On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
What does everyone else have?
Getting hosted's load average to below 100 :) (I accidentally
mistyped hosted as hosed, a Freudian slip as to the current state of
affairs? :) )
I think that gitweb-caching will help a lot
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
Anyone out there with experience and are inclined to get this in hosted?
Is this something that would be better on one of our collab servers or
does it actually have to integrate with hosted somehow?
No experience but
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
I agree, I was under the impression that upstream wasn't interested in the
new patches. Probably because I wasn't paying attention and assumed it :)
Well they haven't been interested for quite some time, I think they've
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Rahul Sundaram
sunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
We can do what?
Oops. somehow quoted an entirely irrelevant portion of your message :)
We can call the list whatever you like. indian-community sounds as
good as any to me.
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
FWIW its working from home, my dedicated box and my box in .au two of those I
run my own resolvers and not my isps.
Oh, the joys of working for a tier1 ISP :)
I just did a round the world trip on our resolvers (New York,
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
Would folks be available at 3 PM EST this Wednesday or Thursday to
do a check-in to see where we are at and what to tackle next? We
might also want to think about possible things to work on at FUDCon.
$DAYJOB has been so
In an effort to work on the cvs side of
https://fedorahosted.org/packagedb/ticket/165 I'd like to have an
offsite copy of cvs1:/cvs/pkgs to test on. Being that this is in
violation of our security policy
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Clint Savage her...@gmail.com wrote:
In the meantime, I'll build an rpm from the src rpm in Fedora-12
branch and get it up on publictest15 tonight/tomorrow and send and
update when I have it completed.
It's important to note that asterisk2 is an F12 box
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
Who's got stuff they want to implement over the next couple of days?
I just have a real simple change of adding cvs* to https://admin.fp.o/status
figured it was pretty non-critical so could wait.
Auth via FAS would be swell. :)
On 10/18/09, Clint Savage her...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
Most likely I'll miss or be very late to the next meeting.
I have made some good prgress with the asterisk setup instructions.
The server is
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us wrote:
Those MD5 hashes aren't your FAS password, they are your VoIP
password, which is a separate setting.
Right, I looked into the FAS Asterisk plugin, and the password (VoIP
password, NOT the FAS password) looks to be stored in
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote:
Jon, that would be fantastic! I've already reached the limit of the
small budget I've been allotted for the event; does that affect your
ability to be there at all?
Gah! Sorry for not seeing this sooner, it doesn't
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote:
We're going to be conversing on this list since obviously the work's
primarily, maybe even wholly, infrastructure-related. Below is a bit
of introductory email from last night that I wanted to make sure was
captured
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks like the user Georgia10 just inserted spam on that page.
Aiyiyi.
What's our procedure for deleting/disabling a rogue FAS account? It
appears that the account in question was just created today, probably
for the
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Kevin Fenzike...@tummy.com wrote:
Are we doing a mass migration? Or just migrating lists some at a time
as time permits? I can see advantages/disadvantages to both ways, just
wondering which we are planning.
I was planning on starting small, and adding from
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 1:34 AM, Rahul
Sundaramsunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Have you thought whether a reorganization is desirable while migrating?
Yes, note the section in the document about renaming lists. I wasn't
very verbose in there about why you'd want to do that, maybe I was in
an
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 1:15 AM, Sandro red
Mathysr...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
so, fedora-list@ will become -@ or n...@? ;)
Obviously not :). I was thinking of like users@ :)
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Matt Domschmatt_dom...@dell.com wrote:
I added a couple notes about _not_ regenerating the archives, and
handling the forwards from Red Hat.
Good catch. I assumed that RHT would be willing to continue hosting
the archives for the old lists for an indefinite
I'd like some mailman experts (if we have any) to take a look at this
procedure to migrate lists from redhat.com to lists.fp.o and let me
know if there's something obviously missing from it or if there's some
way that it can be improved. Feel free to make any edits you deem
necessary.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 3:44 AM, Till Maasopensou...@till.name wrote:
Btw. I just remembered which bot bugzilla account already exists: ftbfs -
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/view/ftbfs
There seems to be no mailing list involved, too.
Nah, I don't much care if no one cares to
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 3:44 AM, Till Maasopensou...@till.name wrote:
Btw. I just remembered which bot bugzilla account already exists: ftbfs -
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/view/ftbfs
There seems to be no mailing list involved, too.
The alias is created - it's just a mail
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Till Maasopensou...@till.name wrote:
How about the alias upstream-release-monitoring? Please forward it to
cnucnu.fedora till name with '@' and '.' added.
I'd personally prefer to make a mailing list for this, rather than put
the point of failure on a single
There's a minor issue with the supybot-based config of MeetBot. Until
it can be resolved, it's important that zodbot be started with it's
cwd in /srv/web/meetbot. Weird, yes. But effective at making it work
:)
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Michael Schwendtbugs.mich...@gmx.net wrote:
How often is bugzilla.redhat.com updated with changes in Fedora pkgdb?
It has yet to sync the audacious* ownership changes from June 29th.
Perhaps it's broken?
It is. Toshio has a change that should be live in the
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Mike McGrathmmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
check smtp-mm1. I'm not sure of it's
status.
smtp-mm1 is the first box of three at various locations that will
serve as SMTP frontends to our mailman instance that runs on collab1.
This one is at Telia. It doesn't appear
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Todd Zullingert...@pobox.com wrote:
This avoids the need for prompting for values that can easily be
determined from the project name and the new REPOSTYPE argument.
This could be further improved to call a script to setup the
repository and any mailing
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Todd Zullingert...@pobox.com wrote:
I need to bone up on the bzr and hg repo creation and refresh my
memory on svn. Ideally, those can be conveniently scripted as well,
and driven automatically by an expanded hosted-setup script. :)
There are existing
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Mike McGrathmmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
I'll be in Chicago all week this week. I have comcast so the internet is
ok, but there will likely be periods that I am disconnected :)
So long as the cable goes out during Cubs games, that's all good :)
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 12:56 PM, susmit
shannigrahithinklinux@gmail.com wrote:
Great!!!
I never knew about this :)
Thanks.
And it didn't work until Ricky made the mediawiki-unbroken package.
Thanks again Ricky! :)
___
Mike -
The whole thing here is that you need to have an *additional* person
there. So we need another infrastructure person to volunteer to
attend.
On 6/11/09, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, John Poelstra wrote:
Hi Infrastructure Team,
At your earliest
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Mike McGrathmmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
I'm a might busy with things at the moment, anyone on the list want to use
this tool on our websites and do a review? (Of both the tool and our
sites?)
The tool is pretty cool, but I'm not much of a web developer. So
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Nigel Jones nigjo...@redhat.com wrote:
Also note, you need to send some of the steaks to Australia...
And some to NYC.
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
Nope.
To be more specific, this is all we have in the logs for yesterday from proxy1:
[jstan...@log1 http]$ cat download.fedoraproject.org-access.log | awk
'{print $9}' | sort -n | uniq -c
23872 302
24961 404
31
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote:
uniq-ing the IP addresses doing the downloading. That method has the
potential to cut out legitimate, repetitive downloads from inside a
firewall. I'd feel better cutting those ticks out if they were
I'm not sure if
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 11:01 AM, susmit shannigrahi
thinklinux@gmail.com wrote:
1. Does all the trac use same trac.ini? I can find only one trac.ini by
$locate
No, there are some global settings, but most stuff is in
/srv/web/trac/project/conf/trac.ini
If not, where is the particular
2009/4/1 Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com:
Some of the recent Test Day live images were hosted from
fedorapeople.org space. I'd like to find out how many downloads there
were of these images, but I can't read /var/log/httpd on that host
(which makes sense). Are those logs supposed to be
---
configs/system/nagios-http.conf.erb |1 +
configs/web/balancer.conf.erb |1 +
configs/web/cacti-secure.conf.erb |1 +
configs/web/exclude.conf.erb|1 +
4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configs/system/nagios-http.conf.erb
Inactive accounts could authenticate to sites using mod_auth_pgsql.
Pretty sure all of these apps are not under freeze, but rather be safe. Some
+1's?
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
/21 Ricky Zhou ri...@fedoraproject.org:
On 2009-03-21 08:59:24 PM, Jon Stanley wrote:
Inactive accounts could authenticate to sites using mod_auth_pgsql.
Pretty sure all of these apps are not under freeze, but rather be safe. Some
+1's?
We tested this out on hosted1 with active and inactive
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
Hey all, there's a lot of outstanding fedorahosted requests. Some are
assigned and have been left uncommitted for some time. Just following up
with everyone to make sure they don't get forgotten about. if you're in
the
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Jon Stanley jonstan...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll go through em tonight, I've been slacking off. :)
Yay! We're down to 7, all long term type things:
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/query?status=newstatus=assignedstatus=reopenedcomponent=Hosted
I'm out, sorry for the top post. But zodbot FAS routines are not
functional due to this, so I'd be +1 here if I had a vote :)
On 3/14/09, Ricky Zhou ri...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On 2009-03-14 05:36:27 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Ricky and I have both looked at the code in
2009/1/19 Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com:
March 27 through Sunday March 29, 2009 is pycon and I know you and I are
giving talks :-)
Maybe arrange it around pycon? If a large group of folks are already
going to be in Chicago for something else, it makes sense to
piggy-back our efforts on
On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 7:17 AM, Kostas Georgiou
k.georg...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
Can you run blktrace+seekwatcher (both in EPEL) to get an idea on
what is going on? An iostat -x -k /dev/sde 1 output will also be
helpfull.
Here's a slabinfo that someone else requested and the iostat. I don't
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Jon Stanley jonstan...@gmail.com wrote:
I need the custom fields plugin for the FamNA request system anyways,
so I'm packaging it now. Hopefully I'll be able to get it in the
infra repo before the end of the night, and in Fedora and EPEL proper
soon after
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 12:45 PM, susmit shannigrahi
thinklinux@gmail.com wrote:
1. I hope that upload of eggs were not universal for all trac instances. Is
it?
I don't think so, but I don't know.
2. Can you please point out the location of the particular trac.ini
file in puppet?
I
Just FYI, I changed the owners of the git repos on hosted1 to be the
first administrator found in their FAS group, since there was a ticket
complaining that everything was owned by 'root'. Now you can see real
owners at http://git.fedorahosted.org for the most part.
If you disagree with the
Someone just came into #fedora-admin and noted that the MNAME in our
SOA's was incorrect - for every domain, the MNAME was set to be the
domain itself, whereas RFC1035 3.3.13 states:
MNAME The domain-name of the name server that was the
original or primary source of data
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Mike McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
no complaints here. Thanks Jon.
Pushed with Jeffrey's change.
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
Service: Puppet
Host: cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com
Address: cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com
State: CRITICAL
Date/Time: Fri Nov 7 03:25:45 UTC 2008
Additional Info:
PROCS CRITICAL: 0 processes with args /usr/bin/ruby /usr/sbin/puppetd, UID =
0 (root)
--
Jon Stanley
Fedora Bug Wrangler
[EMAIL
('[EMAIL PROTECTED]','Jon Stanley')
File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/bugzilla/base.py, line 689, in adduser
self._adduser(user,name)
File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/bugzilla/rhbugzilla.py, line
334, in _adduser
r = self._proxy.bugzilla.addUser(user, name, self.user)
File /usr
Oops, forgot to say that this requires at least python-bugzilla
0.4-rc4 (currently in rawhide)
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 10:24 PM, Jon Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not quite sure where else to send this, so here goes :)
Attached is a patch to use python-bugzilla in export-bugzilla.py using
OK, this is my first nagios change - seems to be sane. Can I get two
+1's since we're in a change freeze? And do we want defaulttemplate or
criticaltemplate for this?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] puppet]$ git diff
diff --git a/configs/system/nagios/services/procs.cfg
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
--
Sent from my mobile device
Jon
2008/8/29 Axel Thimm [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If ATM the key is considered stolen, the users need to stop using the
key immediately anyway. Issuing a new package signed with the old key
is just keeping the racing window open.
I don't think that the key is considered stolen atm. What has happened
different directory, but
it's still 9, not 9+something. (ditto 8)
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
--
Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com
Jon Stanley
Fedora Bug Wrangler
[EMAIL PROTECTED
@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
--
Jon Stanley
Fedora Bug Wrangler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 4:45 PM, seth vidal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wait for the planet to update?
I think that the real question was Is there a test instance of the
planet somewhere with this new-world config file?
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:16 PM, Jeremy Katz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, going off and building our own thing feels like it's going to be a
long-term detriment. Some of the bits for proper CRLs and the like are
not trivial and very important to get right
Not that this matters for
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Thomas Chung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Infrastructure Team
Would you please add approve link in the FAS2 Home page for Todo queue?
It takes too long to view any group (specially 'ambassadors' group
with over 300 members) and approve each request.
I've
functional with FAS2?
Thanks!
-Jon
--
Jon Stanley
Fedora Bug Wrangler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
John Poelstra and I were just thinking about a mailing list for
watching incoming bugs. Unfortunately, I don't know that there's the
right combination of checkboxes in Bugzilla to just get mail about new
bugs. However, filtering based on mail header could get that - every
new bugmail that
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 2:54 PM, Bill Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why is this better than a RSS feed or similar?
Good question - as John said below, different people prefer different
workflows. For those that might like RSS, there's the shiny new:
On Feb 19, 2008 4:09 PM, Jeffrey Ollie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, I would think that a mailing list wouldn't be the best tool for
the free media project anyway. I would think that some sort of
bug/issue tracking system where bugs/issues could be marked as
private would be best - that
On Feb 12, 2008 9:42 AM, Jeffrey Ollie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After writing the message last night I dug a bit more into the details
of hooking up Asterisk and Flumotion and I definitely think that it'll
be possible. I think that combining Asterisk and Flumotion give us the
best of both
://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
--
Jon Stanley
Fedora Ambassador
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure
66 matches
Mail list logo
