On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 5:27 AM, Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can deterministically reproduce this breakdown. Shall I video tape it,
> if you don't want to believe me?
I have a rawhide laptop going here... got the error dialog referred to
in the bug...exactly once.
if I use add/r
Michael H. Warfield wrote:
I probably should stay out of this... But...
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 11:17 -0800, Alex Makhlin wrote:
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Armin Moradi wrote:
Is this turning into a religious war?
Nope - just trying to point out that there is
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Jerry Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/04/2008 02:56 PM, Dave Ihnat wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 12:31:51PM -0700, Craig White wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> because...
>>>
>>>
>>
>> And:
>>
>> 4. The Ubuntu life cycle is much longer than Fedora, making it mo
On 11/04/2008 02:56 PM, Dave Ihnat wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 12:31:51PM -0700, Craig White wrote:
because...
And:
4. The Ubuntu life cycle is much longer than Fedora, making it more
stable for production environments.
I don't particularly buy that argument. If you ar
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 12:31:51PM -0700, Craig White wrote:
> because...
>
And:
4. The Ubuntu life cycle is much longer than Fedora, making it more
stable for production environments.
--
Dave Ihnat
President, DMINET Consulting, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
fedora
I probably should stay out of this... But...
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 11:17 -0800, Alex Makhlin wrote:
> Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
> > Armin Moradi wrote:
> >
> > > Is this turning into a religious war?
> > >
> > >
> > Nope - just trying to point out that there is no correct answer to
> >
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 11:17 -0800, Alex Makhlin wrote:
> Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
> > Armin Moradi wrote:
> >
> > > Is this turning into a religious war?
> > >
> > >
> > Nope - just trying to point out that there is no correct answer to
> > the OPs question. It depends on too many facto
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Armin Moradi wrote:
Is this turning into a religious war?
Nope - just trying to point out that there is no correct answer to
the OPs question. It depends on too many factors for the answer to
be the same in all situations. The OP has not given us enough
infor
Armin Moradi wrote:
>
>
> Is this turning into a religious war?
>
Nope - just trying to point out that there is no correct answer to
the OPs question. It depends on too many factors for the answer to
be the same in all situations. The OP has not given us enough
information to even take a guess o
infact on my computer none of them provide best linux environment i
downloaded fedora 9 burned iso image to cd, cd boots perfectly but hangs in
middle way in case of ubuntu i got free media from canonical ,i installed it
easily but there is sound problem which has not been solved yet from past
six
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Mikkel L. Ellertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Alex Makhlin wrote:
> > Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
> >> Alex Makhlin wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> Which one do you think is better and for what reasons. Ubuntu or Fedora
> >>> 9. Personally I like Fedora 9.
Alex Makhlin wrote:
> Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
>> Alex Makhlin wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Which one do you think is better and for what reasons. Ubuntu or Fedora
>>> 9. Personally I like Fedora 9.
>>>
>>>
>> Better for what? It is a matter of using the correct tool for the job.
>>
>> Mi
On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 11:48 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Antonio Olivares wrote:
> >
> Which one do you think is better and for what
> >> reasons. Ubuntu or Fedora
> 9. Personally I like Fedora 9.
>
>
> >>> Better for what? It is a matter of using the correct
> >> tool fo
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 12:21:04 -0600,
Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
work as a business. The Delorian is best known as the car in the "Back
to the Future"movies.
Perhaps, but their owner's creative ideas in financing also got them a lot
of noteriety at the
On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 12:21:04 -0600,
Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> work as a business. The Delorian is best known as the car in the "Back
> to the Future"movies.
Perhaps, but their owner's creative ideas in financing also got them a lot
of noteriety at the time. That wouldn't ge
On Sunday 02 November 2008 01:21:04 pm Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>>> really big snip
>
> The Ford Edsel model might be a good match to what fedora does. Have
> you heard of that one? It stuck all the new technology available in
> 1957 into one car. Engineering-wise it was not bad at all, but it was
On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 12:21 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> The Delorian is best known as the car in the "Back
> to the Future"movies.
Ah, you mean the DeLorean (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delorean)
poc
PS They used to make them a few miles from my parent's house in Belfast,
till they went bankr
On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 11:48 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> While having choices is nice, if you are going to make the inevitable
> internet car analogy, if one of the companies (Linux distros in general)
> only has about 1% of the total market to begin with, would you still
> think it was a go
--- On Sun, 11/2/08, Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Which one is better Ubuntu Or Fedora 9
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora."
>
&g
Antonio Olivares wrote:
Which is better Ford or Chevy? Wait there's also
Dodge, Toyota, ..., great to have choices. Linux is like
this also. I happen to agree with Mikkel on this one :)
While having choices is nice, if you are going to make the
inevitable internet car analogy, if one of th
> > The job is sir to have the best Linux environment. So
> which is better, Fedora OR Ubuntu?
>
> From a 'use' perspective you end up with pretty
> much the same applications with just some slight version
> differences that leapfrog each other based on the respective
> release dates.
>
> The dif
Alex Makhlin wrote:
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Alex Makhlin wrote:
Hi all,
Which one do you think is better and for what reasons. Ubuntu or Fedora
9. Personally I like Fedora 9.
Better for what? It is a matter of using the correct tool for the job.
Mikkel
The job is sir to have th
> >> The job is sir to have the best Linux environment.
> So which
> >> is better, Fedora OR Ubuntu?
> >>
> >> --
> >
> > Great Question :)
> > Sorry to nose in on this question. But how about
> BOTH!
> > Fedora for getting in recent/latest packages ie.
> kernel, gcc, glibc, ..., etc.
> > Ubunt
Antonio Olivares wrote:
Which one do you think is better and for what
reasons. Ubuntu or Fedora
9. Personally I like Fedora 9.
Better for what? It is a matter of using the correct
tool for the job.
Mikkel
The job is sir to have the best Linux environment. So which
is better,
Fed
--- On Sun, 11/2/08, Alex Makhlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Alex Makhlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Which one is better Ubuntu Or Fedora 9
> To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora."
>
> Date: Sunday,
Alex Makhlin wrote:
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Alex Makhlin wrote:
Hi all,
Which one do you think is better and for what reasons. Ubuntu or Fedora
9. Personally I like Fedora 9.
Better for what? It is a matter of using the correct tool for the job.
Mikkel
The job is sir to have
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Alex Makhlin wrote:
Hi all,
Which one do you think is better and for what reasons. Ubuntu or Fedora
9. Personally I like Fedora 9.
Better for what? It is a matter of using the correct tool for the job.
Mikkel
The job is sir to have the best Linux environ
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Dave Ihnat wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:28:22AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> However, there are conceptual differences in system administration so
>>> it is somewhat painful to jump back and forth between ubuntu and an
>>> RPM based system with redhat-style configu
Tom Horsley wrote:
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:14:51 -0500
"Arthur Pemberton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Package kit is being adopted across all major distros.
You mean it is being ported across all major distros,
not the same as being adopted :-).
There is no porting per say of PackageKit at al
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Aldo Foot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Arthur Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Aldo Foot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:14:51 -0500
"Arthur Pemberton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package kit is being adopted across all major distros.
You mean it is being ported across all major distros,
not the same as being adopted :-).
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: h
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:28:22 -0500
Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, there are conceptual differences in system administration so it
> is somewhat painful to jump back and forth between ubuntu and an RPM
> based system with redhat-style configuration frequently.
Yea, at work we
Tom Horsley wrote:
However, the synaptic GUI (at least on modern ubuntu systems) is
the only package management GUI that ever just made sense to me
out of the box with no learning curve, and it does stuff no other
gui seems to do, like downloading more than one package at a time
This depends o
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:18:40 +
"Marcelo M. Garcia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have you tried yumex? I think it's pretty nice. I prefer "yum" than
> apt-get, apt-cache, dpkg, etc.
Yep, in fact I use yumex in preference to the packagekit gui when
I need to search for stuff and want to do a r
Arthur Pemberton wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:45:18 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex Makhlin) wrote:
Hi all,
Which one do you think is better and for what reasons. Ubuntu or
Fedora 9. Personally I like Fedora 9.
Arthur Pemberton wrote:
Overall the big win with ubuntu is that they've managed to get most of the
packages you are likely to ever want into a set of pre-configured
repositories that are generally consistent with each other. With RPM based
systems you'll end up having to track down an assortme
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Arthur Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> And also has nothing to do with RPM itself.
>>
>> Ultimately not. RPM is just a tool that goes out to get packages from
>> a predefined
>> location. Whether it finds or not what is looking for... that's another
>> st
--- On Thu, 10/30/08, Arthur Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Arthur Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Which one is better Ubuntu Or Fedora 9
> To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora."
>
> Date: Thu
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Aldo Foot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Arthur Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Aldo Foot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Arthur Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Aldo Foot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Overall the big win with ubuntu is that they've managed to get most
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Aldo Foot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Overall the big win with ubuntu is that they've managed to get most of the
>> packages you are likely to ever want into a set of pre-configured
>> rep
Dave Ihnat wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:02:46AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Sure, but there were reasons that SysV, AIX, Solaris, HPUX etc. didn't
share the best way do everything. Among opensource builds of
essentially the same upstream packages there's less excuse to maintain
intenti
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Overall the big win with ubuntu is that they've managed to get most of the
> packages you are likely to ever want into a set of pre-configured
> repositories that are generally consistent with each other. With RPM based
> s
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 10:20 -0500, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:45:18 -0700
>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex Makhlin) wrote:
>
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:02:46AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Sure, but there were reasons that SysV, AIX, Solaris, HPUX etc. didn't
> share the best way do everything. Among opensource builds of
> essentially the same upstream packages there's less excuse to maintain
> intentional differe
Dave Ihnat wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:28:22AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
However, there are conceptual differences in system administration so it
is somewhat painful to jump back and forth between ubuntu and an RPM
based system with redhat-style configuration frequently.
True; but if
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:28:22AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> However, there are conceptual differences in system administration so it
> is somewhat painful to jump back and forth between ubuntu and an RPM
> based system with redhat-style configuration frequently.
True; but if you've lived i
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 10:20 -0500, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:45:18 -0700
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex Makhlin) wrote:
> > Both distros have live media. Why don't you download them and try out
> > eac
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Tom Horsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:24:16 -0600
> Petrus de Calguarium <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> and they lack the sophistication of rpm and yum, having to make due with the
>> deficient and awkward apt system
>
> Huh? Synaptic is
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:07:18AM -0400, Mark Haney wrote:
> I have to completely disagree with that. (At least the last part) I have
> a fairly large network (20+ systems, some SGI clusters) and I must say I
> have more trouble out of my Debian systems (put in before my time) than
> any oth
Mark Haney wrote:
vince wrote:
I agree with you, however, would also like to point out that personally
I think Ubuntu is a compromise between RHE and Fedora. For a stable and
safe business environment I would rather use Debian instead of Ubuntu.
Regards
vince
I have to completely disagree
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:45:18 -0700
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex Makhlin) wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Which one do you think is better and for what reasons. Ubuntu or
>> Fedora 9. Personally I like Fedora 9.
>
> I'll tell you the
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:45:18 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex Makhlin) wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Which one do you think is better and for what reasons. Ubuntu or
> Fedora 9. Personally I like Fedora 9.
I'll tell you the same thing here that I tell folks in the #fedora IRC
channel:
Both distros have liv
Mark Haney ha scritto:
I have to completely disagree with that. (At least the last part) I have
a fairly large network (20+ systems, some SGI clusters) and I must say I
have more trouble out of my Debian systems (put in before my time) than
any other system I run. And we run everything from RH
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 19:47 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
>> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 18:33 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>>
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 05:43 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 19:47 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 18:33 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 05:43 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> I would like bugzilla.redhat.com to know what is consider de
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 18:33 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 05:43 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
I would like bugzilla.redhat.com to know what is consider deficient in
the latest packagekit.
In current Fedora 9.92/rawhide, it's comp
vince wrote:
I agree with you, however, would also like to point out that personally
I think Ubuntu is a compromise between RHE and Fedora. For a stable and
safe business environment I would rather use Debian instead of Ubuntu.
Regards
vince
I have to completely disagree with that. (At lea
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 18:33 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 05:43 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >> I would like bugzilla.redhat.com to know what is consider deficient in
> >> the latest packagekit.
> >
> > In current Fedora 9.92/rawhide, it's comple
Il giorno gio, 30/10/2008 alle 07.55 -0500, Dave Ihnat ha scritto:
> It's not so much a matter of "better" in an absolute sense, as what's
> necessary to manage a system and/or network in a production environment.
>
> Fedora is bleeding-edge, and volatile. It's expected to be; this is
> where th
Tom Horsley wrote:
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:24:16 -0600
Petrus de Calguarium <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
and they lack the sophistication of rpm and yum, having to make due with the
deficient and awkward apt system
Huh? Synaptic is the one reason I might consider switching to ubuntu.
You want t
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 05:43 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
I would like bugzilla.redhat.com to know what is consider deficient in
the latest packagekit.
In current Fedora 9.92/rawhide, it's completely busted:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467976
Discussion w
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 08:34:38PM -0600, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> I have never had rpm, yum or PackageKit crash on me, but that is a
> signature trait of Synaptic.
With all respect, that's not universal. I've had absolute reliable
Synaptic/apt/dpkg performance on four Ubuntu systems--one se
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 04:10:31PM -0700, Alex Makhlin wrote:
> They are both different in many ways. I don't wish to take much time of
> this forum to answer this question. Ubuntu seems to be the main choice
> of major computer companies but why? What is so far better in Ubuntu
> then Fedor
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 05:43 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> I would like bugzilla.redhat.com to know what is consider deficient in
> the latest packagekit.
In current Fedora 9.92/rawhide, it's completely busted:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467976
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedo
Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> Can't you still just:
> apt-get update
> apt-get upgrade
> in a terminal window and save the GUIness for when you want to pick a
> new package or two?
>
I have finally learned that with sidux. And that method has never crashed on me.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-l
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 21:54:31 -0500
Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> > Tom Horsley wrote:
> >
> >> Huh? Synaptic is the one reason I might consider switching to
> >> ubuntu. You want to talk deficient and awkward, compare packagekit
> >> to synaptic and decid
Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
Tom Horsley wrote:
Huh? Synaptic is the one reason I might consider switching to ubuntu.
You want to talk deficient and awkward, compare packagekit to synaptic
and decide which is deficient.
I have never had rpm, yum or PackageKit crash on me, but that is a signatu
Tom Horsley wrote:
> Huh? Synaptic is the one reason I might consider switching to ubuntu.
> You want to talk deficient and awkward, compare packagekit to synaptic
> and decide which is deficient.
>
I have never had rpm, yum or PackageKit crash on me, but that is a signature
trait of Synaptic. I
David Hláčik wrote:
Are you referring to some of the freetype font hinting which is patent
encumbered? If so, a rpmfusion package is available for that. Ubuntu hasn't
done any specific patching in that area afaik.
Well that is not true , they patched cairo , freetype, libXft with
patented bytec
> Are you referring to some of the freetype font hinting which is patent
> encumbered? If so, a rpmfusion package is available for that. Ubuntu hasn't
> done any specific patching in that area afaik.
>
Well that is not true , they patched cairo , freetype, libXft with
patented bytecode hinting , pl
David Hláčik wrote:
Well, one of the reasons could be better font rendering in Ubuntu , but
there are patched rpm with ubuntu rendering available for Fedora.
Are you referring to some of the freetype font hinting which is patent
encumbered? If so, a rpmfusion package is available for that. Ub
>
> I would like bugzilla.redhat.com to know what is consider deficient in the
> latest packagekit. You probably mean gpk-application, the GNOME frontend to
> packagekit since packagekit is just a library and not directly comparable to
> synaptic.
>
> Moreover, apt-rpm and synaptic are already avai
Tom Horsley wrote:
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:24:16 -0600
Petrus de Calguarium <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
and they lack the sophistication of rpm and yum, having to make due with the
deficient and awkward apt system
Huh? Synaptic is the one reason I might consider switching to ubuntu.
You want t
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Alex Makhlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Which one do you think is better and for what reasons. Ubuntu or Fedora 9.
> Personally I like Fedora 9.
None is better than the other.
The notion is that *buntu is easier to setup and maintain..
The question h
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:24:16 -0600
Petrus de Calguarium <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and they lack the sophistication of rpm and yum, having to make due with the
> deficient and awkward apt system
Huh? Synaptic is the one reason I might consider switching to ubuntu.
You want to talk deficient an
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:24:16 -0600
Petrus de Calguarium <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alex Makhlin wrote:
>
> > Which one do you think is better and for what reasons. Ubuntu or
> > Fedora 9. Personally I like Fedora 9.
> >
> In my personal experience, the 'buntus are not as mature as Fedora
> (do
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 15:45 -0700, Alex Makhlin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Which one do you think is better and for what reasons. Ubuntu or Fedora
> 9. Personally I like Fedora 9.
I'm sure we all prefer Ubuntu, that's why we hang out on the Fedora
list.
I think you need to rephrase the question. What
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Alex Makhlin wrote:
Hi all,
Which one do you think is better and for what reasons. Ubuntu or Fedora
9. Personally I like Fedora 9.
Better for what? It is a matter of using the correct tool for the job.
Mikkel
They are both different in many ways. I don't
Alex Makhlin wrote:
> Which one do you think is better and for what reasons. Ubuntu or Fedora
> 9. Personally I like Fedora 9.
>
In my personal experience, the 'buntus are not as mature as Fedora (don't have
the professional backing of Red Hat); servers are painfully slow, so net
installation a
Alex Makhlin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Which one do you think is better and for what reasons. Ubuntu or Fedora
> 9. Personally I like Fedora 9.
>
Better for what? It is a matter of using the correct tool for the job.
Mikkel
--
Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
for thou art crunchy and tast
Hi all,
Which one do you think is better and for what reasons. Ubuntu or Fedora
9. Personally I like Fedora 9.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingLis
82 matches
Mail list logo
