Hi all,
I created a kernel module which can be passed some command line arguments
(I tried that with insmod and it works).
Now I would like, when I start the kernel with grub, to have this module
loaded at boot time so I can pass, at boot time, a kernel boot option to it.
I mean having
2010/1/9 Luca lucar...@gmail.com:
Hi all,
I created a kernel module which can be passed some command line arguments
(I tried that with insmod and it works).
Now I would like, when I start the kernel with grub, to have this module
loaded at boot time so I can pass, at boot time, a kernel
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 09:23 +1100, Chris Smart wrote:
2010/1/6 Linuxguy123 linuxguy...@gmail.com:
Is anyone else experiencing a problem booting ? Does this sound like a
kernel problem or is my hard drive failing ?
If your drive and BIOS supports S.M.A.R.T, then gnome-disk-utility
On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 08:35:43 -0700, Linuxguy123 wrote:
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 09:23 +1100, Chris Smart wrote:
2010/1/6 Linuxguy123 linuxguy...@gmail.com:
Is anyone else experiencing a problem booting ? Does this sound like a
kernel problem or is my hard drive failing ?
If your
Around 03:35pm on Wednesday, January 06, 2010 (UK time), Linuxguy123 scrawled:
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 09:23 +1100, Chris Smart wrote:
2010/1/6 Linuxguy123 linuxguy...@gmail.com:
Is anyone else experiencing a problem booting ? Does this sound like a
kernel problem or is my hard drive
a
kernel problem or is my hard drive failing ?
If your drive and BIOS supports S.M.A.R.T, then gnome-disk-utility
(palimpsest) will tell you the status of your drive..
I can't seem to find this utility in Fedora. Can someone verify its
spelling/existence ?
You can, too
On 01/06/2010 10:35 AM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 09:23 +1100, Chris Smart wrote:
2010/1/6 Linuxguy123 linuxguy...@gmail.com:
Is anyone else experiencing a problem booting ? Does this sound like a
kernel problem or is my hard drive failing ?
If your drive and BIOS supports
If I power down my laptop via the usual KStart-Shutdown means, it can
take up to 4 restart attempts before it fully boots.
That sounds like wonky hardware
It has no problem launching grub and the kernel selection screen. That
it does reliably every time. After that, there are issues
2010/1/6 Linuxguy123 linuxguy...@gmail.com:
If I power down my laptop via the usual KStart-Shutdown means, it can
take up to 4 restart attempts before it fully boots.
It has no problem launching grub and the kernel selection screen. That
it does reliably every time. After
If I power down my laptop via the usual KStart-Shutdown means, it can
take up to 4 restart attempts before it fully boots.
It has no problem launching grub and the kernel selection screen. That
it does reliably every time. After that, there are issues.
Twice I will get a back screen
2010/1/6 Linuxguy123 linuxguy...@gmail.com:
Is anyone else experiencing a problem booting ? Does this sound like a
kernel problem or is my hard drive failing ?
If your drive and BIOS supports S.M.A.R.T, then gnome-disk-utility
(palimpsest) will tell you the status of your drive..
-c
Is anyone else experiencing a problem booting ? Does this sound like a
kernel problem or is my hard drive failing ?
From the error message, possibly there is a problem with your SATA
controller, or with your SATA cables.
SATA cables are pretty cheap. Get some new ones and replace them all
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 03:47:19PM +, David Woodhouse wrote:
Obviously that doesn't count for the nVidia binary module, which doesn't
exist for ppc64. And nouveau is relatively new and not currently being
used in Fedora/PPC64 so I'm prepared to believe that their 'work in
progress' API still
2010/1/1 Paul p...@all-the-johnsons.co.uk:
Hi,
I'm trying to get my Intel graphics driven laptop up and running again
(see BZ 523646 for details of the problem) and am trying to rebuild the
kernel using the latest from kernel.org and the fedora srpm (install
srpm, copy the kernel, run
are not the only one in this thread
to have misunderstood.
Suppose you have a 64 bit processor.
You can run:
(a) 64 bit kernel + 64 bit apps: that would be a pure 64 bit system
(b) 64 bit kernel + 64 bit and 32 bit apps: that would be a multilib system,
where you keep some 32 apps for some reasons
are not the only one in this thread
to have misunderstood.
Suppose you have a 64 bit processor.
You can run:
(a) 64 bit kernel + 64 bit apps: that would be a pure 64 bit system
(b) 64 bit kernel + 64 bit and 32 bit apps: that would be a multilib system,
where you keep some 32 apps for some reasons
Hi,
I'm trying to get my Intel graphics driven laptop up and running again
(see BZ 523646 for details of the problem) and am trying to rebuild the
kernel using the latest from kernel.org and the fedora srpm (install
srpm, copy the kernel, run the spec).
The idea is I drop each patch, build
2010/1/1 Paul p...@all-the-johnsons.co.uk:
Hi,
I'm trying to get my Intel graphics driven laptop up and running again
(see BZ 523646 for details of the problem) and am trying to rebuild the
kernel using the latest from kernel.org and the fedora srpm (install
srpm, copy the kernel, run
Has anyone does this in Fedora 12? I don't want to re-install the whole system.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
slamp slamp slack...@gmail.com writes:
Has anyone does this in Fedora 12? I don't want to re-install the
whole system.
I don't even think this is possible, and even if it is, my suspicion is
you're asking for a lot of trouble.
Just make a copy of your installed packages (rpm -qa), your home
On 01/01/2010 06:24 AM, slamp slamp wrote:
Has anyone does this in Fedora 12? I don't want to re-install the whole system.
Just for fun, on F11 32-bit system (not tried on F12), I downloaded the
latest F11 64-bit kernel package and installed it with
rpm --nodeps --ignorearch --force
*I think depends on your cpu type.
What is your CPU? Intel Core 2 Duo**
*---
Best Wishes,
Waleed Harbi
---
Try not to become a man of success
but rather try to become a man of value.
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 5:24 PM, slamp slamp
--- On Fri, 1/1/10, slamp slamp slack...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone does this in Fedora 12? I
don't want to re-install the whole system.
What did you do anyway? If you installed 64-bit F12 on a 32-bit system, it's
not going to run even if you do install the 64-bit kernel. Everything is
64
john wendel wrote:
Just for fun, on F11 32-bit system (not tried on F12), I downloaded the
latest F11 64-bit kernel package and installed it with
rpm --nodeps --ignorearch --force kernel package name
It installed OK, since the kernel is pretty isolated from the rest of
the system
?
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Ramesh Ramasamy.
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Roberto Ragusa m...@robertoragusa.itwrote:
john wendel wrote:
Just for fun, on F11 32-bit system (not tried on F12), I downloaded the
latest F11 64-bit kernel package and installed it with
rpm --nodeps
, and after the resumption?
Before: nothing. Just the flashing underline character, in the same
large typeface as the boot menu.
After: flashing underline switches to a smaller size, then a message
from plymouth (exactly the same for both versions of the kernel).
plymouthd: ply_keyboard.c:450
Hi,
Is there an option to stop the F12 auto-update system updating my
kernel. I want to avoid a situation where my kernel gets updated but
there isn't a matching Madwifi rpm in the repositories?
Best regards
James
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https
2009/12/30 James Allsopp jamesaalls...@googlemail.com
Hi,
Is there an option to stop the F12 auto-update system updating my
kernel. I want to avoid a situation where my kernel gets updated but
there isn't a matching Madwifi rpm in the repositories?
Best regards
James
--
fedora-list
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 2:01 PM, James Allsopp jamesaalls...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Is there an option to stop the F12 auto-update system updating my
kernel. I want to avoid a situation where my kernel gets updated but
there isn't a matching Madwifi rpm in the repositories?
Adding
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Pikachu_2014 pikachu.2...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/12/30 James Allsopp jamesaalls...@googlemail.com
Hi,
Is there an option to stop the F12 auto-update system updating my
kernel. I want to avoid a situation where my kernel gets updated but
there isn't
a single underline character and nothing
happens at all for 2 min. Then things get underway at normal speed.
Previous kernel is still installed and boots up quite normally.
Any ideas? Anyone else getting the same behaviour? I use the nvidia
drivers but they are up to date and in any case
On Tue, 2009-12-29 at 20:00 +, N James Bridge wrote:
Without quiet I still get no output at all for 2min 35sec, then
normal rush of messages. Bootchart (very nice!) shows that the boot
process itself is running normally, once it starts, about 45sec
overall. The initial wait isn't shown on
My kernel is 32bit.
I installed my fc12 with DVD iso.
Mine didn't work until I update to 2.6.31.9-174.fc12.i686.PAE.
Maybe, you should wait for the next kernel update.
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Jatin K ssh.fed...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/26/2009 11:28 PM, Jason Turning wrote:
Jatin K
min. Then things get underway at normal speed.
Previous kernel is still installed and boots up quite normally.
Any ideas? Anyone else getting the same behaviour? I use the nvidia
drivers but they are up to date and in any case shouldn't be used for a
level 3 boot.
--
N James Bridge ja
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 00:32:07 +
N James Bridge wrote:
Any ideas? Anyone else getting the same behaviour?
I didn't have a problem, but you can see it spew a lot of info
about what is happening if you remove the quiet option
from the kernel boot line. That might give a clue where
2009/12/29 Tom Horsley tom.hors...@att.net:
I didn't have a problem, but you can see it spew a lot of info
about what is happening if you remove the quiet option
from the kernel boot line. That might give a clue where it
is spending time.
Or run bootchart..
http://www.bootchart.org
-c
Jatin K wrote:
Dear all
I've recently updated my kernel from *Linux 2.6.31.6-166.fc12.x86_64 *to
*Linux 2.6.31.9-174.fc12.x86_64*, after that my wireless Brodcom
BCM4312 is not working , on old kernel it was working fine ... if I boot
into old kernel it works fine without any problem
Does
...@gmail.com
mailto:ssh.fed...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all
I've recently updated my kernel from *Linux
2.6.31.6-166.fc12.x86_64 *to *Linux 2.6.31.9-174.fc12.x86_64*,
after that my wireless Brodcom BCM4312 is not working , on old
kernel it was working fine ... if I boot into old kernel
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Jatin Kssh.fed...@gmail.com
mailto:ssh.fed...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all
I've recently updated my kernel from *Linux
2.6.31.6-166.fc12.x86_64 *to *Linux 2.6.31.9-174.fc12.x86_64*,
after that my wireless Brodcom BCM4312 is not working , on old
Jatin K wrote:
My kernel is 64bit ( uname -a is as under )
uname -a
-
Linux jk-pc 2.6.31.9-174.fc12.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Dec 21 05:33:33 UTC 2009
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
I've installed *kmod-wl-2.6.31.6-_166.fc12_.x86_64*as
kmod
As the subject says, I have no wireless with commit
8bf3d79bc401ca417ccf9fc076d3295d1a71dbf5 which hit kernel-2.6.32.2.
I've already filed a bug about this
(http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14874) but it'll take some
time before something happens. I have a common atheros 2413 chip and I
Dear all
I've recently updated my kernel from *Linux 2.6.31.6-166.fc12.x86_64 *to
*Linux 2.6.31.9-174.fc12.x86_64*, after that my wireless Brodcom
BCM4312 is not working , on old kernel it was working fine ... if I boot
into old kernel it works fine without any problem
Does anyone faced
Happened to me yesterday,
I uninstalled drivers, then reinstalled through yum.
It has worked since.
Cheers,
Chris
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Jatin K ssh.fed...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all
I've recently updated my kernel from *Linux 2.6.31.6-166.fc12.x86_64 *to
*Linux 2.6.31.9-174.fc12
updated my kernel from *Linux
2.6.31.6-166.fc12.x86_64 *to *Linux 2.6.31.9-174.fc12.x86_64*,
after that my wireless Brodcom BCM4312 is not working , on old
kernel it was working fine ... if I boot into old kernel it works
fine without any problem
Does anyone faced this problem
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 11:33:23AM +1100, Bojan Smojver wrote:
According to this: http://lwn.net/Articles/367443/, latest kernel
updates have security fixes (the second one appears on the 2.6.31.9
list).
Is this something that has been backported to current F-12 kernels (I
don't see
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 10:56:26 -0500,
Clyde E. Kunkel clydekunkel7...@cox.net wrote:
does adding nomodeset to kernel parm line in grub.conf work?
It gets me back to the other problem. So yeah it does seem like we
are seeing the same thing. I update the bug to mention this.
--
fedora
, grab the kernel from
koji. Otherise you can wait for the kernel to push to updates or
updates-testing depending on how much you want to wait for other
people to test it before you try it out.
I understand what I can do. That is not the issue.
The question is, should Fedora get a security update
it. But, it's not in updates. Hence the question.
Sure wish 2.6.32 would come soon ... anyone know when ?
Be careful what you wish for. 2.6.32 isn't working for me. I have to use
2.6.31 kernels from F12 on my otherwise rawhide system, to get it to
boot.
does adding nomodeset to kernel parm line
.fc9.i686
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 2269712 2009-06-18 12:45
vmlinuz-2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686.PAE
This boot directory is located inside the compressed image, so the
syslinux bootloader cannot use it. The kernel image in /boot is not used
to boot the liveCD. It is used in (at least) two cases
According to this: http://lwn.net/Articles/367443/, latest kernel
updates have security fixes (the second one appears on the 2.6.31.9
list).
Is this something that has been backported to current F-12 kernels (I
don't see it in changelog), or do we need a security update for F-12
here?
--
Bojan
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 11:33:23 +1100,
Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com wrote:
According to this: http://lwn.net/Articles/367443/, latest kernel
updates have security fixes (the second one appears on the 2.6.31.9
list).
Is this something that has been backported to current F-12 kernels
On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 19:16 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
There is a 2.6.31.9 build in Koji.
Yeah, I've seen it. But, it's not in updates. Hence the question.
--
Bojan
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On 12/20/2009 08:34 PM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 19:16 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
There is a 2.6.31.9 build in Koji.
Yeah, I've seen it. But, it's not in updates. Hence the question.
Sure wish 2.6.32 would come soon ... anyone know when ?
--
fedora-devel-list mailing
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 21:17:46 -0500,
Mail Lists li...@sapience.com wrote:
On 12/20/2009 08:34 PM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 19:16 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
There is a 2.6.31.9 build in Koji.
Yeah, I've seen it. But, it's not in updates. Hence the question.
comments indicate back
ported security fixes. So its unlikely the latest security fixes are
in any earlier version. If you want them now, grab the kernel from koji.
Otherise you can wait for the kernel to push to updates or updates-testing
depending on how much you want to wait for other people
On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 22:21 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I didn't see any of the recent previous spec file comments indicate
back ported security fixes. So its unlikely the latest security fixes
are in any earlier version. If you want them now, grab the kernel from
koji. Otherise you can wait
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 16:02:20 +1100,
Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com wrote:
I understand what I can do. That is not the issue.
The question is, should Fedora get a security update or not - you know -
for all the users out there that are unaware of Koji etc. I'm sure
Fedora kernel
On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 23:41 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Should they all get a potentially broken kernel? The risk of known
vulnerabilities that are purported to be fixed, needs to balanced
against the risk that there are regressions in the kernel.
This is what Fedora kernel developers do
I'm sorry with my bad English.
I'm using Fedora 12 X86_64
I have downloaded a kernel(2.6.32.2).
Then,I do these:
cd linux-2.6.32.2
cp
/boot/config-`uname -r`
.config
make menuconfig
make
all
make
modules_install
make
install
reboot
When
I choose the new kernel,I found it's very slow when run
Am Sonntag, den 20.12.2009, 10:35 + schrieb 严晶涛:
I'm sorry with my bad English.
No problem. ;)
I'm using Fedora 12 X86_64
I have downloaded a kernel(2.6.32.2).
Then,I do these:
cd linux-2.6.32.2
cp /boot/config-`uname -r` .config
make menuconfig
make all
make modules_install
make
On 12/19/2009 10:29 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Steven Stern wrote:
On 12/13/2009 07:25 AM, Globe Trotter wrote:
Do you have desktop effects enabled? I found that my system
is much
more stable with desktop effects turned off [1]. My video
is ATI [2]
with driver 'ati' [3].
Footmarks:
1.
2009/12/20 Steven Stern subscribed-li...@sterndata.com:
On 12/19/2009 10:29 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Steven Stern wrote:
On 12/13/2009 07:25 AM, Globe Trotter wrote:
--SNIP--
Note that in the above example of a stable system, item 3. I have had
about equal numbers of people tell me that the
...
Links:
1. http://rpmfusion.org/RPMFusionSwitcher
I found that out. The ATI drivers don't like the current kernel. I'm
using rpmfusion (for the codecs), but I don't see any ATI drivers there.
--
Steve
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https
Steven Stern wrote:
On 12/13/2009 07:25 AM, Globe Trotter wrote:
Do you have desktop effects enabled? I found that my system
is much
more stable with desktop effects turned off [1]. My video
is ATI [2]
with driver 'ati' [3].
Footmarks:
1. ~]$ uptime
10:27:28 up 3 days, 9:22, 3 users,
On 12/13/2009 10:32 AM, Steven Stern wrote:
On 12/13/2009 07:25 AM, Globe Trotter wrote:
--- On Sun, 12/13/09, Hiisivery-c...@rambler.ru wrote:
From: Hiisivery-c...@rambler.ru
Subject: Re: Daily Kernel Panics
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using
Fedora.fedora-list
2009/12/18 Steven Stern subscribed-li...@sterndata.com
On 12/13/2009 10:32 AM, Steven Stern wrote:
--SNIP--
I have had this problem in the past with Fedora 9, I believe using ATI
graphics cards. I tracked it down to glxgears (posted to this group
then) getting invoked and eliminated it to
this to run the diagnostic on servers with 4GB of memory. I
used yum command to install the kernel-PAE.i686 to be able to see 4GB memory.
The install was successful. However, when I rebooted, I was not given the
option to select the PAE kernel (which is probably because it is a livecd
image?).
I
(I know that this question might be more reasonable on a kernel list,
but a while back I posted the question twice and got no answers.)
The acct struct is defined in /usr/include/sys/acct.h includes both
ac_io and ac_rw for bytes transferred and blocks read or written,
respectively
On 10/19/2006 08:23 AM, William W. Austin wrote:
Not that I've got an answer for your question, but you might want to
tell your computer that it's not 2006.
--
Peter
When privacy is outlawed only outlaws will have privacy.
-- Zimmermann
--
fedora-devel-list mailing
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:23:49 -0400
William W. Austin waus...@speakeasy.net wrote:
(I know that this question might be more reasonable on a kernel
list, but a while back I posted the question twice and got no
answers.)
Possibly because the system you are sending email from thinks it's
2006
Peter Jones wrote:
Not that I've got an answer for your question, but you might want to
tell your computer that it's not 2006.
William W. Austin (or possibly his ISP, Speakeasy) is actually resending
mail which was originally sent back in 2006. I got 2 extra copies of a mail
I already
How come I don't see fresh kernel versions in updates-testing? Should I
be looking elsewhere?
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
On 15/12/09 17:42, Konstantin Svist wrote:
How come I don't see fresh kernel versions in updates-testing? Should I
be looking elsewhere?
The infrastructure just moved house.
Give them a chance.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
On 12/15/2009 09:44 AM, Frank Murphy (Frankly3D) wrote:
On 15/12/09 17:42, Konstantin Svist wrote:
How come I don't see fresh kernel versions in updates-testing? Should I
be looking elsewhere?
The infrastructure just moved house.
Give them a chance.
Sorry, I must've missed
On 15/12/09 17:56, Konstantin Svist wrote:
On 12/15/2009 09:44 AM, Frank Murphy (Frankly3D) wrote:
On 15/12/09 17:42, Konstantin Svist wrote:
How come I don't see fresh kernel versions in updates-testing? Should I
be looking elsewhere?
The infrastructure just moved house.
Give
2009/12/14 Paolo Galtieri pgalti...@gmail.com:
I see lots of the following message
Dec 13 23:56:17 localhost pulseaudio[2050]: alsa-mixer.c: Your kernel driver
is broken: it reports a volume range from 18.00 dB to 18.00 dB which makes
no sense.
etc.
Can anyone tell me what the cause
On 12/13/2009 08:53 PM, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
I'm getting lots of these messages in /var/log/messages
Dec 13 19:48:25 localhost kernel: hub 1-4:1.0: over-current change on port 2
They're coming out about one per second. Anybody know what to do about it?
port 2 is my Logitech web cam.Â
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 7:35 AM, Mikkel mik...@infinity-ltd.com wrote:
On 12/13/2009 08:53 PM, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
I'm getting lots of these messages in /var/log/messages
Dec 13 19:48:25 localhost kernel: hub 1-4:1.0: over-current change on
port 2
They're coming out about one per
--- On Sun, 12/13/09, Hiisi very-c...@rambler.ru wrote:
From: Hiisi very-c...@rambler.ru
Subject: Re: Daily Kernel Panics
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.
fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: Sunday, December 13, 2009, 2:34 AM
2009/12/12 Steven Stern subscribed
- The Experience of Freedom =-
-Original Message-
From: Skunk Worx skunkw...@verizon.net
Reply-to: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using
Fedora. fedora-list@redhat.com
To: For users of Fedora Core releases fedora-list@redhat.com
Subject: f12 updates kernel nomodeset option breaks
On 12/13/2009 07:25 AM, Globe Trotter wrote:
--- On Sun, 12/13/09, Hiisivery-c...@rambler.ru wrote:
From: Hiisivery-c...@rambler.ru
Subject: Re: Daily Kernel Panics
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using
Fedora.fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: Sunday, December 13, 2009, 2
2009/12/13 Steven Stern subscribed-li...@sterndata.com:
On 12/13/2009 07:25 AM, Globe Trotter wrote:
--- On Sun, 12/13/09, Hiisivery-c...@rambler.ru wrote:
--SNIP--
I have had this problem in the past with Fedora 9, I believe using ATI
graphics cards. I tracked it down to glxgears (posted
I'm getting lots of these messages in /var/log/messages
Dec 13 19:48:25 localhost kernel: hub 1-4:1.0: over-current change on port 2
They're coming out about one per second. Anybody know what to do about it?
port 2 is my Logitech web cam. They keep coming even after I stop the
camera
I see lots of the following message
Dec 13 23:56:17 localhost pulseaudio[2050]: alsa-mixer.c: Your kernel driver
is broken: it reports a volume range from 18.00 dB to 18.00 dB which makes
no sense.
Dec 13 23:56:17 localhost pulseaudio[2050]: alsa-mixer.c: Your kernel driver
is broken: it reports
After each new kernel update in Fedora 12 x86_64 , default time out is reset
to 15secs and freshly installed kernel is set as default. Since the
proprietary WLAN drivers from RPMFusion comes one or two days after each
kernel update, after each kernel update I have to manually edit settings
asked the
question on this list (haven't received any responses).
How do you know it's kernel panic?
When the machine locks up, the caps-lock and scroll-light both flash. What's
really annoying is that if I'm playing music, it gets really weird and
scares the cats.
--
Steve
Do you have
How do I report these? I get about one a day, typically while in Firefox
and doing something else. The machine locks up tight (flashing num and
scroll locks) and requires power cycling and nothing seems to get
logged. Abrt doesn't see it after restart.
--
Steve
--
fedora-list mailing
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 12:11 -0600, Steven Stern wrote:
I get about one a day, typically while in Firefox
and doing something else. The machine locks up tight (flashing num
and
scroll locks) and requires power cycling and nothing seems to get
logged.
Remove your firefox plugins and
On 12/11/2009 12:51 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 12:11 -0600, Steven Stern wrote:
I get about one a day, typically while in Firefox
and doing something else. The machine locks up tight (flashing num
and
scroll locks) and requires power cycling and nothing seems to get
logged.
it after restart.
--
Steve
The same here:
Linux ***.** 2.6.30.9-102.fc11.i586 #1 SMP Thu Dec 3 23:46:37 EST 2009
i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
And yes, Firefox is not always involved. I've already asked the
question on this list (haven't received any responses).
How do you know it's kernel panic
).
How do you know it's kernel panic?
When the machine locks up, the caps-lock and scroll-light both flash.
What's really annoying is that if I'm playing music, it gets really
weird and scares the cats.
--
Steve
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https
Hi folks,
I'd highly recommend if you're running 2.6.31 or 2.6.32, that you update
to the latest kernel in the koji builds here:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1864871
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1864876
They fix a rather severe security problem
On 12/09/2009 11:14 AM, Kyle McMartin wrote:
Hi folks,
I'd highly recommend if you're running 2.6.31 or 2.6.32, that you update
to the latest kernel in the koji builds here:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1864871
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1864876
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 11:20:02 -0700,
Nathanael D. Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca wrote:
This a rawhide only issue or F12 as well?
It affects F12. You want the -166 kernel. However right now it is still
building. (I didn't check to see if some arches are done already.) The
updated kernel
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 12:23:50 -0600,
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 11:20:02 -0700,
Nathanael D. Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca wrote:
This a rawhide only issue or F12 as well?
It affects F12. You want the -166 kernel. However right now it is still
2009/12/9 Kyle McMartin k...@mcmartin.ca:
NOTE: This is only a problem if you're using EXT4, if you aren't, you're
safe.
ReiserFS FTW!!! :)
--
Christopher Brown
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
that could not boot on one
of my machines. Somehow, I managed to survive this traumatic
experience without installing a completely different distribution.
I waved a magic wand, and continued to boot the last working
kernel, until a new one came out that worked on my hardware once
more.
I
2009/12/7 Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com:
The best way to avoid the problem might be to get grub to display the
list of installed (assuming that the original F12 kernel worked for you)
and select that kernel to boot from. Change the default line
in /etc/grub.conf to automate
Ian Malone writes:
Yes, it does look more polished the way it is now, but what used to be
really obvious (especially to someone who has always run dual boot
set-ups), that you can boot an earlier kernel, is now an obscure piece
of knowledge. Suggestions:
1. The grub boot screen should have
On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 07:13:30 -0500
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I think there's a way to install a one-time only grub configuration file,
for the next boot.
There are two ways: The one documented in the grub info file, and the
one that actually works :-). Both involve savedefault, but the
grub help
1 - 100 of 1932 matches
Mail list logo
