> Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:56:49 -0400
> From: david...@tmr.com
> To: fedora-list@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: kernel 217.2.8 won't boot.
>
> Markus Kesaromous wrote:
>>
>>
>> --
On Saturday 15 November 2008 11:54:32 am Martín Marqués wrote:
> I just updated my F9 in my laptop (Compaq Presario F756la) and I
> noticed problems booting the kernel.
>
> At first I just thought it hanged at boot time (it freezed during the
> boot sequence). Then I took of the quite option from g
2008/11/15 Peter Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Saturday 15 November 2008 11:54:32 am Martín Marqués wrote:
>> I just updated my F9 in my laptop (Compaq Presario F756la) and I
>> noticed problems booting the kernel.
>>
>> At first I just thought it hanged at boot time (it freezed during the
>> boot
On Saturday 15 November 2008 05:09:10 pm Martín Marqués wrote:
> 2008/11/15 Peter Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Saturday 15 November 2008 11:54:32 am Martín Marqués wrote:
> >> I just updated my F9 in my laptop (Compaq Presario F756la) and I
> >> noticed problems booting the kernel.
> >>
> >> At
Peter Reed wrote:
I found this in the linux kernel bugzilla:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11418
Put hpet=disable in the kernel command line and see if that works. It
did for me.
BTW, I have no idea on what hpet is.
Yes thanks that seems to have fixed the problem. Booted fine.
-The High Precision Event Timer (HPET) hardware is the future replacement
-for the 8254 and Real Time Clock (RTC) periodic timer functionality.
-Each HPET can have up to 32 timers. It is possible to configure the
-first two timers as legacy replacements for 8254 and RTC periodic timers.
-A specifi
On Saturday 15 November 2008 10:23:09 pm Waleed Harbi wrote:
> -The High Precision Event Timer (HPET) hardware is the future replacement
> -for the 8254 and Real Time Clock (RTC) periodic timer functionality.
> -Each HPET can have up to 32 timers. It is possible to configure the
> -first two timer
On Sunday 16 November 2008 07:40:04 am Peter Reed wrote:
> On Saturday 15 November 2008 10:23:09 pm Waleed Harbi wrote:
> > -The High Precision Event Timer (HPET) hardware is the future replacement
> > -for the 8254 and Real Time Clock (RTC) periodic timer functionality.
> > -Each HPET can have up
I am seeing the same problem but on a Toshiba Satellite A305-S6825 laptop
instead an HP system. The problem may not be Fedora specific since I having
what appears to be the same problem when I tried to install Ubuntu 8.0.4 on
my new laptop.
I am configuring my laptop as a dual boot system with
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Every other week or so, I get a disk kicked out of my RAID, with this:
Jul 6 04:05:38 commodore kernel: (scsi1:A:0:0): scsi1: device overrun
(status 10) on 0:0:0
Jul 6 04:05:38 commodore kernel: Unexpected busfree in DT Data-in
phase, 1 SCBs aborted, PRGMCNT == 0x22f
J
Chris Snook writes:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Every other week or so, I get a disk kicked out of my RAID, with this:
Jul 6 04:05:38 commodore kernel: (scsi1:A:0:0): scsi1: device overrun
(status 10) on 0:0:0
Jul 6 04:05:38 commodore kernel: Unexpected busfree in DT Data-in
phase, 1 SCBs abort
Sam Varshavchik wrote, On 07/13/2008 10:51 AM:
Chris Snook writes:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Every other week or so, I get a disk kicked out of my RAID, with this:
Jul 6 04:05:38 commodore kernel: (scsi1:A:0:0): scsi1: device
overrun (status 10) on 0:0:0
Jul 6 04:05:38 commodore kernel: Unexp
Todd Denniston writes:
Sam Varshavchik wrote, On 07/13/2008 10:51 AM:
Chris Snook writes:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Every other week or so, I get a disk kicked out of my RAID, with this:
Jul 6 04:05:38 commodore kernel: (scsi1:A:0:0): scsi1: device
overrun (status 10) on 0:0:0
Jul 6 04:05:3
Mail Lists wrote:
Linus switched kernel development away from large releases (odd/even
major numbers) with infrequent release cycles and instead switched to
something more continuous - essentially small rapid changes and
frequent snapshots to stable.
Would the kernel release style be suit
On 10/10/2008 02:30 PM, Chris Snook wrote:
> Mail Lists wrote:
>>Linus switched kernel development away from large releases (odd/even
>> major numbers) with infrequent release cycles and instead switched to
>> something more continuous - essentially small rapid changes and
>> frequent snapshot
Mail Lists wrote:
In this new mode we would have only 2 streams - current development
and stable.
Current development targets remerging every few weeks into stable ..
quite different than current rawhide and patching f8/f9 and the next big
bang release is f10 etc.
Google back in lkml
On 10/10/2008 03:49 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Mail Lists wrote:
>>
>> In this new mode we would have only 2 streams - current development
>> and stable.
> There are a few distributions that do this - Gentoo, Arch etc. Each has
> it's advantages and disadvantages. One of the problems of rolli
Mail Lists wrote:
While that is true, the argument goes that large periodic releases
has drawbacks too - and the kernel seems to be do pretty well with its
approach ... I still wonder whether the kernel way may work for fedora ..
Linux kernel development model is pretty unique and very dist
Mail Lists sapience.com> writes:
>Linus switched kernel development away from large releases (odd/even
> major numbers) with infrequent release cycles and instead switched to
> something more continuous - essentially small rapid changes and
> frequent snapshots to stable.
This is essentially
Mail Lists wrote:
On 10/10/2008 03:49 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Mail Lists wrote:
In this new mode we would have only 2 streams - current development
and stable.
There are a few distributions that do this - Gentoo, Arch etc. Each has
it's advantages and disadvantages. One of the problems
.)
>
> Kevin Kofler
>
Thanks for all the thoughts ..
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 17:19 -0400, Chris Snook wrote:
> Mail Lists wrote:
> > On 10/10/2008 03:49 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >> Mail Lists wrote:
> >>> In this new mode we would have only 2 streams - current development
> >>> and stable.
> >
> >> There are a few distributions that do this -
Mail Lists wrote:
Linus switched kernel development away from large releases (odd/even
major numbers) with infrequent release cycles and instead switched to
something more continuous - essentially small rapid changes and
frequent snapshots to stable.
Would the kernel release style be suit
Bill Davidsen tmr.com> writes:
> I seldom upgrade anything unless it's broken, or has a new feature I *really*
> want.
Bad idea. We do not and cannot test selective upgrades, there are just too many
combinations. In the old RHL days, all update advisories contained the
following warning:
> Befo
On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 19:58 -0300, Martín Marqués wrote:
> Will there be soon a 2.6.27 kernel for Fedora 9, or do we have to wait
> for Fedora 10 to come out?
> If not, what's needed to get the src.rpm from 2.6.27 from F10 compiled
> and installed. I tried compiling it, which went OK, but when I t
Martín Marqués wrote:
Will there be soon a 2.6.27 kernel for Fedora 9, or do we have to wait
for Fedora 10 to come out?
If not, what's needed to get the src.rpm from 2.6.27 from F10 compiled
and installed. I tried compiling it, which went OK, but when I tried
to installed the newly compiled kern
john wendel wrote:
Martín Marqués wrote:
Will there be soon a 2.6.27 kernel for Fedora 9, or do we have to wait
for Fedora 10 to come out?
If not, what's needed to get the src.rpm from 2.6.27 from F10 compiled
and installed. I tried compiling it, which went OK, but when I tried
to installed the
On 05/25/2009 04:56 AM, fred smith wrote:
> When booted up from a live CD (most recent F11 pre-release), I'm thinking
> it's impossible to install something that requires a reboot, such as a
> kernel update.
>
> Unless,... one can figure out how to enable persistence. Which I don't
> know how to d
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Not sure it works well for kernel updates yet but feel free to try.
It doesn't work for kernel updates, you need to hack those per hand
(somebody posted a link with instructions recently, unfortunately I don't
remember the URL).
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-list mailin
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 05:01:03AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/25/2009 04:56 AM, fred smith wrote:
> > When booted up from a live CD (most recent F11 pre-release), I'm thinking
> > it's impossible to install something that requires a reboot, such as a
> > kernel update.
> >
> > Unless,...
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 08:47 -0500, Smith, Herb wrote:
> Tuesday evening the automatic updater downloaded a kernel update. After
> rebooting all I get is a totally black screen with "GRUB_" in the upper
> left corner of the screen. It responds to nothing on the keyboard.
>
> This is a dual boot D
redhat.com
Subject: Re: Kernel update nuked my machine
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 08:47 -0500, Smith, Herb wrote:
> Tuesday evening the automatic updater downloaded a kernel update.
> After rebooting all I get is a totally black screen with "GRUB_" in
> the upper left corner of the scree
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:29:23AM -0500, Smith, Herb wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> Is there a separate Rescue CD for FC10 or does the live CD serve that
> purpose. I haven't found a link to a Rescue CD for 10.
You can use the "boot.iso" found in the images/ folder of any
distribution site:
http://downl
On Fri, 29 May 2009, Wendell Nichols wrote:
While I was conducting a web meeting with a number of people yesterday my
keyboard stopped working. Thats the second time its happened and I was
forced to reboot! Imagine my acute frustration that because of a kernel
update the boot loader failed a
> -Original Message-
> From: M A Young [mailto:m.a.yo...@durham.ac.uk]
> Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 9:30 AM
> To: Community assistance, encouragement,and advice for using Fedora.
> Subject: Re: Kernel update broke my system.
>
> On Fri, 29 May 2009, Wendell
Is there a way to test whether my system has this problem without rebooting?
Dave
>the Updater is doing that job, and it nuked my
> system too.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.
On 5/29/2009 1:16 PM, David Burns wrote:
> Is there a way to test whether my system has this problem without rebooting?
> Dave
>
>> the Updater is doing that job, and it nuked my
>> system too.
You do realize that the kernel that was running when you did the update
is still installed? This one t
; From: David [mailto:dgbo...@comcast.net]
> Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 12:49 PM
> To: Community assistance, encouragement,and advice for using Fedora.
> Subject: Re: Kernel update broke my system.
>
> On 5/29/2009 1:16 PM, David Burns wrote:
> > Is there a way to test whether
On 5/29/2009 2:27 PM, Smith, Herb wrote:
> Can't boot into anything when all you get is the GRUB_ prompt. Wrote to
> the help me list to figure out what to do to get my system back. Once I
> get it back I'll be able to try a lot of different things. From the
> respones of some, it seems that it'
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 13:27:50 -0500,
"Smith, Herb" wrote:
> Can't boot into anything when all you get is the GRUB_ prompt. Wrote to
> the help me list to figure out what to do to get my system back. Once I
> get it back I'll be able to try a lot of different things. From the
> respones of
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 09:42:37 -0500,
"Smith, Herb" wrote:
>
> That may be true, but the Updater is doing that job, and it nuked my
> system too. How often does that happen? This is the first time I've
> seen it since I've been using RH8 up to now, but it does give me pause.
I have had gr
On Sat, 30 May 2009 11:41:16 -0500, Bruno wrote:
> I have had grub get messed up several times during the F11 rawhide period.
> I still get the grub prompt though and know where the configfile is in
> grubspeak. So it's easy for me to fix. I haven't figured out what is causing
> it to do this. My
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 06:00:19 +0200,
Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> Let's hope there's not much more crap in GRUB as found in
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/496093
>
> Apply the patch that is attached there and see whether you still get only
> a grub prompt after installing some kernel updates
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 23:23:37 -0500,
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 06:00:19 +0200,
> Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >
> > Apply the patch that is attached there and see whether you still get only
> > a grub prompt after installing some kernel updates (the original ticket for
]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 12:49 PM
To: Community assistance, encouragement,and advice for using Fedora.
Subject: Re: Kernel update broke my system.
On 5/29/2009 1:16 PM, David Burns wrote:
Is there a way to test whether my system has this problem
without rebooting?
Dave
the Updater is do
On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 11:12 -0400, Todd Denniston wrote:
> On an installed system, WHY do we need to reinstall _grub_ when there
> is a kernel UPDATE?
It shouldn't be. The only thing that needs changing, grub-wise, after
updating kernels, is rewriting the grub.conf file.
--
[...@localhost ~
I'm installing Fedora 11 on a rather ancient Toshiba Satellite 1905-S303
laptop which ought to be tossed in the trash can, and that has the PAE
kernel installed, too.
Bob
On 06/30/2009 09:27 PM, Steven F. LeBrun wrote:
When I installed F11 on my Toshiba laptop, it installed the PAE
version o
On 06/30/2009 09:27 PM, Steven F. LeBrun wrote:
When I installed F11 on my Toshiba laptop, it installed the PAE version
of the kernel. I am assuming that my laptop has a CPU with Physical
Address Extensions functionality and can therefore address up to 64GB of
memory.
My laptop only has 3 GB ins
On 06/30/2009 11:06 PM, Shannon McMackin wrote:
On 06/30/2009 09:27 PM, Steven F. LeBrun wrote:
When I installed F11 on my Toshiba laptop, it installed the PAE version
of the kernel. I am assuming that my laptop has a CPU with Physical
Address Extensions functionality and can therefore address u
On 06/30/2009 11:51 PM, Steven F. LeBrun wrote:
On 06/30/2009 11:06 PM, Shannon McMackin wrote:
On 06/30/2009 09:27 PM, Steven F. LeBrun wrote:
When I installed F11 on my Toshiba laptop, it installed the PAE version
of the kernel. I am assuming that my laptop has a CPU with Physical
Address Ext
Steven F. LeBrun wrote:
When I installed F11 on my Toshiba laptop, it installed the PAE version
of the kernel. I am assuming that my laptop has a CPU with Physical
Address Extensions functionality and can therefore address up to 64GB of
memory.
My laptop only has 3 GB installed. Can anyone
On Wednesday 01 July 2009 02:27:01 Steven F. LeBrun wrote:
> When I installed F11 on my Toshiba laptop, it installed the PAE version
> of the kernel. I am assuming that my laptop has a CPU with Physical
> Address Extensions functionality and can therefore address up to 64GB of
> memory.
>
> My lap
Michael Eager eagercon.com> writes:
>
> kernel-2.6.30. This kernel is available on F11 and F12.
I'm running F11.
Where can I find this kernel?
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproj
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 14:24:46 +,
davide wrote:
> Michael Eager eagercon.com> writes:
>
> >
>
> > kernel-2.6.30. This kernel is available on F11 and F12.
>
> I'm running F11.
> Where can I find this kernel?
No 2.6.30 kernels got pushed to bodhi. In koji I haven't see any for
dist-f1
Bram_Gro wrote:
> (to have "a" minimalised installation) typo, sorry.
The firmware separation doesn't do what you want it to do, yet. Refer
http://lwn.net/Articles/284932/
Rahul
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-li
So the only thing that needs to be done to create a completely open
source Fedora system, is adding the kernel-firmware package to
yum.config exclusion list, so it wont be installed during kernel updates?
Since proprietary Accelerated Graphics Drivers are separated from
Fedora's repositories,
On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 14:23:14 +0200
Bram_Gro wrote:
> So the only thing that needs to be done to create a completely open
> source Fedora system, is adding the kernel-firmware package to
> yum.config exclusion list, so it wont be installed during kernel updates?
And one assumes reflash your BIO
Alan Cox wrote:
On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 14:23:14 +0200
Bram_Gro wrote:
So the only thing that needs to be done to create a completely open
source Fedora system, is adding the kernel-firmware package to
yum.config exclusion list, so it wont be installed during kernel updates?
And one assumes ref
> To maintain a (open source) Fedora installation, is adding the
> kernel-firmware package to yum.config exclusion list sufficient, or are
> there more pitfalls?
Firstly you need to define "open source"
Your question is a bit like asking "what is freedom"
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-li
Alan Cox wrote:
To maintain a (open source) Fedora installation, is adding the
kernel-firmware package to yum.config exclusion list sufficient, or are
there more pitfalls?
Firstly you need to define "open source"
Your question is a bit like asking "what is freedom"
By installing kernel-firm
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 14:53 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> Firstly you need to define "open source"
I didn't think that needed defining. "Free," on the other hand, has
various possible definitions.
--
[...@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.19-78.2.30.fc9.i686
Don't send private replies to my address, th
> By installing kernel-firmware, I would install closed source firmware.
And by turning your laptop on you would use closed source BIOS code
(which you will also redistribute if you should give the laptop away ;))
Its really up to you - there isn't a some precise watertight definition
of open sou
Alan Cox wrote:
By installing kernel-firmware, I would install closed source firmware.
And by turning your laptop on you would use closed source BIOS code
(which you will also redistribute if you should give the laptop away ;))
Its really up to you - there isn't a some precise watertight defin
Bram_Gro wrote:
Alan Cox wrote:
By installing kernel-firmware, I would install closed source firmware.
And by turning your laptop on you would use closed source BIOS code
(which you will also redistribute if you should give the laptop away ;))
Its really up to you - there isn't a some precise
m wrote:
> No.
Then what is?
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Tim wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 14:53 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
>> Firstly you need to define "open source"
>
> I didn't think that needed defining.
It does. "Open Source" as intended by the OSI has a precise definition. The
intuitive meaning ("the source is open", i.e. it is available) is not
s
Bram_Gro wrote:
m wrote:
> No.
Then what is?
There have been various lively discussions of this subject on this list
at different times. It usually degenerates into a bunch of bickering and
whining, generally kicked off by people who don't know how to use mail
filters and complain that the t
m wrote:
> There have been various lively discussions of this subject on this list
> at different times. It usually degenerates into a bunch of bickering and
> whining, generally kicked off by people who don't know how to use mail
> filters and complain that the thread is too long and could you ple
Dan wrote:
Just updated the kernel about an hour ago.
Fedora 10 (x86)
Dell GX240
VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage 128 Pro Ultra TF
When booting it gets as far as "starting anacron" and then I just
get a black screen with keyboard and mouse frozen.
Dmesg and boot log offer no
Dan wrote:
Just updated the kernel about an hour ago.
Fedora 10 (x86)
Dell GX240
VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage 128 Pro Ultra TF
When booting it gets as far as "starting anacron" and then I just
get a black screen with keyboard and mouse frozen.
Dmesg and boot log offer no
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 01:42:15PM +0100, Sharpe, Sam J wrote:
> Suggestion 1)
> Don't use testing kernels and expect anything to work
Lession learned :)
> Suggestion 2)
> Don't enable the updates-testing repo unless you really are testing...
Well, I don't mind testing...but it kind of help if it
Have you an external nss e.g. LDAP, NIS+, which with the new kernel is
not accessible at that point?
suomi
Dan wrote:
Just updated the kernel about an hour ago.
Fedora 10 (x86)
Dell GX240
VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage 128 Pro Ultra TF
When booting it gets as far as "s
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 04:52:31PM +0200, fedora wrote:
> Have you an external nss e.g. LDAP, NIS+, which with the new kernel is
> not accessible at that point?
None at all.
I have backed down to 2.6.27 in the meantime, though I am curious as
to why this particular 2.6.29 kernel won't work on thi
2009/4/16 Dan :
> Just updated the kernel about an hour ago.
>
> Fedora 10 (x86)
> Dell GX240
> VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage 128 Pro Ultra TF
>
> When booting it gets as far as "starting anacron" and then I just
> get a black screen with keyboard and mouse frozen.
> Dmesg an
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 08:12:49PM +0300, Joonas Sarajärvi wrote:
> After installing the same kernel from updates-testing along with all
> the other 'testing updates, I have run into a similar issue.
> First, I noticed that unlike with 2.6.27, KMS is now enabled on my
> hardware. However, booting
Joonas Sarajärvi wrote:
2009/4/16 Dan :
Just updated the kernel about an hour ago.
Fedora 10 (x86)
Dell GX240
VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage 128 Pro Ultra TF
When booting it gets as far as "starting anacron" and then I just
get a black screen with keyboard and mouse fr
Around 12:58pm on Thursday, April 16, 2009 (UK time), Dan scrawled:
> Just updated the kernel about an hour ago.
>
> Fedora 10 (x86)
> Dell GX240
> VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage 128 Pro Ultra TF
>
> When booting it gets as far as "starting anacron" and then I just
> get a
Steve Searle wrote:
Around 12:58pm on Thursday, April 16, 2009 (UK time), Dan scrawled:
Just updated the kernel about an hour ago.
Fedora 10 (x86)
Dell GX240
VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage 128 Pro Ultra TF
When booting it gets as far as "starting anacron" and then I just
On 04/17/2009 06:56 PM, Shannon McMackin wrote:
>>
> I have heard of some instances where the radeon driver is no longer
> working for certain ATI chips. radeonhd is the way to go.
Apparently not.
http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-April/msg00711.html
Rahul
--
fedora-list
On Apr 1, 2009, Bram_Gro wrote:
> For those (like me) who wish to avoid proprietary firmware, they have
> been moved since Fedora 10 into a single package called kernel-firmware.
> Can I uncheck this kernel-firmware package during the custom
> installation process within Anaconda, or is this don
On 08.05.2009 07:53, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
[...]
Your best bet to avoid non-Free Software from Fedora is probably to
resort to Freed-ora Linux-libre builds, available from
http://linux-libre.fsfla.org/, and to exclude *-firmware and
microcode_ctl from the Fedora repositories.
I'd say excluding
2009/12/14 Paolo Galtieri :
> I see lots of the following message
>
> Dec 13 23:56:17 localhost pulseaudio[2050]: alsa-mixer.c: Your kernel driver
> is broken: it reports a volume range from 18.00 dB to 18.00 dB which makes
> no sense.
etc.
> Can anyone tell me what the cause of this is and how ti
On Friday 06 March 2009 16:43:58 Steve wrote:
> After some investigation, I have found that I only get these errors if I
> boot with a CD in the drive. Then I found that they also appear in the logs
> whenever a CD in inserted into the drive.
>
> Anybody else sseing this? I googled and only saw so
On 3/6/09, Bill Crawford wrote:
> On Friday 06 March 2009 16:43:58 Steve wrote:
>
>> After some investigation, I have found that I only get these errors if I
>> boot with a CD in the drive. Then I found that they also appear in the
>> logs
>> whenever a CD in inserted into the drive.
>>
>> Anybody
On Friday 06 March 2009 14:58:34 Andras Simon wrote:
> I'm not sure. I also have a fair amount of these messages, and no lvm.
I bet you have it installed, and hal.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines:
On Friday 06 March 2009 14:58:34 Andras Simon wrote:
> On 3/6/09, Bill Crawford wrote:
...
> > It's lvm scanning for volume group metadata, probably.
>
> I'm not sure. I also have a fair amount of these messages, and no lvm.
See also: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442177
--
fedora
Bill Crawford wrote:
> On Friday 06 March 2009 14:58:34 Andras Simon wrote:
> > On 3/6/09, Bill Crawford wrote:
> ...
> > > It's lvm scanning for volume group metadata, probably.
> >
> > I'm not sure. I also have a fair amount of these messages, and no lvm.
>
> See also: https://bugzilla.
On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 11:43 -0500, Steve wrote:
> kernel: end_request: I/O error. dev sr0, sector 0
> kernel: Buffer I/O error on device sr0, logical block 0
>
>
>
> After some investigation, I have found that I only get these errors if
> I boot with a CD in the drive.
> Then I found that they
On Friday 06 March 2009 18:23:08 Tim wrote:
...
> I see something like that all the time when there's a CD in the drive.
> The auto-mounter attempts to read a file system from the disc, and can't
> (e.g. because it's an audio disc), and those are the error responses
> about the failure. If it can
Tim wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 11:43 -0500, Steve wrote:
> > kernel: end_request: I/O error. dev sr0, sector 0
> > kernel: Buffer I/O error on device sr0, logical block 0
> >
> >
> >
> > After some investigation, I have found that I only get these errors if
> > I boot with a CD in th
Tim:
>> What type of CD is in your drive?
Steve:
> $ sudo lshw
> ...
>*-cdrom
> description: DVD writer
No, what sort of "CD" is *in* your "drive"? Audio, data, cheap disc,
good quality disc...
--
[...@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.15-78.2.23.fc9.i686
Don't send pr
François Patte wrote:
> Bonjour,
>
> I want to upgrade my f8 laptop to f10 but the boot on f10 install disk
> stop after a few seconds:
>
> Kernel panic - not syning: VFS: unable to mount root fs on unknown
> block(0,0)
>
>
> I am unable to enter any options like mediacheck
>
> I don't kno
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 16:10 +, Dave Higton wrote:
> I'm testing DVD-RAM writing and reading for reliability under Fedoras 10
> and 5. While writing some files under F10 this afternoon, there was a
> kernel failure. Details below:
>
> WARNING: at fs/buffer.c:1186 mark_buffer_dirty+0x27/0x79()
On Sat 2009-11-14, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 16:10 +, Dave Higton wrote:
> > I'm testing DVD-RAM writing and reading for reliability
> under Fedoras 10
> > and 5. While writing some files under F10 this afternoon,
> there was a
> > kernel failure. Details below:
> >
> >
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 10:43 +, Dave Higton wrote:
Hello Dave,
Sorry for the late reply.
Somehow missed you message due to excessive F12-release noise. :)
> OK. I've just been Googling for warn_slowpath, but although I've
> found lots of examples, I don't know what it means. My guess is
>
This may not be related, but it seems as though the kernel is having
issues loading devices in general. Mabe there's a kernel option that
changed? I get these USB device errors right before it starts
complaining about accessing swap:
hub 2-0:1.0: unable to enumerate USB device on port 5
hub
>
> This may not be related, but it seems as though the kernel is having
> issues loading devices in general. Mabe there's a kernel option that
> changed? I get these USB device errors right before it starts
> complaining about accessing swap:
>
> hub 2-0:1.0: unable to enumerate USB device on por
David Halik jla.rutgers.edu> writes:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I just yum upgraded three different FC8 workstations I have here at work
> to the latest kernel update and all three broke in the same manner. Upon
I have also had problems with this kernel - see:
http://marc.info/?l=fedora-test-list&m=121
Hi all,
I just yum upgraded three different FC8 workstations I have here at
work to the latest kernel update and all three broke in the same
manner. Upon restart grub loads the kernel and initrd, then it goes
through the classic errors of:
Maybe not related...but that kernel doesn't se
G writes:
Hi
Has Fedora shipped the 2.6.15 series of kernel by default ? I checked
FC4 and FC5. FC4 by default uses 2.6.11 and FC5 uses 2.6.16. For some
development and testing purposes i need 2.6.15 so can i load FC4 and
download kernel 2.6.15 from kernel.org and compile it ? I feel
upgradatio
101 - 200 of 293 matches
Mail list logo
