Richard Shaw hobbes1069 at gmail.com writes:
I just upgraded without issue on a x86_64 F8 system. I installed the i386
version as I did not see a native 64bit version available using yum list
'*flash*'. It seems to be much more CPU efficient. I haven't done any real
benchmarking but almost
Bill Davidsen davidsen at tmr.com writes:
Better in what way? I think either case gets you out of typing a 2nd
LIKS password. Using /dev/urandom seems to avoid having a password where
anyone could ever recover it, and I think using LUKS on swap will kill
suspend in either case (it may work
I have a machine with f9 clean installed and encrypted /, encrypted swap
and encrypted /opt partitions.
Of course during boot you are asked for the luks passphrase for all three
partitions.
I have been able to avoid the passphrase prompt for /opt, by placing a keyfile
in /root and added this
Deron Meranda deron.meranda at gmail.com writes:
The / and primary swap partitions (or logical volumes) are handled a
bit differently than say /opt. They are mounted very early in the boot
process, and in fact are handled by the initrd's nash scripts. If you
change the LUKS options for
Frank Cox theatre at sasktel.net writes:
What's the point of encrypting a partition and then keeping the key for that
partition on the hard drive so you don't have to enter anything to access it?
Well - if unencrypted then in principle in the even of theft the swap partition
would have
Todd Zullinger tmz at pobox.com writes:
If you'd like to not have to disable the gpg signature check, that's
only a few more steps (most of which only need to be done once).
Another valuable piece of the jigsaw - thank you for this Todd
Mike
--
fedora-list mailing list
Mark Haney mhaney at ercbroadband.org writes:
Yes you can use the current F9 src rpm and build it for F7. I did the
same thing for FC6. As for Les' contention about the upgrade cycle,
Thanks Mark - having never done this kind of building before is there a
good easy to follow link to a
John Austin ja at jaa.org.uk writes:
Please see below my notes to myself when doing the same for F5
Hope they help
John
Fantastic - thank you very much for this...
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Does anyone know if there is an easy way to fix bind (bind-chroot) running
in an old machine running FC7 so that it offers the same protection as
bind-chroot-9.5.0-28.P1.fc8
and
bind-9.5.0-33.P1.fc9.i386
??
Can one use the src rpm for F8 and re-configure it for FC7?
I guess there are still
McGuffey, David C. DAVID.C.MCGUFFEY at saic.com writes:
My next task was to go looking at the logs to see what was trying to
scribble in resolve.conf...but your post puts me onto something.
I have used static addressing for ages on desktops from FC1,2,3 onwards -
and on a desktop machine the
Does anyone have Excel 2003 working under Wine in F8?
I installed Office 2003 Pro after installing wine in F8, then running
winecfg to make an initial setup, and using winetricks to install
corefonts. I had to yum install cabextract before the winetricks
script would install corefonts.
I have
Frank Murphy frankly3d-fedoracore at utvinternet.com writes:
Have a look at Crossover Linux, if you don't wan't to run\virtualise
windows .
http://www.codeweavers.com/compatibility/browse/group/?app_parent=779;
This is a report on office 2003
I do use Crossover too (I have been a paid up
Paul Smith phhs80 at gmail.com writes:
VMware Server works fine here on F9.
OK - thanks - one nice thing about Crossover (and Wine) is that one can
run specific MS Office applications without having to install a full
Windows VM operating system. I presume that with VMWare you have to
Frank Murphy frankly3d-fedoracore at utvinternet.com writes:
You can run both in seperate bottles.
Or become an advocate for office 2003, and get the latest\ + nightly
builds, in returen for aiding and abetting
Thanks Frank, that sounds useful
--
fedora-list mailing list
After updating my F8 installation today (which includes update to
xorg-x11-server-Xorg) I am getting crashes with Excel/Excel Xp and 2003
running under both wine and crossover.
Anyone else seeing the same issues?
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
Mike C mike.cloaked at gmail.com writes:
After updating my F8 installation today (which includes update to
xorg-x11-server-Xorg)
Whoops - I misread the log file - there was no update to xorg -
But I am still getting crashes in Excel running under wine or crossover.
Was OK yesterday
Mike C mike.cloaked at gmail.com writes:
Seems that this is a kernel related problem - I reverted back to
2.6.24.7-92.fc8
and now Excel XP runs fine under Crossover. The problem I was
seeing was right clicking a cell and clearing the cell contents
made Excel hang... and needing to reset all apps
Mark Haney mhaney at ercbroadband.org writes:
[root at sulla ~]# ifconfig
wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1E:E5:20:BF:BA
inet addr:192.168.2.3 Bcast:192.168.2.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:19 errors:0
Mike C mike.cloaked at gmail.com writes:
modprobe -rv rt61
modprobe -av rt61
then
ifdown wlan0
ifup wlan0
This just unloads the kernel module and reloads it, and then restarts
the wireless.
I looked back and realised you have the rt61pci module listed but you
can reload
Andrea mariofutire at googlemail.com writes:
I just would like to know if it is possible to choose which interface to
use, and in case NM wants to connect both, how do I choose the default
gateway? I've seen it chosen at random so far.
Equally at some point no doubt someone will want to have
Rahul Sundaram [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does anyone have iwl3945 working well and consistently with F7?
I use it for a few months on my Dell D420 Fedora 7 box which uses this
driver and firmware. Works out of the box with no problems. However I
have heard some reports of this not working
21 matches
Mail list logo
