Original Message
Subject:Power Managemet Testday 22. Oct 2009
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 03:04:12 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jan Scotka jsco...@redhat.com
To: Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com
Hi folks,
Today 2009-10-22 is planned next Power Management Test Day.
We
On Wednesday 21 October 2009 23:27:31 Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 15:16 +0800, Liang Suilong wrote:
Today I upgrade my Fedora to Fedora 12 Beta, It looks very well. But I
found ATi display driver does not run well.
My display card is Sapphire HD3650 with 256MB GDDR3
Dne 21.10.2009 23:35, Adam Williamson napsal(a):
4 - F12 boots really slow on my laptop
http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/files/tmp/bootchart.png something
wrong is happening while udev loading
I have filed a bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528312
... if you run udevadm monitor
2009/10/21 John Poelstra poels...@redhat.com:
520750 - PackageKit - ASSIGNED - Software Update windows checks for update
does not stop ..
This has been reported by one person (no dupes), and I'm still waiting
for more information. I suspect it's actually a hardware problem or
file-system
Le Jeu 22 octobre 2009 09:46, Marcus Moeller a écrit :
is there a way to extract multiple sources in a spec files %setup section?
Something like:
for i in {1..10}; do tar xfz %(SOURCE$i}; done
If you have multiple sources that's usually a sign you're doing something
wrong. It is very
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 3:46 AM, Marcus Moeller wrote:
Hi,
is there a way to extract multiple sources in a spec files %setup section?
Something like:
for i in {1..10}; do tar xfz %(SOURCE$i}; done
Best Regards
Marcus
%setup -q -c -n %{name} -a 0 -a 1 -a 2 -a 3 -a 4 -a 5 -a 6 -a 7 -a 8
I'm trying to create an update for a new package (mingw32-freeglut,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528892) in F-12, but I get
the error below:
$ make update
[...]
Creating a new update for mingw32-freeglut-2.6.0-0.1.rc1.fc12
mingw32-freeglut-2.6.0-0.1.rc1.fc12 not tagged
On Thursday, 22 October 2009 at 00:07, Tom Lane wrote:
Lyos Gemini Norezel lyos.gemininore...@gmail.com writes:
Why not just require a secondary email address?
Require a secondary email address? Not everyone has one, or wants
to hand it over if they do. That sounds more like a recipe for
Hi again,
I finally managed to create the image by downloading net install .iso
image and providing its install.img to jigdo!
Good luck,
Hedayat
On ۰۹/۱۰/۲۲ 03:55, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to download F12 beta DVD x86_64 iso using jigdo (I've used
jigdo to download previous
Hi,
On 21.10.2009 20:10, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
* Should we formalize the unwritten policy for Red Hat maintainers who leave
the company and don't want to maintain their packages anymore?
* Do we need sanity checks to be sure maintainers who do want to keep
their packages do so?
I
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:10:22AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
* Should we expedite these requests in the future if the email address for
the maintainer is no longer in existence?
Yes, please. If the mail address of a maintainers do not work anymore,
then their packages should be orphaned,
$ ll /usr/libexec/pt_chown
-rws--x--x 1 root root 28418 2009-09-28 13:42 /usr/libexec/pt_chown
$ ll /usr/bin/chsh
-rws--x--x 1 root root 18072 2009-10-05 16:28 /usr/bin/chsh
What is the purpose of making binaries like these unreadable?
Originally I thought it was something to do with them
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 09:26:06 +0100,
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
I'm trying to create an update for a new package (mingw32-freeglut,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528892) in F-12, but I get
the error below:
$ make update
[...]
Creating a new
Hi,
I would like to announce couple of major changes in the TeX Live 2009
repository.
The main improvements are:
* TL2009 now contains virtual provides to resolve dependencies among
.sty files. This assures you have a complete set of other styles
installed in order to use one. To install a
On 10/06/2009 06:29 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 16:27 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Thanks for bringing this up. I'll create a patch for the scripts
generating the livecd to add rd_NO_LUKS to the normal livecd
syslinux.cfg entry. I already was planning on doing this, but I
On 10/22/2009 01:46 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 10/06/2009 06:29 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 16:27 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Thanks for bringing this up. I'll create a patch for the scripts
generating the livecd to add rd_NO_LUKS to the normal livecd
syslinux.cfg entry.
Hi,
I've installed F-12 beta on my new laptop with ati radeon hd 4570 graphic
card, I was going to file new bug. With kms enabled, everything is really
slw, with 'nomodeset' it's much faster. I can't say exactly how slow
it
is, is there anything I can use for measuring?
Michal
btw,
On 10/22/2009 01:56 PM, Liang Suilong wrote:
I try to add kernel parameter nomodeset to turn off KMS. After logging
in Gnome and run gnome-terminal, I can scroll up and down my mouse so
smoothly. I do not feel scrolling in the terminal is slow.
I noticed that performance with KMS is more
Jindrich Novy wrote:
Hi,
I would like to announce couple of major changes in the TeX Live 2009
repository.
Where?
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 08:30:37AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
Jindrich Novy wrote:
Hi,
I would like to announce couple of major changes in the TeX Live 2009
repository.
Where?
In the Fedora TeX Live 2009 testing repository, for more info:
Hi,
/sbin/installkernel doesn't pass --dracut to /sbin/new-kernel-pkg, so a
make install from a kernel.org kernel tree tries to
invoke /sbin/mkinitrd rather than dracut. Is that intentional?
Also, any ideas on why a dracut-generated initramfs image generated for
a kernel.org kernel tree would
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 08:47 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
2009/10/21 John Poelstra poels...@redhat.com:
520750 - PackageKit - ASSIGNED - Software Update windows checks for update
does not stop ..
This has been reported by one person (no dupes), and I'm still waiting
for more information.
2009/10/22 Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 3:46 AM, Marcus Moeller wrote:
Hi,
is there a way to extract multiple sources in a spec files %setup section?
Something like:
for i in {1..10}; do tar xfz %(SOURCE$i}; done
Best Regards
Marcus
%setup -q -c -n
Hi,
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 11:10 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:11:37AM +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
Hi,
Jim Parsons left Red Hat a little while back and the only contact
details I have is his Red Hat email address, which is of course no
longer valid. I've
- Put the iso on a ntfs partition
- Put the vmlinuz+initrd.img in F11's grub .. and boot into the installer,
pointing it to install from HDD
- The installer cannot pickup the iso
Yeah this probably won't work because of the NTFSness, but what's the
exact error message? What does the log on
On 10/14/2009 03:40 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Jan Horakjho...@redhat.com wrote:
Mozilla prefers using their own system in this case. It has some pros, like
user don't have to download debug packages (which is approx 80MB for each
package). Building the
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 09:48 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 11:04 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
$ ll /usr/libexec/pt_chown
-rws--x--x 1 root root 28418 2009-09-28 13:42 /usr/libexec/pt_chown
$ ll /usr/bin/chsh
-rws--x--x 1 root root 18072 2009-10-05 16:28
#fedora-bugzappers: F-12-Blocker bug review (part#1)
Meeting started by jlaska at 15:01:09 UTC. The full logs are available
at
Greetings!
This Tuesday was the Confined Users Test Day / FitFinish [1] (TD/FF).
Though we expected higher attendance, the results are really valuable.
The most valuable outcome of a test day could be a fact that we should
bring more attention/people to using/testing SELinux policy and related
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 17:08 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 12:31 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
I just installed F12 Beta. Here are some thoughts
1 - during
Is anyone actively working on multiseat?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Multiseat
Linus Walleij
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 11:16 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
What kind of checks do you mean? If maintainers want to keep their
packages, they can just change the owner of the package to their new
private account before leaving Red Hat.
That assumes the maintainer knows they're leaving Red Hat ahead
Hi all. It has been brought to my attention that my description of my
future vision of rawhide as explained here is much clearer than previous
attempts (including the current no frozen rawhide wiki page). So I
felt it prudent to forward it along to the devel list for more eyes to
look upon it
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 18:20 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
Is anyone actively working on multiseat?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Multiseat
The necessary infrastructure for multiseat is (slowly) being developed
in ConsoleKit and gdm branches upstream.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 09:50 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
This is my vision on how to accomplish both a always active development
stream, and a more stable pending release stream, keeping everybody
happy. Want to help? I'll be at FUDCon Toronto discussing roadblocks
to this vision and
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 09:59:00AM -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 09:48 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 11:04 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
$ ll /usr/libexec/pt_chown
-rws--x--x 1 root root 28418 2009-09-28 13:42 /usr/libexec/pt_chown
$ ll
Hello,
I just saw this article about an effort to create Universal binary style ELF
binaries for Linux, and I thought that this would be something to watch, so
that Fedora could integrate both x86-32 and x86-64 into single DVD sets.
http://icculus.org/fatelf/
There is even a proof of concept VM
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 12:28 -0500, King InuYasha wrote:
http://icculus.org/fatelf/
There is even a proof of concept VM of Ubuntu 9.04 that has both
32-bit and 64-bit kernels and all the apps compiled as FatELF binaries
Except, they're not really ELF binaries. ELF doesn't allow you to do
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 13:06 +, Rawhide Report wrote:
Compose started at Thu Oct 22 06:15:12 UTC 2009
Broken deps for i386
--
openscada-visStation-0.6.4-3.fc12.i686 requires
openscada-Special-FlibSYS
Updated Packages:
On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 20:20 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi All,
I thought with the mass rebuild the i586 rpms were suppose to be gone
but it seems the F-12 repository still has quite a few of them. Are
the old packages that should have been blocked, ones that's that
weren't rebuilt for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 22.10.2009 19:38, schrieb Jon Masters:
Except, they're not really ELF binaries. ELF doesn't allow you to do
both at the same time in the headers, so this adds a new header and is
essentially an encapsulation for other ELF files. Thus, a kernel
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 19:43 +0200, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 22.10.2009 19:38, schrieb Jon Masters:
Except, they're not really ELF binaries. ELF doesn't allow you to do
both at the same time in the headers, so this adds a new header and is
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 09:50 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
Hi all. It has been brought to my attention that my description of my
future vision of rawhide as explained here is much clearer than previous
attempts (including the current no frozen rawhide wiki page). So I
felt it prudent to forward
King InuYasha wrote:
I just saw this article about an effort to create Universal binary style
ELF binaries for Linux, and I thought that this would be something to
watch, so that Fedora could integrate both x86-32 and x86-64 into single
DVD sets.
http://icculus.org/fatelf/
Yuck!!! Please
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 10:55 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
So to make this a reality, we need to ensure that whatever is in rawhide
has a *=* ENVR than anything in the other trees. So I assume that when
submitting a bodhi update, bodhi would check rawhide and ensure that
whatever you were about
Quentin Armitage wrote:
Error: xorg-x11-proto-devel conflicts with libXxf86dga-devel
[snip]
Should the Rawhide report have identified this as a broken dependency?
No. The Rawhide report only lists unresolvable dependencies, not conflicts.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.atwrote:
King InuYasha wrote:
I just saw this article about an effort to create Universal binary style
ELF binaries for Linux, and I thought that this would be something to
watch, so that Fedora could integrate both x86-32
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 11:02 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 10:55 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
So to make this a reality, we need to ensure that whatever is in rawhide
has a *=* ENVR than anything in the other trees. So I assume that when
submitting a bodhi update, bodhi
King InuYasha wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
mailto:kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
King InuYasha wrote:
I just saw this article about an effort to create Universal
binary style
ELF binaries for Linux, and I thought that this
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 11:02 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 10:55 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
So to make this a reality, we need to ensure that whatever is in rawhide
has a *=* ENVR than anything in the other trees. So I assume that when
submitting a bodhi update, bodhi
Tomas Mraz wrote:
We could allow adding numbers after the dist tag in release for this
purpose.
That is already allowed, and encouraged, for branch-specific modfications,
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Minor_release_bumps_for_old_branches
-- Rex
--
Hi Jindrich,
(sorry for not replaying to the original message, I was reading the
list through archives)
I was using TeXLive 2009 repository before, without any problem. After
seeing your message,
I followed the instruction
In case you have an older TL2009 installed on your system from the
tor 2009-10-22 klockan 12:28 -0500 skrev King InuYasha:
I just saw this article about an effort to create Universal binary
style ELF binaries for Linux, and I thought that this would be
something to watch, so that Fedora could integrate both x86-32 and
x86-64 into single DVD sets.
There's
On Thursday 22 October 2009 19:46:29 Jiri Cerny wrote:
Hi Jindrich,
(sorry for not replaying to the original message, I was reading the
list through archives)
I was using TeXLive 2009 repository before, without any problem. After
seeing your message,
I followed the instruction
In
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 13:39 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
Tomas Mraz wrote:
We could allow adding numbers after the dist tag in release for this
purpose.
That is already allowed, and encouraged, for branch-specific modfications,
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 09:17 +0200, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
For the slow 2D performance - _how_ slow is it, really? gnome-terminal
has never been much of a speed demon. Does it get any faster if you boot
with 'nomodeset' as a kernel parameter?
Hi,
I've installed F-12 beta on my new
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 13:07 +, Mat Booth wrote:
2009/10/22 Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 3:46 AM, Marcus Moeller wrote:
Hi,
is there a way to extract multiple sources in a spec files %setup section?
Something like:
for i in {1..10}; do tar xfz
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 11:33 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
Good point. SCM commit time (or tag time) with a CVS hook would be
awesome as long as the hook was fast enough.
Note, I didn't say CVS, I said SCM (:
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca:
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:50:54 -0700, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi all. It has been brought to my attention that my description of my
future vision of rawhide as explained here is much clearer than previous
attempts (including the current no frozen rawhide wiki page). []
On 10/21/2009 07:47 AM, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
Hi.
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:40:46 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
In most cases, you can get that information from the original RPM
compared to the system... if you have the RPM :).
rpm -Vppackage_file_goes_here
Which is pretty much what I
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:28:36 -0500, King InuYasha ngomp...@gmail.com wrote:
I just saw this article about an effort to create Universal binary style ELF
binaries for Linux, and I thought that this would be something to watch, so
that Fedora could integrate both x86-32 and x86-64 into single
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 19:56 +0800, Liang Suilong wrote:
To Adam Williamson
I try to add kernel parameter nomodeset to turn off KMS. After logging
in Gnome and run gnome-terminal, I can scroll up and down my mouse so
smoothly. I do not feel scrolling in the terminal is slow.
Thanks for
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 09:25 -0400, Lyos Gemini Norezel wrote:
In this day and age? It's highly unusual for people to only have one.
I'd say it's rather more common than it used to be; many people don't
use ISP email any more, they just use a gmail or Yahoo! or whatever
account for everything.
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 09:43 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 11:16 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
What kind of checks do you mean? If maintainers want to keep their
packages, they can just change the owner of the package to their new
private account before leaving Red Hat.
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 09:50 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
Hi all. It has been brought to my attention that my description of my
future vision of rawhide as explained here is much clearer than previous
attempts (including the current no frozen rawhide wiki page). So I
felt it prudent to forward
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 14:47 -0600, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:50:54 -0700, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi all. It has been brought to my attention that my description of my
future vision of rawhide as explained here is much clearer than previous
attempts
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 09:43:46AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 11:16 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
What kind of checks do you mean? If maintainers want to keep their
packages, they can just change the owner of the package to their new
private account before leaving Red Hat.
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009, Chuck Anderson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 09:43:46AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 11:16 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
What kind of checks do you mean? If maintainers want to keep their
packages, they can just change the owner of the package to
Pete Zaitcev writes:
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:28:36 -0500, King InuYasha ngomp...@gmail.com wrote:
I just saw this article about an effort to create Universal binary style ELF
binaries for Linux, and I thought that this would be something to watch, so
that Fedora could integrate both x86-32 and
Le Jeu 22 octobre 2009 23:20, Jesse Keating a écrit :
So you can continue to run rawhide all you want. Your entry point to
rawhide may change slightly, you may have to start with the current
Fedora release or the current testing release for the next Fedora, and
then upgrade to the rawhide
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 16:42 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
Perhaps no one should be using their @redhat.com address for Fedora
work :-/
We generally discourage it but several still do it.
Uh, we do? No-one's ever indicated that to me. Why would it be
discouraged? Doesn't RH like its
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 04:42:16PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009, Chuck Anderson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 09:43:46AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 11:16 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
What kind of checks do you mean? If maintainers want to keep their
Le Jeu 22 octobre 2009 23:45, Adam Williamson a écrit :
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 16:42 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
Perhaps no one should be using their @redhat.com address for Fedora
work :-/
We generally discourage it but several still do it.
Uh, we do? No-one's ever indicated that to
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:02:42 -0700,
Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
Yes, but it may happen before the bodhi stage, when we get autoqa
working on post-build tests. This kind of check could happen at SCM
commit time, package build time, or finally bodhi push time. Seems
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 04:42:16PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009, Chuck Anderson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 09:43:46AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 11:16 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
What kind of checks
A few months ago I put together a package for pxe-kexec, a tool that
uses kexec to boot already-running machine from a PXE server, which is
handy for kicking off OS installs remotely. The package has been
reviewed and is ready to go, except I'm not sponsored and haven't
found the time to become
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 18:26 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
I actually have both.
rhel bugs get assigned to svidal at redhat.com
fedora bugs go to skvidal at sethdot.org
Many people aren't willing to jump through the hoops necessary to manage
that separation.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom²
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 14:18 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
I have two particular nits with it. One, it's pretty unwieldy,
especially for part time maintainers (thinking how many hoops we'll have
to jump through just to keep our packages up to date). Having to jump
through the Bodhi hoops
I think this is an awesome idea, and yes I think this version of the
verbage is more clear. Kudos to Jesse (and all those involved in the
development of the idea of the split rawhide) and I hope to see this
come to fruition.
-Adam
--
http://maxamillion.googlepages.com
Hi,
On 22.10.2009 19:29, Quentin Armitage wrote:
1. Is the script that is run and produces the output at
http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/needed-f12-rebuilds.html actually the
script referred to at the bottom of that page
(https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/browser/scripts) ? The reason I ask is
I'll take it if that's ok. I'm new to packaging and looking for more
experience.
-Scott
-Original Message-
From: fedora-devel-list-boun...@redhat.com [mailto:fedora-devel-list-
boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Ed Swierk
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 6:12 PM
To: Development
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 18:26 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
I actually have both.
rhel bugs get assigned to svidal at redhat.com
fedora bugs go to skvidal at sethdot.org
Many people aren't willing to jump through the hoops necessary to manage
that
King InuYasha wrote:
I dunno, it could be useful for Live CDs/USBs. It would let you pack
multiple arches onto a single LiveCD/USB.
The Live CDs are already full without supporting this completely useless
feature.
Surely, the real solution is to position the 64-bit version more prominently
I would also like to jump on the help train if there is anything I am able
to lend a hand with.
-Adam (From Android)
On Oct 22, 2009 9:05 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009, Adam Miller wrote: I think this is an awesome idea,
and yes I think this ve...
I agree, how
Alexander Boström wrote:
There's already lib / lib64 for parallell-installation of libraries,
though granted it's limited to only two arches, but yes, something that
covers bin too would be useful.
bin is not multilib for a reason. You don't need 32-bit binaries on a 64-bit
machine unless
Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 3:31 AM, Rahul Sundaram
sunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Hi
I did a quick survey from Fedora on what software Fedora users are using
that is not available in the repo. Here are the results. If you find
anything interesting, feel free to pick it
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24613
--- Comment #4 from Akira TAGOH ak...@tagoh.org 2009-10-21 23:37:27 PST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Indeed, in the pattern you got after modifying that line, you see that charset
is empty, that is, fontconfig could not recognize any
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24613
--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-10-22
00:31:46 PST ---
The correct solution is probably to write a filter that adds the freetype info
to the font files, so they become normal unicody fonts any font libe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Specific Information about default font need to be displayed on global
font settings' GUI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530285
Summary: Specific
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530285
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617
--- Comment #24 from Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com 2009-10-22 05:07:15
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #23)
2. You
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526204
--- Comment #7 from Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com 2009-10-22 06:01:59
EDT ---
updated package link
Author: ozamosi
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/msimonson-anonymouspro-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19493
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Log Message:
.cvsignore and sources entries for source
Index: .cvsignore
Author: ozamosi
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/msimonson-anonymouspro-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25401
Added Files:
msimonson-anonymouspro-fonts-fontconfig.conf
msimonson-anonymouspro-fonts.spec
Log Message:
Add missing files
--- NEW FILE
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24613
Behdad Esfahbod freedesk...@behdad.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529196
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-10-22 11:11:18 EDT ---
Author: ozamosi
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gdouros-aegean-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv16603
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
gdouros-aegean-fonts-fontconfig.conf gdouros-aegean-fonts.spec
Log Message:
First version
--- NEW
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508899
--- Comment #12 from Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com 2009-10-22 11:57:43
EDT ---
I believe this is fixed in freetype
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511580
Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529594
--- Comment #20 from Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com 2009-10-22 15:04:59
EDT ---
Maybe someone can first describe what
1 - 100 of 170 matches
Mail list logo
