Re: Removal of old projects from fedorahosted.

fedora hosted list of projects, but would still be available via direct link. That way, nothing is lost, but the clutter vanishes. You could even have yet another category for projects that are known to be abandoned. -RN -- Robin Norwood The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone. -Lao

Re: Removal of old projects from fedorahosted.

a case for automatically deleting old projects. -RN -- Robin Norwood The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone. -Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com

Re: Public demo of amber and eventual production instance

On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:07:41 -0400 Robin Norwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Second, Fedora Applications/Amber is eventually going to need an actual production server ready around the Fedora 10 release date. I'd like to get to the point where I can make a formal request for aforementioned

Re: Public demo of amber and eventual production instance

. But if this is an application that end users will be using that doesn't seem quite right. Yes, it isn't really a fedora 'admin' app. As you said, it's targeted at end users. -RN -- Robin Norwood Red Hat, Inc. The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone. -Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching

Public demo of amber and eventual production instance

a formal request for aforementioned resources. What do I need to do to get there? Thanks, -RN -- Robin Norwood Red Hat, Inc. The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone. -Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora

Re: FAS instance on publictest10?

, session.expiration_time A S session_expiration_time \\nFROM session \\nWHERE session.id = %(param_1)s' {'param_1': '620e1904fbcde17dacb96779e77ec9db223 48554'} But, like I said, they aren't happening now. Curious. Maybe it just needed a second cup of coffee. Thanks, -RN -- Robin Norwood Red Hat

Re: FAS instance on publictest10?

On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 12:07:50 -0400 Robin Norwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I've been trying to use the FAS instance on publictest10, and it's acting very strangely. Basically, after a restart, it goes like this: o FAS works fine, both from the web UI and using the API for a few

Re: FAS instance on publictest10?

Ricky set up a FAS instance on pt9 that seems to work fine so far, so I'm done whining. :-) Thanks! -RN -- Robin Norwood Red Hat, Inc. The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone. -Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing

FAS instance on publictest10?

: people Very strange. Any ideas what's going on here? If FAS on publictest10 is going through some development upheaval, I can set one up locally for development and try a public deployment of amber again in a few weeks. Thanks, -RN -- Robin Norwood Red Hat, Inc. The Sage does nothing, yet

Re: Advice on deploying wsgi app using jsonfas

On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:18:04 -0400 Robin Norwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Unable to write to session file /var/www/.fedora_session: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/www/.fedora_session' Ok, I think I figured this out a bit more. When Toshio gave me code to do the FAS stuff, he included

Request for hosting resource

(with sqlalchemy, genshi and (soon) postresql). Does the fedora infrastructure group have resources for this kind of thing? IOW, is there a spare F9 box or virtual instance I can borrow, along the same lines as publictest10? Thanks, -RN -- Robin Norwood Red Hat, Inc. The Sage does nothing, yet

Re: Request for hosting resource

On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:47:51 -0500 (CDT) Mike McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 28 Jun 2008, Robin Norwood wrote: Hi, I've been working (with lots of help from Toshio and Luke) on the Amber project (Fedora Application Database) for a few weeks now, and I'm getting perilously