On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 11:34:59 -0700,
"Daniel B. Thurman" wrote:
> On 10/09/2009 12:36 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> > If you have residential cable or dsl from the local duopoly they
> > are quite likely to be messing with you. They may provide DNS with bogus
> > TTLs, send RST packets inte
Hi all,
I have a problem with unix mail
Whenever there's a cron failure, etc. mail gets sent to root on
localhost. It seems that it tries to use sendmail, except I have ssmtp
set up in the alternatives.
From reading the docs, it looks like ssmtp doesn't support unix mail.
I don't want the lo
Am Mittwoch, den 07.10.2009, 18:03 + schrieb Croombe F. Pensom:
> Ever since I upgraded to F11, I can no longer log in as root.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Enabling_Root_User_For_GNOME_Display_Manager
Regards,
Christoph
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: ht
Am Donnerstag, den 08.10.2009, 21:25 -0400 schrieb Steve Blackwell:
> I'm using xmessage from /etc/profile to put up a message whenever
> anyone logs in. It works fine but it is butt ugly! Does anyone know of
> an alternative? Perhaps something that uses a GNOME theme?
yum install gxmessage
Regar
On 10/11/2009 03:03 PM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
> Apologies if this is not the proper place to
> post this question.
>
> There are two versions of "Glade Interface Designer"
> programs, v2.12.2 and v3.6.1, provided with F11 and I
> seem to be having a problem with GID v3.6.1.
>
> There seems to be
On 10/11/2009 6:00 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 10:57 -0400, David wrote:
>> So your point is that Fedora is a a GNOME *based* distribution taken
>> from the Docs? I would imagine that the 'GNOME thing' you see is a
>> result of the Doc author being familiar with GNOME and
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 10:30:21PM +0100, jenny chapman wrote:
>
> Hi I have an intel chipset G31/946Z with graphics (GMA 3100). I have
> just installed fedora 11 but am not able to change the screen resolution
> so assume I may need additional drivers. New to linux. Advice much
> appreciated.
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 08:20:07AM -0700, Markus Kesaromous wrote:
> Subject: Converting GPT to MBR
>
>
> Second try to find an answer...
> Hi all,
> I purchased a 1.5 TB HD, and I used gparted to create 4 partitions (GPT),
> without knowing that winx XP (32) cannot access GPT. Among the
> is a v
On 10/11/2009 02:30 PM, jenny chapman wrote:
> Hi I have an intel chipset G31/946Z with graphics (GMA 3100). I have
> just installed fedora 11 but am not able to change the screen resolution
> so assume I may need additional drivers. New to linux. Advice much
> appreciated.
>
>
This has been
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 10:57 -0400, David wrote:
> So your point is that Fedora is a a GNOME *based* distribution taken
> from the Docs? I would imagine that the 'GNOME thing' you see is a
> result of the Doc author being familiar with GNOME and not KDE. On the
> help list I often see someone ask fo
Apologies if this is not the proper place to
post this question.
There are two versions of "Glade Interface Designer"
programs, v2.12.2 and v3.6.1, provided with F11 and I
seem to be having a problem with GID v3.6.1.
There seems to be some widgets that are not supported,
hence some widgets being
Hi I have an intel chipset G31/946Z with graphics (GMA 3100). I have
just installed fedora 11 but am not able to change the screen resolution
so assume I may need additional drivers. New to linux. Advice much
appreciated.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https
Frank Cox wrote:
> customizegoogle is available through mozilla
Thanks for the correction :-0
I will keep it in mind, in case I need further
protection.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fe
Hello all,
Swing applications' menus have no border when Clearlook theme is
selected in both fedora 10 and f11, however when nodoka theme is
selected, the menus are well displayed.
currently i have fedora 11 with the last updates which include:
java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-29.b16.fc11
gtk2-engine
Yeah, every morning, I cannot log in, from
the keyboard nor from another system.
I am forced to hit the reset button.
My system is an Intel Core 2 Duo.
When is this annoying problem going to
get fixed or has this been reported as
a bug somewhere?
Here is what I see in /var/log/message file:
==
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Julian Aloofi <
julian.fedorali...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 11.10.2009, 11:39 -0700 schrieb Paolo Galtieri:
> > I'm getting a lot (>42000) of the following message showing up in
> > my .xsession-errors file
> >
> > (firefox:15823): Gdk-WARNING **:
Am Sonntag, den 11.10.2009, 11:39 -0700 schrieb Paolo Galtieri:
> I'm getting a lot (>42000) of the following message showing up in
> my .xsession-errors file
>
> (firefox:15823): Gdk-WARNING **: XID collision, trouble ahead
>
> pid 15823 is /usr/lib64/firefox-3.5.3/firefox
>
> I also see the fo
i've been fighting with this for a while -- any attempt to play
youtube videos plays them at what appears to be double speed, no
audio, and fairly erratically. i have a fully-updated f11 system, and
i have no idea what the problem is -- flash had been working fine for
the longest time. any tho
I'm getting a lot (>42000) of the following message showing up in my
.xsession-errors file
(firefox:15823): Gdk-WARNING **: XID collision, trouble ahead
pid 15823 is /usr/lib64/firefox-3.5.3/firefox
I also see the following errors:
(firefox:5767): Gdk-WARNING **: GdkWindow 0x3f02525 unexpectedl
On 10/09/2009 12:36 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 14:12:32 -0400,
> "Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak" wrote:
>
>> Anyway, it is unlikely that your ISP is messing with you (has such a
>> case ever been reported?), but it is technically possible.
>>
> I think what you mean
On 10/11/2009 11:13 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> Put in this way, it appears that KDE and PPC are
> just "supported because there are a few weird
> people and weird machines around".
Seems people try hard to find fault. However the design is changing for
Fedora 12
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/W
--- On Fri, 10/9/09, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> From: Kevin Fenzi
> Subject: Re: strange issue with XFCE spin LiveCD
> To: fedora-list@redhat.com
> Date: Friday, October 9, 2009, 2:33 PM
> On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 06:31:29 -0700
> (PDT)
> Globe Trotter
> wrote:
>
> ...snip...
>
> > None of the suggesti
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 10/11/2009 07:48 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
>> Nevertheless, it remains true that Fedora is a Gnome-based distro! Why?
>> Because it's all over the documentation. I doubt you'll find the phrase
>> "Fedora is a Gnome-based distro" anywhere in the docs, but the fact
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 10:47:19 -0600
Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> I had a look at customizegoogle, but I pass. Thanks for
> the suggestion, but I prefer to avoid installing
> scripts and firefox addons, etc., that do not originate
> from reputable sources like fedora, mozilla, etc.
customizegoo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/11/2009 11:42 AM, Jim wrote:
> Thunderbird 3.0-2.7.b4.fc11 has strange problems going on.
> My friends are calling me and telling me that Mouse won't work , can't
> send email
> on SMTP server, loosing delete Icons etc.
>
> On the first two I h
Frank Cox wrote:
> [google-analytics.com is] included in my user.action
file. and it hasn't caused any problems yet
> that I'm aware of.
I have removed ssl.google-analytics.com from the sites
that bypass privoxy, but to be safe, I did make an
entry to refuse cookies.
I checked your user.actio
Thunderbird 3.0-2.7.b4.fc11 has strange problems going on.
My friends are calling me and telling me that Mouse won't work , can't
send email
on SMTP server, loosing delete Icons etc.
On the first two I had them move .thunderbird into /Download, temp, and
uninstall Thunderbird and reinstall an
On 10/11/2009 10:18 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-10-10 at 21:01 -0400, David wrote:
>> The applications have to be written in 'something'. These happen to be
>> written in GTK. And my point was that that does not make Fedora a
>> GNOME distribution. It appears to me that Fedora *ch
On 10/11/2009 07:48 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Nevertheless, it remains true that Fedora is a Gnome-based distro! Why?
> Because it's all over the documentation. I doubt you'll find the phrase
> "Fedora is a Gnome-based distro" anywhere in the docs, but the fact
> remains that at every junct
On Sat, 2009-10-10 at 21:01 -0400, David wrote:
> The applications have to be written in 'something'. These happen to be
> written in GTK. And my point was that that does not make Fedora a
> GNOME distribution. It appears to me that Fedora *chooses* to be a
> GNOME Desktop default distro.
Well, th
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 12:04 +0100, Paul Smith wrote:
> but I am using XFCE
Stick that detail in the subject line. It's more likely to get the
attention of someone with an answer, that way. I haven't tried XFCE for
a couple of years.
That, or try a Google search.
--
[...@localhost ~]$ uname -r
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Tim wrote:
>> I have a computer where the Network Manager Applet cannot be seen. How
>> can I restore it on the system tray?
>
> If you're using Gnome, you may have removed the "Notification Area"
> which is where the Network Manager applet (and others) appear. R
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 11:36 +0100, Paul Smith wrote:
> I have a computer where the Network Manager Applet cannot be seen. How
> can I restore it on the system tray?
If you're using Gnome, you may have removed the "Notification Area"
which is where the Network Manager applet (and others) appear. R
Dear All,
I have a computer where the Network Manager Applet cannot be seen. How
can I restore it on the system tray?
Thanks in advance,
Paul
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.
Frank Cox wrote:
> Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
>
>> Any way to solve the conundrum?
>
> 1. It's included in my user.action file. and it
hasn't caused any problems
> yet that I'm aware of.
>
> 2. If you read the article referred you to earlier
you will discover a
> reference to customizegoog
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 09:10:27 +0500,
gil...@altern.org wrote:
>
> I took a look before writing my answer and the information I got is it's a
> mean for people on the net or your ISP to take a look at the data on your
> computer *before* it's encrypted.
Not on your computer, when it reaches t
36 matches
Mail list logo
