On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 16:39 +, Phil Sharrock wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem logging out of Fedora 8.0
F8 hasn't been supported for over a year now.
> The logout window will not appear when the logout icon is clicked on.
Which desktop? Gnome? KDE? Other?
> I have to reboot or shutdown us
Hi,
I have a problem logging out of Fedora 8.0
The logout window will not appear when the logout icon is clicked on.
I have to reboot or shutdown using poweroff.
Any ideas ?
Phil
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it ar
On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 11:57 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 07:52:35 -0700,
> > bruce wrote:
> >> as an example, i tried to use:
> >>ldapsearch -x -h ldap.bu.edu -b "dc=bu,dc=edu" "(sn=tom*)"
> >>(but this generates a ldap_bind: protocol er
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 07:52:35 -0700,
bruce wrote:
as an example, i tried to use:
ldapsearch -x -h ldap.bu.edu -b "dc=bu,dc=edu" "(sn=tom*)"
(but this generates a ldap_bind: protocol error...
I looked through the man page and tried a couple of things
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 07:52:35 -0700,
bruce wrote:
>
> as an example, i tried to use:
> ldapsearch -x -h ldap.bu.edu -b "dc=bu,dc=edu" "(sn=tom*)"
> (but this generates a ldap_bind: protocol error...
I looked through the man page and tried a couple of things that seemed might
wor
Hi..
Trying to run a simple ldap search/query against a supposedly public ldap
server. I've tried a number of copy/paste attempts that I've seen from
various sites with no luck...
If anyone has successfully pinged/queried a public ldap server from the
cmdline, can you post your cmd that you used
I am getting the below error message... and at a lost... could someone please
help? Thanks in
advanced!
Sep 6 21:53:17 hotmallo kernel: [ cut here ]
Sep 6 21:53:17 hotmallo kernel: Badness at fs/quota/dquot.c:964
Sep 6 21:53:17
hotmallo kernel: NIP: c018a754 LR: c018a
On 08/18/2009 03:45 PM, Sharpe, Sam J wrote:
> Red Hat Enterprise Linux is a very successful, profitable product
> line, which many people buy. I'm not sure how many of them are Fedora
> users and I'm not sure how much Red Hat cares either way - people like
> you are not the target market.
>
Tru
2009/8/18 :
> Does Red Hat really think that
> Fedora users will buy RHEL because they dig GIMP 2.2 so much?
Red Hat Enterprise Linux is a very successful, profitable product
line, which many people buy. I'm not sure how many of them are Fedora
users and I'm not sure how much Red Hat cares eithe
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 08/18/2009 09:24 AM, gil...@altern.org wrote:
Unfortunately, the legal approach of Mr Sundaram still doesn't answer this
enigma: if proprietary document formatting is just defining an awfully
more complex and secret way of producing bold than , then what are
media
On 08/18/2009 09:24 AM, gil...@altern.org wrote:
> Unfortunately, the legal approach of Mr Sundaram still doesn't answer this
> enigma: if proprietary document formatting is just defining an awfully
> more complex and secret way of producing bold than , then what are
> media codecs exactly?
Alrea
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 08:54 +0500, gil...@altern.org wrote:
> Does Red Hat really think that Fedora users will buy RHEL because they
> dig GIMP 2.2 so much?
No. Clearly you don't understand, and don't want to understand.
--
[...@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686
Don't send priv
gilpel:
>> This almost looks like a follow-up to the thread "What are
>> Microsoft codecs?" that some real Linux lovers pretty much
>> succeeded in trashing.
Antonio Olivares:
> What do you mean trashing? Could you explain a bit?
People who knew more than they did tore open all the holes in the
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 20:16 -0700, Antonio Olivares wrote:
> A friend of mine pokes fun at me because I use Fedora linux and he
> tells me that nobody gives a sh*t about it and that is why it does not
> get attacked by hackers, virii, spyware, adware, trojan horse, ...,
> etc as much as Micro$oft W
> Software Patents"
To:
" encouragement and advice for using Fedora.Community assistance"
In-Reply-To: <50762.216.239.89.138.1250567653.squir...@altern.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Sorry, I've deleted the "FAQ on
> Software Patents" started by Rahul
>
Sorry, I've deleted the "FAQ on Software Patents" started by Rahul
Sundaram. so I'll have to answer in a new thread.
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> From time to time, the same questions come up on MP3 and other patent
> related things and I have written up some answers at
> https://fedoraproject.org/w
Was: kmod-nvidia revisited. hijacking another thread
Phil Meyer wrote:
> On 08/06/2009 01:11 PM, Michael Hannon wrote:
> A new kernel comes out that is important to you. The kmod-XXX modules
> will normally lag a new kernel for a week in testing
I had the nvidia driver installed for the last 2
On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 19:14 -0700, Markus Kesaromous wrote:
>
> Building latest F11 kernel 2.6.29.6-213 ...
>
> # amke install modules_install
> .
> .
> .
> WARNING:
> /lib/modules/2.6.29.6-215.fc11.i586/kernel/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/p4-clockmod.ko
> needs unknown symbol speedstep_get_proc
Building latest F11 kernel 2.6.29.6-213 ...
# amke install modules_install
.
.
.
WARNING:
/lib/modules/2.6.29.6-215.fc11.i586/kernel/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/p4-clockmod.ko
needs unknown symbol speedstep_get_processor_frequency
WARNING:
/lib/modules/2.6.29.6-215.fc11.i586/kernel/arch/x86/k
(Apologies for messing up the threading yet one more time, and for
cluttering up the fedora thread with more stuff that is only semi-
relevant here.)
Michael Eager wrote,
...
Compilers determine what modifications they can make to the code using
the inferences they make based on the data flo
yes, i had to restart...after installation wasn't working..afther reboot works!
>Messaggio originale
>Da: ulissi...@gmail.com
>Data: 29/06/2009 15.35
>A: "Ivan Dell'Oro"
>Cc: "Community assistance, encouragement,
> and advice for using F
mail.com
>>>Data: 29/06/2009 15.11
>>>A: "Ivan Dell'Oro"> it>
>>>Cc: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora."
>>
>>>Ogg: Re: Re'''s: [was (no subject)]
>> Wireless in F11
>>&
:D
2009/6/29 Ivan Dell'Oro :
> perfect man!now is working...thank's a lot!
>
>>Messaggio originale
>>Da:
> ulissi...@gmail.com
>>Data: 29/06/2009 15.11
>>A: "Ivan Dell'Oro" it>
>>Cc: "Community assistance, encourageme
perfect man!now is working...thank's a lot!
>Messaggio originale
>Da:
ulissi...@gmail.com
>Data: 29/06/2009 15.11
>A: "Ivan Dell'Oro"
>Cc: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora."
>Ogg: Re: Re'''s:
gt; Dell'Oro", "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice
> for using Fedora."
>>Ogg: Re: Re'''s: [was
> (no subject)] Wireless in F11
>>
>>Try this (as root):
>>yum install broadcom-wl
> kmod-wl
>>
>>2009/6/29 Ivan De
i tryed, it says: "Error: b43 conflicts with broacom-wl"
>Messaggio
originale
>Da: ulissi...@gmail.com
>Data: 29/06/2009 14.55
>A: "Ivan
Dell'Oro", "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice
for using Fedora."
>Ogg: Re: Re'&
aggio originale
>>Da: ulissi...@gmail.com
>>Data:
> 29/06/2009 14.15
>>A: "Ivan Dell'Oro", "Community assistance,
> encouragement,
>> and advice for using Fedora."
>>Ogg:
> Re: Re'''s: [was (no subject)] Wire
;Oro", "Community assistance,
encouragement,
> and advice for using Fedora."
>Ogg:
Re: Re'''s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11
>
>Try this:
>su -c
'echo "alias wlan0 b43" >> /etc/modprobe.conf'
>
>Do you have RPM Fusion
repos
one time for ever?
>
>>Messaggio
> originale
>>Da: ulissi...@gmail.com
>>Data: 28/06/2009 1.12
>>A: "ivan
> dell'oro", "Community assistance, encouragement,
>> and advice
> for using Fedora."
>>Ogg: Re: Re''&#
agement,
> and advice
for using Fedora."
>Ogg: Re: Re'''s: [was
(no subject)] Wireless in F11
>
>do you use dual-boot with Windows?
>
>if yes,
boot into Windows and make sure that the wireless device is
>turned on and
working (might be strange but I
yes i use dual boot with xp...it works under win and works the button to turn
on/off
>Messaggio originale
>Da: ulissi...@gmail.com
>Data: 28/06/2009
1.12
>A: "ivan dell'oro", "Community assistance,
encouragement,
> and advice for using Fedora.&q
>>Da: ulissi...@gmail.com
>
>>Data: 27/06/2009 21.58
>>A: "ivan dell'oro", "Community
> assistance, encouragement,
>> and advice for using Fedora." com>
>>Ogg: Re: Re'''s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11
>>
essaggio originale
>Da: ulissi...@gmail.com
>Data: 27/06/2009 21.58
>A: "ivan dell'oro", "Community
assistance, encouragement,
> and advice for using Fedora."
>Ogg: Re: Re'''s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11
>
>Have
you follo
>>A: "ivan dell'oro", "Community
> assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora." com>
>>Ogg: Re: Re'''s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11
>>
>>Try
> with one of these methods:
>>
>>http://fedoraguide.info/i
'oro", "Community
assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora."
>Ogg: Re: Re'''s: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11
>
>Try
with one of these methods:
>
>http://fedoraguide.info/index.php?
title=Main_Page#Broadcom_b43_.28Official_driver.2
;
>>Messaggio originale
>>Da:
> ulissi...@fedoraproject.org
>>Data: 26/06/2009 16.14
>>A: "z3...@libero.it"
> , "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using
> Fedora."
>>Ogg: Re: R: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)]
> Wire
d advice for using
Fedora."
>Ogg: Re: R: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)]
Wireless in F11
>
>In the console type:
>
>su -
>rpm -Uivh http://dnmouse.
org/b43-3-4.fc11.noarch.rpm
>
>and restart
>
>2009/6/26 z3...@libero.it
:
>> so i think that my bcm h
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 15:53:07 +0200,
"z3...@libero.it" wrote:
> org/broadcom.html i can understand that is supported but afther is written
> "only tha 2.4 Ghz part" and i don't understand if with my cpu (AMD Sempron™
> SI-
That's the radio frequency used not the clock rate of your cpu.
--
On Friday 26 June 2009 17:51:23 Bill Davidsen wrote:
>
> Depending on whether you want to be perfectly open source politically
> correct or just have a working system with no illegal software, you could
> try the kmod-wl driver from rpmfusion. Works for me, I'm happy to say, and
> I didn't have to
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 09:21:14 -0600
Christopher A. Williams wrote:
> It would seem to me that an RPM could automate the download and install
> on F11 from a legal distribution point without actually carrying the
> firmware.
msttcorefonts has done something similar to that for quite a while.
--
M
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Friday 26 June 2009 14:53:07 z3...@libero.it wrote:
Hi,
i'm very sorry for the object, i can assure that wasn't intenctional, i
forgot!
so, using the command lspci the answer is: 06:00.0 Network controller:
Broadcom Corporation BCM4312 802.11b/g (rev 01)
i don't know lther
On Friday 26 June 2009 14:53:07 z3...@libero.it wrote:
> Hi,
> i'm very sorry for the object, i can assure that wasn't intenctional, i
> forgot!
> so, using the command lspci the answer is: 06:00.0 Network controller:
> Broadcom Corporation BCM4312 802.11b/g (rev 01)
> i don't know lther cmd to kno
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 09:47 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> Broadcom is bad because not only do they not help with the kernel drivers,
> they have restrictions on distribution of the firmware that drivers need
> to load into the device.
>
> This is from the linux wireless project web page for b43
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 11:51 -0300, Ulissis Gomes Corrêa wrote:
> My replies? or Z3N58 replies?
Z3N58, sorry.
poc
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingLi
My replies? or Z3N58 replies?
2009/6/26 Patrick O'Callaghan :
> OT: you need to check your mailer. None of your replies are being
> correctly threaded, meaning your mailer is not processing the
> In-Reply-To header. This means that this thread is all over the place,
> making it harder to follow (e
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 08:24:19 -0400,
Brian Mearns wrote:
>
> But I digress. I'm guessing the problem will not magically solve
> itself just by installing F11, but I can't say for sure. I think
> certain wireless devices just aren't supported in Linux yet, but if
> you already had it working
OT: you need to check your mailer. None of your replies are being
correctly threaded, meaning your mailer is not processing the
In-Reply-To header. This means that this thread is all over the place,
making it harder to follow (even aside from the wierd Subject line).
poc
--
fedora-list mailing l
Ok Brian i'm very sorry!
so i will try that command and i will let u know if
works!
thank's to everybody!
ivan
>Messaggio originale
>Da:
bmea...@ieee.org
>Data: 26/06/2009 16.12
>A: "z3...@libero.it"
>Ogg: Re: R: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wire
ng Fedora."
>Ogg: Re: R: Re: [was (no subject)] Wireless in F11
>
>2.4 Ghz this case
is the transmission frequency that the wireless
>signal work with.
>
>2009/6/26
z3...@libero.it :
>> Hi,
>> i'm very sorry for the object, i
can assure that wasn't inte
;Messaggio originale
>Da: bmea...@ieee.org
>Data:
26/06/2009 14.24
>A: "z3...@libero.it", "Community assistance,
encouragement, and advice for using Fedora."
>Ogg: Re:
[was (no subject)] Wireless in F11
>
>On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 7:22 AM,
z3...@lib
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Brian Mearns wrote:
>
>> In my experience, Linux is still somewhat immature in the wireless
>> area, but does seem to be catching up rapidly (this is obviously a
>> pretty high demand area). As with most linux-hardware issues, the real
>> pro
Brian Mearns wrote:
> In my experience, Linux is still somewhat immature in the wireless
> area, but does seem to be catching up rapidly (this is obviously a
> pretty high demand area). As with most linux-hardware issues, the real
> problem is vendor support for the Linux kernel.
That does not se
On Friday 26 June 2009 12:22:34 z3...@libero.it wrote:
> Hi,
> i'm a new user of Fedora 'cause I was using another distribution of linux
>
> and i want to put F11 on my laptop (Hp 6735s) but I tryed the live version
> and
>
> the wifi is not working...i wanna jnow if is just a live problem and if i
On 26/06/09 12:22, z3...@libero.it wrote:
http://www.dnmouse.org/broadcom.html
Frank
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 7:22 AM, z3...@libero.it wrote:
> Hi,
> i'm a new user of Fedora 'cause I was using another distribution of linux
>
> and i want to put F11 on my laptop (Hp 6735s) but I tryed the live version and
>
> the wifi is not working...i wanna jnow if is just a live problem and if is
Hi,
i'm a new user of Fedora 'cause I was using another distribution of linux
and i want to put F11 on my laptop (Hp 6735s) but I tryed the live version and
the wifi is not working...i wanna jnow if is just a live problem and if is like
that installing F11 the problem will be solved or is a prob
mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Could someone put a sane subject on this please? (no subject) doesn't
make any sense.
--
Armin Moradi
If he is having problems with reaching some websites and not others it
is a IPV6 DNS
>
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> Guidelines:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
>
Could someone put a sane subject on this please?
Message: 8
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 10:42:14 -0400
From: Mail Lists
Subject: Re: Baffled by a Cable Modem
To: "Community assistance, encouragement,and advice for using
Fedora."
Message-ID: <4a3cf546.6030...@sapience.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On 06/20/2009 10:38 AM,
Message: 8
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 10:42:14 -0400
From: Mail Lists
Subject: Re: Baffled by a Cable Modem
To: "Community assistance, encouragement,and advice for using
Fedora."
Message-ID: <4a3cf546.6030...@sapience.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On 06/20/2009 10:38 AM,
cibertazzi2001 wrote:
> Amarok and audacious player both ask MPEG-1 layer mp3
Amarok needs xine-lib-extras-freeworld, Audacious needs
audacious-plugins-freeworld-mp3 (or the whole audacious-plugins-freeworld
metapackage if you also want other codecs). You can find both in the RPM
Fusion repository
Amarok and audacious player both ask MPEG-1 layer mp3
Kevin Kofler wrote:
cibertazzi2001 wrote:
I can't play mp3 in F10 the player say that no have MPEG-1 Layer (mp3) .
Which player? (The package to add depends on which player you're using.)
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-list m
cibertazzi2001 wrote:
> I can't play mp3 in F10 the player say that no have MPEG-1 Layer (mp3) .
Which player? (The package to add depends on which player you're using.)
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/02/2009 12:59 PM, cibertazzi2001 wrote:
> I can't play mp3 in F10 the player say that no have MPEG-1 Layer (mp3) .
> How I'm solve this?
> Regards
> Caio
>
Add the RPMFUSION repositories then look for packages for your music player.
http://rp
I can't play mp3 in F10 the player say that no have MPEG-1 Layer (mp3) .
How I'm solve this?
Regards
Caio
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuide
Sharpe, Sam J wrote:
> Ok, it wasn't a very good joke.
only in that you spat coffee on your asus. :)
--
peace out.
tc,hago.
g
.
in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
**
help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend today
**
to mess up a linux box, you need to wo
Sharpe, Sam J wrote:
> This was a much funnier post. I spat my morning coffee out over this
> Asus EeePC 701G with Ubuntu 9.04 because of this.
glad you enjoyed it. when i read poc's post, it just popped into my
head and i could not resist.
--
peace out.
tc,hago.
g
.
in a free world wi
2009/4/14 Patrick O'Callaghan :
> On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 07:23 +0100, Sharpe, Sam J wrote:
>> This was an attempt at a joke based on your three recent threads that
>> all contain mention of your new toy.
>
> Perhaps because they were all questions *about* the new toy?
Ok, it wasn't a very good joke
On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 07:23 +0100, Sharpe, Sam J wrote:
> This was an attempt at a joke based on your three recent threads that
> all contain mention of your new toy.
Perhaps because they were all questions *about* the new toy?
poc
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscri
2009/4/14 g :
> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 22:44 +0100, Sharpe, Sam J wrote:
>
>>> That's interesting Patrick, but I'm very keen to learn how Capitals
>>> are working very well with your Asus 1000HE netbook with F10, as it
>>> hasn't made an outing in this thread yet.
>>
>>
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 22:44 +0100, Sharpe, Sam J wrote:
>> That's interesting Patrick, but I'm very keen to learn how Capitals
>> are working very well with your Asus 1000HE netbook with F10, as it
>> hasn't made an outing in this thread yet.
>
> What?
>
> poc
H E
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 22:44 +0100, Sharpe, Sam J wrote:
> 2009/4/13 Patrick O'Callaghan :
> > On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 16:25 -0400, m wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 02:02:02AM +0930, Tim wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 11:31 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> >> > > All-caps are harder to re
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 07:18:59AM +0930, Tim wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 16:25 -0400, m wrote:
> > If thats the case just say its harder to read and be done, don't
> > pretend its like screaming and then scream back breaking your own
> > sacred rule.
>
> You seem to be having quite a tantrum o
m wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 02:02:02AM +0930, Tim wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 11:31 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>>
>>> All-caps are harder to read than mixed caps and should be used
>>> sparingly. This has been well-known to the printing profession for
>>> several hundred
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 11:31 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 23:40 -0400, m wrote:
> > PERHAPS HE HAS POOR EYESIGHT!!!
>
> All-caps are harder to read than mixed caps and should be used
> sparingly. This has been well-known to the printing profession for
> several hundred
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 16:25 -0400, m wrote:
> If thats the case just say its harder to read and be done, don't
> pretend its like screaming and then scream back breaking your own
> sacred rule.
You seem to be having quite a tantrum over this, I don't see why.
A point was made about it's considere
2009/4/13 Patrick O'Callaghan :
> On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 16:25 -0400, m wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 02:02:02AM +0930, Tim wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 11:31 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> > > All-caps are harder to read than mixed caps and should be used
>> > > sparingly. This has b
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 16:25 -0400, m wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 02:02:02AM +0930, Tim wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 11:31 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > All-caps are harder to read than mixed caps and should be used
> > > sparingly. This has been well-known to the printing profess
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 02:02:02AM +0930, Tim wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 11:31 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > All-caps are harder to read than mixed caps and should be used
> > sparingly. This has been well-known to the printing profession for
> > several hundred years.
>
> Not to menti
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 11:31 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> All-caps are harder to read than mixed caps and should be used
> sparingly. This has been well-known to the printing profession for
> several hundred years.
Not to mention school teachers... It's with good reason that we're
first tau
On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 23:40 -0400, m wrote:
> PERHAPS HE HAS POOR EYESIGHT!!!
All-caps are harder to read than mixed caps and should be used
sparingly. This has been well-known to the printing profession for
several hundred years.
poc
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubs
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 11:54:37PM -0300, Armin wrote:
> On Sunday 12 April 2009 07:24:28 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > vujsa wrote:
> > > THE REPOSITORY AT DOWNLOAD.FEDORA.REDHAT.COM IS MISSING!
> >
> > THAT'S BECAUSE YOUR ANCIENT RELEASE IS NO LONGER SUPPORTED! PLEASE UPGRADE!
> >
> > AND STOP WRITING
On Sunday 12 April 2009 07:24:28 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> vujsa wrote:
> > THE REPOSITORY AT DOWNLOAD.FEDORA.REDHAT.COM IS MISSING!
>
> THAT'S BECAUSE YOUR ANCIENT RELEASE IS NO LONGER SUPPORTED! PLEASE UPGRADE!
>
> AND STOP WRITING IN ALL CAPS NEXT TIME!!!
>
> Kevin Kofler
LOL, YEA, I AGREE!
vujsa wrote:
> THE REPOSITORY AT DOWNLOAD.FEDORA.REDHAT.COM IS MISSING!
THAT'S BECAUSE YOUR ANCIENT RELEASE IS NO LONGER SUPPORTED! PLEASE UPGRADE!
AND STOP WRITING IN ALL CAPS NEXT TIME!!!
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redh
2009/4/11 vujsa :
> Well, after reading a lot of posts about this error, I found that none of the
> suggestions dealt with the read problem...
>
> THE REPOSITORY AT DOWNLOAD.FEDORA.REDHAT.COM IS MISSING!
This has been dealt with before. It's not missing, it has been archived:
http://archive.fedor
Well, after reading a lot of posts about this error, I found that none of the
suggestions dealt with the read problem...
THE REPOSITORY AT DOWNLOAD.FEDORA.REDHAT.COM IS MISSING!
You can see here:
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/ [1]
All of the directories there are empty
Amilton Luiz Schiavon Junior wrote:
> Could you exclude my e-mail from this list?
> thank you
could you read next to last line of post to see where it says
'To unsubscribe:'.
you are welcome.
--
peace out.
tc,hago.
g
.
in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
**
help microsoft
No but you could... This link is on every single message:
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
--
Sam
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wik
Could you exclude my e-mail from this list?
thank you
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 9:21 AM, wrote:
>
> Does Yum also update the old baseurl's in /etc/yum.repos.d when
> you get the first new one to work?
>
> My Yum keeps looking for core 5.
>
> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/5/i386
> /os/FC10/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14] HTTP
Does Yum also update the old baseurl's in /etc/yum.repos.d when
you get the first new one to work?
My Yum keeps looking for core 5.
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/5/i386
/os/FC10/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404: Date: Tue,
31 Mar 2009 01:26:15 GMT
Can som
I hope this will help you
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Distribution/FreeMedia
---
Yours,
Waleed Harbi
If you want your goals to come true, don't sleep.
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:40 PM, zaneer mohamed wrote:
> Dear sir,
>
> I
Dear sir,
I woul like take your respective 'Fedora' by mailig near future. If
you can sent me some fedora copies to the following address
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wi
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Michael Pace wrote:
>
>
>
> I am a newbie who is unsure as to which Linux devices I should start
> with.Can anyone help me with this.
>Is Fedora the latest on offer? Is it suitable for a beginner? Thanks for
> any help.
>
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 12:31 -0800, Michael Pace wrote:
> Is it suitable for a beginner?
If you're not technically minded, or interested, then perhaps not. If
you want things to just work without putting any effort in, I'd say
definitely not (some things will just work, but that sort of expectatio
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 12:31 -0800, Michael Pace wrote:
> I am a newbie who is unsure as to which Linux devices I should
> start with.Can anyone help me with this.
>Is Fedora the latest on offer? Is it suitable for a beginner?
> Thanks for any help.
>
>
> Mike Pace
>
Hi Mike,
Michael Pace wrote:
I am a newbie who is unsure as to which Linux devices I should start
with.Can anyone help me with this.
Is Fedora the latest on offer? Is it suitable for a beginner? Thanks for any
help.
I am a newbie who is unsure as to which Linux devices I should start
with.Can anyone help me with this.
Is Fedora the latest on offer? Is it suitable for a beginner? Thanks for any
help.
Rick Stevens wrote, On 01/12/2009 06:14 PM:
free reports the high-water mark of swap (the
highest usage), not how much is being used NOW. It won't be reset until
a reboot occurs.
While I agree with pretty much everything else you wrote, the above seems wrong.
I have a program used just to
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
