Anybody has the same (or similar) problem with latest F12 updates
(Package deb vs. perl-5.8.6)?
sudo yum update
Loaded plugins: presto, refresh-packagekit
Setting up Update Process
Resolving Dependencies
-- Running transaction check
--- Package acl.i686 0:2.2.49-2.fc12 set to be updated
Joachim Backes wrote:
Anybody has the same (or similar) problem with latest F12 updates
snip
ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve:
perl = 5.8.6 is needed by (installed) deb-1.10.27-3.i586
Complete!
(1, [u'Please report this error in http://yum.baseurl.org/report
Joachim Backes wrote:
Anybody has the same (or similar) problem with latest F12 updates
(Package deb vs. perl-5.8.6)?
Total size: 42 M
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
Running rpm_check_debug
ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve:
perl = 5.8.6 is needed by (installed) deb
Ed Greshko wrote:
What is deb? I could not find that in any of the fedora repositories
that I've enabled.
http://yum.baseurl.org/search?q=deb-1.10.27-3.wiki=onchangeset=onticket=on
--
peace out.
tc,hago.
g
.
in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
**
help microsoft stamp
g wrote:
Ed Greshko wrote:
What is deb? I could not find that in any of the fedora repositories
that I've enabled.
http://yum.baseurl.org/search?q=deb-1.10.27-3.wiki=onchangeset=onticket=on
Too bad that doesn't answer my question
--
Q: How did you get into artificial
On 01/08/2010 10:54 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Joachim Backes wrote:
Anybody has the same (or similar) problem with latest F12 updates
(Package deb vs. perl-5.8.6)?
Total size: 42 M
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
Running rpm_check_debug
ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve:
perl
Ed Greshko wrote:
Too bad that doesn't answer my question
correct, you are. i sent wrong link.
this describes it's use, and probably why op installed it;
http://rpmfind.rediris.es/rpm2html/suse-9.3-i586/deb-1.10.27-3.i586.html
--
peace out.
tc,hago.
g
.
in a free world
to today's updates, which included the
latest pulse updates.
lspci:
00:05.0 Audio device: nVidia Corporation MCP61 High Definition Audio (rev a2)
I checked alsamixer and nothing is muted. Checked Pulse Audio Volume
Control and everything looks OK there. Again, I want to emphasize that
(other
why Xine backend no longer works, but gstreamer fixed it. I
added this problem to BZ #551496. I'll update that bug, with your
solution. I have checked the other machine and it has Xine as the backend.
Maybe after another set of updates, either to KDE or pulse, I will try
switching it back. Even
. All sound worked fine prior to today's
updates, which included the
latest pulse updates.
Hi;
this happened to me.
I only run KDE, so did not test gnome.
F - apps - multimedia - pulse volume control
click the config tab.
In my case PA found my Radeon Video card and chose HDMI
I changed it back
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010, Mike McLean wrote:
On 12/30/2009 02:05 AM, William F. Acker WB2FLW +1 303 722 7209 wrote:
I've always noticed that when a package is updated, sometimes the i686
version isn't put into the x86_64 repo for updates. As a workaround, I
Can you give some examples? If multilib
On 12/30/2009 02:05 AM, William F. Acker WB2FLW +1 303 722 7209 wrote:
I've always noticed that when a package is updated, sometimes the i686
version isn't put into the x86_64 repo for updates. As a workaround, I
Can you give some examples? If multilib content is inconsistent across
updates
On 01/04/2010 11:32 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
Multilib set is dynamically determined each compose. If the package
itself changes in a way that no longer triggers the multilib algorithm,
then it will fall out of being multilib.
Is there a mechanism to remove 'fallen' multilib packages? If not,
Trying to do a
yum makecache
on my fedora 12 i386 machine and it starts downloading updates/filelists_db
and the download rate gets slower and slower, from 100s of KBs/second to KBs
to 100s of B/s to Bytes/seccond
to 0 B/s - basically stopping.
I can Control-C to restart but the same happens again
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Rich Emberson emberson.r...@gmail.comwrote:
Trying to do a
yum makecache
on my fedora 12 i386 machine and it starts downloading updates/filelists_db
and the download rate gets slower and slower, from 100s of KBs/second to
KBs to 100s of B/s to Bytes/seccond
--- On Wed, 12/30/09, Rich Emberson emberson.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Trying to do a
yum makecache
on my fedora 12 i386 machine and it starts downloading
updates/filelists_db
and the download rate gets slower and slower, from 100s of
KBs/second to KBs to 100s of B/s to Bytes/seccond
to 0 B
Due to the continuing problems I'm having with Samba on my F11 box I looked
to see if there are any updates, seems there are, but its not reflected in
the official Fedora repo's.
The latest version of one RPM I see, using yumexm, is
samba-3.4.2-0.42.fc11. However there appears to be a newer
On 24/12/09 09:43, KC8LDO wrote:
Due to the continuing problems I'm having with Samba on my F11 box I
looked to see if there are any updates, seems there are, but its not
reflected in the official Fedora repo's.
The latest version of one RPM I see, using yumexm, is
samba-3.4.2-0.42.fc11
On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 09:50:50 +, Frank wrote:
On 24/12/09 09:43, KC8LDO wrote:
Due to the continuing problems I'm having with Samba on my F11 box I
looked to see if there are any updates, seems there are, but its not
reflected in the official Fedora repo's.
The latest version
On 22Dec2009 08:24, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote:
| Frank Cox wrote:
| On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 16:31 -0600, Brian Wood wrote:
| I downloaded/built/installed a new version of sqlite, but that hasn't
| helped.
|
| This is likely your problem. Firefox probably expects to find sqlite
|
Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 22Dec2009 08:24, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote:
| Frank Cox wrote:
| On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 16:31 -0600, Brian Wood wrote:
| I downloaded/built/installed a new version of sqlite, but that hasn't
| helped.
|
| This is likely your problem. Firefox
version like so:
sudo rpm -e --nodeps firefox xulrunner sudo yum install -y
--disablerepo=updates firefox xulrunner
...note you'll be running Firefox w/o the latest updates, but some
people need Firebug (like me).
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https
Hi, John!
Can you (at some point - not terribly vital and can wait until after the
holidays) make these changes to the Marketing schedule
(http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-13/f-13-marketing-tasks.html)?
1. Delete tasks 13 and 15, which refer to a deliverable (the tour) we've
Yesterday I allowed the system to install some security updates.
Since then when I've tried to start Firefox, I get The application has
been updated, but your version of SQLite is too old and the
application cannot run. I downloaded/built/installed a new version
of sqlite, but that hasn't helped
On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 16:31 -0600, Brian Wood wrote:
I downloaded/built/installed a new version of sqlite, but that hasn't
helped.
This is likely your problem. Firefox probably expects to find sqlite
installed from a Fedora rpm and not a homebuilt one.
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~
Frank Cox wrote:
On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 16:31 -0600, Brian Wood wrote:
I downloaded/built/installed a new version of sqlite, but that hasn't
helped.
This is likely your problem. Firefox probably expects to find sqlite
installed from a Fedora rpm and not a homebuilt one.
All
How come I don't see fresh kernel versions in updates-testing? Should I
be looking elsewhere?
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
On 15/12/09 17:42, Konstantin Svist wrote:
How come I don't see fresh kernel versions in updates-testing? Should I
be looking elsewhere?
The infrastructure just moved house.
Give them a chance.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
On 12/15/2009 09:44 AM, Frank Murphy (Frankly3D) wrote:
On 15/12/09 17:42, Konstantin Svist wrote:
How come I don't see fresh kernel versions in updates-testing? Should I
be looking elsewhere?
The infrastructure just moved house.
Give them a chance.
Sorry, I must've missed
On 15/12/09 17:56, Konstantin Svist wrote:
On 12/15/2009 09:44 AM, Frank Murphy (Frankly3D) wrote:
On 15/12/09 17:42, Konstantin Svist wrote:
How come I don't see fresh kernel versions in updates-testing? Should I
be looking elsewhere?
The infrastructure just moved house.
Give
There are some good wireless changes/fixes in 2.6.32 which would be
very worthwhile having in both f12 and f11. I assume it will be pushed
to f12 - yes ?
But, are there plans to make 2.6.32.1 available for f11 ?
If (yes) {
Great!!
} else {
Would it make sense to
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546490
--- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-12-13 23:25:25
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
How about
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546490
--- Comment #7 from Joseph Shraibman j...@iname.com 2009-12-14 00:14:03 EDT
---
I'm not sure why the fonts are installed.
, encouragement, and advice for using
Fedora. fedora-list@redhat.com
To: fedora-list@redhat.com
Subject: Re: 1 update available and no updates available
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:25:15 +0100
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:13:10 -0600
Hi Steve
Try yum clean metadata then yum update (not upgrade
Hi John,
My F12 worked perfectly on my ATI Technologies Inc RV350 AS [Radeon
9550] with no xorg.conf from the first day.
After couple of updates compiz started crashing and xrandr stopped
recognizing settings properly. I used xorg.conf for a while only as a
work around.
Now after couple of recent
After each new kernel update in Fedora 12 x86_64 , default time out is reset
to 15secs and freshly installed kernel is set as default. Since the
proprietary WLAN drivers from RPMFusion comes one or two days after each
kernel update, after each kernel update I have to manually edit settings for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546490
--- Comment #4 from Joseph Shraibman j...@iname.com 2009-12-11 09:38:58 EDT
---
yum.log:
Dec 10 15:27:07 Updated:
Hi All,
Just a friendly reminder that Dec 11 00:00:00 UTC is the cutoff for
F10 updates submission. Ideally these would just be the final stable
updates, as pushes to updates-testing would basically be stuck there
forever.
Please take a few moments to review your pending requests, add any
final
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 12:20 -0700, Linuxguy123 wrote:
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 18:36 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Linuxguy123 wrote:
I have logged 2 bugs that are possibly related to this.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528188
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 11:12:07 +0200 (EET) Pekka Savola wrote:
Now gdm login however doesn't show my username and fingerprint login
is no longer an option
Looks like the issue with hal-0.5.14-1:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-12840
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 10:36 +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote:
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 11:12:07 +0200 (EET) Pekka Savola wrote:
Now gdm login however doesn't show my username and fingerprint login
is no longer an option
Looks like the issue with hal-0.5.14-1:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates
with hal-0.5.14-1:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-12840
I think it has something to do with display power management and the
monitor brightness level. I can replicate the behavior by simply
adjusting the display brightness in a KDE session.
I have logged 2 bugs
Linuxguy123 wrote:
I have logged 2 bugs that are possibly related to this.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528188
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525767
Huh? One of these is a Nouveau bug, the other is a bug in the proprietary
nvidia driver, both of them already
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 18:36 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Linuxguy123 wrote:
I have logged 2 bugs that are possibly related to this.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528188
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525767
Huh? One of these is a Nouveau bug, the other is a
Hi,
On my laptop, after F12 updates-testing update today, after reboot F
logo shows but then the screen goes dark and starts flickering between
various shades of dark (changing modes?) with intel graphics chipset
(GM965/GL960). I'm only using 1024x768 resolution. Nomodeset or using
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 10:33 +0200, Pekka Savola wrote:
Hi,
On my laptop, after F12 updates-testing update today, after reboot F
logo shows but then the screen goes dark and starts flickering between
various shades of dark (changing modes?) with intel graphics chipset
(GM965/GL960). I'm
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 01:50 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 10:33 +0200, Pekka Savola wrote:
Hi,
On my laptop, after F12 updates-testing update today, after reboot F
logo shows but then the screen goes dark and starts flickering between
various shades of dark
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 06:51 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
We wouldn't be talking about removing the original GA set - just adding
updated pkgs into the path.
Woa!!! With all due respect, but this would seem an stupid and silly
plan to me.
The only way not to do that would be to maintain
On 12/03/2009 07:22 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 06:24 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
People doing network installs can either add the updates repo to their
kickstart, or check the box in the anaconda UI, so that the updates
repos are considered at install time. No download
meet people who use kickstart all the time.
May-be internal at RH?
I do every install via kickstart - small company with 30-50 machines.
Been doing fedora+everything+updates installs for many releases now.
In fact - every upgrade is a fresh kickstart install + restore critical
files from backup
files. I've never met such a person.
Really? I meet people who use kickstart all the time.
May-be internal at RH?
I do every install via kickstart - small company with 30-50 machines.
Been doing fedora+everything+updates installs for many releases now.
OK, then it's likely a full time
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 08:31:35PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
Hi All,
Fedora 10 will go EOL on December 17th. The final day for
updates to be submitted will be December 14th. Please make
sure any final updates you want pushed to the F10 repos are
submitted by this date.
Due to the infrastructure
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 00:32 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
We wouldn't be talking about removing the original GA set - just adding
updated pkgs into the path. So you'd still have the number of pkgs -just
all in one repo, that you have to download all of the metadata for all of
the more often,
* Adam Williamson [03/12/2009 10:10] :
I don't think that was actually made clear in the initial proposal. I'd
been assuming that the proposal was _exactly_ to remove the GA set.
No can do.
People who install from the netinst CD or do PXE installs without adding
the updates repo during
this. Can you elaborate? That would help
me scope the impact to MirrorManager.
Right now the same package moves from master URL to master URL as it is pushed
from testing to updates to GA to whatever. That means the same package gets
downloaded many times over because it changed URL (and browsers
On Thu, 3 Dec 2009, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 00:32 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
We wouldn't be talking about removing the original GA set - just adding
updated pkgs into the path. So you'd still have the number of pkgs -just
all in one repo, that you have to download all of
infrastructure instead of fighting it)
Sorry, I don't understand this. Can you elaborate? That would help
me scope the impact to MirrorManager.
Right now the same package moves from master URL to master URL as it is pushed
from testing to updates to GA to whatever. That means the same package gets
I think that idea maybe isn't benefit with repository.
If updates repository is merged into Everything repository, Will metadata
files become too large? I know that the size of metadatas on updates and
everything are more than 30 megabytes. If these two repositories compose, We
will need download
to updates to GA to whatever. That means the same
package gets
downloaded many times over because it changed URL (and browsers,
proxies, etc
understand new url = new file)
It only moves once, at least in the vast majority of cases.
My proposal is to never move a package, put it in a single
pkgs would more or less make
deltarpms very difficult.
I'm not saying I support the proposal, I don't, I think it's a waste of
effort for no benefit. I was just clarifying the initial
characterization. Actually I think the initial proposer _was_ expecting
to remove initial packages when updates
On 12/03/2009 12:24 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 12/02/2009 06:40 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
People doing network installs can either add the updates repo to their
kickstart, or check the box in the anaconda UI, so that the updates
repos are considered at install time. No download of duplicate
On 12/03/2009 08:20 AM, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Thu, 3 Dec 2009, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 00:32 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
We wouldn't be talking about removing the original GA set - just adding
updated pkgs into the path. So you'd still have the number of pkgs -just
all
On 12/02/2009 09:12 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Seth Vidal wrote:
If you're looking for perfect division, sure - but the reality is this:
19K items in a single dir and ext3 and nfs and many many other things crap
themselves returning that list.
If you make 36 subdirs (26+10) performance gets
The separate updates directory has been a pain for as long as I've been
using RHL/Fedora Core/Fedora. It means you have two places to look when
searching for packages manually, and twice as much to configure when
you're configuring yum. It has never benefitted me, or anybody I know,
but it has
Matthew Booth wrote:
The separate updates directory has been a pain for as long as I've
been using RHL/Fedora Core/Fedora. It means you have two places to
look when searching for packages manually, and twice as much to
configure when you're configuring yum. It has never benefitted me
On 12/02/2009 03:39 PM, Matthew Booth wrote:
The separate updates directory has been a pain for as long as I've been
using RHL/Fedora Core/Fedora. It means you have two places to look when
searching for packages manually, and twice as much to configure when
you're configuring yum. It has never
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 09:00:53AM -0600, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Matthew Booth wrote:
The separate updates directory has been a pain for as long as I've
been using RHL/Fedora Core/Fedora. It means you have two places to
look when searching for packages manually, and twice as much
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 02:39:30PM +, Matthew Booth wrote:
The separate updates directory has been a pain for as long as I've been
using RHL/Fedora Core/Fedora. It means you have two places to look when
searching for packages manually, and twice as much to configure when
you're
On 02/12/09 15:26, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 02:39:30PM +, Matthew Booth wrote:
The separate updates directory has been a pain for as long as I've been
using RHL/Fedora Core/Fedora. It means you have two places to look when
searching for packages manually, and twice as much
Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 09:00:53AM -0600, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Matthew Booth wrote:
The separate updates directory has been a pain for as long as I've
been using RHL/Fedora Core/Fedora. It means you have two places to
look when searching for packages manually
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 03:44:08PM +, Matthew Booth wrote:
On 02/12/09 15:26, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 02:39:30PM +, Matthew Booth wrote:
The separate updates directory has been a pain for as long as I've been
using RHL/Fedora Core/Fedora. It means you have two places
2009/12/2 Justin M. Forbes jmfor...@linuxtx.org
The only downside to merging updates into the main repository...
I would also assume that the repo data will need to be regenerated and often
be much larger than the one that is for the updates only repository, so
there will be acost to end users
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 10:01:51AM -0600, Justin M. Forbes wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 02:39:30PM +, Matthew Booth wrote:
The separate updates directory has been a pain for as long as I've been
using RHL/Fedora Core/Fedora. It means you have two places to look when
searching
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 11:09:41AM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Matthew Booth (mbo...@redhat.com) said:
The separate updates directory has been a pain for as long as I've
been using RHL/Fedora Core/Fedora. It means you have two places to
look when searching for packages manually
On Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:27:17 +0100
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 12/02/2009 05:09 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Matthew Booth (mbo...@redhat.com) said:
The separate updates directory has been a pain for as long as I've
been using RHL/Fedora Core/Fedora. It means you have two
Ralf Corsepius (rc040...@freenet.de) said:
Does the FSF/GPL demand to keep a repo around for ISOs?
A rolling Everything would not touch the ISOs. They would still be around.
The LiveCD/spins satisfy their source requirements via the source
repositories; they do not compose separate live source
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 11:28:24AM -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
The separate Everything tree that does not get obsoleted is required
in some form for GPL compliance, with respect to the ISO images that
we ship. Any new solution would have to preserve this.
Might there also be export
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 11:06:22AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
1) Composing a new everything tree for updates would lead to larger
compose times. That could possibly mean that getting updates out would
take 1 day per 'push'. We've been trying to improve updates push
times so it would be a bit
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 11:09:41AM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
we ship. Any new solution would have to preserve this.
Might there also be export compliance implications too?
A larger isssue is constantly having the repodata for the everything
On 12/02/2009 06:01 PM, Casey Dahlin wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 11:06:22AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
However, other than 'browsing manually for packages', I'm not really
sure what problem you are trying to solve by getting rid of the
updates repository. It would seem like this has quite
On 02/12/09 16:01, Justin M. Forbes wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 02:39:30PM +, Matthew Booth wrote:
The separate updates directory has been a pain for as long as I've been
using RHL/Fedora Core/Fedora. It means you have two places to look when
searching for packages manually, and twice
On 02/12/09 16:09, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Matthew Booth (mbo...@redhat.com) said:
The separate updates directory has been a pain for as long as I've
been using RHL/Fedora Core/Fedora. It means you have two places to
look when searching for packages manually, and twice as much to
configure when
Once upon a time, Matthew Booth mbo...@redhat.com said:
The separate updates directory has been a pain for as long as I've been
using RHL/Fedora Core/Fedora. It means you have two places to look when
searching for packages manually, and twice as much to configure when
you're configuring yum
of the kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org tree that
represent Fedora X, Fedora X + updates, Fedora X + testing, etc.
this is intriguing but expensive on kojipkgs.
-sv
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 15:52 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
Isn't this, eventually, what the packagedb is supposed to be able to
do?
I gather it's a ls in a directory kind of thing, not an interface to
one tool or another kind of thing. But I could be wrong.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a
Dne 2.12.2009 17:06, Josh Boyer napsal(a):
However, other than 'browsing manually for packages', I'm not really
sure what problem you are trying to solve by getting rid of the
updates repository. It would seem like this has quite a bit of cost
for relatively little to no real gain?
I am
(on my on tangent...)
On 12/02/2009 12:48 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
I hypothesize that we could place all rpms for a given release
in a single directory (seth will hate this as he wants to split them up
based on first letter of their name for better filesystem performance),
Ugh, first letter
On 12/02/2009 05:03 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 15:52 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
Isn't this, eventually, what the packagedb is supposed to be able to
do?
I gather it's a ls in a directory kind of thing, not an interface to
one tool or another kind of thing. But I could be
On 12/02/2009 03:53 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
3. replace static mirrors with proxy-ing of kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org
(make sure it works with web infrastructure instead of fighting it)
I don't think that would work fine with a lot of our mirrors.
I
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 02:03:51PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 15:52 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
Isn't this, eventually, what the packagedb is supposed to be able to
do?
I gather it's a ls in a directory kind of thing, not an interface to
one tool or another kind of
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 07:35:03PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
3. replace static mirrors with proxy-ing of kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org
(make sure it works with web infrastructure instead of fighting it)
Sorry, I don't understand this. Can you elaborate? That would help
me scope the impact to
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Peter Jones wrote:
(on my on tangent...)
On 12/02/2009 12:48 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
I hypothesize that we could place all rpms for a given release
in a single directory (seth will hate this as he wants to split them up
based on first letter of their name for better
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 11:09:41AM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
The separate Everything tree that does not get obsoleted is required
in some form for GPL compliance, with respect to the ISO images that
we ship. Any new solution would have to preserve this.
? We provide
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Peter Jones wrote:
On 12/02/2009 03:53 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
3. replace static mirrors with proxy-ing of kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org
(make sure it works with web infrastructure instead of fighting it)
I don't think that would
On 12/02/2009 05:58 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Peter Jones wrote:
On 12/02/2009 03:53 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
3. replace static mirrors with proxy-ing of kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org
(make sure it works with web infrastructure
On 12/02/2009 05:58 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Peter Jones wrote:
(on my on tangent...)
On 12/02/2009 12:48 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
I hypothesize that we could place all rpms for a given release
in a single directory (seth will hate this as he wants to split them up
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Peter Jones wrote:
On 12/02/2009 05:58 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Peter Jones wrote:
On 12/02/2009 03:53 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
3. replace static mirrors with proxy-ing of kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org
(make sure
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 17:46 -0500, Peter Jones wrote:
(on my on tangent...)
On 12/02/2009 12:48 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
I hypothesize that we could place all rpms for a given release
in a single directory (seth will hate this as he wants to split them up
based on first letter of their
On 12/02/2009 06:05 PM, James Antill wrote:
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 17:46 -0500, Peter Jones wrote:
so that every directory has about the same number of things.
This should be fairly easy to code, but has a big downside:
Packages will move directories.
1. This will upset yum
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 16:58 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 11:09:41AM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
The separate Everything tree that does not get obsoleted is required
in some form for GPL compliance, with respect to the ISO images that
we ship. Any new solution would
1 - 100 of 1458 matches
Mail list logo
