Christoph Wickert wrote on 12.12.2009 23:41:
Am Samstag, den 12.12.2009, 22:10 + schrieb John Lagrue:
At first glance this look simple, but it seems to be telling me
there's an error.
Running rpm_check_debug
ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve:
kernel-uname-r =
Hi
Me again ;-)
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote on 24.11.2009 08:44:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote on 17.11.2009 20:47:
On 17.11.2009 07:54, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote on 11.11.2009 22:30:
As you may have heard already, several seats of the Fedora
Board, FESCo, and FAMSCO are up
Rahul Sundaram wrote on 24.11.2009 20:27:
On 11/25/2009 12:58 AM, Valent Turkovic wrote:
Could you please share your current kickstart file? .ks file is
independent on updates, right?
Have you thought of packaging omega kickstart file and puting it in
rpmfusion as an package? Will there be
Hi!
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote on 17.11.2009 20:47:
On 17.11.2009 07:54, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote on 11.11.2009 22:30:
As you may have heard already, several seats of the Fedora
Board, FESCo, and FAMSCO are up for election soon(¹). Right now
we are in the nomination
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The RPM Fusion team is proud to announce the public availability of our
''free'' and ''nonfree'' package repositories for Fedora 12 (Constantine). The
repositories contain multimedia applications, kernel drivers, games and other
software the Fedora
On 17.11.2009 07:54, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote on 11.11.2009 22:30:
As you may have heard already, several seats of the Fedora Board,
FESCo, and FAMSCO are up for election soon(¹). Right now we are in
the nomination period, which will be followed by a Candidate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The RPM Fusion team is proud to announce the public availability of our
''free'' and ''nonfree'' package repositories for Fedora 12 (Constantine). The
repositories contain multimedia applications, kernel drivers, games and other
software the Fedora
Hi!
Sorry, I haven't got around to work on the final version of the
questions yet. I plan to do that early tomorrow, which leaves everybody
still something like 13 hours to add questions to the wiki.
CU
knurd
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote on 12.11.2009 07:28:
As you may have heard already, several
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote on 11.11.2009 22:30:
As you may have heard already, several seats of the Fedora Board, FESCo,
and FAMSCO are up for election soon(¹). Right now we are in the
nomination period, which will be followed by a Candidate
Questionnaire. That means we'll give candidates
Hi!
As you may have heard already, several seats of the Fedora Board, FESCo,
and FAMSCO are up for election soon(¹). Right now we are in the
nomination period, which will be followed by a Candidate
Questionnaire. That means we'll give candidates a list of questions to
answer by private mail
On 06.08.2009 11:34, drago01 wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Orcan Ogetbiloget.fed...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 4:58 AM, drago01 wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
I maintain those drivers at RPMFusion. I will be happy beyond
imagination when
On 05.08.2009 12:02, Richard Hughes wrote:
2009/8/5 Josephine Tannhäuser josephine.tannhau...@googlemail.com:
KDE 4.3 will come to F11 and F10. It's a cool thing.
There aren't updates like this for Gnome. Why not?
F10 with Gnome 2.26 sounds fine to me.
Because I don't want to _support_ the
On 31.07.2009 03:52, Bill McGonigle wrote:
On 07/30/2009 01:48 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
[...] does enigmail still need to be built
inside a full thunderbird source tree or has that been properly factored
out?
Afaics the former:
http://cvs.rpmfusion.org/viewvc/rpms/thunderbird-enigmail
On 14.07.2009 10:04, Douglas McClendon wrote:
[...]In any event, I'd love to hear what people think. [...]
I for one think rebooting after install is a very good thing, as only a
full reboot makes sure the install (including boot loaders) was
completely successful and works fine.
Or IOW: I for
CCing #fedora-kernel-list
On 04.07.2009 16:12, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Bojan Smojver wrote:
Now that .1 is out, is there anything in particular stopping F-11 from
having this kernel?
And why is F10 still stuck on 2.6.27? 2.6.29 has been in updates-testing for
ages now.
Good question. Seems the
CCing #fedora-kernel-list
On 04.07.2009 16:12, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Bojan Smojver wrote:
Now that .1 is out, is there anything in particular stopping F-11 from
having this kernel?
And why is F10 still stuck on 2.6.27? 2.6.29 has been in updates-testing for
ages now.
Good question. Seems the
On 01.07.2009 13:30, Paul Smith wrote:
I am experiencing the following problem when doing 'yum update':
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/lib64/gstreamer-0.10/libgstselector.so from install of
gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.23-3.fc11.x86_64 conflicts with file from
package
On 23.06.2009 21:06, homb...@tips-q.com wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:18:37 +0200
Pikachu_2014 pikachu.2...@gmail.com wrote:
Why not install the akmod-wl available on RPM Fusion ? In
your case, it is perfect, since you have a custom kernel;
the module will be rebuilt the next time you'll
On 24.06.2009 02:57, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 21:48 -0300, Martín Marqués wrote:
2009/6/23 Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wolfgang.rupprecht+gnus200...@gmail.com:
Christopher A. Williams chriswfed...@cawllc.com writes:
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 22:44 +0800, Ian Chapman wrote:
On 18.06.2009 18:09, Doctor Who wrote:
Anyway, how do i fix this so I can update to the most recent package?
I guess by running rpm -e yum-fedorakmod
http://rpmfusion.org/FAQ#head-a0575c3e9e8a6be3c18a572cf97df92c0a4f2c83
HTH
CU
knurd
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To
On 16.06.2009 14:48, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 06/16/2009 04:55 PM, Brian Millett wrote:
trying to update the gstreamer packages, there seems to be one missing:
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstdeinterlace.so from install of
On 16.06.2009 15:13, Brian Millett wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 14:57 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 16.06.2009 14:48, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 06/16/2009 04:55 PM, Brian Millett wrote:
trying to update the gstreamer packages, there seems to be one missing:
Transaction Check Error
Hi!
On 12.06.2009 03:47, John Poelstra wrote:
Have you ever wanted to give your perspective on how well the Fedora
development and release process works, but weren't sure where to do it?
Now you have the perfect opportunity!
Nice intro, but...
For Fedora 11 we are having a
project
On 12.06.2009 20:54, Jon Stanley wrote:
Here's the minutes and IRC log of today's FESCo meeting
Minutes:
http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/fedora-meeting/2009/fedora-meeting.2009-06-12-17.01.html
Log:
On 14.06.2009 10:15, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 17:06:32 +1000, Anthony wrote:
Have just upgraded from F10 to F11, it all seemed to go well. However, I
am having trouble with yum as it is not fetching info from livna or
RPMfusion.
I tried to have a look at my repolist but
On 14.06.2009 15:15, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:35:47 +0200, Thorsten wrote:
Livna has discontinued its service long ago
Not really true, as I'd call this
and only provides a single package in its repos.
as service ;-)
Splitting-hairs.
Well, I added a smiley, but
On 14.06.2009 17:19, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 09:49:41 -0500, Bruno wrote:
Looking in http://rpm.livna.org/repo I see:
That's not the same than the previous location
( http://rpm.livna.org/fedora ) which users may have
used as baseurls in their .repo files or in
On 12.06.2009 13:33, Christoph Höger wrote:
Am Freitag, den 12.06.2009, 19:55 +1000 schrieb Eric Springer:
2009/6/12 Christoph Höger choe...@cs.tu-berlin.de:
Could you explain why mp3 (or ogg) encoding is not a real world
benchmark? I do this quite often.
Because they are comparing file
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The RPM Fusion team is proud to announce the public availability of our
''free'' and ''nonfree'' package repositories for Fedora 11 (Leonidas).
The repositories contain multimedia applications, kernel drivers, games
and other software the Fedora
Sorry, was quite busy with other stuff over the past few days and didn't
get around to answer this
On 03.06.2009 02:15, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 01:08:15AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
It IMHO shows a big and more and more pressing problem in Fedora
Sorry, was a bit busy over the past few days and didn't get around to
answer all mails.
On 04.06.2009 00:30, Andreas Thienemann wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Paul W. Frields wrote:
[...]
I'm disappointed this ended up being a more difficult process than you
intended, but I have no doubt we can
On 03.06.2009 21:28, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
As you might remember, we collected a list of questions that a few days
ago were sent to the Candidates of the next Fedora Board/FESCo
Elections(¹). I got most answers back in between (dgilmore should follow
soon; no response from ianweller yet
On 02.06.2009 22:30, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 21:30 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
but if we get RC with the final name transferred to the
mirrors ahead of time then they can be updated relative quickly as well,
as only a few bit change.
We don't do this as it tends
On 01.06.2009 20:14, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 19:49 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 29.05.2009 22:57, Jesse Keating wrote:
Thx for your reply and sorry, I didn't found time to answer earlier.
Some more comments:
[...]
- how about reducing the number or zero day updates
On 01.06.2009 21:50, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 19:49 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
- should we set an way earlier freezes date for things like anaconda,
kernel, isolinux, grub and other crucial pieces to make sure they are
in
better shape a bit earlier and thus are less
On 08.05.2009 07:53, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
[...]
Your best bet to avoid non-Free Software from Fedora is probably to
resort to Freed-ora Linux-libre builds, available from
http://linux-libre.fsfla.org/, and to exclude *-firmware and
microcode_ctl from the Fedora repositories.
I'd say
On 05.05.2009 15:54, Steve wrote:
I get this error when trying to update kmod-nvidia package:
Test Transaction Errors:
file /lib/modules/2.6.27.21-78.2.41.fc9.x86_64/extra/nvidia/nvidia.ko from
install of
kmod-nvidia-2.6.27.21-78.2.41.fc9.x86_64-173.14.15-1.fc9.12.x86_64 conflicts
with file
On 29.04.2009 00:53, Andre Robatino wrote:
VirtualBox-OSE (the Open-Source-Edition) is in RPM Fusion Free
Updates Testing for F10 since yesterday(¹). It'll get moved to the
proper updates directory sooner or later.
[...]
(¹) Note that the RPM Fusion updates-testing repos depend
On 26.04.2009 00:10, Andre Robatino wrote:
This page was set up for the purpose of getting VirtualBox into the
rpmfusion repo, but no activity lately.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TillMaas/Virtualbox
VirtualBox-OSE (the Open-Source-Edition) is in RPM Fusion Free Updates
Testing for F10
On 01.03.2009 13:27, Sharpe, Sam J wrote:
2009/3/1 Andras Simon sza...@gmail.com:
On 3/1/09, Dave Bolt IT Solutions d...@davebolt.co.uk wrote:
I have a test box which has been showing some corruption of the display from
time to time.
Since it doesn't matter if I play, I thought I would try
Attached mail FYI -- if you want to step us as maintainer for madwifi
please contact me (existing Fedora contributors or maintainers with
existing packaging skills would be ideal for the job). Madwifi will be
dropped from RPM Fusion for F11 and later if no one steps up to maintain
it. Feel
On 08.02.2009 18:32, jack wallen wrote:
trying to update my Fedora 10. i use the nvidia-kmod packages and am
getting this error:
Test Transaction Errors: file
/lib/modules/2.6.27.9-159.fc10.i686/extra/nvidia/nvidia.ko from install
of kmod-nvidia-2.6.27.9-159.fc10.i686-180.22-1.fc10.i686
On 06.02.2009 12:07, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
Dave Jones wrote:
2. Will we eventually rename kernel-PAE.686 to kernel.686?
I don't think we can, otherwise someone with non-PAE 686's who
does an update will suddenly find themselves unable to boot.
I was thinking about this for a little while.
On 06.02.2009 20:55, Kyle McMartin wrote:
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 08:47:41PM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Getting rid of the suffix -PAE afaics would solve exactly the problem
that now is just exposed to more people (or might make solving it a
lot easier afaics). And it would make
On 05.02.2009 21:29, Dave Jones wrote:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 03:22:55PM -0500, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
2. Will we eventually rename kernel-PAE.686 to kernel.686?
I don't think we can,
It'd be nice to get a definite answer from the anaconda/yum crowd.
otherwise someone with non-PAE 686's
On 29.01.2009 02:55, David Burns wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:39 PM, John Lagrue jlag...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/1/27 Phil Meyer pme...@themeyerfarm.com
John Lagrue wrote:
Attempting an update this evening I get the following error.
On 12.01.2009 11:01, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 08:31:01AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
(thanks to Thorsten Leemhuis for those pointers) it's no longer
experimental
It may no longer be functionally experimental, but does it still lead to
popping on some hardware when
On 12.01.2009 22:26, Eric Sandeen wrote:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 12.01.2009 11:01, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 08:31:01AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
(thanks to Thorsten Leemhuis for those pointers) it's no longer
experimental
It may no longer be functionally
CCing fedora-kernel
On 08.01.2009 03:49, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Quite a bit of new drivers in
http://lwn.net/Articles/313730/
Related: I raised the staging problem already in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477927
as rawhide contained the at76 driver as separate patch
On 18.12.2008 18:04, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
I had a similar problem. After I installed the nvidia-kmod module the
best resolution I could get is 1280x1024 yet my laptop supports up to
1440x1050. I ended up removing the package and going back to the
default install. I have never been able to
On 17.12.2008 12:18, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 08:41 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 17.12.2008 08:21, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 17.12.2008 07:53, Kam Leo wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 10:07 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis
fed...@leemhuis.info wrote:
Here's a freebie
On 17.12.2008 09:09, Kam Leo wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis
fed...@leemhuis.info wrote:
On 17.12.2008 07:53, Kam Leo wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 10:07 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis
fed...@leemhuis.info wrote:
Here's a freebie: Borrow from Livna's install script
On 17.12.2008 00:55, Kam Leo wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Nigel Henry
cave.dnb2m9...@aliceadsl.fr wrote:
(Note: My only complaint
regarding RPMFusion is that the developers have yum blnders on when
they created their install rpm. They negilected to provide for smart
and apt.)
On 17.12.2008 02:38, Gordon Messmer wrote:
Nigel Henry wrote:
[r...@localhost djmons]# apt-get update
Fedora users ignore this post please. This is a complaint to the Fedora
developers, who are living in their own little world. I thought that Linux
was about choices, but it appears that
On 17.12.2008 07:53, Kam Leo wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 10:07 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis
fed...@leemhuis.info wrote:
Here's a freebie: Borrow from Livna's install script. It already has
provisions for smart and apt.
Guess what: it's not free -- packaging it/adding it to the existing
packages
On 17.12.2008 08:21, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 17.12.2008 07:53, Kam Leo wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 10:07 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis
fed...@leemhuis.info wrote:
Here's a freebie: Borrow from Livna's install script. It already has
provisions for smart and apt.
Guess what: it's not free
On 09.12.2008 10:34, David Hláčik wrote:
Hi guys, is this ATI driver working in Fedora 10?
No -- that accidentally got build in the last kmod rebuild round and
will get removed with the next push. Sorry, was my fault.
CU
knurd
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To
On 09.12.2008 10:44, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
David Hláčik wrote:
i have problem with rendering of liberation fonts in Firefox Browser
(latest in Fedora 10)
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.4) Gecko/2008111217
Fedora/3.0.4-1.fc10 Firefox/3.0.4.
This is how letters u and R are
On 08.12.2008 22:12, Kevin Kofler wrote:
[...]
(However,
livna-release currently requires rpmfusion-nonfree-release. But you don't
actually need any non-Free package.)
Which seems not correct anymore, as it seems livna built a new
livna-release package (available via the livna front page)
On 05.12.2008 02:36, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Livna still exists and will so for the foreseeable future, as it
contains one package (one that is used when playing DVDs) that RPM
Fusion did not want to take.
I won't comment on that decision, but will there be a solution
On 05.12.2008 06:30, Kam Leo wrote:
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 9:14 PM, Dean S. Messing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Recently did a fresh install of F10. All updates (a boatload of them!)
as of yesterday. Disabled IPv6 (in modprobe.conf) Disabled ip6tables
(chkconfig) and rebooted. The ipv6 module is
On 05.12.2008 07:39, Dean S. Messing wrote:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 05.12.2008 06:30, Kam Leo wrote:
snip
Try using the main rpmfusion server. Edit the rpmfusion repo files in
/etc/yum.repos.d directory, enable the baserul (i.e. remove the #
character), and disable the mirrorlist (i.e
On 04.12.2008 01:03, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
rpmfusion-nonfree-release-8-6.noarch
rpmfusion-free-release-8-6.noarch
You have old rpmfusion release files AND you the livna entries in your repolist.
This is probably a problem.
Just to be
On 01.12.2008 20:19, Kevin Kempter wrote:
On Saturday 29 November 2008 16:31:29 Paul W. Frields wrote:
[...]
I installed the nvidia driver like this:
1) I installed the rpmfusion repos
2) I did a yum install kmod-nvidia
Here everything would have worked.
3) I ran nvidia-xconfig (to generate
On 29.11.2008 19:08, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
On Sat, 2008-11-29 at 18:11 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 29.11.2008 17:52, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
On Sat, 2008-11-29 at 13:53 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 29.11.2008 00:16, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
snip...
Perhaps
On 29.11.2008 00:16, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
Come to think of it, the fglrx drivers are also missing. ATI/AMD just
released a new version of these on 11-18 as well.
If you get them to work in a proper way(¹) let the RPM Fusion packagers
know via http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org. But they
On 28.11.2008 23:17, Jim wrote:
[...]
Rpmfusion is also missing the xine package.
You seems to be quite sure with that. But what's this then:
http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/releases/10/Everything/i386/os/repoview/xine.html
On 28.11.2008 18:29, Linuxguy123 wrote:
Some of you may know this, but I didn't and thus I'll share what I
learned.
The rpmfusion nvidia driver needs a special xorg.conf file. It might
not operate properly with a file that previously operated properly with
say a livna sourced driver.
On 29.11.2008 05:03, Lonni J Friedman wrote:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Richard Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 9:31 AM, Linuxguy123 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The solution was to tweak the xorg.conf file to what the rpmfusion
people say is needed. That means
On 29.11.2008 14:51, Valent Turkovic wrote:
[...]
After compiling madwifi-hal and blacklisting ath5k wireless started
working perfectly.
FYI, in case you are not aware of it: You can get madwifi pre-compiled
from RPM Fusion. Getting it from there might be the best for those that
don't want
On 29.11.2008 15:42, Valent Turkovic wrote:
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29.11.2008 14:51, Valent Turkovic wrote:
[...]
After compiling madwifi-hal and blacklisting ath5k wireless started
working perfectly.
FYI, in case you are not aware
On 29.11.2008 16:55, Jim wrote:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 29.11.2008 15:42, Valent Turkovic wrote:
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29.11.2008 14:51, Valent Turkovic wrote:
[...]
After compiling madwifi-hal and blacklisting ath5k wireless
On 29.11.2008 17:52, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
On Sat, 2008-11-29 at 13:53 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 29.11.2008 00:16, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
Come to think of it, the fglrx drivers are also missing. ATI/AMD just
released a new version of these on 11-18 as well.
If you get
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The RPM Fusion team is proud to announce the public availability of our
''free'' and ''nonfree'' package repositories for Fedora 10 (Cambridge).
The repositories contain multimedia applications, kernel drivers, games
and other software the Fedora
On 14.11.2008 09:21, Frank Cox wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 06:25:51 +0530
Rahul Sundaram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Preupgrade provides a solution that looks overall very similar to a live
upgrade. It downloads the all the package updates from the release you
want to upgrade to (you can continue
On 04.11.2008 02:20, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 19:36:09 -0500, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
I tried to update my F8 system with the new RPMFusion repository today.
On DVDAuthorWizard, I got the following:
Error: Missing Dependency: soc is needed by
Hi!
As you'll likely have heard by now: RPM Fusion (http://rpmfusion.org),
the merger of Dribble, Freshrpms and Livna was finally launched today. See
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2008-November/msg3.html
for details. All Livna users will be migrated automatically to
On 03.11.2008 18:53, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 09:33:53 -0800,
Jonathan Ryshpan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently accepted an update of the Livna repository info from
livna-release-9-1.noarch to livna-release-9-2.noarch . This caused the
availability of a large number
On 03.11.2008 19:18, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 11:53 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 09:33:53 -0800,
Jonathan Ryshpan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently accepted an update of the Livna repository info from
livna-release-9-1.noarch to
On 03.11.2008 19:03, Frank Cox wrote:
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 11:53:55 -0600
Bruno Wolff III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Livna is combining with a few other repositories to form RPMFusion and they
have recently started the cutover.
As RPMFusion includes both Fedora and RHEL (Centos) rpms,
Note
On 03.11.2008 19:40, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
As you'll likely have heard by now: RPM Fusion (http://rpmfusion.org),
the merger of Dribble, Freshrpms and Livna was finally launched today. See
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2008-November/msg3.html
for details. All Livna
On 30.10.2008 02:03, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 11:47 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
The current recommendations are to get it from those still willing to risk
distributing it (rpmfusion currently is not)
[...]
What's the proposed alternative? Suppose we can't get libdvdcss
Hi!
Find below a cut'n'pasted and slightly enhanced version of a post from
my blog FYI:
As you'll likely have heard by now: RPM Fusion ( http://rpmfusion.org ),
the merger of Dribble, Freshrpms and Livna gets closer to its official
release/start. Most of the packages from Livna have been
On 25.10.2008 15:35, Linuxguy123 wrote:
I am running the latest stable kernel for my Fedora 8 installation.
$ uname -a
Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.26.6-49.fc8 #1 SMP Fri Oct 17 15:59:36
EDT 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
I would like an nvidia driver for this kernel. It doesn't seem to be
On 25.10.2008 18:23, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le samedi 25 octobre 2008 à 17:04 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis a écrit :
Find below a cut'n'pasted and slightly enhanced version of a post from
my blog FYI:
As you'll likely have heard by now: RPM Fusion ( http://rpmfusion.org ),
the merger of Dribble
On 17.10.2008 16:35, Jim wrote:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 12.10.2008 21:26, Jim wrote:
Beartooth wrote:
On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 14:24:03 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
[...]
The madwifi drivers at Livna does not work as they should for the
2.6.26 kernels.
Did you (or somebody else) file a bug
On 12.10.2008 21:26, Jim wrote:
Beartooth wrote:
On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 14:24:03 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
[...]
The madwifi drivers at Livna does not work as they should for the
2.6.26 kernels.
Did you (or somebody else) file a bug so this can be fixed? Then we can
save a lot of users
On 11.10.2008 02:37, Dave Jones wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 05:55:50PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Friday 10 October 2008 17:27:00 Chris Snook wrote:
Dave Jones wrote:
For a while, diffs in the Fedora kernel have followed the form
linux-2.6-*.patch
Then, we started seeing
On 15.08.2008 07:10, Mogens Kjaer wrote:
Dave Burns wrote:
...
using rpmbuild command? What switches?
This is not rocket science :-)
For my x86_64 machine:
# rpm -i nvidia-kmod-173.14.12-2.lvn9.src.rpm
# rpm -i buildsys-build-rpmfusion-9.1-9.lvn9.src.rpm
Just FYI, you don't need to
Hi!
Just fyi, new kernels will afaics hit the Fedora 8 and 9 repos over the
next few hours. But Livna has a buildsys outage and won't be able to
builds new kmods for them in time. Sorry for the trouble. We'll build
them asap; consider to wait with updating to the new kernels (they are
afaics
Hi all
John (CCed), I really appreciate your work in the wireless area and
would like to use the opportunity to say thanks for all you work, as
support for WLAN hardware in the Linux kernel improved a lot in the
upstream kernel and Fedora thx to your (and other linux wireless
developers)
On 05.07.2008 15:54, drago01 wrote:
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- a karama of +3 in bodhi seems not enough for a auto-move from testing to
stable (or even worse: straight to stable if enough people tested the kernel
and gave their +1 after
On 05.07.2008 17:22, drago01 wrote:
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05.07.2008 15:54, drago01 wrote:
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
- a karama of +3 in bodhi seems not enough for a auto-move from
On 21.05.2008 21:33, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, 21 May 2008 16:20:39 -0300
Alexandre Oliva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 21, 2008, Brian Pepple [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Inclusion in Fedora (future and recent past releases) of the
kernel-libre package, a 100% Free Software variant of the
On 22.05.2008 10:37, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Jeu 22 mai 2008 10:24, Thorsten Leemhuis a écrit :
Dave, what's the status of the precompiled vanilla kernel rpms for
Fedora?
It would be mightily useful to have regular pre-built vanilla and
linux-next fedora rpms available in a well-known repo
. The plan is to migrate users automatically over from
Livna to RPM Fusion slowly once the repos are available.
Bye!
Thorsten Leemhuis
== More details ==
=== Reminder for the folks that plan to yum-update to Fedora 9 ===
If you have livna-packages installed on your system and plan to
live-update
On 24.03.2008 20:53, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Monday 24 March 2008 03:32:37 pm Dave Jones wrote:
I took a stab at bz 197065 and arrived at the patch below.
Would appreciate some eyeballs before I commit from people
familiar with the macro goo in the specfile. (Hi Roland!)
Aparently pm-utils will
On 25.03.2008 13:47, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Tuesday 25 March 2008 02:02:04 am Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 24.03.2008 20:53, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Monday 24 March 2008 03:32:37 pm Dave Jones wrote:
I took a stab at bz 197065 and arrived at the patch below.
Would appreciate some eyeballs
On 21.02.2008 21:13, Matt Domsch wrote:
If running all of /etc/kernel/postinst.d/ is so scary, I'm ok with
new-kernel-pkg explicitly doing
[ -x /etc/kernel/postinst.d/dkms ] /etc/kernel/postinst.d/dkms $kernelver
/boot/vmlinuz-$kernelver
FYI, livna's akmods stuff (a simple script that
Hi all!
/me is a bit puzzled
On 28 Jan 2008 22:14:47 -0700 kernel-2.6.23.14-64.fc7 was shipped as
update:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-January/msg00968.html
Some minutes ago on 02 Feb 2008 02:01:59 -0700 kernel-2.6.23.14-60.fc7
was shipped as update:
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
