Re: New proposed top level FAQ for the defunct FedoraLegacy project

David A. Ranch wrote: After the IRC conversations I had today with "F13", here is a proposed FAQ for the top level http://fedoralegacy.org/ site. Please change all instances of Centos to CentOS. Issues : 3. Maybe it would be best to strip out all content off the site and only hav

Re: Fedora Legacy shutting down

David Eisenstein wrote: In addition to what someone else said about the planetmirror mirror in another message, I had heard that the fermilab ftp mirror (of Batavia, Illinois, USA) has no intention to go down any time soon. The contact there, Troy Dawson, kindly informed Jesse Keating that fnal

Re: Fedora Legacy shutting down

Stuart Low wrote: Also I'd like to know if there's a list of mirrors that will continue to be available for a while. If not I'd like to know how I can rsync all packages created by the Fedora Legacy Project without also rsyncing the packages that are still available at download.fedora.redhat.com

Re: Fedora Legacy shutting down

Jesse Keating wrote: On Tuesday 02 January 2007 11:06, Eric Rostetter wrote: Fixed on www.fedoralegacy.org, but not on download.fedoralegacy.org. Can someone please change these? They're both very small changes, but I think it's best not to confuse people now. Jesse will have to do downlo

Re: RHEL subset of which FC ?

Martin Marques wrote: Is there any ideas on when RHEL5 will be out? http://www.itweek.co.uk/itweek/news/2171826/red-hat-enterprise-linux says: "Red Hat Enterprise OS Marketing Manager Nick Carr said that the proposed schedule for a downloadable version of RHEL 5.0 is looking good for m

Re: RHEL subset of which FC ?

P. Martinez wrote: Hi, is it true when i say, FC3 == RHEL4 ? No, but you can say RHEL4 was based on FC3. RHEL5 will be based on FC6. But you can't really say they are the same thing at all. Nils Breunese. PGP.sig Description: Dit deel van het bericht is digitaal ondertekend -- fedora-l

Re: where? security updates for FC4

Karanbir Singh wrote: FC5 installed and then updated with all released packages will contain packages that will by the time CentOS-5 is out there, already be newer than whats included in CentOS-5. Which will create problems since those packages will then not get yum updated to whats in th

Re: where? security updates for FC4

Karanbir Singh wrote: Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) wrote: You could upgrade to FC5 and later upgrade to CentOS 5? Will most likely not work as expected : FC5 updates are going to out strip the E-V-R for similar packages in EL5. And there is the issue of orphan packages that in turn might be

Re: where? security updates for FC4

Florin Andrei wrote: Now that the Legacy project is shutting down, the biggest problem becomes the security updates. FL never provided anything else than security updates. I have an FC4 server that I plan to keep running until CentOS 5 comes out, but I also have to apply security patches t

Re: Fedora Legacy shutting down

Axel Thimm wrote: On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 01:08:10PM +0100, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) wrote: I have trouble gettinng this to work. When I exclude *.rpm and include *legacy*.rpm I seem to receive no rpms at all. I ran the following dry-run command: $ rsync -avH --exclude "*.rpm"

Re: Fedora Legacy shutting down

Axel Thimm wrote: Is there an easy way to just download (rsync?) the legacy updates? I think all packages have "legacy" in their names, so using proper rsync options like excluding '*.rpm' and then including '*legacy*rpm' should work. I have trouble gettinng this to work. When I exclude *.rp

Re: Fedora Legacy shutting down

Axel Thimm wrote: On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 11:29:28PM -0500, seth vidal wrote: On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 20:54 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: On Monday 01 January 2007 20:42, Jesse Keating wrote: It wouldn't take space Correction, wouldn't take huge amounts of space. It's 63GB in total. I count

Re: Fedora Legacy shutting down

Jesse Keating wrote: On Saturday 30 December 2006 00:23, fedora-legacy- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Discussions last night on the #Fedora-Legacy channel have brought to light the fact that certain Fedora Legacy properties (servers) may be going away soon, such as the repository at

Re: Fedora Legacy shutting down

David Eisenstein wrote: In case any of you are not aware, the Fedora Legacy project is in the process of shutting down. There's a big discussion going on on Slashdot (http:// linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/12/31/1837253). I think it really is time to change the right sidebar on www.fe

Re: Fedora Legacy shutting down

D.Terweij | NTG-Support wrote: I am try to create a local repo if all is synced and add that to my boxes. And maybe i set it online too. You never know who else is in need of "old" packages. Do I understand correctly that the FC1-FC4 base and updates repositories will still be available

Re: Fedora Legacy shutting down

seth vidal wrote: seems to work for me if you use: rsync -avH download.fedoralegacy.org::legacy legacy Works me for me too now. Nils Breunese. PGP.sig Description: Dit deel van het bericht is digitaal ondertekend -- fedora-legacy-list mailing list fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com https://www.

Re: Fedora Legacy shutting down

David Eisenstein wrote: Discussions last night on the #Fedora-Legacy channel have brought to light the fact that certain Fedora Legacy properties (servers) may be going away soon, such as the repository at download.fedoralegacy.org/> and the build server. I'd like to mirror the legacy tree

Re: Legacy wiki -- statement?

Mike McCarty wrote: Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) wrote: Mike McCarty wrote: Migrating them to what? That's my question. CentOS 4. Why do you ask? Nils Breunese. You seem to think this is a foregone conclusion. I don't. But for my needs, yes, I have come to this conclusion some

Re: {Spam?} Re: Legacy wiki -- statement?

Eric Rostetter wrote: I copied the wiki text to the website... I'm not happy with the way it looks, so I'll try to improve it when I get time, but at least it is up on the site now... Can someone also edit http://download.fedoralegacy.org/ ? It lists FC3 and FC4 as active releases. Nils B

Re: Legacy wiki -- statement?

Mike McCarty wrote: Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) wrote: I was just thinking out loud really. I don't expect it is possible to revive the Legacy Project at this point, but was just thinking that maybe trying to get companies that build on Fedora (not just Fedora Legacy) to supply reso

Re: Legacy wiki -- statement?

Jesse Keating wrote: On Tuesday 12 December 2006 10:20, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) wrote: I agree and we could just end it at that and say we don't care everybody and their dog is running unpatched systems. But has anyone ever tried contacting these big companies and explaining the situati

Re: Legacy wiki -- statement?

Jesse Keating wrote: On Tuesday 12 December 2006 07:49, Roozbeh Pournader wrote: Most of the dedicated hosting sites that offer Fedora don't mention a version on the front page, but I tried diving a little, and it seems that most of them may still be offering 3 and 4. I found one 5, but still n

Re: Legacy wiki -- statement?

Jeff Sheltren wrote: On Dec 12, 2006, at 5:32 AM, Roozbeh Pournader wrote: Well, apparently some hosting companies, like 1&1, are still offering their customers Fedora Core 4. http://tinyurl.com/y4q3j3 http://tinyurl.com/y7pj9r I guess we should try to make things more obvious, or we may be

Re: Legacy wiki -- statement?

Roozbeh Pournader wrote: Well, apparently some hosting companies, like 1&1, are still offering their customers Fedora Core 4. http://tinyurl.com/y4q3j3 http://tinyurl.com/y7pj9r I guess we should try to make things more obvious, or we may be jeopardizing several servers on the Internet... 1&

Re: nails in coffins? Re: Openssl updates

Op 30-nov-2006, om 17:11 heeft Matthew Miller het volgende geschreven: On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 04:40:55PM +0100, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) wrote: Not for that couple of FC3 machines my clients have running. Or am I misunderstanding the 13 months of support somehow? FC3 was released on

Re: nails in coffins? Re: Openssl updates

Rex Dieter wrote: Unfortunately I will have to be migrating our last Fedora servers over to CentOS even sooner now... I take it, then, that extending Fedora's (supported) life-cycle to 13+ mos isn't sufficient for your needs? Not for that couple of FC3 machines my clients have running. Or

Re: nails in coffins? Re: Openssl updates

Axel Thimm wrote: If some statement from legacy is needed about FC3/FC4 before that decision is made (which IMHO is needed), how about something along a heading of "Fedora Legacy is ending its current support model working towards direct involvement in maintenance of upcoming Fedora releas

Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy

Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 10:40:57PM -0500, Nils Breunese wrote: Every system needs an admin. I don't think it's realistic to not run 'yum update' for a year and expect everything to be fine. If you'd If there's no updates available, it doesn't matter how often they run

[SPAM] HIGH * Re: RHEL3: Problem going from RH 2.4.20 to Linus 2.4.33

David Douthitt wrote: I compiled a version of Linus' kernel 2.4.33 for CentOS 3 (RHEL 3) and found that several programs started failing with core dumps or lockups. It seems to center on two different things: the clone() call, and some kind of file locking call that isn't supported ("fuse

[SPAM] LOW * Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy

Bill Perrotta wrote: That is fine where can i download an iso of centos? If it is similar enough to do all labs for rhel3 rhce that is my only concern. Come on, Google is your friend. Go to http://www.centos.org/ and take it from there. CentOS 3 is exactly the same as RHEL 3, except for the

Re: Sorry for confusion -- Re: Some supporting ideas regarding fedora legacy project when FC6 is out today

Robinson Tiemuqinke wrote: Currently FC just scares aways small business users to Debian/Gentoo because the former have so short a lifespan. Without real business users play in these FC test-beds RHEL will die away shortly. Why do you think they will move to Debian or Gentoo? And why Debian

Re: lwn article on the death of Fedora Legacy

Matthew Miller wrote: I know that personally I haven't been able to contribute the amount of time I'd like to make this succeed. But I have a full-time job and a young child, and am mildly active in umpteen other projects. Legacy support is hard work, and really needs two or three full-tim

Re: [Fwd: Problem in Upgradation Mysql 3.23 in Fedora 2]

David Eisenstein wrote: I am cc'ing in the Fedora-Legacy-List just in case someone on it may have some answers for you. I did a quick search on rpm.pbone.net (a nice RPM package search engine) for "mysql" and it returned only mysql-3.23.58-x. You said you downloaded "mysql-server-4.1.1

Re: Odd problem with sha1sums

Gene Heskett wrote: Actually I'm not really sure running sha1sum on the device should give the same sum as running it on the iso file. I believe the standard procedure is to run sha1sum on the iso after you've downloaded it and then check the outcome. Did you do that? Yes. And did the sha1su

Re: Kernel panic - installing on HP DC7100

Nicholas Adrian Suppiah wrote: I am trying to install FC5 on a HP DC7100 but it fails to even load the installation kernel. The same goes for SuSE10.1. It just displays a kernel Panic message after detecting the mouse and keyboard. Can anyone advice? It may be a BIOS problem but I have yet t

Re: Odd problem with sha1sums

Gene Heskett wrote: I have now burnt 2 copies of the FC-6T2-live-dvd.iso, one on a +dvd and one on a -dvd disk. Both of these freshly written dvd's check with an identical sha1sum when doing a 'sha1sum -b /dev/cdrom'. But it doesn't match the sha1sum of the iso I started with! Is this a

Re: Now that fc2 is retired, is there any valid yum repos?

Gene Heskett wrote: Is this a desktop workstation or a server? If this is a workstation or a non-production server, why not just go with the Fedora flow? I run Fedora Core 5 on my workstation and it's working just fine. If you really don't like upgrading your OS every couple of months I'd backu

Re: Now that fc2 is retired, is there any valid yum repos?

Adam Gibson wrote: Nils Breunese (Lemonbit Internet) wrote: If you really don't like upgrading your OS every couple of months I'd backup my data and do a fresh install of CentOS 4.4. However, CentOS 5 will be out in 6 months... :o) No immediate need to upgrade then though as

Re: Now that fc2 is retired, is there any valid yum repos?

Gene Heskett wrote: Plz see subject. I'd like to clean up my yum repo list as it appears some of the repos have disappeared. Are there any new ones for truely legacy stuff? I don't believe so. Fedora Core 2 is dead, you'll have to upgrade to a newer Fedora Core version (or migrate to s

yum.log and logwatch

Hi all, I was looking through a logwatch e-mail from one of my FC3 servers and noticed the yum section said it updated e2fsprogs and tzdata yesterday. I was certain I didn't run yum yesterday and this server is not updated automatically. I grepped /var/log/yum.log for these packages and s

Re: apache 2.2.3 on FC3 - repo?

I wrote: Dave Stevens wrote: I'd like to update my apache httpd version from the current 2.0.53 to the most recent 2.2.3. I assume it is available in some repo but I don't know where. Ideas? The major repo's don't have it, as far as I know. Do you need 2.2 features? I guess you best up

Re: apache 2.2.3 on FC3 - repo?

Dave Stevens wrote: I'd like to update my apache httpd version from the current 2.0.53 to the most recent 2.2.3. I assume it is available in some repo but I don't know where. Ideas? The major repo's don't have it, as far as I know. Do you need 2.2 features? I guess you best upgrade to FC

Re: repos?

Dave Stevens wrote: I've done that, followed instructions (as far as I can see) and run "yum update" after a lot of checking of various sorts the last few lines of output are as follows... --> Processing Dependency: libavcodec.so.51 for package: vlc --> Processing Dependency: k3b = 0:0.1

Re: repos?

Dave Stevens wrote: I am new to this list. Will someone please point me to a FAQ? and especially to info about repos for use with my FC3? Just check the website: http://www.fedoralegacy.org/docs/yum-fc3.php Nils Breunese. -- fedora-legacy-list mailing list fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com htt

FC1/2 EOL? FC4 legacy?

Hello list, I was just wondering what the status of the EOL of FC1 and FC2 is and whether FC4 has already entered FL. On the website there's the announcement that the EOL will be on July 26. Has support indeed been suspended by that day? The website still mentions FC1-3 being supported an

Re: FL repositories down?

Seth Vidal wrote: On Sun, 2006-07-30 at 14:47 +0200, Nils Breunese wrote: My servers are currently unable to run yum update because the Fedora Legacy repositories seem unavailable. I also can't get to http:// download.fedoralegacy.org/fedora/3 in my browser. Is this known downtime or is the pr

Re: All rpm Commands Hang Indefinitely (RH 9)

Tim Evans wrote: I've just found FedoraLegacy; this is great. I have a batch of RH 9 systems that badly need updating, and have already started working with 'yum' to get them done. Remember Fedora Legacy will EOL RH9 by the end of this year. Nils Breunese. PGP.sig Description: Dit deel

Squirrelmail 1.4.7 security fixes

Hello, I see squirrelmail 1.4.7 fixes several security issues (see http:// www.squirrelmail.org/changelog.php), but I couldn't find any bugs related to these in bugzilla. I'm not a bugzilla wizard however, so I didn't open any, I might just be blind. Can anyone tell me if these issues affe

Re: Announcing End of Life times (Fedora Core 1, 2, Red Hat Linux 7.3, 9)

Jesse Keating wrote: With Fedora Core 6 Test 2 set to be released July 26th, it is time we announce the End of Life of our various Legacy supported releases. Shouldn't this info be on the website as well? The EOLs are three days away, but I have only seen this info pop up here on this m

Re: Friday Flames - What to do with RHL7.3/9 and FC1/2

Jeff Sheltren wrote: I agree with this - let's do away with RHL and FC1/FC2 support once we take on FC4. Jesse has already given many good reasons for doing so, so I won't repeat them here again :) Although I agree RHL and FC1/2 support should probably stop, this might be a big problem f

Re: Fedora products, to upgrade rather than backport?

Jesse Keating wrote: On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 16:12 -0500, Eric Rostetter wrote: You can though think it does make sense to change the handling because it is EOL, independent of who is touching it. EOL means end of development which means end of upgrades, at least to some. Can we agree to n

Re: fedora Core2 updates

Chris Olds wrote: I'm new to the list, I have some webservers running Fedora Core2, i'm using yum to manage updates. I've run into a dependency snafu, does anyone have a suggestion for satisfying this lib dependency? Resolving dependencies Unable to satisfy dependencies Package glibc-dumm

Re: RKHUNTER reporting on my system

kles koe wrote: why don't you just ask the author of rkhunter to update the hashes for these packges? i think i did once and it was fixed within a few days. I said I already reported this issue twice, but so far I haven't received any reaction and the latest version of the hashes still d

Re: RKHUNTER reporting on my system

Max Pyziur wrote: I have an FC2 system which rkhunter reports some suspicious files. In particular, during the MD5 hash scan, it reports /bin/dmesg /bin/kill /bin/login /bin/mount /usr/bin/kill I run FC2 and have a similar issue. I've run rkhunter --up

Re: FC3 (j)whois on .eu fails

Kevin Kofler wrote: This isn't quite a legacy-specific issue. The FC5 whois reacts the same way. Passing -h whois.eu on the command line works around this, just like your config file edit. But Red Hat maintained packages will probably be updated, while the legacy packages may not. The qu

Re: FC3 (j)whois on .eu fails

Jesse Keating wrote: On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 23:59 +0200, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit Internet) wrote: The tzdata update wan't a security issue either. I reckon this is an issue at least somewhat like the tzdata issue. Time being correct is something of a security issue, at a stretch.

Re: FC3 (j)whois on .eu fails

David Rees wrote: On 4/10/06, Danny Terweij - Net Tuning | Net <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have : jwhois-3.2.2-6.FC3.1 And whois on .eu fails (falling back to default whois server). When i add in jwhois.conf the following line : "\\.eu$" = "whois.eu"; Then it works. Time for an j

Re: sendmail update left me in a fix

Peter J. Holzer wrote: BTW, is there somewhere a complete up-to-date description of the spec file? The file above is just a "what's new since some unspecified release" file, and RPM to the max is now over 5 years old. See the documentation section on the frontpage of http://www.rpm.org/ Nils.

Re: BT RANT, Was Re: Question about yum.conf for fc2

Gene Heskett wrote: What the hecks the matter with you folks? Take Take Take, but never give back in kind. I just raised the speed limit to about 90% of my bandwidth, but thats still not enough to feed other hungry torrents. So if you have it, give it back. Fire up that client and share! Whe

Re: Question about yum.conf for fc2

Jeff Sheltren wrote: On Mar 23, 2006, at 8:37 AM, Gene Heskett wrote: Yum is rather continuously erroring out on fedora extras, both branches recently. Do I need to edit that line and send it someplace else now? Gene, as far as I know Fedora Extras has only ever been FC3 and up. What

Re: Fedora Legacy Update : kdelibs dependency problems

A E Lawrence wrote: Trying to update (yum) the kdelibs and kdelibs-devel rpms fails on a AMD64 FC3 legacy system because all the other kde packages appear to require kdebase-3.3.1-4.3.FC3. I can't see anyone else reporting this problem in the archives of this list, so I am mystified. I su

Re: 1-2-3 out, time for FC2?

Mike McCarty wrote: just think it would be interesting (for Fedora Legacy) to have some sort of idea of why people are running legacy versions of Red Hat and Fedora, so FL knows 'who they are doing it for'. My guess is that it's Oh, idle curiosity. Why would the people at FL be intere

Re: 1-2-3 out, time for FC2?

James Kosin wrote: My reasons: (1) Device driver for my Digi card is not supported by the newer kernels. (2) It took me weeks to setup everything originally, and I don't want to take weeks more if something goes wrong. (3) It actually works (FC1 that is)... I haven't had any problems

Re: 1-2-3 out, time for FC2?

Nigel Henry wrote: On Tuesday 21 March 2006 23:34, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit Internet) wrote: Why don't you update to a newer Fedora Core release? Hi Nils. Personally I take offense at someone telling me to get a better distro. I see this a lot on forums. Someone asking a questi

Re: 1-2-3 out, time for FC2?

Mike McCarty wrote: I have an FC2 machine which is my main machine. I don't have another, and no finances to get another, so I don't help with testing. OTOH, due to recent discussion regarding changes to QA policy, I'm not pulling from FL at the moment, so that may negate couting my machine. W

Re: 1-2-3 out, time for FC2?

Gene Heskett wrote: On Monday 20 March 2006 14:01, Donald Maner wrote: With the release of FC5, I figured I'd start the discussion to gauge the amount of support for keeping FC2 updates going. As specified in the FAQ, Fedora Legacy will pick it up and maintain it for two additional Fedora C

Re: docbook format Q

Op 20-mrt-2006, om 4:53 heeft Gene Heskett het volgende geschreven: I just installed kleansweep from the tarball, but have found that its docs are in a compressed docbook format. I asked once before how does one go about viewing such files, and was chide for not reading the fine manual. Well,

Re: Discussion of content, security Re: FC3 yum instructions

David Eisenstein wrote: STEP 2 AND STEP 1.4 I am wondering ... it seems to me that we included code in the RPM "legacy-yumconf-3-4.fc3.noarch.rpm" that includes and automatically installs the Fedora Legacy GPG key when this RPM package is installed. Can someone confirm or deny that? If so, the

Re: Announces

Danny Terweij wrote: From: "Nils Breunese (Lemonbit Internet)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Did you add your own .repo file to /etc/yum.repos.d/ or did you add the info to /etc/yum.conf? Or did you download the rpm that installs the repo file? I add them manual as .repo at yum.re

Re: Announces

Danny Terweij wrote: From: "Nils Breunese (Lemonbit Internet)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Update: mozilla-nss.i386 37:1.7.12-1.3.3.legacy - legacy-updates ?. Those and some others i did get today and dont see it on any anounce list i am subscribed to. I did get those announces...

Re: Announces

Danny Terweij wrote: So where are the announces of : Update: mozilla.i386 37:1.7.12-1.3.3.legacy - legacy-updates Update: mozilla-nspr.i386 37:1.7.12-1.3.3.legacy - legacy-updates Update: mozilla-nss.i386 37:1.7.12-1.3.3.legacy - legacy-updates ?. Those and some others i did get today and

Re: Announces

Danny Terweij wrote: At the legacy announce list i see only package update messages for Legacy Test. At the fedora announce list i only see for some time now only FC4 updated packages. Where do i see (mailing list) a list of the legacy FC3 new/updated announces? A mixed one is okay too w

Re: Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification: kernel (fc3)

Henry Hartley wrote: On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 10:17 AM Nils Breunese said: Henry Hartley wrote: Uname says I'm running 2.6.12-1.1372_FC3, which seems quite a bit older than this announced kernel. Yum appears to have have installed four newer kernels but I haven't rebooted in over six months so t

Re: Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification: kernel (fc3)

Henry Hartley wrote: On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 7:58 PM Marc Deslauriers said: Name: kernel Versions: fc3: kernel-2.6.12-2.3.legacy_FC3 Summary : The Linux kernel (the core of the Linux operating system). Please pardon my ignorance. Uname says I'm running 2.6.12-1.1372_FC3, which

VMware en Fedora

Hi all, Check out http://clunixchit.blogspot.com/2006/02/launching-fedora- based-livecd-with.html and the linked article there. Maybe interesting stuff for the QA/VMware department? Nils Breunese. -- fedora-legacy-list mailing list fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailma

Re: crazy thought about how to ease QA testing

Pekka Savola wrote: That's the primary reason I haven't volunteered for testing for FC2. I have an FC2 machine which I don't want to clobber. Isn't that the *reason* Legacy exists? We don't want to clobber our machines. I'd suspect most folks should have dozens if not hundreds of systems run

Re: An imap server?

Michael Mansour wrote: What yum install 'name' should I use for name to install an imap mail server on a RH7.3 box? I'm going to try and move the spam filtering off my desktop machine. Try dovecot. I don't see dovecot package at http://download.fedoralegacy.org/ redhat/7.3/os/i386/ so I gu

Re: An imap server?

Gene Heskett wrote: What yum install 'name' should I use for name to install an imap mail server on a RH7.3 box? I'm going to try and move the spam filtering off my desktop machine. yum install imap Nils. -- fedora-legacy-list mailing list fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.co

Re: KMail and its UI freezes while fetching/sorting mail

Gene Heskett wrote: This has about worn me out, to the extent that I'm looking for another email agent that can fetch from the local /var/spool/mail/user spoolfile fetchmail uses, run it thru SA, and deposit it for reading in the /root/Mail directory 100% compatible with the kmail way of doin

Re: Is FC3 now on Fedora Legacy?

Nigel Henry wrote: Hi Jesse. I'm only using Yum on one of my FC1 installs. Are the the FC3 security updates also available with apt, as most of my installs are already using apt for planetccrma stuff, and it's more convenient to just add the URL to the apt sources.list. Nigel. You might

Re: Is FC3 now on Fedora Legacy?

Gene Heskett wrote: On Wednesday 25 January 2006 16:43, Nigel Henry wrote: Hi folks. Thanks for all the support for FC1,2. Has FC3 now been transferred to Fedora Legacy? If so, I'll update my apt sources.list. I'd love to take part in testing packages, but as I've just been working with Linux f

Re: Obtaining the Latest ISOs for RH 7.3

Eric Wood wrote: I may be dreaming but is there some up-to-date RH 7.3 iso's that already incorporate most of the package updates? Are do I have to do a three-step process of: 1) installing the stock 7.3 2) update all rpms RedHat published 3) configure yum and update all the Legacy updates.

Re: Need discussion, Re: Latest contrib perl

Michael Mansour wrote: The perl versions I'm currently using on FC1 are from that directory: # rpm -q perl perl-suidperl perl-5.8.3-18.1.legacy perl-suidperl-5.8.3-18.1.legacy I built these versions for FC1; however, they are actually older than the -17.3.legacy versions. I didn't realize

Re: Latest contrib perl

Michael Mansour wrote: I'm trying to apply the latest contrib perl from: http://www.fedoralegacy.org/contrib/perl/ namely: perl-5.8.3-19.2.legacy.i386.rpm perl-suidperl-5.8.3-19.2.legacy.i386.rpm but I get the following result: # rpm -Uvh perl-suidperl-5.8.3-19.2.legacy.i386.rpm perl-5.8.3-

Re: Apt pkglist not updated?

Brian Perkins wrote: http://download.fedoralegacy.org/apt/redhat/9/i386/base/ pkglist.updates.bz2 was last modified Sept. 15th, but there are some new packages since then. I suspect that this is why apt isn't getting the new updates for me. Perhaps I'm using an old/broken version of ap

Re: Upcoming transition of FC3

Jim Popovitch wrote: Nils Breunese (Lemonbit Internet) wrote: Why would anyone who has updates enabled not want legacy updates to be enabled? From my perspective, I want to know *who* the updates are coming from. In the case of Redhat updates, I know that there are ISO-9001 procedures

Re: Upcoming transition of FC3

Jesse Keating wrote: On Sat, 2005-10-22 at 11:49 -0400, Tom Diehl wrote: Has anyone given thought to pushing an update to yum that enables these repos as the last update to come from the Fedora Project? That way for those that do not realize the transition is happening, it "just works" fo

Re: Another security problem..

G. Roderick Singleton wrote: Deamonshield works like a charm. If you check the forums there is a patch to make it work under RH7.3 provided you have python24 installed. I don't believe it's available via yum, right? Python24 is. Don't know about daemonshield as I did it from source and haven

Re: Another security problem..

G. Roderick Singleton wrote: Another script I've found is Daemon Shield [2], but I haven't tried it yet. Adds iptables rules for probing hosts. Any comments? Does anyone know of better scripts? Deamonshield works like a charm. If you check the forums there is a patch to make it work under RH7.

Re: Another security problem..

Matthew Nuzum wrote: I've not looked into it, but it would be nice if there was some *simple* to maintain script that would detect these types of probes and automatically add the IP to hosts.deny and etc. I found DenyHosts [1] which is a Python script you can run in daemon mode (or a cro

Re: Which is the last stable kernel for FC2?

Thomas wrote: About yum, I usually use it to upgrade some programs, but I'm not very confidence to do it with the kernel. I've got the memory problems with a production server. Isn't it too risky? Isn't what too risky? If you have problems with the current kernel, I guess you don't want t

Re: Which is the last stable kernel for FC2?

Thomas wrote: Using Fedora Core 2 '2.6.9-1.667', I'm suffering memory problems: --- Oct 16 21:03:10 www kernel: oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x1d2 --- Which is the last stable kernel for FC2 in order to check if this isn't a non-fixed bug? 2.6.10-1.771_FC2 is available from http://download.fe

Re: Subscribed properly?

Mike wrote: Hm, well, that looks just fine actually. You might want to name the Erm, did you notice I exclude kernel* ? Yes, there can be good reasons for that and shouldn't keep you from getting updates (except kernel updates of course) Nils. -- fedora-legacy-list mailing list fedora-l

Re: Subscribed properly?

Mike wrote: [base] gpgcheck=1 name=Fedora Core $releasever - Base baseurl=http://download.fedoralegacy.org/fedora/$releasever/os/ $basearch [updates] gpgcheck=1 name=Fedora Core $releasever updates baseurl=http://download.fedoralegacy.org/fedora/$releasever/updates/ $basearch [legacy-utils

Re: Subscribed properly?

the exact repository entries in your yum.conf? Nils Breunese Lemonbit Internet -- fedora-legacy-list mailing list fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

Re: New bugzilla feature

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jesse Keating: So would anybody be willing to mock up a web page using this rss information so that we can have a page that shows real-time but status. Jesse, that was a very amusing typo. :) Or, maybe it was intentional? ;) Er... whoops. I