Outage Notification - date -d '2009-12-11 02:00:00 UTC'

2009-12-09 Thread Mike McGrath
There will be an outage starting at date -d '2009-12-11 02:00:00 UTC', which will last approximately 2 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d 'date -d '2009-12-11 02:00:00 UTC'' Affected Services: Database

Re: F12 updates-testing issue: X flickers and fails to start

2009-12-09 Thread Michal Schmidt
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 11:12:07 +0200 (EET) Pekka Savola wrote: Now gdm login however doesn't show my username and fingerprint login is no longer an option Looks like the issue with hal-0.5.14-1: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-12840 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list

abrt issue

2009-12-09 Thread Neal Becker
I just got a crash in kde plasma. Traceback is not useful, because of missing debug pacakges. I'm told I can reload after 'installing the needed packages', but there is no clue what packages are needed. A bit of a mystery. It seems sometimes abrt will go ahead and download needed debuginfo

Re: abrt issue

2009-12-09 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 07:47:44 -0500, Neal wrote: I just got a crash in kde plasma. Traceback is not useful, because of missing debug pacakges. Seems to happen more frequently recently. The latest backtraces I've seen in bugzilla all were missing dozens of debuginfo packages. I'm told I can

Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?

2009-12-09 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 06:51:59 +0100, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote: Seems to me, as if some people in Fedora's leadership don't want to understand that being able to deploy Linux on old or recycled hardware used to be one big selling point in Linux. I think the question is

Re: thunderbird is removing spaces

2009-12-09 Thread Joachim Backes
On 12/09/2009 01:23 PM, Stefan Assmann wrote: Hi, thunderbird seem to remove spaces from lines that only consist of one or more spaces. Any way of preventing thunderbird from doing so? I already have mailnews.send_plaintext_flowed false and turned of line wrapping. With these option sending

Re: abrt issue

2009-12-09 Thread Jiri Moskovcak
$ yum update abrt --enablerepo=updatetesting and try the updated version which should fix some problems with debuginfo installing. It should be: yum update abrt --enablerepo=updates-testing, but it seems it didn't hit the repository yet even thou I got the email. J. attachment:

Re: abrt issue

2009-12-09 Thread Neal Becker
Jiri Moskovcak wrote: On 12/09/2009 02:05 PM, Neal Becker wrote: Jiri Moskovcak wrote: On 12/09/2009 01:47 PM, Neal Becker wrote: I just got a crash in kde plasma. Traceback is not useful, because of missing debug pacakges. I'm told I can reload after 'installing the needed packages',

Re: abrt issue

2009-12-09 Thread Jiri Moskovcak
On 12/09/2009 02:23 PM, Neal Becker wrote: Jiri Moskovcak wrote: On 12/09/2009 02:05 PM, Neal Becker wrote: Jiri Moskovcak wrote: On 12/09/2009 01:47 PM, Neal Becker wrote: I just got a crash in kde plasma. Traceback is not useful, because of missing debug pacakges. I'm told I can reload

Re: F12 updates-testing issue: X flickers and fails to start

2009-12-09 Thread Linuxguy123
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 10:36 +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote: On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 11:12:07 +0200 (EET) Pekka Savola wrote: Now gdm login however doesn't show my username and fingerprint login is no longer an option Looks like the issue with hal-0.5.14-1:

Re: F12 updates-testing issue: X flickers and fails to start

2009-12-09 Thread Linuxguy123
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 06:27 -0700, Linuxguy123 wrote: On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 10:36 +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote: On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 11:12:07 +0200 (EET) Pekka Savola wrote: Now gdm login however doesn't show my username and fingerprint login is no longer an option Looks like the issue

Re: Useless setroubleshoot alerts

2009-12-09 Thread Christopher Brown
2009/12/8 Konstantin Ryabitsev i...@fedoraproject.org: From the point of view of security usability, this is cardinal sin: http://file.status.net/identica/tieguy-20091208T063036-ngc2rhp.png If we start the warning message with SELinux has detected suspicious behaviour on your system and end

Re: Fedora release criteria completely revised

2009-12-09 Thread John Poelstra
Adam Williamson said the following on 12/08/2009 07:12 AM Pacific Time: On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 15:07 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Plus, why was the KDE SIG not invited? (We had at least 4 KDE SIG folks present at FUDCon.) We had a pre-hackfest meeting for the whole FUDCon attendee list where

Re: Fedora release criteria completely revised

2009-12-09 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Monday, 07 December 2009 at 23:55, Adam Williamson wrote: [...] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_13_Alpha_Release_Criteria https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_13_Beta_Release_Criteria 16. Automatic mounting on insertion of removable media must work It should be clarified with ...

Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?

2009-12-09 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Tuesday, 08 December 2009 at 20:07, Jon Masters wrote: On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 18:41 +0100, drago01 wrote: On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Rallias UberNerd But wouldn't it be better to use 32 bit when less then 4 GB of ram is present? no, using x86_64 means more registers, sse2 as

Re: Why pavucontrol is not installed by default?

2009-12-09 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 13:51 +0100, Christof Damian wrote: On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:59, Tomasz Torcz to...@pipebreaker.pl wrote: On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 09:51:55AM -0200, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: pavucontrol is regarded as advance tool, but also partly obsolete. Current gnome-volume-control

rawhide and tagging requests

2009-12-09 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi All, What's the status of the issues with the rawhide compose? Are they going to be fixed and a push done before the upcoming extended outage? What about outstanding tag build-override requests? Cheers, Peter -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com

Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?

2009-12-09 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 12/09/2009 02:05 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 06:51:59 +0100, Ralf Corsepiusrc040...@freenet.de wrote: Seems to me, as if some people in Fedora's leadership don't want to understand that being able to deploy Linux on old or recycled hardware used to be one big

Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?

2009-12-09 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le Mer 9 décembre 2009 15:00, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski a écrit : Actually, x86_64 is an AMD invention (originally called AMD64) and is called EM64T by Intel. The only Intel 64 I can think of is IA64, i.e. Itanium (called Itanic by some). When Intel realised Itanium was a failure, they

Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?

2009-12-09 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 03:00:51PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: Actually, x86_64 is an AMD invention (originally called AMD64) and is called EM64T by Intel. The only Intel 64 I can think of is IA64, i.e. Itanium (called Itanic by some). http://www.intel.com/technology/intel64/

Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?

2009-12-09 Thread James Antill
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 15:26 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: However, some $DEITY's have decided otherwise ... I am inclined to think inevitably, because such platforms aren't the platforms most developers use nor the platforms RHEL is aiming at ... These people think in terms of Quad machines

Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?

2009-12-09 Thread John Reiser
On 12/09/2009 07:14 AM, James Antill wrote: ... The minimum RAM size on any of these 5 boxes is 2GB. I'd be surprised to find that anyone working as a full time developer has any (non-virt) boxes that are spec'd less than that. Surprise! I have 4 boxes that are 1GB or less (as low as

Re: Why pavucontrol is not installed by default?

2009-12-09 Thread Christof Damian
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 15:14, Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com wrote: I am curious: If pavucontrol is obsolete, is there some other tool to tell skype to use headsets, while rhythmbox uses the speakers? It's not obsolete, it's just not installed by default. pavucontrol currently crashes

Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?

2009-12-09 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 12/09/2009 04:14 PM, James Antill wrote: On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 15:26 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: So, yeh, if _you_ want to support slower machines Well, I do not want to, I can't avoid to ... ... _you_ will have to do the work, you might get help from the community but just ranting

Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?

2009-12-09 Thread Seth Vidal
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 12/09/2009 04:14 PM, James Antill wrote: On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 15:26 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: So, yeh, if _you_ want to support slower machines Well, I do not want to, I can't avoid to ... ... _you_ will have to do the work, you might

Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?

2009-12-09 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 12/09/2009 10:17 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 12/09/2009 04:14 PM, James Antill wrote: On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 15:26 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: So, yeh, if _you_ want to support slower machines Well, I do not want to, I can't avoid to ... ... _you_ will have to do the work, you

Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?

2009-12-09 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 12/09/2009 05:51 PM, Seth Vidal wrote: On Wed, 9 Dec 2009, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 12/09/2009 04:14 PM, James Antill wrote: On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 15:26 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: So, yeh, if _you_ want to support slower machines Well, I do not want to, I can't avoid to ... ...

Re: yum download estimates and stalls

2009-12-09 Thread Seth Vidal
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: I don't want to make unfair comparisons to the famous bug in Windows Vista[1], but it seems as if when a yum download stalls, then the estimates can start to look a little large: rawhide/primar 20% [- ] 0.0 B/s | 2.5 MB

Re: Fedora release criteria completely revised

2009-12-09 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 09:19 -0500, Colin Walters wrote: Hi Adam, Looks really great in general! Thanks! One specific comment, for Final 9; I think we need a more specific definition of and subsequent login. Does that mean that you just type your username/password and look at the

Changed license for clojure-1.0.0 (CPL - EPL)

2009-12-09 Thread Jochen Schmitt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hallo, I want to notifiy you, that the license of clojure-1.0.0 was changed from the Common Public License to Eclipse Public License 1.0. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using

Re: F12 updates-testing issue: X flickers and fails to start

2009-12-09 Thread Kevin Kofler
Linuxguy123 wrote: I have logged 2 bugs that are possibly related to this. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528188 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525767 Huh? One of these is a Nouveau bug, the other is a bug in the proprietary nvidia driver, both of them already

Re: yum download estimates and stalls

2009-12-09 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 12:20:12PM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote: On Wed, 9 Dec 2009, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: I don't want to make unfair comparisons to the famous bug in Windows Vista[1], but it seems as if when a yum download stalls, then the estimates can start to look a little large:

Re: Fedora release criteria completely revised

2009-12-09 Thread Colin Walters
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: This is what it was intended to mean, actually running apps I would have defined as 'login and use'. How would you suggest wording a clarification? Looking at it again, it's fairly clear that this just covers the

kernel update highly recommended

2009-12-09 Thread Kyle McMartin
Hi folks, I'd highly recommend if you're running 2.6.31 or 2.6.32, that you update to the latest kernel in the koji builds here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1864871 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1864876 They fix a rather severe security problem with

Re: kernel update highly recommended

2009-12-09 Thread Nathanael D. Noblet
On 12/09/2009 11:14 AM, Kyle McMartin wrote: Hi folks, I'd highly recommend if you're running 2.6.31 or 2.6.32, that you update to the latest kernel in the koji builds here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1864871 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1864876

Re: kernel update highly recommended

2009-12-09 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 11:20:02 -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca wrote: This a rawhide only issue or F12 as well? It affects F12. You want the -166 kernel. However right now it is still building. (I didn't check to see if some arches are done already.) The updated kernel for

Re: kernel update highly recommended

2009-12-09 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 12:23:50 -0600, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote: On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 11:20:02 -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca wrote: This a rawhide only issue or F12 as well? It affects F12. You want the -166 kernel. However right now it is still

Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?

2009-12-09 Thread Ville Skyttä
On Wednesday 09 December 2009, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 12/08/2009 09:26 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote: These probably aren't things to be generally overly concerned about though, ... try a yum update over GSM or over a modem and you'll very soon experience what I am talking about. Been there,

Re: Why pavucontrol is not installed by default?

2009-12-09 Thread Jon Masters
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 21:45 +, Bastien Nocera wrote: On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 14:05 -0500, Jon Masters wrote: The new gnome-volume-control is so cut-down it's not useful to me. In the quest to be more Mac-like in removing mixer controls No, it's in a quest of providing *solutions* to

Re: Why pavucontrol is not installed by default?

2009-12-09 Thread Jon Masters
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 02:44 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Jon Masters wrote: The new gnome-volume-control is so cut-down it's not useful to me. In the quest to be more Mac-like in removing mixer controls (and not even having any obvious advanced mode), I now

Re: F12 updates-testing issue: X flickers and fails to start

2009-12-09 Thread Linuxguy123
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 18:36 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Linuxguy123 wrote: I have logged 2 bugs that are possibly related to this. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528188 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525767 Huh? One of these is a Nouveau bug, the other is a

Request for help maintaining packages while away.

2009-12-09 Thread Jeff Spaleta
Good Alaskan Morning! In two weeks I'm going to be in Antarctica for a month+ and I'm looking for other packagers to step in for me and maintain my packages and prepare them for F13. I'm not exactly sure what my time and bandwidth access will be so I'm planning for the worst and that I'll be

Re: Request for help maintaining packages while away.

2009-12-09 Thread Jon Ciesla
Jeff Spaleta wrote: Good Alaskan Morning! In two weeks I'm going to be in Antarctica for a month+ and I'm looking for other packagers to step in for me and maintain my packages and prepare them for F13. I'm not exactly sure what my time and bandwidth access will be so I'm planning for the

Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?

2009-12-09 Thread Seth Vidal
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009, Ville Skyttä wrote: On Wednesday 09 December 2009, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 12/08/2009 09:26 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote: These probably aren't things to be generally overly concerned about though, ... try a yum update over GSM or over a modem and you'll very soon

Re: abrt issue

2009-12-09 Thread José Matos
On Wednesday 09 December 2009 12:47:44 Neal Becker wrote: I just got a crash in kde plasma. Traceback is not useful, because of missing debug pacakges. Downgrading hal and hal-libs fixes the crash. I noticed the other thread where this bug is reported. I was seeing both

Re: Fedora release criteria completely revised

2009-12-09 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 14:54 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: On Monday, 07 December 2009 at 23:55, Adam Williamson wrote: [...] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_13_Alpha_Release_Criteria https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_13_Beta_Release_Criteria 16. Automatic mounting

Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?

2009-12-09 Thread Kevin Kofler
John Reiser wrote: Sometimes I doubt even that, particularly when shipped software has python syntax errors (type mismatch, wrong number of arguments, no such member, ...) rantThe joys of interpreted languages… In a compiled language, such an error would just fail the build./rant

Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?

2009-12-09 Thread Kevin Kofler
Ville Skyttä wrote: Yeah, I've done that in some setups but I was talking about purifying the _repos_ above; that setting doesn't affect them, e.g. it doesn't make the metadata to be downloaded any smaller. (As said, not that I think it's a big general issue at all, but just that I'd

Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?

2009-12-09 Thread Kevin Kofler
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: Actually, x86_64 is an AMD invention (originally called AMD64) and is called EM64T by Intel. The only Intel 64 I can think of is IA64, i.e. Itanium (called Itanic by some). EM64T was renamed to Intel 64 eons ago. Kevin Kofler --

Re: abrt issue

2009-12-09 Thread Kevin Kofler
Neal Becker wrote: I don't know what debuginfo package is needed. rpm -qa '*plasma*' doesn't give a good answer. Probably kdebase-workspace (and its dependencies, like kdelibs, but debuginfo-install takes care of that automatically). Kevin Kofler -- fedora-devel-list mailing list

Re: Request for help maintaining packages while away.

2009-12-09 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 10:24:16AM -0900, Jeff Spaleta wrote: Good Alaskan Morning! In two weeks I'm going to be in Antarctica for a month+ and I'm looking for other packagers to step in for me and maintain my packages and prepare them for F13. I'm not exactly sure what my time and

Re: Request for help maintaining packages while away.

2009-12-09 Thread Jeff Spaleta
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote: Jef, I'll help with istanbul.  If anyone else out there is considering doing so, please feel free to team up with me. Other than revelation(which essentially has a dead upstream)...Istanbul is probably the most in need

Planning the accessibility stack rebase

2009-12-09 Thread Matthias Clasen
As some of you may know, the accessibility framework is getting ported from CORBA/ORBit to DBus [1]. The (ambitious) upstream plan is to have this transition completed in time for GNOME 2.30, ie within the F-13 timeframe. This is a big effort, and the accessibility guys need all the help they

Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?

2009-12-09 Thread Seth Vidal
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi said: Yeah, I've done that in some setups but I was talking about purifying the _repos_ above; that setting doesn't affect them, e.g. it doesn't make the metadata to be downloaded any smaller. (As

Non responsive maintainer: Karol Trzcionka

2009-12-09 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi, As per policy at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers, I have filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546072 Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Re: Non responsive maintainer: Karol Trzcionka

2009-12-09 Thread Debayan Banerjee
2009/12/10 Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org: Hi, As per policy at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers, I have filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546072 This person used to maintain the Tesseract OCR software. He has not

Re: Non responsive maintainer: Karol Trzcionka

2009-12-09 Thread Debayan Banerjee
2009/12/10 Debayan Banerjee debaya...@gmail.com: 2009/12/10 Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org: Hi, As per policy at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers, I have filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546072 This person used to

Re: Non responsive maintainer: Karol Trzcionka

2009-12-09 Thread Christoph Wickert
Am Donnerstag, den 10.12.2009, 04:02 +0530 schrieb Debayan Banerjee: ermm, I do know how to write spec files, and build RPMs, but am a bit unsure about the process of uploading the packages upstream to Fedora repos. Again, I shall Google and learn.

Re: Non responsive maintainer: Karol Trzcionka

2009-12-09 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 12/10/2009 04:02 AM, Debayan Banerjee wrote: 2009/12/10 Debayan Banerjee 2009/12/10 Rahul Sundaram Hi, As per policy at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers, I have filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546072 This person used to

upstart-0.6.3 in rawhide, tomorrow 2009-12-10

2009-12-09 Thread Bill Nottingham
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Upstart0.6.0 was approved at last week's FESCo meeting. It was built today, and will land in rawhide tomorrow. What this means for you: It's going to be a bit of a bumpy first yum upgrade. You will likely have to reboot with 'reboot -f', as the job

Re: Request for help maintaining packages while away.

2009-12-09 Thread José Matos
On Wednesday 09 December 2009 19:38:55 Jeff Spaleta wrote: For F13 you probably want to push latest versions of the both scipy and matplotlib together. So if you take scipy* sign up for matplotlib* as well. Not only those but also: python-basemap -- Plots data on map projections (with

Re: Docs Installation Guide - Submission and Download problem

2009-12-09 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 10:51:59AM +0200, Dimitris Glezos wrote: 2009/12/3 Ruediger Landmann r.landm...@redhat.com: On 12/02/2009 05:47 PM, Dimitris Glezos wrote: Rudi, you could clear the cache and refresh it. Really? How do I do that? I'd thought that a button like that would be

Re: kernel update highly recommended

2009-12-09 Thread Christopher Brown
2009/12/9 Kyle McMartin k...@mcmartin.ca: NOTE: This is only a problem if you're using EXT4, if you aren't, you're safe. ReiserFS FTW!!! :) -- Christopher Brown -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Re: Request for help maintaining packages while away.

2009-12-09 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 12:38:11PM -0900, Jeff Spaleta wrote: On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote: Jef, I'll help with istanbul.  If anyone else out there is considering doing so, please feel free to team up with me. Other than revelation(which

Re: Docs Installation Guide - Submission and Download problem

2009-12-09 Thread Noriko Mizumoto
Paul W. Frields さんは書きました: On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 10:51:59AM +0200, Dimitris Glezos wrote: 2009/12/3 Ruediger Landmann r.landm...@redhat.com: On 12/02/2009 05:47 PM, Dimitris Glezos wrote: Rudi, you could clear the cache and refresh it. Really? How do I do that? I'd thought that a button

Re: rawhide and tagging requests

2009-12-09 Thread Jesse Keating
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 06:43 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: All the broken deps preventing a compose attempt have been cleared out. However the new rpm build was busted in a way that it made the compose fall over, a new build of rpm is coming and I hope to kick off another rawhide attempt when it

Re: rawhide and tagging requests

2009-12-09 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 18:15:53 -0800, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 06:43 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: All the broken deps preventing a compose attempt have been cleared out. However the new rpm build was busted in a way that it made the compose fall

Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?

2009-12-09 Thread Seth Vidal
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009, Gregory Maxwell wrote: On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Seth Vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org wrote: and then you have to do that as well for updates. :( Not if you don't have a separate updates repo, no? still need an updates-testing. -sv -- fedora-devel-list

Re: X on UEFI systems.

2009-12-09 Thread Dave Airlie
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 07:32 +0300, Vasily Levchenko wrote: Hi, folks. Currently at Virtualbox has introduced UEFI support in 3.1 release. But there is one issue with X server. When trying configure X with -configure. Resulted xorg.conf.new looks right except missed Modes. Observing code

[Bug 529594] [CJK] pango uses different fonts for LATIN and COMMON glyphs

2009-12-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529594 --- Comment #30 from fujiwara tfuji...@redhat.com 2009-12-09 03:35:28 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=377115) --

[Bug 529594] [CJK] pango uses different fonts for LATIN and COMMON glyphs

2009-12-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529594 fujiwara tfuji...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 500569] [si_LK][GPOS] Delete 0D[0-F][A-D] 0DDA need to press backspace key three times

2009-12-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500569 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 500563] [si_LK][GPOS] U0DB8 U0DDA font shape has error

2009-12-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500563 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 500563] [si_LK][GPOS] U0DB8 U0DDA font shape has error

2009-12-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500563 --- Comment #5 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2009-12-09 04:29:58 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=377125) --

[Bug 529594] [CJK] pango uses different fonts for LATIN and COMMON glyphs

2009-12-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529594 --- Comment #31 from fujiwara tfuji...@redhat.com 2009-12-09 05:01:52 EDT --- Filed the upstreamed bug in pango side at the

[Bug 541793] Review Request: woffTools - Tool for manipulating and examining WOFF files

2009-12-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541793 sandeep shedmake sshed...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 541792] Review Request: woff - Encoding and Decoding for Web Open Font Format(Woff)

2009-12-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541792 sandeep shedmake sshed...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 541793] Review Request: woffTools - Tool for manipulating and examining WOFF files

2009-12-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541793 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-12-09 05:33:26 EDT --- Please also put the fonts sig

[Bug 541792] Review Request: woff - Encoding and Decoding for Web Open Font Format(Woff)

2009-12-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541792 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-12-09 05:32:47 EDT --- Please also put the fonts sig

[Bug 541793] Review Request: woffTools - Tool for manipulating and examining WOFF files

2009-12-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541793 --- Comment #5 from sandeep shedmake sshed...@redhat.com 2009-12-09 06:14:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request

[Bug 541792] Review Request: woff - Encoding and Decoding for Web Open Font Format(Woff)

2009-12-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541792 --- Comment #7 from sandeep shedmake sshed...@redhat.com 2009-12-09 06:14:30 EDT --- New Package CVS Request

[Bug 545824] Boldface not working with some sizes

2009-12-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545824 --- Comment #1 from Cong Ma frigoris...@gmail.com 2009-12-09 08:00:50 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=377172) --

[Bug 545824] Boldface not working with some sizes

2009-12-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545824 --- Comment #2 from Cong Ma frigoris...@gmail.com 2009-12-09 08:01:48 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=377173) --

[Bug 542461] Review Request: digna-fonts - Handwriting font

2009-12-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542461 Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 541888] Fontforge crashes when loading font

2009-12-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541888 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-12-09 17:56:57 EDT --- Strange. I didn't do anything at all... ;( I

[Bug 539896] [abrt] crash detected in control-center-1:2.28.1-4.fc12 (pango extents)

2009-12-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539896 --- Comment #3 from Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com 2009-12-10 02:18:52 EDT --- Might have been fixed in 1.26.1 pango

Re: Docs Installation Guide - Submission and Download problem

2009-12-09 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 10:51:59AM +0200, Dimitris Glezos wrote: 2009/12/3 Ruediger Landmann r.landm...@redhat.com: On 12/02/2009 05:47 PM, Dimitris Glezos wrote: Rudi, you could clear the cache and refresh it. Really? How do I do that? I'd thought that a button like that would be

Outage Notification - date -d '2009-12-11 02:00:00 UTC'

2009-12-09 Thread Mike McGrath
There will be an outage starting at date -d '2009-12-11 02:00:00 UTC', which will last approximately 2 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d 'date -d '2009-12-11 02:00:00 UTC'' Affected Services: Database

Re: Outage Notification - date -d '2009-12-11 02:00:00 UTC'

2009-12-09 Thread Darren VanBuren
Mike, you kinda made a little mistake with your date command.. The date command should return Fri Dec 11 02:00:00 UTC 2009 Darren L. VanBuren = http://theoks.net/ On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 23:15, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: There will be an outage starting at

[Fedora-legal-list] Legal aspects of fedora based appliances

2009-12-09 Thread Fabian Deutsch
Hello. Fedora contains various tools for appliance creation. AFAIK it is intended that Fedora shall be used as a base for various appliances ISVs or OEMs want to create. But there is there some legal-guide which summarizes the legal aspects of Fedora based appliances e.g. when I want to

Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Legal aspects of fedora based appliances

2009-12-09 Thread Fabian Deutsch
Am Mittwoch, den 09.12.2009, 16:14 -0500 schrieb Paul W. Frields: On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 09:57:10PM +0100, Fabian Deutsch wrote: Hello. Fedora contains various tools for appliance creation. AFAIK it is intended that Fedora shall be used as a base for various appliances ISVs or OEMs

Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Please define effective license (for the love of consistency)

2009-12-09 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote: On Wednesday 09 December 2009, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: 1) I came across another review with the same license question. The source files have one of the GPLv2, GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ headers each. They get compiled and produce 1 final binary

Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Legal aspects of fedora based appliances

2009-12-09 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 10:22:07PM +0100, Fabian Deutsch wrote: Am Mittwoch, den 09.12.2009, 16:14 -0500 schrieb Paul W. Frields: On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 09:57:10PM +0100, Fabian Deutsch wrote: Hello. Fedora contains various tools for appliance creation. AFAIK it is intended that

F12 Boot error message re mount of loop device

2009-12-09 Thread David
Maybe I'm doing something wrong, so I'm asking here first. If no-one points out a better way, I'll file a bug report. Also I'd appreciate guidance where best to file it. During boot I want to mount an iso9660 file as a loop device. The iso file is on a ext3 partition labelled HUGE_01 which is

Re: Selinux problems

2009-12-09 Thread James Allsopp
Yes, it seems to have worked, thank you! James 2009/12/9 Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wolfgang.ruppre...@gmail.com James Allsopp jamesaalls...@googlemail.com writes: I keep getting this SELinux issue, This is a new install of Fedora 12, and I just copied all of my home directory back to this

Re: Fedora on Macbook Air?

2009-12-09 Thread Colin Paul Adams
Tom == Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com writes: But how to get the Air to try to boot from the USB port? Tom Try booting with c pressed (it is supposed to be for Tom CDs/DVDs but it might work with a bootable external drive I actually meant with a DVD drive, but probably forgot to say

Fedora 12 on Sun Blade x6250

2009-12-09 Thread Marcelo M. Garcia
Hi I'm trying to install Fedora 12 x86_64 in a Sun Blade x6250 with PXE boot but the installation hangs when loading Anaconda, both in graphical and text mode. I'm using the Sun management tool (Sun eLOM) to do the network install, maybe Fedora requirements are to high to this tool, but does

Re: How do I disable coredumps on F12?

2009-12-09 Thread Andre Costa
Hi Ed, On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 01:57, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote: Andre Costa wrote: Hi Rick, thks for the reply. Comments below: On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 23:12, Rick Stevens ri...@nerd.com mailto:ri...@nerd.com wrote: On 12/08/2009 03:44 PM, Andre Costa wrote:

Re: Latest Kernel causes reboot hell

2009-12-09 Thread Chris
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 18:30:02 -0500 Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com wrote: Chris writes: On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 18:06:12 -0500 Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com wrote: Some time ago, in F9-F10 era, there was a consecutive series of about four kernels that were released that

Re: Latest Kernel causes reboot hell

2009-12-09 Thread Ian Malone
2009/12/7 Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com: The best way to avoid the problem might be to get grub to display the list of installed (assuming that the original F12 kernel worked for you) and select that kernel to boot from. Change the default line in /etc/grub.conf to automate that.

  1   2   3   >