Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727
--- Comment #3 from Lucian Langa 2009-01-18 09:36:41 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Thanks for pointing it out. It no
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727
--- Comment #4 from Matthew Truch 2009-01-18 10:25:39 EDT ---
> It won't fail if you correctly pick doxygen and pdfjam as
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727
--- Comment #5 from Matthew Truch 2009-01-18 10:27:04 EDT ---
I forgot to add, rpmlint still complains about the soname, an
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727
Lucian Langa changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727
--- Comment #7 from Matthew Truch 2009-02-16 15:33:03 EDT ---
Still having trouble with the soname stuff. It seems that re
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727
--- Comment #8 from Matthew Truch 2009-02-16 15:36:23 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Still having trouble with the sona
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727
--- Comment #9 from Lucian Langa 2009-02-23 15:17:14 EDT
---
Please bump & post your spec and srpm for each modification y
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727
--- Comment #10 from Matthew Truch 2009-02-23 15:37:23 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Please bump & post your spec and
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727
--- Comment #11 from Lucian Langa 2009-02-24 11:00:18 EDT
---
Thanks for the update.
Package fails to build under mock fo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727
--- Comment #12 from Matthew Truch 2009-02-24 11:32:02 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Thanks for the update.
>
> Pack
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727
--- Comment #13 from Lucian Langa 2009-02-26 05:40:38 EDT
---
Review:
OK source files match upstream:
c69db6265d
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727
--- Comment #14 from Matthew Truch 2009-02-26 09:46:52 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #13)
>
> Blocker: License field should
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727
--- Comment #15 from Lucian Langa 2009-02-26 10:02:15 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #14)
> The included license is GPLv3, a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727
--- Comment #16 from Matthew Truch 2009-04-04 23:03:28 EDT ---
Sorry it's been a while; I've been swamped at work.
Upstrea
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727
--- Comment #17 from Lucian Langa 2009-04-10 14:24:29 EDT
---
Thanks for the update.
License is GPLv3+
because:
// Slim
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727
--- Comment #18 from Matthew Truch 2009-05-12 22:53:50 EDT ---
I've changed the name of the binary to slimdata. I've discu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727
Lucian Langa changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727
Matthew Truch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727
Matthew Truch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727
Matthew Truch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727
Lucian Langa changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727
--- Comment #2 from Matthew Truch 2009-01-11 16:11:03 EDT ---
> - there is a newer upstream 2.6.1b, and it seems upstream s
24 matches
Mail list logo