On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 16:22 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
2008/9/2 Paul W. Frields [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
They are required to do this, if they use the Fedora trademarks to
advertise the media for sale:
http://fedoraproject.org/legal/trademarks/guidelines/page4.html
I didn't say they weren't.
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 10:17:31AM -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Mani A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vendors should clearly state the quality of the media being used.
I do not agree with this. I think vendors should be required to have a
stated warranty on the
2008/9/2 Paul W. Frields [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
They are required to do this, if they use the Fedora trademarks to
advertise the media for sale:
http://fedoraproject.org/legal/trademarks/guidelines/page4.html
I didn't say they weren't. What I'm saying is I don't think we should
be in the business
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Mani A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vendors should clearly state the quality of the media being used.
I do not agree with this. I think vendors should be required to have a
stated warranty on the media to be listed. Individual customers can
choose vendors based on
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 11:47 PM, Jeff Spaleta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When bad media happens we must rely on the vendors to stand behind the
terms of the warranty statements in place at the time of sale. If
they can't live up to the warranty statements then they get booted
from our list.
Paul W. Frields wrote:
On what basis do we remove vendors from our distribution list?
Looking at the various replies.
Without knowing the actual complaint(s).
It's difficult, to make a judgement.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Distribution/OnlineVendors
Remember, we do reserve the right to
addendum:
I don't see any policy pertaining to removal.
Frank
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On what basis do we remove vendors from our distribution list?
They enjoy their presence on the list at the pleasure of the FPL or
other Ambassadors/Marketing leadership.
If they are misbehaving, just remove them. IMHO, no need for a
committee
Max Spevack wrote:
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008, Paul W. Frields wrote:
They enjoy their presence on the list at the pleasure of the FPL or
other Ambassadors/Marketing leadership.
If they are misbehaving, just remove them. IMHO, no need for a
committee discussion on this item.
Agreed,
but
They enjoy their presence on the list at the pleasure of the FPL or
other Ambassadors/Marketing leadership.
If they are misbehaving, just remove them. IMHO, no need for a
committee discussion on this item.
Agreed,
but would be nice to know if it was a scratched cd, or fraud.
How
On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 15:07 +0200, Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) wrote:
They enjoy their presence on the list at the pleasure of the FPL or
other Ambassadors/Marketing leadership.
If they are misbehaving, just remove them. IMHO, no need for a
committee discussion on this item.
Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 15:07 +0200, Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) wrote:
Since the vendor in question hasn't responded to my attempt (or the
customer's attempts) to contact them, I'm happy to note it here publicly
now:
LinuxOnline.biz apparently shipped a customer a
There should be a clear owner - perhaps FAmSCo (they are already
supposed to be the public face) or something similar - that makes
decisions about pulling people from the list. And $owner should be
identified on the page so people know who to complain to. If there
isn't a clear owner things are
2008/8/30 Paul W. Frields [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On what basis do we remove vendors from our distribution list?
Do we have a Grievience Cell for dealing with customer dissatisfaction?
Vendors should clearly state the quality of the media being used.
We also need to distinguish between those who do
On what basis do we remove vendors from our distribution list?
--
Paul W. Frields
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://paul.frields.org/ - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
2008/8/30 Paul W. Frields [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On what basis do we remove vendors from our distribution list?
That's my opinion:
1) Active or inactive vendors (are the versions they are shipping the
newest or are they solding FC3?)
2) Are they applying a high prize (all we know the cost of
On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 00:36 +0200, Francesco Ugolini wrote:
2008/8/30 Paul W. Frields [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On what basis do we remove vendors from our distribution list?
That's my opinion:
1) Active or inactive vendors (are the versions they are shipping the
newest or are they solding
agree with that and also what about vendors that are doing over priced
distribution of the media, as a previous post said that we all know the
price of media these days.
also just a idea, i have thought of though, is why don't we also put in
a information/fact sheet of fedora, ie about of its
On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 00:36 +0200, Francesco Ugolini wrote:
2008/8/30 Paul W. Frields [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On what basis do we remove vendors from our distribution list?
2) Are they applying a high prize (all we know the cost of media
production and the earning from each CD/DVD distributed)
19 matches
Mail list logo
