Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564
--- Comment #12 from Juan Manuel Rodriguez
2009-03-14 03:28:54 EDT ---
Rajeesh,
I can't get it to compile using upstream
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703
Matej Cepl changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490152
Matej Cepl changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486390
Mamoru Tasaka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226
--- Comment #15 from Remi Collet 2009-03-14
04:21:39 EDT ---
+ rpmlint is ok
php-pecl-runkit.i386: I: checking
php-pecl-ru
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226
--- Comment #16 from Remi Collet 2009-03-14
04:23:01 EDT ---
+ no .so
=> Of course I mean no shared lib which need to be
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478617
--- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2009-03-14
04:29:46 EDT ---
* Sat Mar 14 2009 Fabian Affolter - 0.6-1
- Updated to ne
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480851
--- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter 2009-03-14
04:33:40 EDT ---
F10/i386
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.c
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474992
--- Comment #11 from Jan ONDREJ 2009-03-14 04:52:01 EDT
---
Thank you for review.
About license, there is 2 licenses ment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564
--- Comment #13 from Rajeesh 2009-03-14 06:06:23
EDT ---
Heck, have been trying to set up mock for past 2 hours with my sl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478771
--- Comment #2 from Aurelien Bompard 2009-03-14 06:12:45 EDT
---
Thanks for looking at my package.
I've fixed the URLs
I'v
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150
--- Comment #14 from Tim Fenn 2009-03-14 06:45:03 EDT ---
added a gcc 4.4 patch and fixed desktop-file-install - tested OK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486390
Bug 486390 depends on bug 490254, which changed state.
Bug 490254 Summary: IL_LBM changed to IL_ILBM without any notice?
https:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467418
--- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-03-14 09:17:59
EDT ---
I'll just note here that we don't have a working
Portab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448122
--- Comment #32 from Andrea Francia 2009-03-14
09:41:01 EDT ---
I don't think that Jean-François is going to provide the l
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483453
--- Comment #6 from Parag AN(पराग) 2009-03-14 09:43:52
EDT ---
any progress here?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478771
--- Comment #3 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-03-14 10:03:53
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I've looked for info on the maps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: xfglenses - Gravitational lenses visualization program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490269
Summary: Review Request: xfglenses - G
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490269
--- Comment #1 from Thibault North 2009-03-14
10:12:34 EDT ---
Note:
The file COPYING is missing, as upstream is choosing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564
--- Comment #14 from Rajeesh 2009-03-14 10:41:52
EDT ---
Ah, after a round of wrestling with Mock, I sorted out all the Bu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478613
--- Comment #2 from Jim Radford 2009-03-14 10:42:49
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> - If packaging Emacs modes, you mig
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478769
Alexey Torkhov changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486390
--- Comment #1 from Hedayat Vatankhah 2009-03-14 11:28:30
EDT ---
OK, I'll fix the issue with DevIL-1.7.8 with a patch. Pl
Depends on||490101
--- Comment #2 from François Kooman 2009-03-14 11:25:21
EDT ---
* Sat Mar 14 2009 François Kooman - 2.1.1-0.20090314
- prepare for release 2.1.1, update to snapshot 20090314
- remove upstreamed patches
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480607
--- Comment #3 from François Kooman 2009-03-14 11:27:49
EDT ---
Correct SRPM URL:
http://users.tuxed.net/fkooman/rpmbuild/
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480103
--- Comment #11 from Tom Wisniewski 2009-03-14
11:34:10 EDT ---
Thanks for the quick reply.
I'll make sure to remove the p
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485641
--- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System
2009-03-14 11:57:33 EDT ---
pdftk-1.41-13.fc10 has been submitted as an update f
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478771
--- Comment #4 from Aurelien Bompard 2009-03-14 12:01:12 EDT
---
Done :
http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/spring/
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485641
Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484485
--- Comment #17 from manuel wolfshant 2009-03-14
12:04:13 EDT ---
Sorry for the delay, rough week at work.
Unfortunately i
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489633
--- Comment #6 from Michael Ploujnikov 2009-03-14 13:18:05
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> The %{_mingw32_configure} li
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486390
Mamoru Tasaka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478770
Alexey Torkhov changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478770
--- Comment #4 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-03-14 13:47:22
EDT ---
Also, versioned BuildRequires seem to be excessive.
--
Co
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490269
Jussi Lehtola changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977
Nicolas Mailhot changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489026
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System
2009-03-14 15:08:52 EDT ---
auto-buildrequires-1.0-3.fc10 has been submitted as
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489026
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System
2009-03-14 15:09:04 EDT ---
auto-buildrequires-1.0-3.fc9 has been submitted as a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100
--- Comment #14 from MERCIER 2009-03-14 16:28:10
EDT ---
src.rpm file :
http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/firebird-2.1.2.181
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448122
Terje Røsten changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461484
--- Comment #20 from manuel wolfshant 2009-03-14
19:15:31 EDT ---
Things look mostly OK. A small issue is that part of the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478852
--- Comment #17 from Marcin Zajaczkowski 2009-03-14 19:24:34
EDT ---
Thanks for a hint. I added it also there.
--
Config
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470702
--- Comment #3 from Conrad Meyer 2009-03-14 19:29:15 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Does the -devel package actually r
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478613
--- Comment #3 from Michel Alexandre Salim
2009-03-14 23:02:11 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453849
--- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert 2009-03-15
02:39:52 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I've just done a full review, ba
45 matches
Mail list logo