On Sun, 2008-08-10 at 07:45 +0100, Colin Paul Adams wrote:
On two separate machines (both running Fedora 9) VLC fails when trying
to play DVDs, complaining of kernel errors trying to read a particular
sector (and just repeats - it is very hard to actually stop - in one
case i had to reboot the
Patrick == Patrick O'Callaghan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Patrick On Sun, 2008-08-10 at 07:45 +0100, Colin Paul Adams wrote:
On two separate machines (both running Fedora 9) VLC fails when
trying to play DVDs, complaining of kernel errors trying to
read a particular sector (and
2008/8/8 Josh Boyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 00:39 +0100, Christopher Brown wrote:
2008/8/7 Josh Boyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 23:01 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
http://jwboyer.fedorapeople.org/pub/
Let the kernel installs begin.
Hopefully I didn't fsck
On Sat, 2008-08-09 at 23:20 +0100, Christopher Brown wrote:
The intention isn't to provide an alternative kernel. It's more for
those that want to test something and see if it works on vanilla as
opposed to a patched Fedora kernel. That should be quite rare, as the
Fedora kernels are
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 23:01 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
http://jwboyer.fedorapeople.org/pub/
Let the kernel installs begin.
Hopefully I didn't fsck something up horridly. If I did, then I'll fix
it for -rc2.
Updated to -rc2 builds now. And the kernel-firmware Requires issue
should be fixed
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 12:37:32PM -0700, Antonio Olivares wrote:
Dear fellow testers,
New kernel oops again and no X when starting it
kernel-2.6.27-0.215.rc1.git4.fc10.i686
Here's oops
http://www.kerneloops.org/submitresult.php?number=48331
nasty... did this just start recently?
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 04:16:39PM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 12:37:32PM -0700, Antonio Olivares wrote:
Dear fellow testers,
New kernel oops again and no X when starting it
kernel-2.6.27-0.215.rc1.git4.fc10.i686
Here's oops
On Tue, 2008-08-05 at 16:18 -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 04:16:39PM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 12:37:32PM -0700, Antonio Olivares wrote:
Dear fellow testers,
New kernel oops again and no X when starting it
G wrote:
Hi
Has Fedora shipped the 2.6.15 series of kernel by
default ? I checked
FC4 and FC5. FC4 by default uses 2.6.11 and FC5 uses
2.6.16. For some
development and testing purposes i need 2.6.15 so can
i load FC4 and
download kernel 2.6.15 from kernel.org and compile it
? I
G writes:
Hi
Has Fedora shipped the 2.6.15 series of kernel by default ? I checked
FC4 and FC5. FC4 by default uses 2.6.11 and FC5 uses 2.6.16. For some
development and testing purposes i need 2.6.15 so can i load FC4 and
download kernel 2.6.15 from kernel.org and compile it ? I feel
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 01:03:39PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
BTW, see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/roland/task_714174/
for a kernel-vanilla build I did of 2.6.26.
This gives a baseline for regression testing any problems to see if they
are caused by some Fedora patches (e.g.
On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 16:12 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 01:03:39PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
BTW, see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/roland/task_714174/
for a kernel-vanilla build I did of 2.6.26.
This gives a baseline for regression testing any
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 04:28:50PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 16:12 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 01:03:39PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
BTW, see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/roland/task_714174/
for a kernel-vanilla build I did of
Sam Varshavchik wrote, On 07/13/2008 10:51 AM:
Chris Snook writes:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Every other week or so, I get a disk kicked out of my RAID, with this:
Jul 6 04:05:38 commodore kernel: (scsi1:A:0:0): scsi1: device
overrun (status 10) on 0:0:0
Jul 6 04:05:38 commodore kernel:
Todd Denniston writes:
Sam Varshavchik wrote, On 07/13/2008 10:51 AM:
Chris Snook writes:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Every other week or so, I get a disk kicked out of my RAID, with this:
Jul 6 04:05:38 commodore kernel: (scsi1:A:0:0): scsi1: device
overrun (status 10) on 0:0:0
Jul 6
Chris Snook writes:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Every other week or so, I get a disk kicked out of my RAID, with this:
Jul 6 04:05:38 commodore kernel: (scsi1:A:0:0): scsi1: device overrun
(status 10) on 0:0:0
Jul 6 04:05:38 commodore kernel: Unexpected busfree in DT Data-in
phase, 1 SCBs
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Every other week or so, I get a disk kicked out of my RAID, with this:
Jul 6 04:05:38 commodore kernel: (scsi1:A:0:0): scsi1: device overrun
(status 10) on 0:0:0
Jul 6 04:05:38 commodore kernel: Unexpected busfree in DT Data-in
phase, 1 SCBs aborted, PRGMCNT == 0x22f
Hi Jorgen,
Here are the two kernel lines from your grub
configuration:
kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.25.10-86.fc9.i686 ro root=/dev/dm-0 quiet
usbcore.au tosuspend=1 agp=off agppart=off
kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.25.10-85.fc9.i686 ro
root=UUID=27915760-e016-4843-9d
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:57:27 +, Jorgen Jonsson wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 05:37:04 -0400, David C. Chipman wrote:
Hi Jorgen,
Here are the two kernel lines from your grub
configuration:
kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.25.10-86.fc9.i686 ro root=/dev/dm-0 quiet
usbcore.au
Jorgen Jonsson wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 05:37:04 -0400, David C. Chipman wrote:
Hi Jorgen,
Here are the two kernel lines from your grub
configuration:
kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.25.10-86.fc9.i686 ro root=/dev/dm-0 quiet
usbcore.au tosuspend=1 agp=off agppart=off
kernel
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 12:29:37 -0400, sean darcy wrote:
Jorgen Jonsson wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 05:37:04 -0400, David C. Chipman wrote:
Hi Jorgen,
Here are the two kernel lines from your grub
configuration:
kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.25.10-86.fc9.i686 ro root=/dev/dm-0 quiet
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:34:19 +0200, Jorgen Jonsson wrote:
Kernel 2.6.25.10-85 works great, but -86 won't find my root filesystem
on lvm I
noticed that the installation of -86 changed my root to /dev/dm-0
instead of UUID. I tried with UUID but that didn't wotk either.
grub.conf:
title
I am seeing the same problem but on a Toshiba Satellite A305-S6825 laptop
instead an HP system. The problem may not be Fedora specific since I having
what appears to be the same problem when I tried to install Ubuntu 8.0.4 on
my new laptop.
I am configuring my laptop as a dual boot system with
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 05:13:24PM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
* remove CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_POWERSAVE -- ondemand automatically
throttles down to lowest, and is just a hardcoded state
I don't think removal of powersave governor is good idea. Generally
ondemand governor does great job but in
On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 09:10 +0200, Adam Tkac wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 05:13:24PM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
* remove CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_POWERSAVE -- ondemand automatically
throttles down to lowest, and is just a hardcoded state
I don't think removal of powersave governor is good
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 09:10:28AM +0200, Adam Tkac wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 05:13:24PM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
* remove CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_POWERSAVE -- ondemand automatically
throttles down to lowest, and is just a hardcoded state
I don't think removal of powersave governor
On Monday 30 June 2008 05:54:32 am Richard Hughes wrote:
Right, cheers for your feedback. In view of everybodies comments, what
about the following:
* Compile _into_ the kernel ondemand, performance, powersave and
userspace.
Sounds reasonable.
* Default to performance in the kernel rather
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:13:24 +0100
Richard Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At the moment we set:
# CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_PERFORMANCE is not set
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_USERSPACE=y
# CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_ONDEMAND is not set
# CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_CONSERVATIVE is not
Richard Hughes wrote:
In an ideal world we would:
* compile into the kernel CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND -- we really
want to be running this on all systems that support it
* set ONDEMAND or PERFORMANCE to default as USERSPACE is just changed
to something else by cpuspeed. You really don't
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Richard Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You really don't want to be using
USERSPACE at all.
seems like cpufreq-applet uses it
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 22:56 +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 10:01 PM, Richard Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 21:16 +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Richard Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You really don't want to be using
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 09:01:34PM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 21:16 +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Richard Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You really don't want to be using
USERSPACE at all.
seems like cpufreq-applet uses
Jelena i Zoran wrote:
I have not been able to update the kernel on FC8 since
kernel-2.6.24.3-12.fc8.
All later versions stop loading at udev stage. I looked on the interned and
others seem so have similar issues. None of the suggestions I found on
the internet worked.
The message I get at the
Richard Shaw wrote:
After updaing to kernel 2.6.25.4-10.fc8 X will not load. dkms runs and
says it's loading the module but X fails to run. Choosing my previous
(still installed) kernel 2.6.24.7-92.fc8 boots fine.
Anyone else run into any X issues with the latest kernel?
With Fedora 9, an
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 5:49 AM, Mike Burger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard Shaw wrote:
After updaing to kernel 2.6.25.4-10.fc8 X will not load. dkms runs and
says it's loading the module but X fails to run. Choosing my previous
(still installed) kernel 2.6.24.7-92.fc8 boots fine.
Anyone
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Richard Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 5:49 AM, Mike Burger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard Shaw wrote:
After updaing to kernel 2.6.25.4-10.fc8 X will not load. dkms runs and
says it's loading the module but X fails to run. Choosing my
Richard Shaw wrote:
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Richard Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 5:49 AM, Mike Burger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard Shaw wrote:
After updaing to kernel 2.6.25.4-10.fc8 X will not load. dkms runs and
says it's loading the module but X fails
Jelena i Zoran wrote:
I have not been able to update the kernel on FC8 since
kernel-2.6.24.3-12.fc8.
All later versions stop loading at udev stage. I looked on the interned and
others seem so have similar issues. None of the suggestions I found on
the internet worked.
The message I get at the
Richard Shaw wrote:
After updaing to kernel 2.6.25.4-10.fc8 X will not load. dkms runs and
says it's loading the module but X fails to run. Choosing my previous
(still installed) kernel 2.6.24.7-92.fc8 boots fine.
Anyone else run into any X issues with the latest kernel?
With Fedora 9, an
This may not be related, but it seems as though the kernel is having
issues loading devices in general. Mabe there's a kernel option that
changed? I get these USB device errors right before it starts
complaining about accessing swap:
hub 2-0:1.0: unable to enumerate USB device on port 5
hub
This may not be related, but it seems as though the kernel is having
issues loading devices in general. Mabe there's a kernel option that
changed? I get these USB device errors right before it starts
complaining about accessing swap:
hub 2-0:1.0: unable to enumerate USB device on port 5
Well, it looks like after a couple of hours I was able to fix it after
all. Luckily a friend went through a similar issue months ago and
suggested I try and disable any type of power management for the SATA
drive. Sure enough, I found an option for SATA power management in the
workstation
On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 12:26 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Tuesday 01 April 2008 10:09:17 am Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 09:52 +0200, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Sat, 2008-03-29 at 15:19 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
We recently tweaked the main kernel package's spec
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 09:49 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
ok, new-kernel-pkg grows a --rpmposttrans mode then to call these
hooks, and we add a %posttrans to each kernel RPM.
This looks to be working fine, but let me see if I've got this
straight ...
+%define kernel_variant_posttrans(s:r:v:) \
Hi Jarod,
(Copying fedora-kernel-list so other folks know what we're at)
On Sat, 2008-03-29 at 15:19 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
We recently tweaked the main kernel package's spec file such that we now
include arch in uname -r output, and have standardized a bunch of path names
to match.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 11:18:17AM +0100, Adam Pribyl wrote:
I am just wondering what is going on with all this device names renaming.
hostap always used to use wlanX device names.. but well in F8 this is some
kind of different - at least on SMP system, the kernel asks for device
wlan0 to
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 09:36 -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
In that thread you indicated that you had previously used orinoco,
which would have given you an ethX name for that same MAC address.
So somewhere that association has stuck. Perhaps you are using an
HWADDR line in
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 01:50:46PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 01:42:49PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
PJ == Peter Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
PJ That doesn't guarantee the right thing -- it's inverted. It makes
PJ it so that before kernel-devel's %post
On 21.02.2008 21:13, Matt Domsch wrote:
If running all of /etc/kernel/postinst.d/ is so scary, I'm ok with
new-kernel-pkg explicitly doing
[ -x /etc/kernel/postinst.d/dkms ] /etc/kernel/postinst.d/dkms $kernelver
/boot/vmlinuz-$kernelver
FYI, livna's akmods stuff (a simple script that
On Sun, 2008-02-17 at 20:16 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
is there any reason why we can't just move %post to %posttrans?
%posttrans breaks the way we do bootloader config updating as it leaves
around no entries in the bootloader config after all the %preuns have
been processed. I looked at this a
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 09:36:49AM -0500, Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Sun, 2008-02-17 at 20:16 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
is there any reason why we can't just move %post to %posttrans?
%posttrans breaks the way we do bootloader config updating as it leaves
around no entries in the bootloader
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 09:49:44AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 09:36:49AM -0500, Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Sun, 2008-02-17 at 20:16 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
is there any reason why we can't just move %post to %posttrans?
%posttrans breaks the way we do bootloader
Matt Domsch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433121
DKMS would like to have the opportunity to run it's
auto-rebuilder/installer after a new kernel RPM has been installed,
without having to wait for a system restart to run it. Likewise, when
a kernel
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 12:35:19PM -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 09:53:26AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433121
DKMS would like to have the opportunity to run it's
auto-rebuilder/installer after a new kernel RPM has been
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 09:53:26AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433121
DKMS would like to have the opportunity to run it's
auto-rebuilder/installer after a new kernel RPM has been installed,
without having to wait for a system restart to run it.
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 01:13:35PM -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 12:01:23PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 12:54:29PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Matt Domsch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
Use triggers - this functionality already exists without
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 12:45:05PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Matt Domsch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433121
DKMS would like to have the opportunity to run it's
auto-rebuilder/installer after a new kernel RPM has been installed,
without
Matt Domsch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
Use triggers - this functionality already exists without kernel-specific
infrastructure.
a) LSB suggests triggers are evil.
Then triggers must be the right answer.
b) triggers don't tell me the version of the package that got
installed that
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 11:48:41AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
Also from a support perspective, it becomes more complicated to support
kernel installs when random user scripts can cause unknown behaviour.
This has been the argument against DKMS for 5 years now. However, in
those 5 years,
Jason L Tibbitts III ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
MD == Matt Domsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
MD [...] there's no ordering guarantee between the two such that we
MD know kernel-devel is always installed before kernel.
It should be possible to have kernel-devel have Requires(post): kernel
Peter Jones wrote:
(Adding Panu to the Cc)
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
MD == Matt Domsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
MD [...] there's no ordering guarantee between the two such that we
MD know kernel-devel is always installed before kernel.
It should be possible to have kernel-devel have
PJ == Peter Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
PJ That doesn't guarantee the right thing -- it's inverted. It makes
PJ it so that before kernel-devel's %post runs, kernel must be
PJ installed. What Matt needs is a guarantee that kernel-devel is
PJ installed (if it will be installed at all) before
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 01:42:49PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
PJ == Peter Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
PJ That doesn't guarantee the right thing -- it's inverted. It makes
PJ it so that before kernel-devel's %post runs, kernel must be
PJ installed. What Matt needs is a guarantee
(Adding Panu to the Cc)
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
MD == Matt Domsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
MD [...] there's no ordering guarantee between the two such that we
MD know kernel-devel is always installed before kernel.
It should be possible to have kernel-devel have Requires(post): kernel
On Sat, 2008-02-16 at 09:53 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
DKMS would like to have the opportunity to run it's
auto-rebuilder/installer after a new kernel RPM has been installed,
without having to wait for a system restart to run it. Likewise, when
a kernel RPM is removed, it would like to be able
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 02:17:16PM -0500, Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Sat, 2008-02-16 at 09:53 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
DKMS would like to have the opportunity to run it's
auto-rebuilder/installer after a new kernel RPM has been installed,
without having to wait for a system restart to run it.
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 06:51:49PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 02:17:16PM -0500, Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Sat, 2008-02-16 at 09:53 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
DKMS would like to have the opportunity to run it's
auto-rebuilder/installer after a new kernel RPM has been
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 08:16:25PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
is there any reason why we can't just move %post to %posttrans?
two patches below, moving %post to %posttrans in the kernel packages
(not -devel of course), and implementing the hooks in new-kernel-pkg.
Thanks,
Matt
--
Matt Domsch
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 07:50:42PM -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 04:47:55PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
Why are we building kernels with this broken compiler?
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8501
On 02/01/2008 05:17 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 22:06:29 +0100, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
...
And, after fixing that one we get (on ppc):
*** ERROR: same build ID in nonidentical files!
/usr/lib/debug/lib/modules/2.6.24-14.fc9/vmlinux
and /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.24-14.fc9
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 04:47:55PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
Why are we building kernels with this broken compiler?
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8501
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=388196name=build.log
Why are we building these broken kernels with
Why are we building kernels with this broken compiler?
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8501
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=388196name=build.log
Why are we building these broken kernels with our shiny new compiler?
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 12:38 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
See:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249587
Some users need mdadm to build an initrd.
The problem here is that without the requires, it's not guaranteed to be
first in the transaction set and thus it can't be used.
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 04:22:24PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
Okay, here's the first draft of spec changes to alter the kernel rpm
version and release fields to more closely match what the actual
upstream kernel base is. Its heavily commented at the moment to try to
explain what's going on.
Jarod Wilson wrote:
Roland McGrath wrote:
What's Patch5?
D'oh. Meant to nuke that. Inserted for testing purposes -- 'spectool
kernel-2.6.spec -p 5 -d somemacro value' to verify expected N-V-R's
being set properly. Disregard the -v2 patch, use this guy instead. :)
(or just drop the Patch5
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 11:56:27AM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
Jarod Wilson wrote:
Roland McGrath wrote:
What's Patch5?
D'oh. Meant to nuke that. Inserted for testing purposes -- 'spectool
kernel-2.6.spec -p 5 -d somemacro value' to verify expected N-V-R's
being set properly.
On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 12:33 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 11:56:27AM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
Jarod Wilson wrote:
Roland McGrath wrote:
What's Patch5?
D'oh. Meant to nuke that. Inserted for testing purposes -- 'spectool
kernel-2.6.spec -p 5 -d
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 11:47:18AM -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
This is why Fedora adopted the pre-release versioning scheme that we
did:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#PreReleasePackages
In the Fedora scheme, this would be
0.%{X}.%{alphatag}
It's non-obvious to me what %{?buildid} is, but it seems to
auto-increment.
buildid is the please set this to .me one.
fedora_build is the one to bump on commit.
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 11:52:00AM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
It's non-obvious to me what %{?buildid} is, but it seems to
auto-increment.
buildid is the please set this to .me one.
fedora_build is the one to bump on commit.
Can't %{fedora_build} be set based on the $Revision$ keyword,
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 03:56:45PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 11:52:00AM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
It's non-obvious to me what %{?buildid} is, but it seems to
auto-increment.
buildid is the please set this to .me one.
fedora_build is the one to
Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 11:47:18AM -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
This is why Fedora adopted the pre-release versioning scheme that we
did:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#PreReleasePackages
In the Fedora scheme, this would be
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 03:01:16PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
snip
The other crazy idea I had was to call 2.6.22-rc7
2.6.22-0.rc7.git0.1.fc8. Making fedora_build auto-increment is probably
cleaner, though it'd be nice to also have it reset on a kernel major
version rebase (either manually or
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 03:56:45PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 11:52:00AM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
It's non-obvious to me what %{?buildid} is, but it seems to
auto-increment.
buildid is the please set this to .me one.
fedora_build is the
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 03:32:51PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 12:26:06PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 03:56:45PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 11:52:00AM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
It's non-obvious to me
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 03:01:16PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
snip
The other crazy idea I had was to call 2.6.22-rc7
2.6.22-0.rc7.git0.1.fc8. Making fedora_build auto-increment is probabl=
y
cleaner, though it'd be nice to also have it reset on a kernel major
version rebase (either manually
What about before the first -rcN tag?
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Roland McGrath wrote:
What about before the first -rcN tag?
I presume you're referring to the likes of say kernel 2.6.21-gitX, which
was post-2.6.21, but pre-2.6.22-rc1? Crap. Hadn't thought about that
case. Okay, will have to do some further twiddling to cover that case...
--
Jarod Wilson
I presume you're referring to the likes of say kernel 2.6.21-gitX, which
was post-2.6.21, but pre-2.6.22-rc1? Crap. Hadn't thought about that
case. Okay, will have to do some further twiddling to cover that case...
Yes, that's what I meant. Faking it as rc0 might be the easiest thing to
keep
Roland McGrath wrote:
I presume you're referring to the likes of say kernel 2.6.21-gitX, which
was post-2.6.21, but pre-2.6.22-rc1? Crap. Hadn't thought about that
case. Okay, will have to do some further twiddling to cover that case...
Yes, that's what I meant. Faking it as rc0 might be
What's Patch5?
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Roland McGrath wrote:
What's Patch5?
D'oh. Meant to nuke that. Inserted for testing purposes -- 'spectool
kernel-2.6.spec -p 5 -d somemacro value' to verify expected N-V-R's
being set properly. Disregard the -v2 patch, use this guy instead. :)
(or just drop the Patch5 line out of the resulting
kathy pu wrote:
Hi Everybody,
I have recently updatqed to fedora 2.6.20-1.2933. I would like to
know how to add a kernel debugger and kernel dump analysis utility.
1. Is KGDB the right tool? Or there is others?
2. How and where to download and enable KGDB, and the working version
for my
On Sunday 01 October 2006 13:06, Stephen Buccola wrote:
I'm fairly new to Linux and chose to download Fedora Core 5. I'm currently
installing a program, PCMIA, and it asks me to locate my kernel source
directory. I was under the impression that it could be found under
/usr/src/linux, however,
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 13:28 +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
In nVidia/ATI's defense, unlike previous FC/non-GPL problems (udev, 4K
stacks, etc) the problem is not with the closed source drivers failing
to follow the latest kernel trunk.
Beside releasing their code under GPL (Which is a
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
well API changes are one of the prices you pay for being an outside
module, and is not unique to Fedora.
The entire kernel development model is setup for having everything in
one repo, and everything outside that is just painful. See that as
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006, dragoran wrote:
Any thoughts on how to make everyone happy? :)
I have no idea :(
Paul
A solution is not to check the kernel version but to check for features/apis
they need.
the (closed) nvidia driver does this for the wrapper part and it seems to work
fine.
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 09:44 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
Hi,
upstream kernels that are release candidates or git sub-rcs etc. are
versioned in FC/RHEL based on the previous stable kernel release,
e.g. FC5's 2.6.16-rc5-git9 kernel is released as 2.6.15.
I generally think that's a good idea
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 19:42 -0500, Warren Togami wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=150222hide_resolved=1
We are now attempting to fix some last minute problems. Your help would
be greatly appreciated in finding solutions for the problems listed in
the
On Fri, 2006-03-03 at 17:09 +0200, Pekka Pietikainen wrote:
Err... would it be possible to get some solution for the Help!
I just want to run oprofile and systemtap scenario?
-rw-rw-r--1 ftp ftp 459625793 Mar 02 09:20
kernel-debuginfo-2.6.15-1.2008_FC5.i686.rpm
is just not
301 - 400 of 400 matches
Mail list logo
