Then I'll reformulate my question as a patch. [...]
Is there anything fundamentally wrong with this approach?
I still maintain that getting this to work, testing it and,
especially, maintaining it is a lot of work. [For example, you
mention that finalizers that point to the object they
Then I'll reformulate my question as a patch. [...]
Is there anything fundamentally wrong with this approach?
I still maintain that getting this to work, testing it and,
especially, maintaining it is a lot of work.
Isn't it worth a little effort? Requiring finalizers to be foreign
___
FFI mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ffi
George Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote,
Simon Marlow wrote
PS. I'm sorry to keep banging on about this. Ultimately it doesn't
really matter to me that much, since I only really use mallocForeignPtr.
I guess I was just intrigued to see if the problem was really as
difficult as we'd
