On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 13:44:39 -0400,
"Paul W. Frields" wrote:
>
> Did other attendees visit the URL to indicate their available times?
It didn't work for me. I got a 410 status. Probably it didn't like
my browser config, since it seems to have worked for others.
I probably don't need to be
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 08:52:59PM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 04:41:56PM -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> > Paul W. Frields said the following on 09/25/2009 10:13 AM Pacific Time:
> >> I constructed a page on the wiki for an upcoming FAD where some
> >> contributors are go
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 09:02:55 -0500,
Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
>
> I've got F-11 rpms here:
>
> http://jcollie.fedorapeople.org/asterisk-1.6.2/
Thanks! My asterisk machine is currently pinned at F11 because I need dahdi
and I have found any prebuilt rpms for F12. (And with the kernel change
I a
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 9:28 PM, John Poelstra wrote:
> Jeffrey Ollie said the following on 09/30/2009 07:12 PM Pacific Time:
>>
>> IIRC that was a 1.6.1.0 release candidate with a bunch of patches
>> backported from trunk. Time passed and what was trunk then is now a
>> 1.6.2.0 release candidate
Jeffrey Ollie said the following on 09/30/2009 07:12 PM Pacific Time:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
The problem with using versions before 1.6.2.X is that to get
conferencing you either need to hack in a 3rd party patch (which wa
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
>>
>> The problem with using versions before 1.6.2.X is that to get
>> conferencing you either need to hack in a 3rd party patch (which was
>> too difficult to maintain so I took it out of the Fedora p
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 03:51:23PM -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> >> Jeffrey Ollie said the following on 09/30/2009 10:43 AM Pacific Time:
> >>>
> >>> FYI, I
> >>> plan on keeping the "official"
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 04:41:56PM -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> Paul W. Frields said the following on 09/25/2009 10:13 AM Pacific Time:
>> I constructed a page on the wiki for an upcoming FAD where some
>> contributors are going to work on some long-standing Fedora Talk
>> related tickets. Detail
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 03:51:23PM -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
>> Jeffrey Ollie said the following on 09/30/2009 10:43 AM Pacific Time:
>>>
>>> FYI, I
>>> plan on keeping the "official" F12 and F11 Asterisk packages on
>>> 1.6.1.X. F13 wil
Paul W. Frields said the following on 09/25/2009 10:13 AM Pacific Time:
I constructed a page on the wiki for an upcoming FAD where some
contributors are going to work on some long-standing Fedora Talk
related tickets. Details are here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FAD_Fedora_Talk_2009
There'
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 03:51:23PM -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> Jeffrey Ollie said the following on 09/30/2009 10:43 AM Pacific Time:
>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Paul W. Frields
>> wrote:
>>> Jeff C. Ollie wrote:
Probably want to look at getting Asterisk 1.6.2 packaged. It's
Jeffrey Ollie said the following on 09/30/2009 10:43 AM Pacific Time:
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Jeff C. Ollie wrote:
Probably want to look at getting Asterisk 1.6.2 packaged. It's
still in release candidate, but 1.6.2 has new conferencing software
that isn't hac
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
>
> Jeff C. Ollie wrote:
>>
>> Probably want to look at getting Asterisk 1.6.2 packaged. It's
>> still in release candidate, but 1.6.2 has new conferencing software
>> that isn't hacked in by a 3rd party or requires a kernel module.
>> Sinc
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 03:42:21PM -0700, Darren VanBuren wrote:
> I assume you won't be doing stuff at 18:40-ish on Friday. Because,
> unfortunately that's when I get home (15:40-ish back here on the West
> Coast).
>
> If you could make like a rough outline of what happened on Friday at
> t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I assume you won't be doing stuff at 18:40-ish on Friday. Because,
unfortunately that's when I get home (15:40-ish back here on the West
Coast).
If you could make like a rough outline of what happened on Friday at
the end of the day, that'd be
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 09:12:56AM -0400, Jon Stanley wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
>
> > Jon, that would be fantastic! I've already reached the limit of the
> > small budget I've been allotted for the event; does that affect your
> > ability to be there at all
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> Jon, that would be fantastic! I've already reached the limit of the
> small budget I've been allotted for the event; does that affect your
> ability to be there at all?
Gah! Sorry for not seeing this sooner, it doesn't really affect me
e
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 11:52:24AM -0700, Darren VanBuren wrote:
> I'd be able to remotely attend on Saturday and Sunday. There's no way I
> would be able get money to physically attend. I do have credit with
> Alaska Airlines though.. But I wouldn't have money to stay some place.
> Nor would
Hey folks,
I was forwarded this because of the Dogtail mention. I'm not subscribed,
so if you want me to see replies please CC me.
On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 13:13 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > It'd be nice if there was some easy tool that people could
> > yum-install that would make it easy to se
I'd be able to remotely attend on Saturday and Sunday. There's no way
I would be able get money to physically attend. I do have credit with
Alaska Airlines though.. But I wouldn't have money to stay some place.
Nor would my parents let me go to Virgina. Especially just for an
Activity day.
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 14:25:47 -0400,
"Paul W. Frields" wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 01:31:03PM -0400, Jon Stanley wrote:
>
> If it does, we do plan to use IRC, Gobby, and Fedora Talk itself to
> facilitate remote participation. For instance, Bruno said he was
> going to try to do some w
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 01:37:43PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Sep 2009, Paul W. Frields wrote:
>
> > I constructed a page on the wiki for an upcoming FAD where some
> > contributors are going to work on some long-standing Fedora Talk
> > related tickets. Details are here:
> >
> > htt
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> I constructed a page on the wiki for an upcoming FAD where some
> contributors are going to work on some long-standing Fedora Talk
> related tickets. Details are here:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FAD_Fedora_Talk_2009
>
Count me in as a remotee
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 01:31:03PM -0400, Jon Stanley wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
>
> > We're going to be conversing on this list since obviously the work's
> > primarily, maybe even wholly, infrastructure-related. Below is a bit
> > of introductory email fro
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> We're going to be conversing on this list since obviously the work's
> primarily, maybe even wholly, infrastructure-related. Below is a bit
> of introductory email from last night that I wanted to make sure was
> captured transparently he
I constructed a page on the wiki for an upcoming FAD where some
contributors are going to work on some long-standing Fedora Talk
related tickets. Details are here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FAD_Fedora_Talk_2009
There's a list of related tickets on the page, namely #s 309, 395,
453, and 1160
26 matches
Mail list logo
