On 6/15/06, Philip Molter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
With that said, it'd be nice if right after a release was moved into
FC4, the outstanding bugs (not security fixes, but bugs) were addressed.
FC2's kernel, for example, has numerous little bugs that were in
Bugzilla both before and after th
I too lack time to contribute other than my projects' funding of
the SNARE ports to FC2 & FC3. Since that has locked us into
very specific kernel releases (2.6.9 & 2.6.11), we're currently
exploring what path to take to allow us to upgrade to something
newer (and I like what I've been reading abo
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 11:04:38PM -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> ... I consider Fedora to be a desktop solution, and since I run
> servers I have not considered Fedora a suitable replacement. I do know
> about the Fedora server-only ISO releases, but I feel the Fedora focus
> is much more on a
Michael Mansour wrote:
Although I like and highly respect the communities (both Fedora and FL) I find
these days I have little time to contribute and "play" with distributions -
life gets in the way :P - so my involvement with both Fedora and FL will cease
when I've migrated those last 3 machine
> David Eisenstein wrote:
> > As we continue to talk over where Fedora Legacy is going, and what distro's
> > should or shouldn't be maintained by us, it occurs to me that we are
> > forgetting some important things
> >
> >* How many contributors do we have now that get the work of Fedor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Eisenstein wrote:
> As we continue to talk over where Fedora Legacy is going, and what distro's
> should or shouldn't be maintained by us, it occurs to me that we are
> forgetting some important things
>
>* How many contributors do we
As we continue to talk over where Fedora Legacy is going, and what distro's
should or shouldn't be maintained by us, it occurs to me that we are
forgetting some important things
* How many contributors do we have now that get the work of Fedora
Legacy done, and how many of those wil
