[Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 Sarantis Paskalis paska...@di.uoa.gr changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 Alex Lancaster al...@users.sourceforge.net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 Sarantis Paskalis paska...@di.uoa.gr changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 Sarantis Paskalis paska...@di.uoa.gr changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 --- Comment #17 from Sarantis Paskalis paska...@di.uoa.gr 2009-01-19 06:23:07 EDT --- Opened up a review request for the

[Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-18 16:41:53 EDT --- And FESCO approved the FPC

[Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 --- Comment #15 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-15 03:31:06 EDT --- The fontpackages-*-1.14

[Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 --- Comment #12 from Sarantis Paskalis paska...@di.uoa.gr 2009-01-14 04:14:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) After a

[Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 --- Comment #13 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 04:30:58 EDT --- The ctan bit is to be

[Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 --- Comment #14 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:38:01 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-13 06:56:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) I

[Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 --- Comment #9 from Sarantis Paskalis paska...@di.uoa.gr 2009-01-13 07:35:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) rpm

[Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-13 18:27:25 EDT --- After a mail exchange with

[Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 Sarantis Paskalis paska...@di.uoa.gr changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11 10:20:22 EDT --- To help packagers manage the