Re: X-Chat 2.4.0 to 2.6

2006-03-08 Thread Danny Terweij - Net Tuning | Net
From: Rex Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can someone provide a new version of X-Chat in legacy updates fc3 repo? Probably not. legacy updates is for security and critical bug fixes only. Hmm that sucks. Not 1 of all the FC3 repo's providing a new version. I use RH since 5.0. But sinds Fedora i

Re: X-Chat 2.4.0 to 2.6

2006-03-08 Thread Rex Dieter
Danny Terweij - Net Tuning | Net wrote: From: Rex Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can someone provide a new version of X-Chat in legacy updates fc3 repo? Probably not. legacy updates is for security and critical bug fixes only. Hmm that sucks. It's prominent on http://fedoralegacy.org/ What

Re: X-Chat 2.4.0 to 2.6

2006-03-08 Thread Stephen J. Smoogen
On 3/8/06, Danny Terweij - Net Tuning | Net [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Rex Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can someone provide a new version of X-Chat in legacy updates fc3 repo? Probably not. legacy updates is for security and critical bug fixes only. Hmm that sucks. Not 1 of all the

Re: X-Chat 2.4.0 to 2.6

2006-03-08 Thread Kelson
Danny Terweij - Net Tuning | Net wrote: Not 1 of all the FC3 repo's providing a new version. I use RH since 5.0. But sinds Fedora i dislike it more and more. Are there here people that wants create a *real* legacy-updates repo for NEW versions? If you want new versions of Fedora's

Re: X-Chat 2.4.0 to 2.6

2006-03-08 Thread Josep L. Guallar-Esteve
On Wednesday 08 March 2006 11:46, Danny Terweij - Net Tuning | Net wrote: From: Rex Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can someone provide a new version of X-Chat in legacy updates fc3 repo? Probably not. legacy updates is for security and critical bug fixes only. Hmm that sucks. Not 1 of

Re: FC3 fedora-updates-testing

2006-03-08 Thread wwp
Hello, On Wed, 8 Mar 2006 18:19:10 +0100 wwp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all, I wonder what will happen to the packages in the FC3 fedora-updates-testing? Will they land to FC3's the fedora-updates, or is this -testing repos just dangling now that FC3 is over? I've well understood