On Friday 12 December 2008, Les Mikesell wrote:
>Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>> On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Joshua C.
wrote:
Does the maintainer read this list? He still works on it (in
koji) but it seams he doesn't know that the user are u
ohhh gawwd...
indeed, a disappointment to see this sort of thing; not the reassuring
premier, membership e-mail to receive, eh? ... for such a /mature/
project as Fedora? (albeit, i do have a knack for /timing/, so to
speak. No doubt, however, Time will tell-- also /so to speak/.)
ach!
oh well. on
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> What or who is ReadHat?
>
> Perhaps you mean Red Hat? I'm not sure, because that has been pointed out
> to you before.
It seems there is such a thing as "write-only email"...
poc
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To un
2008/12/12 Jeff Spaleta :
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Joshua C. wrote:
>> Does the maintainer read this list? He still works on it (in koji)
>> but it seams he doesn't know that the user are using his broken
>> "update"
>
> He's aware.. he's apologized publicly in the -devel-list.
>
> -jef
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:53:59 -0800, Alex wrote:
> Excuse me? YUM is completely broken!
How?
> What the #$@&$ am I supposed to do now but wait?
> Until January?
Wait for what?
> This is a period of time when most
> companies have a code freeze.
Fedora is not a company.
> I will be amazed if
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Alex Makhlin wrote:
> Arthur Pemberton wrote:
[ snip ]
>>
>> I have to admit, not having to do weekly virus+spyware+defrag+updates
>> does get one lazy.
>>
>
> Excuse me? YUM is completely broken! What the #$@&$ am I supposed to do now
> but wait? Until January? Th
Arthur Pemberton wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Robert P. J. Day
wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Joshua C. wrote:
Does the maintainer read this list? He still works on it (in
koji) but it seams he doesn't know that t
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Robert P. J. Day
wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Joshua C. wrote:
>> > Does the maintainer read this list? He still works on it (in
>> > koji) but it seams he doesn't know that the user are using his
>> > b
Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Joshua C. wrote:
Does the maintainer read this list? He still works on it (in koji)
but it seams he doesn't know that the user are using his broken
"update"
He's aware.. he's apologized publicly in the -devel-list.
But the individual in
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Joshua C. wrote:
Does the maintainer read this list? He still works on it (in
koji) but it seams he doesn't know that the user are using his
broken "update"
He's aware.. he's apologized publicl
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Joshua C. wrote:
> > Does the maintainer read this list? He still works on it (in
> > koji) but it seams he doesn't know that the user are using his
> > broken "update"
>
> He's aware.. he's apologized publicly in the -d
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Joshua C. wrote:
> Does the maintainer read this list? He still works on it (in koji)
> but it seams he doesn't know that the user are using his broken
> "update"
He's aware.. he's apologized publicly in the -devel-list.
-jef
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora
2008/12/12 Kevin Kofler :
> Jeff Spaleta wrote:
>> That's a question I don't have an answer for. Epoch could have been
>> bumped to handle the version downgrade for a reversion. I think this
>> was the first mention of reverting the dbus update that I have seen in
>> discussion.
>
> Actually I al
Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> That's a question I don't have an answer for. Epoch could have been
> bumped to handle the version downgrade for a reversion. I think this
> was the first mention of reverting the dbus update that I have seen in
> discussion.
Actually I already suggested it. It could have b
Original Message
Subject: Re: Why was this dbus disaster released mid-release?
From: Jeff Spaleta
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.
Date: 12/11/2008 03:36 PM
Honestly I'm having a hard time even thinking about how you would r
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> The dbus security policy change was the heart of the issue.
Its the issue that got noticed by a significant number of users.
Anyone who watches the broken dep reports which are generated for
package maintainers knows that pre-mature p
Original Message
Subject: Re: Why was this dbus disaster released mid-release?
From: Jeff Spaleta
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.
Date: 12/11/2008 01:03 PM
Dbus hasn't been the only package affected by a pre-mature push to
s
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:42:45 -0900
"Jeff Spaleta" wrote:
>
> Pushing to stable was not intended and was done by
> mistake. Shall I have him brought to the Board Room and
> flogged for his incompetence? Mistakes happen. I very
> much expect Colin will be making a personal extra effort
> to carefu
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Thanks for pointing out those posts. The fedora-devel thread was quite long
> and I stopped following it. I assume most other users are in the dark as
> well and I wanted to start a thread on it. Instead of having a thousand
> "PackageK
Original Message
Subject: Re: Why was this dbus disaster released mid-release?
From: Jeff Spaleta
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.
Date: 12/11/2008 12:42 PM
http://cgwalters.livejournal.com/22189.html
https://www.redhat.com/archives
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Where was this discussed? Where was this tested?
The maintainer responsible for the push already apologized publicly
for pushing to stable:
http://cgwalters.livejournal.com/22189.html
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/
21 matches
Mail list logo
