On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 7:12 AM, john skaller
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why fork it? Why not a single compiler with a switch?
Eventually I want to do that, but it's a lot easier to hack out all
the c++ stuff and replace it with llvm stuff. So, it's completely
incompatible. I didn't want my expe
On 18/05/2008, at 9:05 AM, Erick Tryzelaar wrote:
> I've started a fork of felix to modify our compiler's backend to
> target llvm instead of c++.
Why fork it? Why not a single compiler with a switch?
--
john skaller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
