On 05/16/2009 04:14 PM, Steven W. Orr wrote:
Not that it matters, but the Alpha chip was one impressive processor. That
thing could clock off as many as 6 instructions per clock tick because of
intelligent pipelining.
Note that many of the Intel compiler people are former Digital compiler
g wrote:
intel sucks on anything but ms, because intel joined the ms whore house
years ago along with many other oem suppliers because of their fear of
not being included in ms specs.
in off quote of b.g., 'exclusively ms or be left out'.
Balderdash! Intel appears to be working quite hard to
On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 21:07 -0700, john wendel wrote:
Intel finally realized that pipeline flushing was the main thing the
processor was doing. The new (I7) architecture has fixed this problem,
with very impressive results.
I think you're confusing this with the original Core architecture
g wrote:
Valent Turkovic wrote:
If you wondered why Intel sucks on Fedora read this article, it
expains all complexities of Intel drivers and for me it shows hope
that Intel drivers are becoming better.
intel sucks on anything but ms, because intel joined the ms whore house
years ago
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 4:52 AM, Petrus de Calguarium
kwhisk...@gmail.com wrote:
Valent Turkovic wrote:
If you wondered why Intel sucks on Fedora
I cannot say that Intel sucks on Fedora, but some problems
are apparent (like, kms won't work on i915, like the display
freezing when trying to
Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
Valent Turkovic wrote:
If you wondered why Intel sucks on Fedora
I cannot say that Intel sucks on Fedora, but some problems
are apparent (like, kms won't work on i915, like the display
freezing when trying to play videos, etc, but this sounds like
a new
Frank Murphy (Frankly3d) wrote:
Any Relevance?
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Phoronix/~3/0t49mIt2Oy0/vr.php
I really couldn't say, as I have no understanding of the
workings of these things, but, now that you point it out, it
seems quite plausible that these symptoms are caused by the
http://keithp.com/blogs/Sharpening_the_Intel_Driver_Focus/
If you wondered why Intel sucks on Fedora read this article, it
expains all complexities of Intel drivers and for me it shows hope
that Intel drivers are becoming better.
Valent.
--
http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/
linux, blog, anime
Valent Turkovic wrote:
If you wondered why Intel sucks on Fedora read this article, it
expains all complexities of Intel drivers and for me it shows hope
that Intel drivers are becoming better.
intel sucks on anything but ms, because intel joined the ms whore house
years ago along with many
On Saturday, May 16th 2009 at 15:00 -, quoth g:
=Valent Turkovic wrote:
=
= If you wondered why Intel sucks on Fedora read this article, it
= expains all complexities of Intel drivers and for me it shows hope
= that Intel drivers are becoming better.
=
=intel sucks on anything but ms, because
Valent Turkovic wrote:
If you wondered why Intel sucks on Fedora
I cannot say that Intel sucks on Fedora, but some problems
are apparent (like, kms won't work on i915, like the display
freezing when trying to play videos, etc, but this sounds like
a new 'paradigm' for the display driver, so
Steven W. Orr wrote:
On Saturday, May 16th 2009 at 15:00 -, quoth g:
=Valent Turkovic wrote:
=
= If you wondered why Intel sucks on Fedora read this article, it
= expains all complexities of Intel drivers and for me it shows hope
= that Intel drivers are becoming better.
=
=intel sucks
| From: Steven W. Orr ste...@syslang.net
| The Intel line is so massively pipelined that it's almost impossible to
| write an optimizer that doesn't have to flush its entire cache every few
| instructions.
Don't confuse companies with technologies.
What you don't like is the Pentium 4 design
| From: g gel...@bellsouth.net
| intel sucks on anything but ms, because intel joined the ms whore house
| years ago along with many other oem suppliers because of their fear of
| not being included in ms specs.
I actually subscribe to your conspiracy theory.
Having said that, there are levels
14 matches
Mail list logo