> From: Simon Wesp
> The problem is (for me) that it is definitly pornographic, because it
> helps you to get this stuff. You know that a instigator for a
> murder is
> guilty like the murderer himself! so this is for me forbidden and
> should not be allowed in fedora.
Say what? ::jaw drops
Tom Horsley wrote:
On Thu, 28 May 2009 12:52:23 +0200
Simon Wesp wrote:
The problem is (for me) that it is definitly pornographic, because it
helps you to get this stuff. You know that a instigator for a murder is
guilty like the murderer himself! so this is for me forbidden and
should not be a
Simon Wesp wrote:
This problem is like the duplicated zlib problematic for rsync and
zsync.
No, it isn't.
Is a modified zlib a duplicate of zlib? Or is it is own fork?
The latter.
Or whatever?
It's bad design. A package which hacks around into commonly accepted and
widely used system lib
> This package comes without pornographic content, but it help you to
> get this content.
So its no different to the origins of pan ;) which we do ship.
> The problem is (for me) that it is definitly pornographic, because it
> helps you to get this stuff. You know that a instigator for a murder i
Tom Horsley wrotes:
TH> Shouldn't you remove all bittorrent clients then :-).
mh I know my arumentation has a big gap :-)
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen aus dem schönen Hainzell
Simon Wesp
The G in GNU stands for GNU
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SimonWesp
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 28 May 2009 12:52:23 +0200
Simon Wesp wrote:
> The problem is (for me) that it is definitly pornographic, because it
> helps you to get this stuff. You know that a instigator for a murder is
> guilty like the murderer himself! so this is for me forbidden and
> should not be allowed in fedo
Jens Kaddelbach wrotes:
JK> sounds good! thank you. Can I have a link for that review?
mh, well
The problem is for me, that the guidelines says:
"Content must not be pornographic, or contain nudity, whether animated,
simulated, or photographed. There are better places on the Internet to
get
On 05/28/2009 04:09 PM, Jens Kaddelbach wrote:
> sounds good! thank you. Can I have a link for that review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013
Rahul
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines
sounds good! thank you. Can I have a link for that review?
2009/5/28 Simon Wesp
> Simon Wesp wrotes:
> SW> very interessting... I saw this 2 days ago on gnomefiles.org
> SW> There is a gap in the guidelines, for a case like that!
> SW> mh, I will take a look in it.
>
> @ Jens,
> I created a rev
Simon Wesp wrotes:
SW> very interessting... I saw this 2 days ago on gnomefiles.org
SW> There is a gap in the guidelines, for a case like that!
SW> mh, I will take a look in it.
@ Jens,
I created a review a few minutes ago. I don't know if it is allowed in
Fedora, because i didn't find a hint in
Another cool apüplication is:
gnaughty
http://sourceforge.net/projects/gnaughty
Gnaughty is an utility to automatically download adult sex content, i.e.
porn movies and pictures, from a known internet porn directory (
sublimedirectory.com). Providing a friendly interface, users who feel like
hav
On 05/28/2009 11:25 AM, net foss wrote:
> Ns is a discrete event simulator targeted at networking research.
Added to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_Survey_May_2009
Thanks.
Rahul
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinf
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Rahul Sundaram
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am doing a quick survey for software that you use on a regular basis
> that is not available via the Fedora repository. Software that you
> suggest should be free and open source, free of patent and other legal
> issues.
>
> Tell me
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 12:26 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/22/2009 05:57 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 16:31 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >> Tell me the home page of the software and give me a brief description
> >> on what it does.
> >
> > A couple of video tran
On 05/21/2009 12:53 PM, Giuseppe Fuggiano wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am doing a quick survey for software that you use on a regular basis
>> that is not available via the Fedora repository. Software that you
>> suggest should be free and open source, free of patent and other lega
One other program that I use regularly and install on everything is this:
http://gtapecalc.sourceforge.net/
http://www.mailinglistarchive.com/fedora-list@redhat.com/msg108188.html
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redh
On 05/22/2009 05:57 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 16:31 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> Tell me the home page of the software and give me a brief description
>> on what it does.
>
> A couple of video transcoder GUIs which look interesting. See
> http://lwn.net/SubscriberLi
Am Mittwoch, den 27.05.2009, 02:04 -0400 schrieb Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu:
> On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 19:57 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 16:31 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > > Tell me the home page of the software and give me a brief description
> > > on what it does.
> >
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 19:57 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 16:31 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > Tell me the home page of the software and give me a brief description
> > on what it does.
>
> A couple of video transcoder GUIs which look interesting. See
> http://lwn.net
On 05/26/2009 12:32 PM, charles zeitler wrote:
> ytree
>
>
>a curses based file manager,
>less overhead than gui types,
>and can be used when X is unavailable.
>
>GPL licensed at: http://www.han.de/~werner/ytree.html
>
> found, but haven't tried:
> ftp://rpmfind.net/linu
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 6:01 AM, Rahul Sundaram
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am doing a quick survey for software that you use on a regular basis
> that is not available via the Fedora repository.
> Rahul
>
> ytree
a curses based file manager,
less overhead than gui types,
and can be used when
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Joomla - a web content management system
http://www.joomla.org/
I haven't used it, just ran across it, but was surprised it was not in the repositories when I went to install it so I
could play around with it. It says it is open source, maybe there is some other reason
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Forgot this One:
Amaya W3C web Editor
http://osdir.com/ml/fedora-devel-list/2009-03/msg00016.html
Maybe releavnt:
http://osdir.com/ml/fedora-devel-list/2009-03/msg00016.html
Frank
--
msn: frankly3d skype: frankly3d
Mailing-List Reply to: Mailing-List
Still Learning, Unic
I thought I had posted this earlier, but while going through the
archives I realised it wasn't there. So here it goes again.
Suvayu Ali wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi,
I am doing a quick survey for software that you use on a regular basis
that is not available via the Fedora repository. Soft
On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 16:31 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Tell me the home page of the software and give me a brief description
> on what it does.
A couple of video transcoder GUIs which look interesting. See
http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/333904/1e8930cff396a065/ for an overview.
1) Arista: http
Quoting "David Burns" :
Just read about this in linux magazine and it sounds interesting.
Agedu makes a html report of the age of files in your filesystem.
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/agedu/
Done, review request at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502101
--
Jussi L
Just read about this in linux magazine and it sounds interesting.
Agedu makes a html report of the age of files in your filesystem.
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/agedu/
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Rahul Sundaram
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am doing a quick survey for software that you use on a regular basis
> that is not available via the Fedora repository. Software that you
> suggest should be free and open source, free of patent and other legal
> issues.
>
> Tell me
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi,
I am doing a quick survey for software that you use on a regular basis
that is not available via the Fedora repository. Software that you
suggest should be free and open source, free of patent and other legal
issues.
Tell me the home page of the software and give me a
Robin Laing wrote:
> kxstitch.
> http://kxstitch.sourceforge.net/
>
> I have been in contact with the author about updating the software but I
> cannot build it on F10. Not enough experience yet on my part.
Most likely you're just missing kdelibs3-devel.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-list ma
Mike Cloaked wrote:
Pim Zandbergen wrote:
Any CalDAV server.
This would be really nice to have available
Yes, CalDAV is getting hot.
Google and Yahoo do CalDAV.
The iPhone 3.0 OS will sync calendars over the air using CalDAV,
and the ZideOne connector looks promising for co
"Sharpe, Sam J" wrotes:
SS> "TorK is an Anonymity Manager. It helps you to manage and use the
SS> Tor network for anonymous internet activity and the mixminion
SS> network for anonymous email."
tork works with the mozilla addon torbutton (for thunderbird and
firefox) but the xpi-files are binarie
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 22:30:11 -0400,
max wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 08:26:31PM +0100, Sharpe, Sam J wrote:
> >
> > "TorK is an Anonymity Manager. It helps you to manage and use the Tor
> > network for anonymous internet activity and the mixminion network for
> > anonymous email."
> >
Rahul Sundaram wrotes:
RS> I am doing a quick survey for software that you use on a regular
RS> basis that is not available via the Fedora repository.
games
RS> Tell me the home page of the software and give me a brief
RS> description on what it does.
a)
Unknown Horizon
www.unknown-horizons.org
On 05/12/2009 11:05 PM, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak wrote:
> I would like to see moserial added.
>
> moserial is a clean, friendly gtk-based serial terminal for the gnome
> desktop. I use it daily for hardware hacking.
>
> http://live.gnome.org/moserial
> http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/moser
I would like to see moserial added.
moserial is a clean, friendly gtk-based serial terminal for the gnome
desktop. I use it daily for hardware hacking.
http://live.gnome.org/moserial
http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/moserial/2.26/
http://git.gnome.org/cgit/moserial
It is written in vala
On 05/12/2009 09:05 PM, Robin Laing wrote:
> Here is a product that is not maintained but the SVN has been updated
> multiple times to fix minor problems and add the number of phones
> supported but as the Fedora maintainer states, until an official release
> is out, forget it.
>
> https://bugzil
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi,
I am doing a quick survey for software that you use on a regular basis
that is not available via the Fedora repository. Software that you
suggest should be free and open source, free of patent and other legal
issues.
Tell me the home page of the software and give me a
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 08:26:31PM +0100, Sharpe, Sam J wrote:
> 2009/5/11 Rahul Sundaram :
> > On 05/11/2009 05:25 PM, Fennix wrote:
>
> >> I have been trying to find TorK which might be a usefull addition
> >
> > Homepage? What does it do?
>
> http://tork.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php
>
>
On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 16:31 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am doing a quick survey for software that you use on a regular basis
> that is not available via the Fedora repository. Software that you
> suggest should be free and open source, free of patent and other legal
> issues.
>
> Tel
On Tue, 12 May 2009 01:11:35 +0530
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > I said that: some software that needs it I'd rather not figure out
> > how to rebuild. (Yes, non-open source software - I'm doomed :-).
>
> Which ones? Please be specific. It is important to know the nature of
> the problem.
Well, th
On 05/12/2009 01:04 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Tue, 12 May 2009 00:19:13 +0530
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
>> It is not very useful to request a random old library without explaining
>> what benefit it provides.
>
> I said that: some software that needs it I'd rather not figure out
> how to rebuil
On Tue, 12 May 2009 00:19:13 +0530
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> It is not very useful to request a random old library without explaining
> what benefit it provides.
I said that: some software that needs it I'd rather not figure out
how to rebuild. (Yes, non-open source software - I'm doomed :-).
> I
2009/5/11 Rahul Sundaram :
> On 05/11/2009 05:25 PM, Fennix wrote:
>> I have been trying to find TorK which might be a usefull addition
>
> Homepage? What does it do?
http://tork.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php
"TorK is an Anonymity Manager. It helps you to manage and use the Tor
network for
On 05/11/2009 05:25 PM, Fennix wrote:
>
> Alien: Converts packages between various formats (rpm, deb, tgz, etc.).
> This already seems to have an associated review request:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456756
If it already has a review request, I don't need to int
On 05/11/2009 06:19 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> I just remembered another one: A compatibility rpm with the
> old libcap.so.1 library so some software I'd rather not have
> to rebuild can run (to invoke distro jealousy I'll mention
> that both ubuntu and suse still have libcap.so.1 in their
> repos :-
Tom Horsley пишет:
I just remembered another one: A compatibility rpm with the
old libcap.so.1 library so some software I'd rather not have
to rebuild can run (to invoke distro jealousy I'll mention
that both ubuntu and suse still have libcap.so.1 in their
repos :-).
No, i'm actually kinda s
I just remembered another one: A compatibility rpm with the
old libcap.so.1 library so some software I'd rather not have
to rebuild can run (to invoke distro jealousy I'll mention
that both ubuntu and suse still have libcap.so.1 in their
repos :-).
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.c
Siddhesh Poyarekar пишет:
On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 16:31 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
I am doing a quick survey for software that you use on a regular basis
that is not available via the Fedora repository. Software that you
suggest should be free and open source, free of patent and other legal
i
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 16:31 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > I am doing a quick survey for software that you use on a regular basis
> > that is not available via the Fedora repository. Software that you
> > suggest should be free and ope
On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 16:31 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> I am doing a quick survey for software that you use on a regular basis
> that is not available via the Fedora repository. Software that you
> suggest should be free and open source, free of patent and other legal
> issues.
>
> Tell me the
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:41 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> NiftyFedora Mitch wrote:
>>
>> Plugins for 64 bit Firefox are a tangle.
>> This is especially so if Opera and other
>> browsers are installed.
>> An 'alternates' solution for Firefox(32|64)
>> would be nice.
>> Not as nice as a Adobe moving to
Rahul Sundaram writes:
> I am doing a quick survey for software that you use on a regular basis
> that is not available via the Fedora repository. Software that you
> suggest should be free and open source, free of patent and other legal
> issues.
analog -- www logfile analyser and summary repor
NiftyFedora Mitch wrote:
Plugins for 64 bit Firefox are a tangle.
This is especially so if Opera and other
browsers are installed.
An 'alternates' solution for Firefox(32|64)
would be nice.
Not as nice as a Adobe moving to 64 bit..
but flash and friends are not the only plugins
in the world.
It
On 5/7/09, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am doing a quick survey for software that you use on a regular basis
> that is not available via the Fedora repository. Software that you
> suggest should be free and open source, free of patent and other legal
> issues.
>
Plugins for 64 bit Firefox a
Dave Feustel wrote:
> 64-bit Maxima is in the education and science repositories, but it does
> not install for me on Suse 11.0 because of dependency issues.
64-bit Maxima works just fine in Fedora, issues with other distros are off
topic here.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-list mailing list
f
On 05/08/2009 10:25 PM, Georgi Hristozov wrote:
>
> I didn't knew that policy, sorry then.
You weren't really expected to be aware of all the Fedora policies. I am
sure, I am not.
> I think the problem with omnibook is with the kernel, not Fedora. I
> don't know the kernel development process i
Hi,
Rahul Sundaram написа:
> On 05/07/2009 05:32 PM, Georgi Hristozov wrote:
>
>> It will be nice to see the omnibook module too (
>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/omke ). The project seems dead and the
>> only usable version is the SVN snapshot, but I think it will help the
>> notebook users w
On 05/08/2009 04:58 PM, Henry Ritzlmayr wrote:
> www.kdenlive.org
> free and open-source video editor for GNU/Linux and FreeBSD
Yes, It is going to RPM Fusion because it isn't acceptable for Fedora
due to the usual thorny multimedia related patent issues.
Rahul
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedo
Am Donnerstag, den 07.05.2009, 16:31 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
> Hi,
>
> I am doing a quick survey for software that you use on a regular basis
> that is not available via the Fedora repository. Software that you
> suggest should be free and open source, free of patent and other legal
> issues
t;
This would be really nice to have available
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/What-software-is-missing-in-the-Fedora-repository--tp23424358p23443877.html
Sent from the Fedora List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
On Friday 08 May 2009, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Gene Heskett
wrote:
>> Unforch Arther, it hasn't made a peep since. But I haven't hit the MSM
>> news sites yet either. Probably need to reboot just so things can find
>> each other again I suppose. Did you reboot
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Unforch Arther, it hasn't made a peep since. But I haven't hit the MSM news
> sites yet either. Probably need to reboot just so things can find each other
> again I suppose. Did you reboot?
I can't say that I remember, but that probably wo
On Thursday 07 May 2009, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Gene Heskett
wrote:
>> On Thursday 07 May 2009, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>>>On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 8:37 PM, Gene Heskett
>>
>> wrote:
On Thursday 07 May 2009, Rex Dieter wrote:
>Gene Heskett wrote:
>> W
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Thursday 07 May 2009, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>>On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 8:37 PM, Gene Heskett
> wrote:
>>> On Thursday 07 May 2009, Rex Dieter wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
> While not an answer, how about something that will let kde so
On Thursday 07 May 2009, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 8:37 PM, Gene Heskett
wrote:
>> On Thursday 07 May 2009, Rex Dieter wrote:
>>>Gene Heskett wrote:
While not an answer, how about something that will let kde sounds work
with fedora? Obviously and apparently pulse i
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 8:37 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Thursday 07 May 2009, Rex Dieter wrote:
>>Gene Heskett wrote:
>>> While not an answer, how about something that will let kde sounds work
>>> with fedora? Obviously and apparently pulse isn't it, probably for lack of
>>> configuration tools.
On Thursday 07 May 2009, Rex Dieter wrote:
>Gene Heskett wrote:
>> While not an answer, how about something that will let kde sounds work
>> with fedora? Obviously and apparently pulse isn't it, probably for lack of
>> configuration tools.
>
>That's either
>1. configuration issue
>2. audio driver
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 1:01 AM, Rahul Sundaram
wrote:
> I am doing a quick survey for software that you use on a regular basis
> that is not available via the Fedora repository. Software that you
> suggest should be free and open source, free of patent and other legal
> issues.
Tell me the home p
On 05/07/2009 05:30 PM, sankarshan wrote:
> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Rahul Sundaram
> wrote:
>
>> Tell me the home page of the software and give me a brief description on
>> what it does. Bonus points if you can see in Google for "software-name
>> fedora package review" to figure it if it
On 05/07/2009 06:31 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> While not an answer, how about something that will let kde sounds work with
> fedora? Obviously and apparently pulse isn't it, probably for lack of
> configuration tools.
I have no idea what the problem is but it is obviously completed
unrelated t
On 05/07/2009 07:12 PM, Tim wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 14:53 +0200, Axel wrote:
>> Homepage : http://www.kill-9.org/mbrowse/ (down at this moment)
>
> I notice that sort of thing with a lot of packages. You do a rpm -qi on
> them, and the package's homepage is dead, or links to a wrong page o
On Thu, 07 May 2009 08:17:31 -0700, Francis wrote:
> > It doesn't engender much confidence in using some software
> > if its website is dead, or hasn't been updated in five years.
>
> There are actually rules that don't permit such software to remain in
> Fedora,
Really? Rules actually? Or just
Tim:
>> It doesn't engender much confidence in using some software
>> if its website is dead, or hasn't been updated in five years.
Francis Earl:
> There are actually rules that don't permit such software to remain in
> Fedora, so file bugs when you come across something that hasn't been
> touched
Gene Heskett wrote:
> While not an answer, how about something that will let kde sounds work
> with fedora? Obviously and apparently pulse isn't it, probably for lack of
> configuration tools.
That's either
1. configuration issue
2. audio driver support/bug
3. pulseaudio bug
none of which i
> It doesn't engender much confidence in using some software
> if its website is dead, or hasn't been updated in five years.
There are actually rules that don't permit such software to remain in
Fedora, so file bugs when you come across something that hasn't been
touched in such a long period. I a
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi,
I am doing a quick survey for software that you use on a regular basis
that is not available via the Fedora repository.
Any CalDAV server.
Not using one now, but I would like to.
Preferably Apple's Calender Server which has been ported to Debian
http://calendarserver
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi,
I am doing a quick survey for software that you use on a regular basis
that is not available via the Fedora repository.
chan-capi (http://www.chan-capi.org)
chan-capi allows the Asterisk open source PBX, which is already part of
Fedora
to use ISDN cards using the CA
> that is not available via the Fedora repository. Software that you
> suggest should be free and open source, free of patent and other legal
> issues.
JMRI is the obvious one now we have openjdk. However JMRI relies upon the
java async communications interfaces which openjdk currently appears to
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am doing a quick survey for software that you use on a regular basis
> that is not available via the Fedora repository. Software that you
> suggest should be free and open source, free of patent and other legal
> issues.
>
> Tell me the home page of the software an
On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 14:53 +0200, Axel wrote:
> Homepage : http://www.kill-9.org/mbrowse/ (down at this moment)
I notice that sort of thing with a lot of packages. You do a rpm -qi on
them, and the package's homepage is dead, or links to a wrong page on
their site. It doesn't engender much conf
On Thursday 07 May 2009, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I am doing a quick survey for software that you use on a regular basis
>that is not available via the Fedora repository. Software that you
>suggest should be free and open source, free of patent and other legal
>issues.
>
>Tell me the home page
Le 07/05/2009 13:01, Rahul Sundaram a écrit :
Hi,
I am doing a quick survey for software that you use on a regular basis
that is not available via the Fedora repository. Software that you
suggest should be free and open source, free of patent and other legal
issues.
Tell me the home page of the
On 05/07/2009 05:32 PM, Georgi Hristozov wrote:
>
> It will be nice to see the omnibook module too (
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/omke ). The project seems dead and the
> only usable version is the SVN snapshot, but I think it will help the
> notebook users who can't compile the module thems
Hi,
Rahul Sundaram написа:
> Hi,
>
> I am doing a quick survey for software that you use on a regular basis
> that is not available via the Fedora repository. Software that you
> suggest should be free and open source, free of patent and other legal
> issues.
>
> Tell me the home page of the sof
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Rahul Sundaram
wrote:
> Tell me the home page of the software and give me a brief description on
> what it does. Bonus points if you can see in Google for "software-name
> fedora package review" to figure it if it is already in the Fedora
> package review queue. I
On Thu, 07 May 2009 16:31:55 +0530
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> I am doing a quick survey for software that you use on a regular basis
> that is not available via the Fedora repository.
I use "remind" as a substitute for evolution's appointment mechanism
since I gave up on evolution ever working relia
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 04:31:55PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am doing a quick survey for software that you use on a regular basis
> that is not available via the Fedora repository. Software that you
> suggest should be free and open source, free of patent and other legal
> issues.
>
On 07/05/09 12:01, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi,
I am doing a quick survey for software that you use on a regular basis
that is not available via the Fedora repository. Software that you
suggest should be free and open source, free of patent and other legal
issues.
Tell me the home page of the soft
Hi,
I am doing a quick survey for software that you use on a regular basis
that is not available via the Fedora repository. Software that you
suggest should be free and open source, free of patent and other legal
issues.
Tell me the home page of the software and give me a brief description on
wha
90 matches
Mail list logo
