On 3.1.2010 13:37, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 01/02/2010 03:32 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 13:39:07 +0100, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote:
When the debuginfo package of a particular binary is
installed, then the symbols are loaded whenever the binary is loaded or
are the
On 12.11.2009 08:50, Adam Pribyl wrote:
Domnívám se, že zakopaný pes je v tom, že někteří z nás se na tento
problém koukají z pohledu vědeckého (nebo vědeckého pohledu?). Zdá se
dokonce jao profesionální lingvista (aspon tak to na mě působí), zatímco
jiní z pohledu jazykových laiků, kteří
Vážený kolego,
dovolím si ostře nesouhlasit s Vámi předkládanými argumenty, proč by se
měl Fedora Project překládat jako Fedora projekt.
Máte samozřejmě pravdu v tom, že jazyk je dynamický systém, který se
(poměrně rychle) vyvíjí, a přejímání cizích slov je zcela rutinní
proces. To však
On 11.11.2009 21:44, Josef Hruška wrote:
Milan Kerslager napsal(a):
Přehození slov
způsobí, že se změní smysl sdělení, celé se to posune a vlastně už to
ani nebude odpovídat tomu, co to oficiálně je.
Toto jsem prve úplně přehlédl, vizte poznámku na konci.
Já bych to ze své vůle rozhodně
On 25.10.2009 08:18, David Timms wrote:
On 10/20/2009 08:48 PM, Milos Jakubicek wrote:
http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/need-rebuild.html
hmmn, glglobe is mine, wonder what went wrong.
It seems that the build logs are no longer available ?
No, they are kept only for 14(?) days or so
Next bunch built, it's a complete set of those with mock exit status 30
(I'm curious what does this exit status mean, missing prerequisity is
denoted by 10) and some others too:
piggyback-2.6.26-4.fc12 (on sparc)
perl-Perl-Critic-1.105-1.fc12
glglobe-0.2-8.fc12
libica-2.0.2-1.fc12 (on s390)
On 22.10.2009 03:39, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Milos Jakubicek wrote:
Most probably those are the packages which failed during the mass
rebuild...there are still plenty of them:
http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/need-rebuild.html
That list is out of date. I fixed clutter-gtkmm to build a while
OK, I took the 3 hours today and went through the packages which have
not been submitted at all for building:
On 22.10.2009 19:29, Quentin Armitage wrote:
Not submitted for rebuild (65)
==
I've successfully rebuilt (and requested tagging for dist-f12):
- at
Hi,
On 21.10.2009 20:10, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
* Should we formalize the unwritten policy for Red Hat maintainers who leave
the company and don't want to maintain their packages anymore?
* Do we need sanity checks to be sure maintainers who do want to keep
their packages do so?
I
Hi,
On 22.10.2009 19:29, Quentin Armitage wrote:
1. Is the script that is run and produces the output at
http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/needed-f12-rebuilds.html actually the
script referred to at the bottom of that page
(https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/browser/scripts) ? The reason I ask is
Hi,
On 10/21/2009 11:11 AM, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
Hi,
Jim Parsons left Red Hat a little while back and the only contact
details I have is his Red Hat email address, which is of course no
longer valid. I've opened a bugzilla #530027 as per the unresponsive
maintainer procedure, but I was
On 10/21/2009 03:21 PM, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
I'm willing to accept that argument, and indeed just the same discussion
is currently going on, on one of our internal lists too. The issue is
who will do the work to get s-c-c back working again? Conga is actively
maintained, and s-c-c is not at
Hi,
On 10/19/2009 09:20 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi All,
I thought with the mass rebuild the i586 rpms were suppose to be gone
but it seems the F-12 repository still has quite a few of them. Are
the old packages that should have been blocked, ones that's that
weren't rebuilt for some reason
Hi Orion,
- does local mock build fail too?
- could you upload the SRPM somewhere?
Regards,
Milos
On 10/19/2009 04:58 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
This has happened two for two now:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1754220name=build.log
ENTER do(['bash', '--login', '-c',
On 10/10/2009 10:43 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Samstag, den 10.10.2009, 21:41 +0200 schrieb Chitlesh GOORAH:
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
I am starting the AWOL procedure [1] for Claudio Tomasoni, because he
didn't respond to a bug I opened 5 months ago [2].
Hi,
On 17.9.2009 16:29, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
cvs2svn - CVS to Subversion Repository Converter
I've taken this one.
Regards,
Milos
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Dne 1.9.2009 23:40, Seth Vidal napsal(a):
I probably CAN. :)
I'll run it again shortly and dump them in.
Then please skip:
ignoring obsolete pkg lzma-4.32.7-3.fc12.i686
obsoleted by xz-lzma-compat', 'i686', '0', '4.999.9', '0.1.beta.fc12'
...that's intended.
Regards,
Milos
--
rpmreaper may be handy for that too...
Regards,
Milos
Dne 29.8.2009 19:07, Ray Chen napsal(a):
Thanks, package-cleanup is what I want:)
-Ray
在 2009-08-29六的 03:29 -0400，Michel Alexandre Salim写道：
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 5:54 AM, Ray Chenchenrano2...@163.com wrote:
If the package
Dne 29.8.2009 22:46, Ray Chen napsal(a):
rpmreaper is NOT installed by default, I want use yum API in scripts to
remove unnecessary packages.
Rpmreaper doesn't use yum API, it's pure rpm-based. For usage refer to
the relevant manpage (man rpmreaper), you might be especially
insterested in
Dne 28.8.2009 23:33, Adam Miller napsal(a):
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Milos Jakubicekxja...@fi.muni.cz wrote:
snip
I'm very very sorry for this as I'm sure that I've partially invalidated
my/your/both work, which is just bad:(
Could you try to merge my and your work somehow? I'd be
Oops...I think I screwed up a bit again.
I've already prepared a pkgdb open search plugin a few months ago but
did not publish/announce it:((( (I run of time, wanted to review it
again, but should have done it nevertheless)
You can try it from here:
http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/pkgdb/
On 29.7.2009 00:12, Jesse Keating wrote:
Orphan: ht2html
jython requires ht2html = 2.0-9.fc11
Took ht2html because of jython, ah ya.
CC: Andrew, are you aware of this?
Regards,
Milos
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On 29.7.2009 00:12, Jesse Keating wrote:
Orphan: python-cjson
sugar-datastore requires python-cjson = 1.0.5-3.fc11
For the record: I've contacted sugar-datastore maintainers to prevent
bad things, Michael Stone (mstone) took this one.
Regards,
Milos
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
He recently responded, though he seems to be not so active now:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474017
Milos
On 13.6.2009 19:38, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
that's true.
I am also have a bug reported for nx package waiting for a long time.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Ricky
On 23.5.2009 19:46, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Hi!
I now and then check which files on my systems are not owned by any RPM
package. That often turns up a lot's of old and obsolete stuff that
sometimes eats space I'd like to free. During those checks I often find
lots of files and directories that
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
No. They are not firmware and cannot be considered as one.
They are not firmware, but are they content? Non-code content, e.g. game
data, is allowed under the same rules as firmware. On the other hand, this
does not apply for things like fonts or
Hi all,
I've following bugreport from a BOINC user:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487981
Basically, CUDA is a Nvidia technology which enables the GPU to be used
for various complex scientific computations (which are then even faster
than on CPU).
I was about to close the bug
27 matches
Mail list logo
