Beartooth wrote that he:
> … did "yum install kvm virt-manager," and got both plus ten
> dependencies.
>
> Is there a better way to get started than a man page?
I’d start playing with Virtual Tools -> Virtual Machine Manager or
virt-manager (from a root shell): it gives a basic graphical i
Beartooth wrote:
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:18:22 +0100, Alex de Jong wrote:
There's no need to get rid of wine, since you're running XP completely
seperate of your Linux install.
Which virtualisation program are you running? I guess you should be able
to add another CD/DVD-drive by directory in yo
Beartooth wrote:
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:00:55 -0700, Phil Meyer wrote:
McGuffey, David C. wrote:
Rather than configuring a dual-boot machine for running those
occasional Windows apps, which one of these virtualization tools
provides the best (read most accurate) virtualization environment on
F
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:18:22 +0100, Alex de Jong wrote:
> There's no need to get rid of wine, since you're running XP completely
> seperate of your Linux install.
> Which virtualisation program are you running? I guess you should be able
> to add another CD/DVD-drive by directory in your virtualis
There's no need to get rid of wine, since you're running XP completely
seperate of your Linux install.
Which virtualisationprogram are you running? I guess you should be able
to add another CD/DVD-drive by directory in your virtualisation program.
Beartooth wrote:
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:41:28
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:41:28 +, James Wilkinson wrote:
> Beartooth wrote:
>> What of Rahul's comment, further up the thread, saying "KVM
>> (assuming you have the hardware support) with Virt-manager (if you need
>> a GUI)"??
[...]
> For AMD
> grep svm /proc/cpuinfo
Beartooth wrote:
> What of Rahul's comment, further up the thread, saying "KVM
> (assuming you have the hardware support) with Virt-manager (if you
> need a GUI)"??
>
> How do we tell if we have the hardware it takes? (And I for one
> do need a GUI for anything very complicated.)
Y
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 20:50:36 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
[...]
> KVM can virtualize everything, and does not by itself contain any M$
> software. But if you want to use KVM to run Window$ programs, you'll
> need an installation of Window$ inside it. Try WINE if you want to run
> Window$ prog
Please don't post HTML to this list. See
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
poc
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGui
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Beartooth wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:00:55 -0700, Phil Meyer wrote:
>
> > McGuffey, David C. wrote:
> >> Rather than configuring a dual-boot machine for running those
> >> occasional Windows apps, which one of these virtualization tools
> >> provides the bes
Beartooth wrote:
> Dumb question on a small point of purism, btw. IF (big if) I
> understand correctly, some if not all of these virtualizers actually
> contain (in some sense of "contain") a full install of XP or whatever,
> wrapped in linux like a mystery inside an enigma -- or a cyst inside an
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:00:55 -0700, Phil Meyer wrote:
> McGuffey, David C. wrote:
>> Rather than configuring a dual-boot machine for running those
>> occasional Windows apps, which one of these virtualization tools
>> provides the best (read most accurate) virtualization environment on
>> F10? Wh
McGuffey, David C. wrote:
Rather than configuring a dual-boot machine for running those occasional
Windows apps, which one of these virtualization tools provides the best
(read most accurate) virtualization environment on F10? Which one is
the easiest to install and configure? I had problems wi
McGuffey, David C. wrote:
Rather than configuring a dual-boot machine for running those occasional
Windows apps, which one of these virtualization tools provides the best
(read most accurate) virtualization environment on F10? Which one is
the easiest to install and configure? I had problems wi
Raymond C. Rodgers wrote:
While I have used KVM for more than a year for my own uses, I find that
VirtualBox offers an easier and seemingly more complete feature set
right now than KVM. For instance, it's a simple matter to get sound
working in VirtualBox where as I haven't figured out how t
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
McGuffey, David C. wrote:
Rather than configuring a dual-boot machine for running those occasional
Windows apps, which one of these virtualization tools provides the best
(read most accurate) virtualization environment on F10? Which one is
the easiest to install and config
McGuffey, David C. wrote:
Rather than configuring a dual-boot machine for running those occasional
Windows apps, which one of these virtualization tools provides the best
(read most accurate) virtualization environment on F10? Which one is
the easiest to install and configure?
KVM (assuming
Rather than configuring a dual-boot machine for running those occasional
Windows apps, which one of these virtualization tools provides the best
(read most accurate) virtualization environment on F10? Which one is
the easiest to install and configure? I had problems with VMWare on F7,
and would p
18 matches
Mail list logo
