On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 12:34:20AM -0600, Mel Chua wrote:
> >I think the update in progress needs to be ..uhm.. "propagated" more.
> >Not a lot of folks (I also mean users who only heard of the drama via
> >dents etc and nothing more) are aware of it.
>
> +1 - thanks for getting this started, Anku
On 11/20/2009 02:04 AM, susmit shannigrahi wrote:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/19/fedora_12_root_imbroglio/
The site has posted this update at the top of the article.
"Updated: This story was updated about 11 hours after it was published
to reflect that Fedora developers have reversed
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/19/fedora_12_root_imbroglio/
The site has posted this update at the top of the article.
"Updated: This story was updated about 11 hours after it was published
to reflect that Fedora developers have reversed course. Operating
system users once again will be
I think the update in progress needs to be ..uhm.. "propagated" more.
Not a lot of folks (I also mean users who only heard of the drama via
dents etc and nothing more) are aware of it.
+1 - thanks for getting this started, Ankur. Things are moving fast
around here, and anything we can do to hel
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 23:43 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 07:24:44AM +0530, susmit shannigrahi wrote:
> > "Fedora users are revolting against a change introduced in the latest
> > version of the operating system that allows the installation of
> > thousands of software tit
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 08:42:25AM +0400, Amit Caleechurn wrote:
>Now that an update has been announced for packagekit, will this update be
>applied to official ISOs or will users be expected to apply the update
>themselves or disable this behavior if they don't have the machine
>co
On 11/20/2009 10:12 AM, Amit Caleechurn wrote:
> Now that an update has been announced for packagekit, will this update
> be applied to official ISOs or will users be expected to apply the
> update themselves or disable this behavior if they don't have the
> machine connected to the net?
An update
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 07:24:44AM +0530, susmit shannigrahi wrote:
> "Fedora users are revolting against a change introduced in the latest
> version of the operating system that allows the installation of
> thousands of software titles without an administrative password.
>
> Critics say the move
Now that an update has been announced for packagekit, will this update be
applied to official ISOs or will users be expected to apply the update
themselves or disable this behavior if they don't have the machine connected
to the net?
Regards,
Amit
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 5:54 AM, susmit shannigra
"Fedora users are revolting against a change introduced in the latest
version of the operating system that allows the installation of
thousands of software titles without an administrative password.
Critics say the move diminishes the security of machines running the
open-source OS by giving unpri
10 matches
Mail list logo
