #4) > Tha

[Bug 477462] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477462 --- Comment #5 from Sarantis Paskalis 2009-01-13 04:41:52 EDT --- They are more or less modifications of the same type. W

[Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts

2009-01-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-13 04:11:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > PS

[Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font

2009-01-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 --- Comment #19 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-13 04:09:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > I have the package installed

[Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font

2009-01-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 Ankur Sinha changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts

2009-01-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 Ankur Sinha changed: What|Removed |Added --