Joachim,
>
>
> I downloaded the wrong file (link to video and not the video itself).
> Please apologize for inconvenience.
No problem I enjoyed the video
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.
On 01/09/2010 12:01 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Joachim Backes wrote:
On 01/09/2010 11:05 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Joachim Backes wrote:
When opening the following website:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Möbiusband,
you will find on this page a small video pointing to
http://de.wikipedia.org/wi
Joachim Backes wrote:
> On 01/09/2010 11:05 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>> Joachim Backes wrote:
>>> When opening the following website:
>>>
>>> http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Möbiusband,
>>>
>>>
>>> you will find on this page a small video pointing to
>>> http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Moebiusb
On 01/09/2010 11:05 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Joachim Backes wrote:
When opening the following website:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Möbiusband,
you will find on this page a small video pointing to
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Moebiusband_wikipedia_animation.ogg
I want to play this v
It was not possible to scan this message completely. You should
not assume that it is free of viruses.
Joachim Backes wrote:
> When opening the following website:
>
> http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Möbiusband,
>
>
> you will find on this page a small video pointing to
> http://de.wikipedia.org/w
When opening the following website:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Möbiusband,
you will find on this page a small video pointing to
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Moebiusband_wikipedia_animation.ogg
I want to play this video offline after downloading this ogg file.
But when trying
is not the
problem (I suspected this when testing in F11)
Now the help required at this point: mplayer
I'm using the one provided by rpmfusion free repo
mplayer-1.0-0.111.20091029svn.fc12.x86_64
mplayer -ao alsa:spdif with a dts sample file gives no sound in F11
while it "almost&qu
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 09:42:06PM +, jorge a secas wrote:
> we at work have some PC's with 256 MB RAM, the graphical mode doesn't
> load, so we choice the text mode, but in all machines we get the same
> error, Anaconda 12.47
What is the error you get in text mode?
--
Matthew Miller
Senior
On Friday 08 January 2010 07:04, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jan 2010 23:40:16 +
>
> "Joseph L. Casale" wrote:
> > >we at work have some PC's with 256 MB RAM, the graphical mode doesn't
> > > load, so we choice the text mode, but in all machines we get the same
> > > error, Anaconda 12.47
> >
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jan 2010 23:40:16 +
> "Joseph L. Casale" wrote:
>
>> >we at work have some PC's with 256 MB RAM, the graphical mode doesn't load,
>> >so we choice the text mode, but in all machines we get the same error,
>> >Anaconda 12.47
>> >
>>
On 01/08/2010 12:04 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jan 2010 23:40:16 +
> "Joseph L. Casale" wrote:
>
>>> we at work have some PC's with 256 MB RAM, the graphical mode doesn't load,
>>> so we choice the text mode, but in all machines we get the same error,
>>> Anaconda 12.47
>>>
>>> do you
On Thu, 7 Jan 2010 23:40:16 +
"Joseph L. Casale" wrote:
> >we at work have some PC's with 256 MB RAM, the graphical mode doesn't load,
> >so we choice the text mode, but in all machines we get the same error,
> >Anaconda 12.47
> >
> >do you have an idea how to solve it?
>
> Yeah, add ram.
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Ralph Blach wrote:
> On am embedded power pc project with 256 mb of ram, I ran fvwm, just fine.
> This was with nfs root and a very old matrox video card.
>
> I also compiled xdoom, madplay, and mozilla.
>
> So this can be done, you will just need to install the ba
On am embedded power pc project with 256 mb of ram, I ran fvwm, just
fine. This was with nfs root and a very old matrox video card.
I also compiled xdoom, madplay, and mozilla.
So this can be done, you will just need to install the basic machine in
text mode, the install x, and fvwm along wit
On 10-01-07 18:40:16, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> > we at work have some PC's with 256 MB RAM, the graphical mode
> > doesn't load, so we choice the text mode, but in all machines we
> > get the same error, Anaconda 12.47
> >
> >do you have an idea how to solve it?
>
> Yeah, add ram. Anaconda need
Hi,
> we at work have some PC's with 256 MB RAM, the graphical mode doesn't
> load, so we choice the text mode, but in all machines we get the same
> error, Anaconda 12.47
Which version of Fedora are you using and what is the video card in the
machines?
TTFN
Paul
--
Sie können mich aufreizen
>we at work have some PC's with 256 MB RAM, the graphical mode doesn't load, so
>we choice the text mode, but in all machines we get the same error, Anaconda
>12.47
>
>do you have an idea how to solve it?
Yeah, add ram. Anaconda needs like 1/2 gig, and nevermind trying to
Fedora w/ < 1/2gig as w
2010/1/8 jorge a secas :
> we at work have some PC's with 256 MB RAM, the graphical mode doesn't load,
> so we choice the text mode, but in all machines we get the same error,
> Anaconda 12.47
>
> do you have an idea how to solve it?
>
I don't know what that error is, but AFAIK the minimum amount
we at work have some PC's with 256 MB RAM, the graphical mode doesn't load, so
we choice the text mode, but in all machines we get the same error, Anaconda
12.47
do you have an idea how to solve it?
txs.
___
n one, try `virsh --connect qemu:///system'. You can see all the
commands with `help' and more specifics about every commands with `help
'.
Thank you!
I found this the hard way about a week back. Hope this helps you. And
Happy New Year to all. :)
--
Suvayu
Open source is th
On 01/03/2010 10:43 PM, suvayu ali wrote:
> Hi Gene,
>
> Try /etc/libvirt/qemu for the xml files.
>
Holy smoke - you're right!!
I never woulda guessed it would be in /etc ... who would have thunk!!!
Shouldn't it be in /var/lib or whatever?
Thank you!
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-li
Hi Gene,
2010/1/3 Mail Lists :
> On 01/03/2010 08:10 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
>> the vm ?
>>
>> The simplest way is to regularly backup your machine definitions
>> via "virsh dumpxml name > name.xml", then you can recover the
>> machine definition via "virsh define name.xml". If you can still
>> boo
While I am still unable to find the original .xml files on the backup
- I did find a log file in root/.virt-manager which has the xml
definitions from when they were created.
Then Tom's virsh define should now work if I copy the lines from log
to a .xml file.
Thanks for help!
--
f
On 01/03/2010 10:50 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 10:29:14 -0500
> Mail Lists wrote:
>
>> I have backups of the entire disk but cannot still boot f11. Is that
>> .xml file stored somewhere ?
>
> Libvirt itself stashes all its info in some random place, God knows
> where :-).
On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 10:29:14 -0500
Mail Lists wrote:
> I have backups of the entire disk but cannot still boot f11. Is that
> .xml file stored somewhere ?
Libvirt itself stashes all its info in some random place, God knows
where :-). If you really have an complete disk image of f11, you might
b
efine a new virtual machine with virt-manager, and when
> it gets to the disk image part, say "use existing", then "browse local",
> then point it at your existing image file. When it boots from
> the iso image, use "force off", then you should be able to boot
&g
On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 00:33:40 -0500
Mail Llists wrote:
> What do I need to do/recover from backups - so that virt-manager sees
> the vm ?
The simplest way is to regularly backup your machine definitions
via "virsh dumpxml name > name.xml", then you can recover the
machine definition via "virsh d
On 01/03/2010 12:33 AM, Mail Llists wrote:
>
> I have an image file with everything I need installed on it.
>
> It was running fine in f11 (has win xp in it).
>
> I intalled f12.
>
> What do I need to do/recover from backups - so that virt-manager sees
> the vm ?
>
I should add I can
I have an image file with everything I need installed on it.
It was running fine in f11 (has win xp in it).
I intalled f12.
What do I need to do/recover from backups - so that virt-manager sees
the vm ?
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.red
ul
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/unix-faq/shell/csh-whynot/
Even if it's a bug, hundreds of reasons to not use tcsh in the first place
might make it easier to switch over. I'll even help you rewrite your old login
scripts. :-)
--
Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger t
On 09-12-19 15:27:48, Globe Trotter wrote:
> --- On Fri, 12/18/09, Aldo Foot wrote:
...
> > So... the tcsh rpm is installed?
> > $ rpm -qa tcsh
>
> tcsh-6.15-8.fc12
>
> Yes, it is!
Possibly some of the shell scripts used by GDM (or whatever) don't
specify the interpreter with a shebang lin
--- On Fri, 12/18/09, Aldo Foot wrote:
> From: Aldo Foot
> Subject: Re: please help! -- F12: login disallowed upon changing shell from
> bash to tcsh
> To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora."
>
> Date: Friday, December 18, 20
ot;
After a day's worth of troubleshooting, I have tracked it down to changing the
login shell from bash to tcsh. Any suggestions as to how i can have tcsh as
well as be able to log in?
Btw, I am using slim because I am using the LXDE spin.
Any help is much appreciated!!
Best wishes,
T
t; "Failed to execute login command"
>
> After a day's worth of troubleshooting, I have tracked it down to changing
> the login shell from bash to tcsh. Any suggestions as to how i can have tcsh
> as well as be able to log in?
>
> Btw, I am using slim because I am
hooting, I have tracked it down to changing the
login shell from bash to tcsh. Any suggestions as to how i can have tcsh as
well as be able to log in?
Btw, I am using slim because I am using the LXDE spin.
Any help is much appreciated!!
Best wishes,
T
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-lis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bonsoir,
Here is the first line of the boot sequence:
[Firmware Warn]: MTRR: CPU 0: SYSCFG[MtrrFixDramModEn] not cleared by BIOS
And the second line is the same for CPU 1
After that, boot is OK.
What does it mean?
running f12.
I had to add "
On 12/16/2009 07:16 AM, Simon Schneebeli wrote:
Well, since I can surf the web with Opera and use Skype but not
Firefox, Evolution and Thuderbird, the connection between the computer
and my wireless ADSL modem as well as between the modem and the web
work. I just don't understand why some appli
2009/12/16 Simon Schneebeli
> No difference with or without firewall. But I discovered something else:
>
> Here's what happens:
> - I start my computer and connect to the wireless: Firefox and Thunderbird
> can not connect to the wireless but Opera can.
> - I plug in the Ethernet cable. Now all c
No difference with or without firewall. But I discovered something else:
Here's what happens:
- I start my computer and connect to the wireless: Firefox and
Thunderbird can not connect to the wireless but Opera can.
- I plug in the Ethernet cable. Now all connections work, with or
without firew
Yes! Your firewall could be , the issue here..
_
The only thing I can think of suggesting is, have you looked at your
firewall configuration ?
Aaron
2009/12/16 Simon Schneebeli
Well, since I
The only thing I can think of suggesting is, have you looked at your
firewall configuration ?
Aaron
2009/12/16 Simon Schneebeli
> Well, since I can surf the web with Opera and use Skype but not Firefox,
> Evolution and Thuderbird, the connection between the computer and my
> wireless ADSL mode
Well, since I can surf the web with Opera and use Skype but not Firefox,
Evolution and Thuderbird, the connection between the computer and my
wireless ADSL modem as well as between the modem and the web work. I
just don't understand why some applications can't connect. But I agree
that it proba
On 12/15/2009 08:36 PM, Robert Collard wrote:
May sound silly, but have you turned off your home modem or reset it
lately? Sometimes that is all it takes.
To add to that, if you add a router, a computer and the Mac# changes
some of these Internet Modems have to be reset to reconize the new
May sound silly, but have you turned off your home modem or reset it
lately? Sometimes that is all it takes.
--
Robert Collard
Springfield, IL
Fedora 12 x86_64
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: ht
On 12/15/2009 03:32 PM, Simon Schneebeli wrote:
>
> I've actually checked that. It's properly set and always was. The
> problem must be elsewhere. Astonishingly I have the same problem when I
> start from the live CD, and on the other hand I didn't have this problem
> when connecting to the wirele
On 12/15/2009 04:43 PM, Mikkel wrote:
On 12/15/2009 09:23 AM, William Case wrote:
I have come to this thread late and only given it a cursory read. My
knowledge of NetworkMangager is limited. However, in a response to my
post "Re: Fedora 12 -- A great new version !", Dec 13, Linuxguy123 m
On 11/12/2009 23:27, Simon Schneebeli wrote:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Simon Schneebeli writes:
Through the network connection, I manage to establish a connection
with my wireless ADSL model. It also works through a wired
connection. Ping works. But neither Firefox nor any other programme
manage t
On 12/15/2009 09:23 AM, William Case wrote:
>
> I have come to this thread late and only given it a cursory read. My
> knowledge of NetworkMangager is limited. However, in a response to my
> post "Re: Fedora 12 -- A great new version !", Dec 13, Linuxguy123 makes
> the passing remark "I didn't h
third party
repo usage just uncovered this.
> My experience with wicd on Ubuntu was actually really good, so if
> there is an easy way to do it on my computer and if furthermore this
> could help solve my problem, I'd be more than willing to give it a
> try.
>
> Simon
>
--
Hi Simon;
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 23:27 +0100, Simon Schneebeli wrote:
> On 12/14/2009 11:02 PM, R. G. Newbury wrote:
> > Simon wrote:
> >
I have come to this thread late and only given it a cursory read. My
knowledge of NetworkMangager is limited. However, in a response to my
post "Re: Fedora 12
Simon wrote:
>> > >As for wicd: I used that when working with Ubuntu and was always
quite
> > happy. So let's give it a try:
> >
>> > >My, my. What a headache. These thing make me feel kind of lost...
>> > >Simon
> > Sounds like you are actually quite close. Once wired is working, the
> > univ
On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 08:18 -0500, William W. Austin wrote:
> Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Sorry if this sounds glib, but the suggestion that comes to mind is
"install F12". FC3 and FC4 are ancient systems, long past their
shelflife and completely unsupported (including for securi
On 12/15/2009 02:25 AM, Jatin K wrote:
> Question is asked in Feb 2006 ...!! :-)
Which would have been the correct timeframe for moving an FC3 system to
FC4. At that time FC5 was the new release. I know, I had a system
which had to jump from FC3 to FC5 after FC3 hit EOL.
> Dear Mr. Will
On 02/27/2006 06:48 PM, William W. Austin wrote:
I had to replace a disk (the one with all of the home directories on
it) on an FC3 box, and so I bought a new drive (particulars unimportant).
To make a long story short, I decided to put FC4 on this box, and so I
installed the new drive and p
I had to replace a disk (the one with all of the home directories on
it) on an FC3 box, and so I bought a new drive (particulars
unimportant).
To make a long story short, I decided to put FC4 on this box, and so I
installed the new drive and put the root filesystem on it. I still
have
2009/12/14 Simon Schneebeli :
> /usr/lib/python2.6/config/Makefile
[...@samlap ~]$ sudo yum provides /usr/lib/python2.6/config/Makefile
python-devel-2.6.2-2.fc12.i686 : The libraries and header files needed for
: Python development.
Repo: fedora
Matched from
>As for wicd: I used that when working with Ubuntu and was always quite
happy. So let's give it a try:
>My, my. What a headache. These thing make me feel kind of lost...
>Simon
Yes. It is actually simpler to download the 2 packages from
wicd.sourceforge.net, and make && make install. That avo
On 12/14/2009 11:02 PM, R. G. Newbury wrote:
Simon wrote:
> At my brothers place I managed to connect to the internet with no
> > problem. All programmes worked, so I could add all the
additional
> > programs I needed and install the latest updates.
>
>Meanwhile, the wire
Simon wrote:
> At my brothers place I managed to connect to the internet with no
> > problem. All programmes worked, so I could add all the
additional
> > programs I needed and install the latest updates.
>
>Meanwhile, the wired connection works (was it because I manually a
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Simon Schneebeli
wrote:
> Here's what I get with ifconfig.
>>>
>>> [r...@sangam simon]# ifconfig eth0
>>> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1A:6B:CE:85:A7
>>> inet addr:192.168.1.33 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
>>> inet6 addr: f
il you get comfortable with Fedora and repositories.
Craig
My experience with wicd on Ubuntu was actually really good, so if there
is an easy way to do it on my computer and if furthermore this could
help solve my problem, I'd be more than willing to give it a try.
Simon
--
fedora-list mail
Here's what I get with ifconfig.
[r...@sangam simon]# ifconfig eth0
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1A:6B:CE:85:A7
inet addr:192.168.1.33 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::21a:6bff:fece:85a7/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICA
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 20:40 +0100, Simon Schneebeli wrote:
> On 12/14/2009 05:58 PM, R. G. Newbury wrote:
> As for wicd: I used that when working with Ubuntu and was always quite
> happy. So let's give it a try:
>
> I downloaded wicd from here: http://atrpms.net/dist/f12/wicd/
>
> It tells me t
rity settings enabled??? Check that DHCP is turned ON.
>>
>> Check that system-config-network has IP address entries for your ISP's DNS
>> server(s) and that the gateway address in on the correct network (ie
>> 192.168.1.1 and not by mistake 192.168.0.1 etc.) You migh
ork has IP address entries for your ISP's
DNS server(s) and that the gateway address in on the correct network
(ie 192.168.1.1 and not by mistake 192.168.0.1 etc.) You might want to
try settings a STATIC IP address to avoid DHCP contention errors. This
will not help if you have MAC address fi
server(s) and that the gateway address in on the correct network (ie
> 192.168.1.1 and not by mistake 192.168.0.1 etc.) You might want to try
> settings a STATIC IP address to avoid DHCP contention errors. This will
> not help if you have MAC address filtering turned ON, at the router
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 18:01 +, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Monday 14 December 2009 16:58:36 R. G. Newbury wrote:
> > At a console enter:
> > 'service NetWorkManager stop'
>
> I guess that should read 'service NetworkManager stop'. Note the small w
> compared to the capital W. These things are
On Monday 14 December 2009 16:58:36 R. G. Newbury wrote:
> At a console enter:
> 'service NetWorkManager stop'
I guess that should read 'service NetworkManager stop'. Note the small w
compared to the capital W. These things are case-sensitive, and can lead to
problems if one is not careful. :-)
erver(s) and that the gateway address in on the correct network (ie
192.168.1.1 and not by mistake 192.168.0.1 etc.) You might want to try
settings a STATIC IP address to avoid DHCP contention errors. This will
not help if you have MAC address filtering turned ON, at the router.
At a con
192.168.1.1 and the correct IP for download.fedoraproject.org, etc)
> which proves the correct functionality from your ISP and modem.
>
I don't think that the problem is linked to that either, since this
morning, at my brother's place, everything went well.
I'll try tomorrow wi
192.168.1.1 and the correct IP for download.fedoraproject.org, etc)
> which proves the correct functionality from your ISP and modem.
>
I don't think that the problem is linked to that either, since this
morning, at my brother's place, everything went well.
I'll try tomorrow wi
figuration seams to work (nslookup reported: server
> > 192.168.1.1 and the correct IP for download.fedoraproject.org, etc)
> > which proves the correct functionality from your ISP and modem.
> >
> I don't think that the problem is linked to that either, since this
>
his
morning, at my brother's place, everything went well.
I'll try tomorrow with the live CD and also try to find out the DNS
numbers, just to be sure that it's not that.
Thanks anyway for your help.
Simon
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://
me: wildcard.fedoraproject.org
>>> Address: 66.35.62.166
>>> Name: wildcard.fedoraproject.org
>>> Address: 80.239.156.215
>>> Name: wildcard.fedoraproject.org
>>> Address: 152.46.7.222
>>>
>>> And if
And if I directly type "firefox 66.35.62.166", I get to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/IndexAdmin without further problem. So he
means that this might be a problem with DNS...
Do you have any SELinux issues with libc or similar?
//HW
Simon
I think we need a lot more information abo
2.46.7.222
>
> And if I directly type "firefox 66.35.62.166", I get to
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/IndexAdmin without further problem. So he
> means that this might be a problem with DNS...
>
Do you have any SELinux issues with libc or similar?
//HW
> Simon
>
>
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 12:07 AM, wrote:
>
>>>
>>> What's that magic trick? I get to
>>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/IndexAdmin
>>> and can surf around there without a problem. Magic?
>>>
>>
>> It's seams to be an DNS issue. FF fails to lookup the IP-number.
>> During the installation of F
ectly type "firefox 66.35.62.166", I get to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/IndexAdmin without further problem. So
he means that this might be a problem with DNS...
Simon
I think we need a lot more information about your network setup before
we can help ;o)
--
fedora-list mailing
provider, another modem, but I don't know any details.
What kind of modem? DSL, Cable, 3G/HSPDA? How are you connected?
Wireless, Wired etc.
I think we need a lot more information about your network setup before
we can help ;o)
--
Sam
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.c
Q
What strikes me about that list is the ones that don't work are
NetworkManager aware - I wonder if NetworkManager is telling them the
connection is offline.
Do you have a NetworkManager icon in your systray? Does it show your
network connection? How are you setting up your connection? What's
d
2009/12/13 :
> Quoting Aaron Konstam :
>
>> On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 13:35 -0700, simon.schneeb...@okko.org wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> My problem is definitively not linked to the fedora-webpage being
>>> down. Meanwhile I made some progress:
>>>
>>> At my brothers place I managed to connect t
while fetching mail".
>
> RPM: "Couldn't resolve host"
>
What is the respons if you try:
nslookup download.fedoraproject.org
//HW
> To mention again: These messages appear immediately, not only after some
> seconds like the server doesn't answer...
>
> Sim
ror while fetching mail".
RPM: "Couldn't resolve host"
To mention again: These messages appear immediately, not only after
some seconds like the server doesn't answer...
Simon
I guess that this is about the strangest problem that I have ever ha
tware update, Ping.
It would be nice to have an expanded version of "DoES NOT WORK"
What happens when you try Firrefox, for example?
>
> I guess that this is about the strangest problem that I have ever had
>
On Sunday 13 December 2009 12:35 PM, simon.schneeb...@okko.org wrote:
Now, back home, my problem is the following:
- DOES NOT WORK: Firefox, Thunderbird, Evolution (error connecting to
the server)
- DOES WORK: Opera, Sype, Software update, Ping.
Could it be that IPV6 thing? I think recently anot
Quoting "H. Willstrand" :
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 9:35 PM, wrote:
Hello all,
My problem is definitively not linked to the fedora-webpage being down.
Meanwhile I made some progress:
At my brothers place I managed to connect to the internet with no problem.
All programmes worked, so I could a
->Network->Settings->"Configure proxies to
access the Internet"
//HW
> - DOES WORK: Opera, Sype, Software update, Ping.
>
> I guess that this is about the strangest problem that I have ever had since
> I use Linux. Help would me most welcome.
>
> Simon
>
2009/12/11 Simon Schneebeli
> Hello all,
>
> After having used Ubuntu since almost more than three years, I decided to
> give Fedora a try. The installation went perfectly fine. Everything was
> perfectly recognised. Now I face one big problem: I can't manage to connect
> to the internet.
>
> Thr
updates.
Now, back home, my problem is the following:
- DOES NOT WORK: Firefox, Thunderbird, Evolution (error connecting to
the server)
- DOES WORK: Opera, Sype, Software update, Ping.
I guess that this is about the strangest problem that I have ever had
since I use Linux. Help would me most
Yeah, I used the security options, that is why I had "options" in my
command above. It didn't work.
Fortunately my cabled connection did work and yum update fixed
everything. I am now running F12 with zero problems.
Thanks for the help.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fe
linux guy - Sunday 13 December 2009 15:34:41:
> I installed cnetwork manager and I can't get a wifi connection for some
> reason. I invoke cnetworkmanager -C options and hangs.
>
If you're connecting to a wireless network you need:
cnetworkmanager -C --
where can be:
--unprotected for an unpr
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 3:37 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 01:59 -0700, linux guy wrote:
> > iwconfig lets me set the various parameters of an interface, but how
> > do I start that interface such that the router assigns it an IP and
> > DNS works ?
>
> NM can be configur
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 5:48 AM, Julian Aloofi <
julian.fedorali...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > I think i could rectify the situation if I ran yum update but I don't
> have a
> > wifi connection from the console session. How does one administer a wifi
> > connection from the command line in F12 ?
On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 13:48 +0100, Julian Aloofi wrote:
> > I think i could rectify the situation if I ran yum update but I don't have a
> > wifi connection from the console session. How does one administer a wifi
> > connection from the command line in F12 ? I know my SSID, etc, but how do
> > I
> I think i could rectify the situation if I ran yum update but I don't have a
> wifi connection from the console session. How does one administer a wifi
> connection from the command line in F12 ? I know my SSID, etc, but how do
> I set it from the command line ?
If you have it installed by any
On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 01:59 -0700, linux guy wrote:
> iwconfig lets me set the various parameters of an interface, but how
> do I start that interface such that the router assigns it an IP and
> DNS works ?
NM can be configured to activate on boot, without waiting for a login,
so system-config-net
On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 23:48 +, Sam Sharpe wrote:
> ... but that announcement was for 11:00 UTC 12/12/2009 - which is
> still well before your message saying it started in 20 minutes (which
You're quite right. I was reading 11:00 as pm (it was late :-)
poc
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-
iwconfig lets me set the various parameters of an interface, but how do I
start that interface such that the router assigns it an IP and DNS works ?
Thanks.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 13/12/2009 09:34, linux guy a écrit :
> I've been running F11 pretty much since it came out. It worked well.
>
> I upgraded to F12 earlier this evening. For whatever reason it will not
> start an X session. I think the problem is that I was usi
I've been running F11 pretty much since it came out. It worked well.
I upgraded to F12 earlier this evening. For whatever reason it will not
start an X session. I think the problem is that I was using the nvidia
driver and kmod can't get an internet connection due to wifi not finding a
network
1 - 100 of 1376 matches
Mail list logo
