>> Hi;
>>
>> I have sent 2 or three posts to the mailing list but have not received a
>> return copy of those posts.
>>
>> I have double checked the archive list and the posts are there. My user
>> profile is checked 'yes' to receive a copy of my own posts. It has
>> always worked up to a couple
On 09/28/2009 10:33 PM, William Case wrote:
I understand that it is a complex question and that emails are not
guaranteed to arrive in a set order but can bounce around all over the
place. However, in this case, something that has not been 'normal' in
the past is now happening. It makes the que
Thanks poc;
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 11:29 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 10:37 -0400, William Case wrote:
> > Just for future reference, and to add to my own personal knowledge, I
> > wish I had a better idea of what was going on. I have wasted 2 or 3
> > hours try to fig
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 16:22 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> William Case wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 10:11 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> >
> >> Have you checked the Received headers of the messages in question?
> >
> > No I hadn't. I am not sure what I would be looking for.
>
>
Hi Bill,
William Case wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 10:11 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>
>> Have you checked the Received headers of the messages in question?
>
> No I hadn't. I am not sure what I would be looking for.
Ahh. Well, you'd want to follow the received headers to watch as each
mail
> Hi;
>
> I have sent 2 or three posts to the mailing list but have not received a
> return copy of those posts.
>
> I have double checked the archive list and the posts are there. My user
> profile is checked 'yes' to receive a copy of my own posts. It has
> always worked up to a couple of days
Hi;
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 10:11 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Have you checked the Received headers of the messages in question?
No I hadn't. I am not sure what I would be looking for.
> It's quite possible that one of the hops along the way was the source
> of the delay. Greylisting or other
Hi Todd;
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 10:11 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> William Case wrote:
> > Just for future reference, and to add to my own personal knowledge,
> > I wish I had a better idea of what was going on. I have wasted 2 or
> > 3 hours try to figure out what I did wrong when I probably ha
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 10:37 -0400, William Case wrote:
> Just for future reference, and to add to my own personal knowledge, I
> wish I had a better idea of what was going on. I have wasted 2 or 3
> hours try to figure out what I did wrong when I probably haven't done
> anything I shouldn't have.
William Case wrote:
> Just for future reference, and to add to my own personal knowledge,
> I wish I had a better idea of what was going on. I have wasted 2 or
> 3 hours try to figure out what I did wrong when I probably haven't
> done anything I shouldn't have. It would be nice to be able to
> r
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 10:06 +0400, Hiisi wrote:
> 2009/9/28 William Case :
> > Hi Hiisi
> > On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 00:37 +0400, Hiisi wrote:
> >> 2009/9/28 William Case :
> >
> >>
> >> Does it matter if you have a replay to your post (like now)? Can you
> >> see your message now?
> >>
> >
> >> Can y
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 10:06 +0400, Hiisi wrote:
> In my opinion gmail is the best mail-provider I've
> ever used. But I use web-mail, not programs like evolution or kmail...
These are not mutually exclusive. I use Gmail for most of my lists, but
do it via IMAP through Evolution. I then always have
William Case wrote:
> I sent a message over a half an hour ago replying 'Yes' to your query;
> but that 'yes' response hasn't shown up here yet although it is in the
> archive. The usual turnaround time is about 1 to 2 minutes. The first
> two messages that I sent on this thread made it through
2009/9/28 William Case :
> Hi Hiisi
> On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 00:37 +0400, Hiisi wrote:
>> 2009/9/28 William Case :
>
>>
>> Does it matter if you have a replay to your post (like now)? Can you
>> see your message now?
>>
>
>> Can you see your message now?
>
> I sent a message over a half an hour ago
Hi Hiisi
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 00:37 +0400, Hiisi wrote:
> 2009/9/28 William Case :
>
> Does it matter if you have a replay to your post (like now)? Can you
> see your message now?
>
> Can you see your message now?
I sent a message over a half an hour ago replying 'Yes' to your query;
but that
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 00:37 +0400, Hiisi wrote:
> 2009/9/28 William Case :
> > Hi;
> >
> > I have sent 2 or three posts to the mailing list but have not received a
> > return copy of those posts.
> >
> > I have double checked the archive list and the posts are there. My user
> > profile is checked
Hi;
On Sun, 2009-09-27 at 20:32 +, William Case wrote:
> Hi;
>
> I have sent 2 or three posts to the mailing list but have not received a
> return copy of those posts.
>
> I have double checked the archive list and the posts are there. My user
> profile is checked 'yes' to receive a copy of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/27/2009 03:32 PM, William Case wrote:
> Hi;
>
> I have sent 2 or three posts to the mailing list but have not received a
> return copy of those posts.
>
> I have double checked the archive list and the posts are there. My user
> profile is che
2009/9/28 William Case :
> Hi;
>
> I have sent 2 or three posts to the mailing list but have not received a
> return copy of those posts.
>
> I have double checked the archive list and the posts are there. My user
> profile is checked 'yes' to receive a copy of my own posts. It has
> always worke
Hi;
I have sent 2 or three posts to the mailing list but have not received a
return copy of those posts.
I have double checked the archive list and the posts are there. My user
profile is checked 'yes' to receive a copy of my own posts. It has
always worked up to a couple of days ago.
Is there
20 matches
Mail list logo
