2008/12/12 Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at:
Jeff Spaleta wrote:
That's a question I don't have an answer for. Epoch could have been
bumped to handle the version downgrade for a reversion. I think this
was the first mention of reverting the dbus update that I have seen in
discussion.
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Joshua C. joshua...@googlemail.com wrote:
Does the maintainer read this list? He still works on it (in koji)
but it seams he doesn't know that the user are using his broken
update
He's aware.. he's apologized publicly in the -devel-list.
-jef
--
fedora-list
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Joshua C. joshua...@googlemail.com wrote:
Does the maintainer read this list? He still works on it (in
koji) but it seams he doesn't know that the user are using his
broken update
He's aware.. he's apologized
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Joshua C. joshua...@googlemail.com wrote:
Does the maintainer read this list? He still works on it (in
koji) but it seams he doesn't know that the user are using his
broken update
He's aware..
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Robert P. J. Day
rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Joshua C. joshua...@googlemail.com wrote:
Does the maintainer read this list? He still works on it (in
koji) but it seams he doesn't
Arthur Pemberton wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Robert P. J. Day
rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Joshua C. joshua...@googlemail.com wrote:
Does the maintainer read this list? He still works on it
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Alex Makhlin makhl...@gmail.com wrote:
Arthur Pemberton wrote:
[ snip ]
I have to admit, not having to do weekly virus+spyware+defrag+updates
does get one lazy.
Excuse me? YUM is completely broken! What the #$@$ am I supposed to do now
but wait? Until
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:53:59 -0800, Alex wrote:
Excuse me? YUM is completely broken!
How?
What the #$@$ am I supposed to do now but wait?
Until January?
Wait for what?
This is a period of time when most
companies have a code freeze.
Fedora is not a company.
I will be amazed if
2008/12/12 Jeff Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Joshua C. joshua...@googlemail.com wrote:
Does the maintainer read this list? He still works on it (in koji)
but it seams he doesn't know that the user are using his broken
update
He's aware.. he's apologized
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
What or who is ReadHat?
Perhaps you mean Red Hat? I'm not sure, because that has been pointed out
to you before.
It seems there is such a thing as write-only email...
poc
--
fedora-list mailing list
ohhh gawwd...
indeed, a disappointment to see this sort of thing; not the reassuring
premier, membership e-mail to receive, eh? ... for such a /mature/
project as Fedora? (albeit, i do have a knack for /timing/, so to
speak. No doubt, however, Time will tell-- also /so to speak/.)
ach!
oh well.
On Friday 12 December 2008, Les Mikesell wrote:
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Joshua C. joshua...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Does the maintainer read this list? He still works on it (in
koji) but it seams he doesn't know that the
Where was this discussed? Where was this tested? Why wasn't the change
*REVERTED* immediately?
System security? This is local access only. dbus has been open for
years. A dbus package with the change REVERTED should had been released
instead of having to wait weeks for fixed packages. System
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote:
Where was this discussed? Where was this tested?
The maintainer responsible for the push already apologized publicly
for pushing to stable:
http://cgwalters.livejournal.com/22189.html
Original Message
Subject: Re: Why was this dbus disaster released mid-release?
From: Jeff Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.
fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: 12/11/2008 12:42 PM
http://cgwalters.livejournal.com/22189
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote:
Thanks for pointing out those posts. The fedora-devel thread was quite long
and I stopped following it. I assume most other users are in the dark as
well and I wanted to start a thread on it. Instead of having a
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:42:45 -0900
Jeff Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com wrote:
Pushing to stable was not intended and was done by
mistake. Shall I have him brought to the Board Room and
flogged for his incompetence? Mistakes happen. I very
much expect Colin will be making a personal extra effort
Original Message
Subject: Re: Why was this dbus disaster released mid-release?
From: Jeff Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.
fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: 12/11/2008 01:03 PM
Dbus hasn't been the only package
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote:
The dbus security policy change was the heart of the issue.
Its the issue that got noticed by a significant number of users.
Anyone who watches the broken dep reports which are generated for
package maintainers knows
Original Message
Subject: Re: Why was this dbus disaster released mid-release?
From: Jeff Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.
fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: 12/11/2008 03:36 PM
Honestly I'm having a hard time even
Jeff Spaleta wrote:
That's a question I don't have an answer for. Epoch could have been
bumped to handle the version downgrade for a reversion. I think this
was the first mention of reverting the dbus update that I have seen in
discussion.
Actually I already suggested it. It could have been
21 matches
Mail list logo
