--- On Thu, 10/1/09, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> From: Michael Schwendt
> Subject: Re: fribidi error with abiword on F11
> To: fedora-list@redhat.com
> Date: Thursday, October 1, 2009, 2:35 AM
> On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:47:43 -0700
> (PDT), Globe wrote:
>
> > >
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:47:43 -0700 (PDT), Globe wrote:
> > /usr/local/lib/libfribidi.so.0 (0x00502000)
> > > undefined symbol: fribidi_get_type
> $ echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH
> /usr/local/lib
>
>
> Clearly some setting somewhere which got set: wonder where.It happened after
> a installing the p
2009/9/30 Globe Trotter :
>> From: Sharpe, Sam J
>> M that's interesting. As root it's resolving to a
>> library in
>> /usr/lib but as the user it's resolving to a library in
>> /usr/local/lib
>> (why do you have fribidi libraries in /usr/local/lib?)
>>
>> What's the output of this command
--- On Wed, 9/30/09, Sharpe, Sam J wrote:
> From: Sharpe, Sam J
> Subject: Re: fribidi error with abiword on F11
> To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora."
>
> Date: Wednesday, September 30, 2009, 2:56 PM
> 2009/9/30 Globe Trott
2009/9/30 Globe Trotter :
>> 2) Can you show that the libfribidi.so.0 library is found
>> and
>> linked with /usr/lib/libabiword-2.6.so?
>> Run: ldd -r /usr/lib/libabiword-2.6.so|grep frib
>
> ldd -r /usr/lib/libabiword-2.6.so|grep frib
> libfribidi.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libfribidi.so.0 (0
Hi,
Thanks very much for your detailed help and instructions!!
> $ repoquery --whatprovides libfribidi.so.0
> fribidi-0:0.19.2-1.fc11.i586
# repoquery --whatprovides libfribidi.so.0
fribidi-0:0.19.2-1.fc11.i586
>
> $ rpm --query --provides fribidi|grep so
> libfribidi.so.0
# rpm --query
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:49:59 -0700 (PDT), Globe wrote:
>
> >
> > > > fribidi-0.19.2-1.fc11
> > > > contains libfribidi.so.0 with the symbol
> you
> > refer to.
> >
> > > Clearly this is installed. But yum provides
> > */libfribidi0*
> >
> > libfribidi.so.0 == libfribidi0*
> >
> >
>
> > > fribidi-0.19.2-1.fc11
> > > contains libfribidi.so.0 with the symbol
you
> refer to.
>
> > Clearly this is installed. But yum provides
> */libfribidi0*
>
> libfribidi.so.0 == libfribidi0*
>
> Since when?
>
But that was my point! The responder indicated it was. So,
ho
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:53:08 -0700 (PDT)
Globe Trotter wrote:
> > fribidi-0.19.2-1.fc11
> > contains libfribidi.so.0 with the symbol you refer to.
> Clearly this is installed. But yum provides */libfribidi0*
libfribidi.so.0 == libfribidi0*
Since when?
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ ht
--- On Tue, 9/29/09, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> From: Michael Schwendt
> Subject: Re: fribidi error with abiword on F11
> To: fedora-list@redhat.com
> Date: Tuesday, September 29, 2009, 5:15 AM
> On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:54:32 -0700
> (PDT), Globe wrote:
>
> > Hi,
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:54:32 -0700 (PDT), Globe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been having the following error when I use abiword on a Word .doc on
> F11. Specifically, I get the following:
>
> abiword: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libabiword-2.6.so: undefined symbol:
> fribidi_get_type
>
> Looking
Hi,
I have been having the following error when I use abiword on a Word .doc on
F11. Specifically, I get the following:
abiword: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libabiword-2.6.so: undefined symbol:
fribidi_get_type
Looking around the web, it appears that I am missing libfribidi0. But this is
no
12 matches
Mail list logo
